Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://ah.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/117669
題名: 紀錄片:《一伴》
Documentary :《The Better Half》
作者: 洪辰嫣
Hung, Chen-Yen
貢獻者: 郭力昕
洪辰嫣
Hung, Chen-Yen
關鍵詞: 紀錄片
手天使
身障

性權
Documentary
Hand angels
Disability
Sex
Sexual right
日期: 2018
上傳時間: 12-Jun-2018
摘要: 2013年,台灣本土出現第一個關心身障者「性」的義工團體-手天使,其組織免費提供重度身體障礙者性服務。當身障者「性權」議題逐漸檯面化時,來申請手天使服務的人卻皆為男性,經過手天使的努力,才終於在2016年9月出現第一位女性受服務者。本片記錄三位不同年齡的女性身障者,以及手天使團隊成員們,試圖從個人生命經驗,及社會「性」實踐,交織出女性障礙者在當今社會如何完成生命的渴望。
In 2013, Hand Angels was founded. It is the first Taiwanese NGO with a focus on sexual rights, providing sexual services for people with severe physical disabilities. However, even amidst increasing awareness of sexual relief as an aspect of human rights for the disabled, all applicants for Hand Angels` services remained male until September 2016, when the organization serviced its first female applicant. Through the personal stories of three women with disability, and through following the work of the Hand Angels team, this documentary paints a picture of the struggles faced by disabled women in today`s society, and their efforts to coexist with their physical disabilities and experience all that life has to offer.
參考文獻: 王大鵬(2009)。《放鬆去愛》。台北:心鼓手。\n何春蕤(1994)。《豪爽女人:女性主義與性解放》。台北:皇冠。\n何春蕤(2015年7月)。〈性/別研究二十年:歷史與理論的反思〉。「溝通與匯聚:第五屆中國性研究學術研討會」。中國人民大學性學研究所。北京。\n林谷芳(1998)。《性是生命的一大公案:一個蟬者眼中的男女》。台北:元尊。\n梁美榮(2015)。〈我國身心障礙者性權之省思:不再緘默與迴避的身心障礙者的性議題〉,《社區發展季刊》,149:81-90。\n邱大昕(2012)。〈為什麼需要女性主義身心障礙研究?〉,《婦研縱橫》,96:16-24。\n邱連枝(2011)。〈探討不同障礙者的情慾問題:一個質性研究成果的分析〉,《臺大社會工作學刊》,24:39-86。\n曾凡慈譯(2010)。《污名:管理受損身份的筆記》。台北:群學。(原書Goffman, E. [1963]. Stigma: notes on the management of spoiled identity. London: Penguin)\n楊若慈(2015)。《那些年我們愛的步步驚心:台灣言情小說浪潮中的性別政治》。台北:秀威資訊。\n郭玉梅譯(2007)。《性義工》。台北:八方。(原書河合香織[2004]。《セックスボランティア》。東京:新潮社。)\n蔡文輝(2006)。《社會學原理》。台北:五南。\n嚴嘉楓、林金定(2009)。〈智能障礙者女性月經來潮歷程探索:以智能障礙者女性與其主要 照顧者之視觀分析〉。《身心障礙研究》,7(3):156-181。\nConnell, Raewyn. (2011). Southern bodies and disability: Re-thinking concepts. Third World Quarterly, 32(8), 1369-1381.\nLloyd, Margaret.(2001). The politics of disability and feminism: Discord or synthesis? Sociology, 35(3), 715-728.\nLink, B. G., & Phelan, J. C. (2001). Conceptualizing Stigma. Annual Review of Sociology, 27, 363-385. \nLink, B. G., & Phelan, J. C. (2010). Labeling and stigma. In T. L. Scheid & T. N. Brown (Eds.), A handbook for the study of mental health: Social contexts, theories, and systems (2nd ed., pp. 571-587). New York: Cambridge University Press.\nSchriempf, Alexa. (2001). (Re)fusing the amputated body: An interactionist bridge for feminism and disability. Hypatia: A Journal of Feminist Philosophy, 16(4), 53-79.\nTaleperos, G., & McCabe, M. P. (2001). Physical disability and sexual esteem. \nSexuality and Disability, 19(2), 131-148.
描述: 碩士
國立政治大學
傳播學院傳播碩士學位學程
103464051
資料來源: http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#G1034640512
資料類型: thesis
Appears in Collections:學位論文

Files in This Item:
File SizeFormat
051201.pdf1.22 MBAdobe PDF2View/Open
Show full item record

Google ScholarTM

Check


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.