Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:

Title: Comparison of Word Recognition Strategies in EFL Adult Learners: Orthography vs. Phonology
Authors: 薛玉政
Sieh, Yu-Cheng
Keywords: EFL;orthography;phonology;word recognition;university learners
Date: 2016-10
Issue Date: 2018-05-08 14:53:51 (UTC+8)
Abstract: In an attempt to compare how orthography and phonology interact in EFL learners with different reading abilities, online measures were administered in this study to two groups of university learners, indexed by their reading scores on the Test of English for International Communication (TOEIC). In terms of accuracy, the less-skilled learners performed significantly more poorly than the skilled learners in Nonword Reading, Word Reading, and Rhyme Detection. With regard to reaction time, the less-skilled learners also responded significantly more slowly while they read nonwords and vocabulary words. Nevertheless, both groups performed comparably on Rhyme Detection when asked to decide whether word pairs varied in their orthographic (O) and phonological (P) similarity (S) or difference (D). A further investigation on the test items revealed that the two groups performed comparably in accuracy only when a pair of words was orthographically similar and phonologically similar (OSPS). Intriguingly, the most significant between-group difference occurred when a pair of words was orthographically similar but phonologically different (OSPD), suggesting that orthography played a bigger role in word recognition among less-skilled learners. In contrast, the two groups performed non-differentially in reaction times only when a pair of words was orthographically different but phonological similar (OOPS), suggesting that the skilled learners relied more on phonology in word recognition and might have slowed down as a consequence. Taken together, the results seem to suggest that the less-skilled learners had significantly weaker word recognition skills and phonological representations of English words, which might be attributed to their over-reliance on orthography during word recognition processes.
Relation: Taiwan Journal of TESOL, 13(2), 35-69
Data Type: article
Appears in Collections:[臺灣英語教學期刊 THCI] 期刊論文

Files in This Item:

File Description SizeFormat
132-35-69.pdf20394KbAdobe PDF166View/Open

All items in 學術集成 are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved.

社群 sharing