Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
Can Health Insurance Boost Fertility? The Fertility Effect of National Health Insurance in Taiwan
National health insurance
Difference in differences
|Issue Date:||2018-07-19 17:30:21 (UTC+8)|
The implementation of Taiwanese National Health Insurance in 1995 affected almost every Taiwanese citizen’s healthcare options and coverage. Inclusion of low-cost prenatal and postnatal care, delivery services, and child healthcare coverage indicates the implicit pronatalism of NHI policy. Given the endogeneity of healthcare availability to childbearing decisions, this study uses the 1995 implementation of NHI to estimate the impact of national healthcare on Taiwanese fertility. We first approach this question using OLS regression to test for correlation between completed childbearing and an NHI dummy, among other demographic factors. In the second approach, difference-in-differences methodologies estimate the effect of 1995 NHI implementation on the treatment group of Taiwanese women and state-insured control group. Our data sources are the 1979-2016 waves of the Women’s Marriage, Fertility, and Employment Survey conducted by the Statistical Department of the Taiwanese Ministry of the Interior. We hypothesize that the 1995 NHI policy change increased the fertility of Taiwanese women around the cutoff date despite sub-replacement national fertility beginning in the 1980s. OLS analysis fails to show a positive correlation between NHI and women’s fertility in Taiwan, however. Further, DID estimations using a maternal age and a conception time both reject the hypothesis that lowered cost of childbearing through NHI stimulated Taiwanese fertility.
|Reference:||Ashraf, Q. H., Weil, D. N., & Wilde, J. (2013). The effect of fertility reduction on economic growth. Population and development review, 39(1), 97-130.|
Becker, G. S. (1960). An economic analysis of fertility. In Demographic and economic change in developed countries (pp. 209-240): Columbia University Press.
Becker, G. S. (1965). A Theory of the Allocation of Time. The economic journal, 493-517.
Becker, G. S., & Lewis, H. G. (1973). On the Interaction between the Quantity and Quality of Children. Journal of political Economy, 81(2, Part 2), S279-S288.
Chang, M.-C. (2006). Taiwan's Transition from High Fertility to Lowest Low Levels. Asian Journal of Health and Information Sciences, 1(1), 1-15.
Chang, M.-C., Freedman, R., & Sun, T.-H. (1987). Trends in fertility, family size preferences, and family planning practices in Taiwan, 1961-85. Studies in family Planning, 18(6), 320-337.
Chen, C.-S., Liu, T.-C., & Chen, L.-M. (2003). National Health Insurance and the antenatal care use: a case in Taiwan. Health policy, 64(1), 99-112.
Chen, K., & Yang, C. (2005). Nuptiality effects on fertility: A compositional analysis. Paper presented at the International Conference on Lowest Low Fertility and Response: The French Experience and East-Asian Realities. Taipei.
Chen, L., Chen, C.-L., & Yang, W.-C. (2008). The influences of Taiwan's National Health Insurance on women's choice of prenatal care facility: Investigation of differences between rural and non-rural areas. BMC health services research, 8(1), 67.
Chen, Y. (2015). The factors and implications of rising housing prices in Taiwan. Brookings Taiwan-US Quarterly Analysis.
Chesnais, J.-C. (1996). Fertility, family, and social policy in contemporary Western Europe. Population and development review, 729-739.
Chou, S.-Y., Grossman, M., & Liu, J.-T. (2014). The impact of national health insurance on birth outcomes: a natural experiment in Taiwan. Journal of Development Economics, 111, 75-91.
Chou, S.-Y., Liu, J.-T., & Hammitt, J. K. (2003). National health insurance and precautionary saving: evidence from Taiwan. Journal of Public Economics, 87(9-10), 1873-1894.
Davis, K. (1945). The world demographic transition. The Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 237(1), 1-11.
DeLeire, T., Lopoo, L. M., & Simon, K. I. (2011). Medicaid expansions and fertility in the United States. Demography, 48(2), 725-747.
Demeny, P. (1986). Pronatalist policies in low-fertility countries: Patterns, performance, and prospects. Population and development review, 12, 335-358.
Demeny, P. (2005). Ethical and political constraints on public choices in the field of fertility. Genus, 331-345.
Easterlin, R. A. (1975). An economic framework for fertility analysis. Studies in family Planning, 6(3), 54-63.
Feeney, G. (1991). Fertility decline in Taiwan: A study using parity progression ratios. Demography, 28(3), 467-479.
Freedman, D. S. (1975). Consumption of modern goods and services and it's relation to fertility: A study in Taiwan. The Journal of Development Studies, 12(1), 95-117.
Freedman, R., Chang, M.-C., & Sun, T.-H. (1994). Taiwan's transition from high fertility to below-replacement levels. Studies in family Planning, 317-331.
Freedman, R., Hermalin, A. I., & Chang, M.-C. (1975). Do statements about desired family size predict fertility? the case of Taiwan, 1967–1970. Demography, 12(3), 407-416.
Freedman, R., & Sun, T.-H. (1969). Taiwan: Fertility trends in a Crucial period of transition. Studies in family Planning, 1(44), 15-19.
Frejka, T., & Zakharov, S. (2013). The apparent failure of Russia's pronatalist family policies. Population and development review, 39(4), 635-647.
Gauthier, A. H. (2007). The impact of family policies on fertility in industrialized countries: a review of the literature. Population research and policy review, 26(3), 323-346.
Hermalin, A. I. (1976). Empirical research in Taiwan on factors underlying differences in fertility. In Economic Factors in Population Growth (pp. 243-272): Springer.
Hoem, J. M. (2008). Overview Chapter 8: The impact of public policies on European fertility. Demographic research, 19(10), 249-260.
Joyce, T., Kaestner, R., & Kwan, F. (1998). Is Medicaid pronatalist? The effect of eligibility expansions on abortions and births. Family Planning Perspectives, 108-127.
Keng, S.-H., & Sheu, S.-J. (2011). Can education subsidy reverse falling fertility? The case of Taiwan. Journal of development studies, 47(11), 1677-1698.
Lai, N. M. S., & Tung, A.-C. (2015). Who supports the elderly? The changing economic lifecycle reallocation in Taiwan, 1985 and 2005. The Journal of the Economics of Ageing, 5, 63-68.
Landry, A. (1987). Adolphe Landry on the demographic revolution. Population and development review, 13(4), 731-740.
Lee, G. H., & Lee, S. P. (2014). Childcare availability, fertility and female labor force participation in Japan. Journal of the Japanese and International Economies, 32, 71-85.
Lee, M., & Lin, Y.-H. (2016). Transition from Anti-natalist to Pro-natalist Policies in Taiwan. In Low Fertility, Institutions, and their Policies (pp. 259-281): Springer.
Lee, S.-S. (2009). Low fertility and policy responses in Korea. The Japanese Journal of Population, 7(1), 57-70.
Legge Jr, J. S., & Alford, J. R. (1986). Can government regulate fertility? An assessment of pronatalist policy in Eastern Europe. Western Political Quarterly, 39(4), 709-728.
Leibowitz, A. (1990). The response of births to changes in health care costs. Journal of Human Resources, 697-711.
Li, W. L. (1973). Temporal and spatial analysis of fertility decline in Taiwan. Population studies, 27(1), 97-104.
Luoh, M.-C. (2007). The appearance and reality of declining total fertility rates in Taiwan. Journal of Taiwan Studies, 3, 37-60.
McDonald, P. (2002). Sustaining fertility through public policy: The range of options. Population, 57(3), 417-446.
Milligan, K. (2005). Subsidizing the stork: New evidence on tax incentives and fertility. Review of Economics and statistics, 87(3), 539-555.
Montgomery, M. R., & Casterline, J. B. (1993). The diffusion of fertility control in Taiwan: Evidence from pooled cross-section time-series models. Population studies, 47(3), 457-479.
Nakajima, R., & Tanaka, R. (2014). Estimating the effects of pronatal policies on residential choice and fertility. Journal of the Japanese and International Economies, 34, 179-200.
Notestein, F. W. (1945). Population - The Long View. In T. W. Schultz (Ed.), Food for the World (pp. 36-57). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Parish, W. L., & Willis, R. J. (1993). Daughters, education, and family budgets Taiwan experiences. Journal of Human Resources, 863-898.
Rindfuss, R. R., & Brewster, K. L. (1996). Childrearing and fertility. Population and development review, 22, 258-289.
Rindfuss, R. R., Guilkey, D. K., Morgan, S. P., & Kravdal, Ø. (2010). Child‐Care Availability and Fertility in Norway. Population and development review, 36(4), 725-748.
Rutstein, S. O. (1974). The influence of child mortality on fertility in Taiwan. Studies in family Planning, 5(6), 182-188.
Schmidt, L. (2007). Effects of infertility insurance mandates on fertility. Journal of health economics, 26(3), 431-446.
Sun, T.-H., Lin, H.-S., & Freedman, R. (1978). Trends in fertility, family size preferences, and family planning practice: Taiwan, 1961-76. Studies in family Planning, 9(4), 54-70.
Szreter, S. (1993). The idea of demographic transition and the study of fertility change: a critical intellectual history. Population and development review, 659-701.
Van de Kaa, D. J. (1987). The Idea of a Second Demographic Transition in Industrialized Countries. Paper presented at the Sixth Welfare Policy Seminar of the National Institute of Population and Social Security, Tokyo, Japan.
Van de Kaa, D. J. (2001). Postmodern fertility preferences: From changing value orientation to new behavior. Population and development review, 27, 290-331.
Whittington, L. A., Alm, J., & Peters, H. E. (1990). Fertility and the personal exemption: implicit pronatalist policy in the United States. The American Economic Review, 80(3), 545-556.
Zaidi, B., & Morgan, S. P. (2017). The Second Demographic Transition: A Review and Appraisal. Annual Review of Sociology(0).
Zavodny, M., & Bitler, M. P. (2010). The effect of Medicaid eligibility expansions on fertility. Social Science & Medicine, 71(5), 918-924.
|Appears in Collections:||[International Master's Program in International Studies] Theses |
Files in This Item:
All items in 學術集成 are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved.