Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://ah.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/118268
題名: 以「性別議題」為主題之中高級華語教學設計與實踐
Instructional design and implementation of gender-based courses in CSL for intermediate-high level learners
作者: 陳毅
Chen, Yi
貢獻者: 舒兆民
Shu, Zhao-Min
陳毅
Chen, Yi
關鍵詞: 華語文教學
性別議題
中高級華語討論課
教學設計
Teaching chinese as a second language
Gender issues
Intermediate-high level Chinese discussion course
Instructional design
日期: 2018
上傳時間: 3-Jul-2018
摘要: 本研究旨在將「性別議題」與中高級華語語言課程互相結合,發展華語性別議題討論課之「教學設計」。本研究採用文獻探討法、調查研究法、觀察研究法和行動研究法。首先從三個面向探討過去相關的研究。第一部分探討性別議題與語言教學的關係,先論證將性別議題融入語言教學的優點與必要性,再探討英語和華語教學中現有的實際課堂案例並分析其優缺點,以作為本次教學設計的參考;第二部分探究中高級口語課之教學理論與教學重點,並檢視合適的教學法與口語活動,以期能梳理出發展性別議題討論課的方向;第三部分則討論性別議題討論課之教學設計,探究可應用於本研究之教學模式與教學設計理論,並透過5C準則訂定教學目標。接著,根據上述研究基礎開始規劃教學設計,於「華語性別議題討論課」課堂上實施教學,並於之後分析與討論研究工具所蒐集到的資料,藉此總結本研究之研究結果。\r\n本研究分為「語言表達能力」、「性別思維」和「教學設計」三個方面總結研究結論。根據資料分析,此次「華語性別議題討論課」之實施成果,在語言表達能力方面,對學習者的口說和聽力之提升有所助益;在性別思維方面,能夠訓練學習者對性別議題思考的能力,但無法在短時間內改變其對性別議題的核心觀點;而在教學設計方面,透過資料回饋之分析與討論,歸納出本次教學實施之優缺點,並提出修正方案,最後提出華語性別議題討論課的教學原則與建議。
This study aims to incorporate “gender issues” into intermediate-high Chinese language class and to develop systematic instructional design for “gender-based Chinese discussion course.” The research methods used in the study include document analysis, survey research, observation, and action research. The study at first reviewed the previous relevant studies from three aspects: first, the relationship between gender issues and language education; second, intermediate-high level discussion course; third, instructional design integrated with gender issues. The instructional design was developed and implemented based on the results of the literature review. After the implementation, the study analyzed the data collected from the research tools used during the entire research, then concluding the final result of the research.\r\nAccording to the analysis, this paper reached its final conclusions with regard to the gender-based Chinese discussion course from three aspects. First, in terms of language proficiency, the course in general improved the five learners’ speaking and listening skills. Second, when it comes to “thinking on gender issues”, the course can indeed train the students’ ability to think about gender issues, but their original values almost remain unchanged after the course. As for the instructional design, the study found the merits and demerits of the instructional implementation and offered some suggestions to make it better. Eventually, the study concluded several teaching principles for the gender-based Chinese discussion course.
參考文獻: 參考文獻\r\n\r\n中文部分\r\n\r\n一、中文書目\r\n王文科、王智弘(2006)教育研究法(增訂十版)。台北:五南。\r\n呂必松(1993)。對外漢語教學研究。北京:北京語言學院。\r\n呂必松(2005)。語言教育與對外漢語教育。北京:外語教學與研究出版社。\r\n杜振亞、郭聰貴、周伶瑛、鄭麗娟、林麗娟、吳佳蕙(譯)(2007)。學 習導向的教學設計原理。台北市:湯姆生。(原作者:Gagne R. M., Wager W.W., Golas K. C. & Keller J. M.,2005)。\r\n李子瑄、曹逢甫(2009)。漢語語言學。台北:正中書局。\r\n李宗薇(1993)。師院「社會科教學研究」課程應用教學設計之實驗研 究。台北:師大書苑。\r\n李曉琪(主編)(2006)。對外漢語口語教學研究。北京市:商務印書館。\r\n林宜樺(2009)。華語文文化課程教學設計—以性別文化作為教學主題。載於葉德明(主編),對外華語課程設計 (頁 121-134)。台北市:台灣華語文教學學會。\r\n周新富(2007)。教育研究法。台北市:五南。\r\n周新富(2014)。教學原理與設計。台北:五南。\r\n胡幼慧(1996)。質性研究。台北:巨流出版社。\r\n陳建民(1984)。漢語口語。北京:北京出版社。\r\n盛群力、李志強(2003)。現代教學設計論。台北市:五南。\r\n舒兆民(2016)。華語文教學。台北市:新學林。\r\n曾妙芬(2007)。推動專業化的 AP 中文教學:大學二年級中文教學成功模式之探討與應用。北京市:北京語言大學出版社。\r\n鈕文英(2013)。研究方法與論文寫作(二版)。台北市:雙葉書廊有限公司。\r\n楊惠元(2009)。對外漢語聽說教學十四講。北京:北京大學出版社。\r\n趙金銘(2010)。對外漢語教學概論,台北:新學林出版社。\r\n蔡清田(2000)。教育行動研究。台北:五南。\r\n蔡美華(譯)(2003)。行動研究法。台北市:學富文化。(原作者: Geoffrey E. Mills,2002)\r\n蔡整瑩(2009)。漢語口語課教學法。北京市:北京語言大學出版社。\r\n譚光鼎、劉美慧、游美惠(2012)。多元文化教育。台北市:高等教育。\r\n\r\n二、中文期刊\r\n方永泉(1999)。教師作為一種轉化的知識份子:教育史角度的考察。暨大學報,3(1),99-126。\r\n王若江(1999)。對漢語口語課的反思。漢語學習,(2),38-44。\r\n付繼偉(2005)。直接法與高級漢語教學的模式。雲南師範大學學報,3, 2,1-5。\r\n呂必松(2000)。試論漢語書面語言教學。華文教學與研究,(1)。\r\n呂必松(1997)。漢語教學中的說話訓練。載於法國首屆國際漢語教學學術研討會論文集。巴黎:鳳凰書店。\r\n段愛萍、石凱民、劉小軍(2001)。漢語留學生高級班課堂教學法探討。西北工業大學學報(社會科學版),21,3,68-71。\r\n張黎(1995)。試論中級口語課的規範化問題。載於語言文化教學論文集。北京:外語教學與研究出版社。\r\n張金蘭(2010)。5C 理論在華語文教學中的運用。中原華語文學報, (5), 71-90。\r\n張若瑩(1997)。試論高級口語教學中的幾個基本問題。載於第五屆國際漢語教學討論會論文選。北京:北京大學出版社。\r\n鄧守信、信世昌、李明懿、黃郁純(2007)。以溝通為本的基礎語法大綱模式研究。載於 2007 台灣華語文教學學會年會暨研討會論文集。台中市:逢甲大學。\r\n戴悉心(2001)。留學生漢語口頭語言交際溝通能力的層次及其訓練標準。語言文字應用,(1)。\r\n藍珮君、陳柏熹和許嘉凌(2014)。以 TOCFL 連結 CEFR 與 ACTFL:標準設定程序的應用,2014 第三屆標準本位評量國際研討會,台北:國立台灣師範大學。\r\n顧百里(2005)。高級漢語口語語法與詞彙的訓練:對漢語非母語學生的教學法研討。New Developments in Teaching and Research on Written Chinese (pp.185-199). Beijing Language and Culture University Press, Beijing.\r\n\r\n三、學位論文\r\n何佳蓉(2011)。華語溝通教學活動設計與成效研究---以中文初級複習課為例(未出版之碩士論文)。中原大學,桃園市。\r\n吳馥如(2008)。中級華語交際溝通會話課程之設計與實證(未出版之碩 士論文)。國立台灣師範大學,台北市。\r\n李秀芬(2011)。華語文溝通教學策略研究---以 5C 融入之 AP 中文教學 為例 (未出版之博士論文)。國立台灣師範大學,台北市。\r\n林芝逸(2015)。環保議題融入中高級華語課程設計與實踐(未出版之碩 士論文)。國立政治大學,台北市。\r\n林家盈(2016)。初級華語課程中之口語任務型教學設計與實驗---以華裔青年來台學習之短期班為範圍(未出版之碩士論文)。台北市立大 學,台北市。\r\n舒兆民(2012)。以修讀學位為目的之外籍生華語文養成課程設計與教學實施(未出版之博士論文)。國立台灣師範大學,台北市。\r\n廖玉蕙(2011)。中級商務華語口語溝通課程之設計與實證(未出版之碩 士論文)。國立台灣師範大學,台北市。\r\n\r\n四、中文網路資料\r\n林麗娟(2012)。圖書館學與資訊科學大辭典-ADDIE 教學模式。國家教育研究院-雙語詞彙、學術名詞暨辭書資訊網。2018 年 5 月 20 日取自https://goo.gl/n8xaSB\r\n國立台灣師範大學國語教學中心。課程等級與學習目標。2017 年 4 月 1 日 取自 https://goo.gl/sGeJz6\r\n國家華語測驗推動工作委員會。華語文口語能力指標。2017 年 3 月 9 日取 自 https://goo.gl/zTWXNZ\r\n\r\n英文部分\r\n\r\n一、英文書目\r\nBrown, Douglas (2006). Teaching by Principles: An Interactive Approach to Language Pedagogy. Pearson Education.\r\nBrown, Douglas (1990). On Track to Century 21. Plenary talk at TESOL ’90, San Francisco\r\nCochran-Smith, M., & Lytle, S. L. (1993). Inside/Outside Teacher Research and Knowledge. New York, New York: Teachers College Press.\r\nCouncil of Europe [COE]. (2001). Common European Framework of Reference for Languages: Learning, Teaching, Assessment. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.\r\nDe Bono, Edward. (1991). Teaching Thinking. Penguin Books.\r\nDenzin, N. K. (1978). The Research Act: A Theoretical Introduction to Sociological Methods. New York, NY: McGraw-Hill.
Dick, W. & Carey, L. (1985). The Systematic Design of Instruction. Scott: Foreman and Company.
Finicchiaro, M. & Brumfit, C. (1983). The Functional—notional Approach: From Theory to Practice. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.\r\nGagne, R., Briggs, L. & Wager, W. (1992). Principles of Instructional Design (4th Ed.). Fort Worth, TX: HBJ College Publishers.
Grafinger, D. J. (1988). Basics of Instructional Systems Development. INFO-LINE Issue 8803. Alexandria: American Society for Training and Development.
Johnson, R. B., & Christensen, L. (2013). Educational Research: Quantitative, Qualitative, and Mixed Approaches. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage. [Google Book. Retrieved November 23, 2017]
Kemmis, S., & Robin, M. T. (2005). Participatory Action Research: Communicative Action and the Public Sphere. In Denzin, N.K., & Lincoln, Y.S. (Eds.), The Sage Handbook of Qualitative Research (pp. 271-330). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.\r\nKramsch, C., & Von Hoene, L. (2001). Cross-cultural excursions: Foreign language study and feminist discourses of travel. In A. Pavlenko, A. Blackledge, I. Piller, & M. Teutsch-Dwyer (Eds.), Multilingualism, second language learning, and gender (pp. 283-306). Berlin, Germany: Mouton de Gruyter.
Krashen, S. (1981). Second language acquisition and second language learning. Oxford: Pergamon Publisher.
Littlewood, W. (1981). Communicative Language Teaching. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
Lodico, M. G., & Spaulding, D. T., & Voegtle, K. H. (2010). Methods in Educational Research: From Theory to Practice. San Francisco, CA: John Wiley & Sons. [Google Book. Retrieved November 23, 2017]
Lyons, J. (1968). Introduction to Theoretical Linguistics. London: Cambridge University Press.\r\n\r\n二、英文期刊\r\nBenesch, Sarah (1993). ESL, Ideology, and the Politics of Pragmatism. TESOL Quarterly, Vol. 27, No. 4., 705-717.\r\nBonny Norton & Aneta Pavlenko (2004). Addressing gender in the ESL/EFL classroom. TESOL Quarterly, Vol. 38, No. 3.\r\nBranson, R. K. (1978). The interservice precedures for instructional systems development. Educational Technology, 18(3), 11-14.\r\nCates, K. A. (1990). Teaching for a Better World: Global Issues and Language Education. The Language Teacher, XIV(5), 41-52.\r\nDrake, Denise (1999). Teaching gender issues in the EFL classroom. JALT: Global Issues in Language Education Newsletter, 34.\r\nHymes (1971). Competence and performance in linguistic theory. In R. Huxley & E. Ingram (Eds.). Language Acquisition and Methods. New York: Academic Press.\r\nJin, Hong Gang (2004). The role of formulaic speech in teaching and learning patterned Chinese structures. In Journals of Chinese Language Teachers Association, Vol. 39, No. 1., 45-62.\r\nKeller, J. M. (1983). Motivational design of instruction. Instructional Design Theories and Models: An Overview of Their Current Status, 1, 383-434.\r\nKrashen, S. & Scarcella, R. (1978). On routines and patterns in language acquisition and performance. Language Learning, 28, 283-300.\r\nMaley, A. (1992). Global issues in ELT. Practical English Teaching, 13(2), 73.\r\nMolenda, M. (2003). In Search of the Elusive ADDIE Model. Performance Improvement, 42 (5), 35.\r\nNagasaka, Tatsuhiko (2009). Gender awareness raising and EFL. Jissen Women`s University FLC Journal, 4, 41-47.\r\nWilkins, D. A. (1972). Grammatical, situational, and notional syllabuses. Paper presented at the meeting of the Proceedings of the Third International Congree of Applied Linguistics, Copenhagen, Holland. In Association Internationale de Linguistique Appliqu e (AILA)(Eds.), Heidelberg, Germany: Julius Groos Verlag.\r\nYoshihara, Reiko (2013). Learning and teaching gender and sexuality issues in the EFL classroom: where students and teachers stand. The Language Teacher, 37(5), 8-11.\r\n\r\n三、英文網路資料\r\nAmerican Council on the Teaching of Foreign Languages (ACTFL). (2015). Standards for foreign language learning in the 21st century. Retrieved April 14, 2016, from https://goo.gl/heFx1A
American Council on the Teaching of Foreign Languages (ACTFL). (2012). ACTFL Proficiency Guidelines 2012 [PDF Download]. Retrieved March 9, 2017, from https://goo.gl/GTwGnj
描述: 碩士
國立政治大學
華語文教學碩博士學位學程
102161008
資料來源: http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#G0102161008
資料類型: thesis
Appears in Collections:學位論文

Files in This Item:
File SizeFormat
100801.pdf8.43 MBAdobe PDF2View/Open
Show full item record

Google ScholarTM

Check

Altmetric

Altmetric


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.