Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
https://ah.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/116794| 題名: | 印尼留台學生在促進印台關係中的角色 The Role of Indonesian Students in Enhancing Indonesia-Taiwan Relations |
作者: | 平亞諦 Putri, Ardila |
貢獻者: | 邱炫元 Chiou, Syuan-yuan 平亞諦 Putri, Ardila |
關鍵詞: | 印尼與台灣的關係 民間關係 公共外交 印尼學生運動 亞洲國際高等教育 Indonesia-Taiwan relations People-to-people relations Public diplomacy Indonesian student activism Asian international higher education |
日期: | 2018 | 上傳時間: | 9-Apr-2018 | 摘要: | 本研究的主要目的是考察印尼學生在他們的學生組織中如何扮演促進印尼與台灣之間關係的角色。本論文用公共外交的概念與分析框架，以作者在台就學之便親身參與各項印尼學生組織活動的經驗觀察所得，結合相關的文獻分析，最後發現，印尼學生在促進印台關係中扮演三種角色：1. 強化兩國人民的關係；2. 增進彼此的瞭解；3. 提升了兩國彼此在對方民眾與社會中的能見度與形象。而印尼學生之所以可以在台灣非穆斯林社會達到這樣的成果，主要歸功於：1. 印尼社群的互助傳統（gotong-royong）變成他們在台灣推動組織工作的社會資本；2. 在台灣的印尼移工與學生社群對這些服務的需求；3. 駐台北印尼經濟貿易辦公室、台灣政府以及各個大學學務單位的多方的支持與協助。 The main objective of this study is to examine the role Indonesian students in Indonesian student organizations in Taiwan have played in enhancing the relationship between Indonesia and Taiwan. This thesis explores and details some of the activities of Indonesian students as they study in Taiwan, and examines how these activities have contributed to bridging and increasing the volume of people-to-people relations between the two countries, as well as how the associations and their activities have indirectly enhanced mutual understanding between Taiwanese and Indonesians. This thesis adopts the new public diplomacy and relational public diplomacy framework. Some data were collected during the researcher’s participation in Indonesian student associations and activities. Other data were gathered via discussion with several prominent Indonesian student association leaders. For the document analysis, this research uses Indonesian student organization document reports, Indonesia and Taiwan government reports, statistical data, newspapers, and websites. This thesis suggests that there are three roles Indonesian students play in bridging the relationship between Indonesia and Taiwan: (1) strengthening people-to-people relations (2) bridging mutual understanding (3) increase visibility and positive image. In addition, this thesis shows that there are three factors leading Indonesian students to establish their associations and conduct their activities: (1) their tradition of communal work (gotong-royong) as social capital (2) the demands of Indonesian migrant workers and students (3) support from various institutions, such as the Indonesian government especially IETO, universities, and the Taiwan government. The three factors are important and they are related to each other. Because of the three factors, Indonesian students can carry out their activities. |
參考文獻: | Book, Thesis and Dissertation\nAspinall, E. (2005). Opposing Suharto: Compromise, resistance, and regime change in Indonesia. California: Stanford University Press.\nBerridge, G. R. (2002). Diplomacy Theory and Practice. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.\nBerridge, G. R. (1994). Talking to the Enemy, How State Without Diplomatic Relations Communicate. Great Britain: The Macmillan press ltd. \nBetty, M. L. (2014). The Fulbright Program and American Public Diplomacy (Doctoral Dissertation). Retrieved from http://ethos.bl.uk/OrderDetails.do?did=1&uin=uk.bl.ethos.617314. \nCraig, H. (2012). The Rhetoric of Soft Power. Public Diplomacy in Global Context. United Kingdom: Lexington Books.\nCross, M., & Jan M., ed. (2013). European Public Diplomacy. Soft Power at Work. New York: United States.\nD’hooghe, I. (2016). China’s Public Diplomacy. Leiden: Koninklijke Brill NV.\nDirgantara, G. Indonesian Students` Association (PPI) in Netherlands from 1952 to 2015: A Continuing Dynamic (Master Thesis). Retrieved from https://openaccess.leidenuniv.nl/handle/1887/43463.\nElisabeth, A., & Chaw T., ed. (2014). Indonesia-Taiwan Economic Cooperation Arrangement, is it Feasible? Jakarta: Yayasan Pustaka Obor.\nFeilleux, J. R. L. (2009). The Dynamics of Diplomacy. London: Lynne Rienner Publisher.\nFisher, A. (2013). Collaborative Public Diplomacy. How Transnational Networks Influenced American Studies in Europe. New York: Palgrave MacMillan.\nFortner, R. S. (1994). Public Diplomacy and International Politics. The Symbolic Contracts of Summits and International Radio News. Westport: Praeger Publisher.\nHart, J. (2013). Empires of the Idea. The Origins of Public Diplomacy and the Transformation of US Foreign Policy. New York: Oxford University Press.\nHo, K. Leong and Hou K C., ed. (2006). Ensuring Interests: Dynamics of China-Taiwan Relations and South East Asia. Kuala Lumpur: Institute of China Studies, University of Malaya.\nHolmes, A. R. & J. S. R. (2016). Global Diplomacy: Theories, Types and Models. Boulder: West View Press.\nHuijgh, E. (2016). The Public Diplomacy of Emerging Powers Part 2: The Case of Indonesia. Los Angeles: Figueroa Press.\nJönsson, C & Martin H. (2005) Essence of Diplomacy. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.\nJr., Wilson P. D. (2004). Inventing Public Diplomacy. The Story of the US Foreign Agency. London: Lynne Rienner Publisher.\nKabinawa, L. N. R. W. Economic and Socio-Cultural Relations between Indonesia and Taiwan: An Indonesia Perspective, 1990-2012 (Master Thesis). Retrieved from http://etd.lib.nsysu.edu.tw/ETD-db/ETD-search/view_etd?URN=etd-0604113-004308 \nKurbalija, J. (1999). Knowledge and Diplomacy. Malta: Diplo Projects.\nLee, J. S. & Jan M., ed. (2011). Public Diplomacy and Soft Power in East Asia. New York: Palgrave Macmillan. \nLiu, H. (2011). China and The Shaping of Indonesia, 1949-1965. Singapore: NUS Press. \nLord, C. (2006). Losing Hearts and Minds. Public Diplomacy and Strategic Influence in the Age of Terror. United States: Praeger Security International. \nMelissen, J & Yulshon., ed. (2015) Understanding Public Diplomacy in East Asia. Middle Power in Trouble Region. New York: Palgrave MacMillan.\nMelissen, J., ed. (2005). The New Public Diplomacy: Soft Power in International Relations. England: Palgrave Macmillan.\nMuhammad, A. (2013). Notes of 1.000 Days in Taiwan. Yogyakarta: Diva Press.\nOECD/Asian Development Bank. (2015). Review of National Policies for Education, Education in Indonesia, Rising to the Challenge. Paris: OECD Publishing.\nPamment, J. (2013). New Public Diplomacy in 21st Century. a Comparative Study of Policy and Practice. New York: Routledge.\nPigman, G. A. (2010). Contemporary Diplomacy. United Kingdom: Polity Press.\nRichmond, Y. (2008). Practicing Public Diplomacy. A Cold War Odyssey. United States: Berghahn Books. \nRobinson, K., ed. (2016). Youth Identities and Social Transformations in Modern Indonesia. Leiden: Koninklijke Brill. \nRugh, W. A. (2011). The Practice of Public Diplomacy. Confronting Challenges Abroad. New York: Palgrave MacMillan. \nRugh, W. A., ed. (2014). Front Line Public Diplomacy How U.S Embassy Communicate with Foreign Publics. New York: Palgrave MacMillan.\nSeib, P., ed. (2009). Toward a New Public Diplomacy: Redirecting US Foreign Policy. New York: Palgrave MacMillan.\nSeib, P. (2013). Religion and Public Diplomacy. Global Public Diplomacy. New York: Palgrave MacMillan.\nSevin, E. (2017). Public Diplomacy and the Implementation of foreign policy in the US, Sweden and Turkey. New York: Palgrave MacMillan.\nSharp, P. (2009) Diplomatic Theory of International Relations. United Kingdom: Cambridge University Press.\nSnow, N., & Phillip M T., ed. (2009). Routledge Handbook of Public Diplomacy. New York: Routledge, Taylor & France\nTran, L & Tand C. G., ed., (2017). International student Connectedness and Identity, Transnational Perspective. Singapore: Springer\nWaller, J. M. (2007). The Public Diplomacy Reader. Washington: The Institute of World Politic Press.\nWatson, A. (1982). Diplomacy. Great Britain: Eyre Methuen Ltd.\nWeiss, M. L., & Edward A., ed. (2012). Student Activism in Asia: Between Protest and Powerlessness. London: University of Minnesota.\nWiseman, G. (2015). Isolate or Engage. Adversarial States US Foreign Policy and Public Diplomacy. California: Standford University Press.\nZaharna, R.S. (2014). Battles to Bridges US Strategic Communication and Public Diplomacy after 9/11. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.\nZaharna, R.S., Amelia A., & Ali Fisher., ed. (2013). Relational, Networked, and Collaborative Approaches to Public Diplomacy. New York: Routledge.\n\nJournal and Paper\nBudiman, A. (Jun 1978). The Student Movement in Indonesia: A Study of the Relationship between Culture and Structure. Asian Survey, 18 (6), 609-625.\nEffendi, T. D. (December 2016). The Roles of Diaspora Community in Indonesia-Taiwan Relations. International Journal of International Relations, Media and Mass Communication Studies, 2 (4), 25-36. \nElias, R. A. Invisible Agent in Taiwan-Indonesia Cooperation. Paper presented in the TASEEAS Conference, Taiwan, May 31, 2013. Retrieved from fgumail.fgu.edu.tw/~cseas2013/1-2-2.pdf\nGilboa, E. (2008). Searching for a Theory of Public Diplomacy. The ANNALS of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 616, 55-77. Accessed June 9, 2017. doi: 10.1177/0002716207312142\nGolan, G. (2013). An Integrated Approach to Public Diplomacy. American Behavioral Scientist, 57 (9) 1251–1255 \nHall, I & F. S. (2013). The Struggle for Soft Power in Asia: Public Diplomacy and Regional Competition. Asian Security, 9 (1), 1-18\nHouse of Commons Foreign Affairs Community. Public Diplomacy. Third Report of Session 2005-06.\nFischer, J & Juwono S. (Spring, 1971). Indonesian Student Activism. Pacific Affairs, 44 (1) 92-96\nKim, J. (2016). Public Relation and Public Diplomacy in Cultural and Educational Exchange Program: A Coorientational Approach to the Humphrey Program. Public Relations Review, 42, 135–145.\nKu, S. C.Y. (2002). Indonesia’s Relations with China and Taiwan: From Politics to Economic. Asian Perspective, 26 (4), 227-256.\nMerickov, L. (2014). Alternative Approaches to Public Diplomacy. Polish Sociological Review, 3, 351-365. Accessed June 9, 2017. http://polish-sociological-review.eu/wp-content/uploads/2014/11/PSR187-05.pdf. \nLee, S. T. & Julian L. (2017). An Integrated Approach to Public Diplomacy and Public Relations: A Five-Year Analysis of the Information Subsidies of the United States, China, and Singapore. International Journal of Strategic and Communications, 11, 1. \nLima, A F. de. (2007). Students Corner: The Role of International Educational Exchanges in Public Diplomacy. Place Branding and Public Diplomacy, 3 (3), 234-251.\nMa, A. H. S. (2014). The Development of International Student Recruitment Policies in Taiwan: A 60-year Trajectory. Journal of Studies in International Education, 18 (2), 120-140.\nMark, S. 2009. Discussion Paper in Diplomacy: A Greater Role for Cultural Diplomacy. Netherland Institute of International Relations Clingendael. Accesed June 9, 2017 https://www.clingendael.nl/sites/default/files/20090616_cdsp_discussion_paper_114_mark.pdf\nMelissen, J. (2011). Beyond the New Public Diplomacy. Clingendael Paper No 3 Netherland Institute of International Relations. \nNatalia, L. (2011). Public Diplomacy as a Method to Improve the Insertion of Taiwan in Latin America and Attain a Greater Rapprochement to Chile. Research Report, Universidad del Desarrollo.\nNye, J. S. Jr. (2008). Public Diplomacy and Soft Power. The ANNALS of the American Academy of Political and Social SciencE, 616, 94-109 \nParamitaningrum & Johanes H. (Dec. 2016). Economic Diplomacy, Soft Power and Taiwan’s Relation with Indonesia. Contemporary Chinese Political Economy and Strategic Relations: An International Journal, 2 (3), 1173-1194.\nParamitaningrum. (2013). Enhancing People to people Cooperation between ASEAN and East Asia Countries through Counterparts: The Case of Indonesian Student in Taiwan. Journal of ASEAN Studies, 1 (2) 164-175.\nRawnsley, G. D. (2014). Taiwan’s Soft Power and Public Diplomacy. Journal of Current Chinese Affairs, 43(3), 161–174. \nTriana, B. (2015). Cultural demands of the Host-Nation: International Student Experience and the Public Diplomacy Consequence. Journal of International Students, 5 (4), 383-394\nWang, J. (June 2006). Managing National Reputation and International Relations in the Global Era: Public Diplomacy revisited. Public Relations Review, 32 (2) 91-96\nZaharna, R.S. 2007. The Soft Power Differential: Network Communication and Mass Communication in Public Diplomacy. The Hague Journal of Diplomacy, 2 (3), 213-228.\n\nInternet Article\nCross Cutting Issues - A Horizontal Review of the Range of Canadian Public and Cultural Diplomacy Programming. Accessed June 9, 2017. http://www.international.gc.ca/about-a_propos/oig-big/2005/evaluation/horizontal_review-examen_horizontal.aspx?lang=eng\nCull, Nicholas J. Public Diplomacy Before Gullion: The Evolution of a Phrase Accessed June 9, 2017. https://uscpublicdiplomacy.org/blog/public-diplomacy-gullion-evolution-phrase\nGlassman, James K. Public Diplomacy 2.0: A New Approach to Global Engagement. Accessed June 9, 2017. https://2001-2009.state.gov/r/us/2008/112605.htm\nGrant Thornton. The politics of international student mobility, higher education report 2016. Accessed June 9, 2017. https://www.grantthornton.global/globalassets/1.-member-firms/global/insights/article-pdfs/2016/the-politics-of-international-student-mobility---lr-final.pdf\nInternational Education Association of Australia. International Education as Public Diplomacy. Accessed June 9, 2017. http://www.ieaa.org.au/documents/item/258.\nJansen, Sue. Review: New Public Diplomacy in 21st Century. Accessed June 9, 2017. http://www.e-ir.info/2013/08/26/review-new-public-diplomacy-in-the-21st-century/\nJing, Bo-jiun. Taiwan and Southeast Asia: Opportunities and Constraints of Continued Engagement. Contemporary Asian Studies Series. Accessed June 9, 2017. http://digitalcommons.law.umaryland.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1229&context=mscas \nJohnson, Joe B. A Strategic Approach to Public Diplomacy. Accessed June 9, 2017. http://www.afsa.org/strategic-approach-public-diplomacy \nKwei-bo, Huang. Taiwan’s Public Diplomacy at a Time of Institutional Change. Accessed June 9, 2017. https://www.brookings.edu/opinions/taiwans-public-diplomacy-at-a-time-of-institutional-change/\nLauren, Moloney-Egnatious. The International Student Journey in the United States and the Netherland: a Comparative Analysis. Accessed June 9, 2017. https://www.american.edu/sis/practica/upload/Mueller-International-Student-House-Report.pdf \n\nDocuments\nPPI Taiwan. Laporan Pengurus Harian PPI Taiwan 2015/2017. (PPI Taiwan Executive Board Report 2015/2017)\nPPI Taiwan. Laporan Pengurus Harian PPI Taiwan 2014/2015. (PPI Taiwan Executive Board Report 2014/2015)\nPPI Taiwan. Laporan Pengurus Harian PPI Taiwan 2013/2014. (PPI Taiwan Executive Board Report 2013/2014)\nPPI Taiwan. Laporan Pengurus Harian PPI Taiwan 2012/2013. (PPI Taiwan Executive Board Report 2012/2013)\nPKBM PPI Taiwan. Buku Petunjuk Penyelenggaraan PKBM PPI Taiwan. (PKBM PPI Taiwan Organizing Instruction and Standard Operating Procedure Book)\nUT-Taiwan. Laporan Badan Pelaksana UT Taiwan 2016/2017. (UT Taiwan Executive Board Report 2016/2017) \nUT-Taiwan. Laporan Badan Pelaksana UT Taiwan 2015/2016. (UT Taiwan Executive Board Report 2015/2016)\n\nWebsite\nhttp://pkbmppitaiwan.sch.id/\nhttp://portal.tecindonesia.com/\nhttp://tecindonesia.blogspot.tw/\nhttp://ut-taiwan.org/\nhttp://www.esit.org.tw/\nhttp://www.kdei-taipei.org/ \nhttp://www.perpita.com/\nhttp://www.roc-taiwan.org/id_en/index.html\nhttp://www.studyintaiwan.org/\nhttp://yinnihao.wixsite.com/yinnihao\nhttps://ppitaiwan.org/\nhttps://www.formmit.org/ | 描述: | 碩士 國立政治大學 亞太研究英語碩士學位學程(IMAS) 104926002 |
資料來源: | http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#G1049260021 | 資料類型: | thesis |
| Appears in Collections: | 學位論文 |
Files in This Item:
| File | Size | Format | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 002101.pdf | 1.14 MB | Adobe PDF2 | View/Open |
Google ScholarTM
Check
Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.