Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://ah.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/118822
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.advisor賴建都zh_TW
dc.contributor.advisorLai, Jian-Duen_US
dc.contributor.author嚴智慧zh_TW
dc.contributor.authorYan, Zhi-Huien_US
dc.creator嚴智慧zh_TW
dc.creatorYan, Zhi-Huien_US
dc.date2018en_US
dc.date.accessioned2018-07-23T08:59:48Z-
dc.date.available2018-07-23T08:59:48Z-
dc.date.issued2018-07-23T08:59:48Z-
dc.identifierG0105464069en_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/118822-
dc.description碩士zh_TW
dc.description國立政治大學zh_TW
dc.description傳播學院傳播碩士學位學程zh_TW
dc.description105464069zh_TW
dc.description.abstract如今很多女性消費者在社群媒體觀看美妝博主視頻和推文的過程中,很容易對美妝博主使用或推薦產品產生購買慾望,並且對品牌產生較為深刻的印象,美妝博主為何能夠對消費者產生如此大的影響力?這種影響是以何種形式產生?最終又是通過怎樣的作用機制影響到消費者的購買意願呢?\n\n本文以刺激反應(S-O-R)模式為理論框架,研究在美妝博主參照群體的刺激下(Stimulate),通過認知(Cognitive)-情緒-感知價值的機體(Organism),最終實現對消費者購買意願的影響(Reaction)。本研究採用問卷調查法,進行線性回歸分析、Bootstrap中介效果分析和調節效果分析,最終研究結果如下:\n\n1. 美妝博主參照群體影響構面對消費者購買意願有顯著正向影響,且其三個不同的構面,即:資訊性、價值性和互動性,對消費者購買意願皆存在顯著正向影響,三個構面對消費者購買意願的影響程度由大到小分別為:資訊性、互動性、價值性。\n\n2. 美妝博主參照群體通過CEV模式正向影響消費者的購買意願。且根據Bootstrap中介效應檢測結果顯示,在資訊性、價值性、互動性對消費者購買意願的影響中,CEV中介效果均顯著,其中,CEV在資訊性和價值性對消費者購買意願的影響中,起到部分中介的效果,在互動性對消費者購買意願的影響中,起到完全中介效果。\n\n3. 研究發現流行敏感度在美妝博主對消費者購買意願的影響中存在調節效應。當消費者流行敏感越低時,美妝博主參照群體對購買意願的影響程度越大,當消費者的流行敏感越高時,美妝博主參照群體對購買意願的影響程度越小。zh_TW
dc.description.abstractNowadays, many female consumers in the social media watch beauty bloggers’ videos and tweets, it is easy for beauty bloggers to use or recommend products to generate a desire to buy, and have a more profound impression on the brand, beauty bloggers Why can it have so much influence on consumers? In what form does this effect occur? In the end, what kind of mechanism will affect the consumer`s willingness to buy?\n\nIn this paper, the author used the S-O-R model as the theoretical framework to study the influence of the reference group of beauty bloggers through the body of cognitive-emotional-perceived value, and finally realize the influence on consumers` purchase intention. In this study, the author conducted questionnaire survey using spss for linear regression analysis, Bootstrap mediation analysis, and moderator analysis. The final findings are as follows:\n\n1. Beauty bloggers reference configurations to consumers affected groups have a significant positive effect on willingness to buy, and their three distinct facets, informational, value and interactivity to consumers willingness to buy all there is significant forward Influence, the influence of the three structures on consumers` willingness to purchase from big to small are: informational, interactive, and value.\n\n2. The beauty blogger`s reference group positively influences the purchase intention of consumers through the CEV model. According to the test results of Bootstrap mediating effect, the effect of information, value, and interaction on consumer`s purchase intention is significant, and the effect of CEV mediation is significant. Among them, the impact of CEV on consumer`s purchase intention is information and value. It plays a part of the mediating effect and plays a complete mediating effect in the interaction of consumer purchase intention.\n\n3. The study found that epidemic sensitivity has a moderating effect on the influence of beauty bloggers on consumers` purchase intention. When the sensitivity of consumer prevalence is lower, the influence of the reference group of the beauty blogger on the purchase intention will be greater. When the prevalence sensitivity of the consumer is higher, the influence of the reference group of the beauty blogger on the purchase intention will be smaller.en_US
dc.description.tableofcontents摘要 I\nAbstract III\n第一章 緒論 1\n第一節 研究背景與動機 1\n第二節 研究問題 5\n第三節 研究目的 7\n第四節 研究流程 8\n第二章 文獻探討 9\n第一節 女性化妝品與消費者 9\n一、 女性化妝品消費市場現狀 9\n二、 女性消費者特點 10\n第二節 參照群體(Reference Group) 13\n一、 參照群體的定義 13\n二、 參照群體的構面 15\n三、 參照群體對購買意願的影響 22\n第三節 CEV(Cognitive-Emotion-Value)模式 25\n一、 認知 26\n二、 消費者情緒 28\n三、 感知價值 30\n第四節 S-O-R(Stimulate-Organism-Reaction)模式 36\n第五節 消費者生活型態 39\n第六節 小結 41\n第三章 研究方法 43\n第一節 研究方法 43\n第二節 研究架構與假設 44\n第三節 抽樣與問卷設計 46\n一、 研究母體 46\n二、 抽樣方法 46\n三、 樣本數量 47\n四、 問卷設計 47\n五、 資料分析方法 53\n第四章 資料分析與呈現 54\n第一節 描述性統計 54\n第二節 信度和效度分析 56\n一、 信度分析 56\n二、 效度分析 57\n第三節 研究假設驗證分析 61\n一、 線性迴歸分析 61\n三、 中介效果分析 66\n三、 調節效應檢驗 71\n四、 小結 74\n第五章 結論與建議 76\n第一節 研究結論 76\n第二節 理論貢獻 81\n第三節 實務建議 83\n第四節 研究限制與未來方向 85\n參考文獻 87\n中文文獻 87\n英文文獻 90\n附錄 94zh_TW
dc.source.urihttp://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#G0105464069en_US
dc.subject美妝博主zh_TW
dc.subject參照群體zh_TW
dc.subjectCEV模式zh_TW
dc.subject購買意願zh_TW
dc.subject流行敏感zh_TW
dc.subjectBeauty bloggersen_US
dc.subjectReference groupen_US
dc.subjectCEV modelen_US
dc.subjectPurchase intentionen_US
dc.subjectPopular sensitiveen_US
dc.title從參照群體及消費體驗視角剖析美妝博主對消費者購買意願之影響zh_TW
dc.titleStudy on the influence of beauty bloggers toward consumers` purchase intention from the perspective of reference groups and consumer experienceen_US
dc.typethesisen_US
dc.relation.reference中文文獻\n宋冠群 (2015)。 網路事件行銷淺析. 商場現代化, (10), 47-47.\n\n李先國、陳寧頡、張新聖 (2017)。 虛擬品牌社區感知價值對新產品購買意願的影響機制——基於群體認同和品牌認同的雙中介視角. 中國流通經濟, (2017 年 02), 93-100.\n\n李慢、馬欽海、趙曉煜 (2014)。 網路服務場景對線上體驗及行為意向的作用 研究. 管理科學, 27(4), 86-96.\n\n杜偉強、 於春玲、趙平 (2009)。 參照群體類型與自我-品牌聯繫. 心理學報, (2), 156-166.\n\n沈鵬熠 (2011)。 農產品區域品牌的形成過程及其運行機制. 農業現代化研究, 32(5), 588-591\n\n武永紅、範秀成 (2004)。 基於顧客價值的企業競爭力整合模型探析. 中國軟科學, (11), 86-92.\n\n武瑞娟、王承璐 (2014)。 網店專業性對消費者情感和行為影響效應研究———一項基於大學生群體的實證研究. 管理評論, 26(1), 109-119.\n\n姚鐘華 (2002)。 企業獲取核心競爭力的顧客價值分析. 江西社會科學, (2), 145-146.\n\n孫強、司有和 (2007)。 網上購物顧客感知價值構成研究. 科技管理研究, 27(7), 185-187.\n\n張波、周恩毅 (2011)。 現代中青年女性消費心理及行銷對策分析. 中國商貿, (3), 25-26.\n\n張婷婷 (2011)。 基於白領女性消費心理的廣告策略研究(Master`s thesis, 湘潭大學).\n\n張璐 (2011)。 基於虛擬社區的網路互動對旅遊目的地形象感知的影響研究 [D] (Doctoral dissertation, 杭州: 浙江大學).\n\n張豔 (2017)。 參照群體對老齡消費者購物行為的影響. 瀋陽師範大學學報: 社會科學版, (1), 36-39.\n\n許嘉儀、林恬恬、甘春梅 (2017)。 社會化商務情境下用戶行為影響因素研究: 基於 SOR 模型. 知識管理論壇, 1, 007.\n\n陳家瑤、劉克、宋亦平 (2006)。 參照群體對消費者感知價值和購買意願的影響. 上海管理科學, 28(3), 25-30.\n\n景奉傑、嶽海龍 (2005)。 中國消費者衝動性購買傾向量表的研究. 財政研究, (5), 37-40.\n\n程丹、陳長彬 (2014)。 中國奢侈品消費偏好影響因素實證研究. 商業研究, (5), 134-140.\n\n程振宇 (2013)。 社交網路下網路互動對購買意願影響及信任保障機制研究. 北京郵電大學, 7.\n\n賀和平、劉雁妮、周志民 (2014)。 微博何以令人欲罷不能——基於網路志方法的微博成癮行為研究. 行銷科學學報, (4), 1-16.\n\n黃文彥、勞陳峰 (2013)。網路口碑品質對顧客感知價值和購買意願的影響研究. 消費經濟, 29(5), 48-53.\n\n楊偉文、劉新 (2010)。 品牌認知對消費者購買行為的影響. 商業研究, (3), 158-162.\n\n賈鶴、王永貴、劉佳媛、馬劍虹 (2008)。 參照群體對消費決策影響研究述評. 外國經濟與管理, 30(6), 51-58.\n\n蔣豔梅、趙文平 (2011)。 基於參照群體影響的消費者首次網購決策模型分析. 統計與決策, (24), 85-88.\n\n薑淩、王磊 (2010)。 消費者產品購買決策中不同類型參照群體影響力比較研究. 華東經濟管理, 24(6), 112-115.\n\n薑淩、周庭銳、王成璋 (2009)。 奢侈品牌消費中參照群體影響研究. 管理科學, (5), 81-91.\n\n蘇凇、孫川、陳榮 (2013)。 文化價值觀, 消費者感知價值和購買決策風格: 基於中國城市化差異的比較研究. 南開管理評論, (1), 102-109.\n\n鐘小娜 (2005)。 網路購物模式下的顧客感知價值研究. 經濟論壇, (15), 131-133.\n\n英文文獻\nAaker, J. L. (1997). Dimensions of brand personality. Journal of marketing research, 347-356.\n\nBearden, W. O., & Etzel, M. J. (1982). Reference group influence on product and brand purchase decisions. Journal of consumer research, 9(2), 183-194.\n\nBearden, W. O., Netemeyer, R. G., & Teel, J. E. (1989). Measurement of consumer susceptibility to interpersonal influence. Journal of consumer research, 15(4), 473-481.\n\nBone, P. F., & Ellen, P. S. (1992). The generation and consequences of communication-evoked imagery. Journal of Consumer Research, 19(1), 93-104.\n\nBrinberg, D., & Plimpton, L. (1986). Self-monitoring and product conspicuousness on reference group influence. ACR North American Advances.\n\nBurnkrant, R. E., & Cousineau, A. (1975). Informational and normative social influence in buyer behavior. Journal of Consumer research, 2(3), 206-215.\n\nChan, K., & Prendergast, G. P. (2008). Social comparison, imitation of celebrity models and materialism among Chinese youth. International Journal of Advertising, 27(5), 799-826.\n\nChilders, T. L., & Rao, A. R. (1992). The influence of familial and peer-based reference groups on consumer decisions. Journal of Consumer research, 19(2), 198-211.\n\nDeutsch, M., & Gerard, H. B. (1955). A study of normative and informational social influences upon individual judgment. The journal of abnormal and social psychology, 51(3), 629.\n\nDodds, W. B., Monroe, K. B., & Grewal, D. (1991). Effects of price, brand, and store information on buyers` product evaluations. Journal of marketing research, 307-319.\n\nEngel, J. F., Blackwell, R. D., & Kollat, D. T. (1968). Consumer Behavior, New York. Eşi, M., Nedelea, A.-M.,(2014) Mission of business organiyations and the social-economic entrepreneurship, 252.p.1121-1139.\n\nEscalas, J. E., & Bettman, J. R. (2003). You are what they eat: The influence of reference groups on consumers’ connections to brands. Journal of consumer psychology, 13(3), 339-348.\n\nFiore, A. M. (2002). Effects of experiential pleasure from a catalogue environment on approach responses toward fashion apparel. Journal of Fashion Marketing and Management: An International Journal, 6(2), 122-133.\n\nFiore, A. M., & Kim, J. (2007). An integrative framework capturing experiential and utilitarian shopping experience. International Journal of Retail & Distribution Management, 35(6), 421-442.\n\nHolbrook, M. B. (1986). Emotion in the consumption experience: Toward a new model of the human consumer. The role of affect in consumer behavior: Emerging theories and applications, 6(23), 17-52.\n\nHolbrook, M. B., & Corfman, K. P. (1985). Quality and value in the consumption experience: Phaedrus rides again. Perceived quality, 31(2), 31-57.\n\nHolt, D. B. (1995). How consumers consume: A typology of consumption practices. Journal of consumer research, 22(1), 1-16.\n\nHyman, H. H. (1942). The psychology of status. Archives of Psychology (Columbia University).p.269\n\nKeller, K. L. (2001). Building customer-based brand equity: A blueprint for creating strong brands.\n\nKelman, H. C. (1958). Compliance, identification, and internalization three processes of attitude change. Journal of conflict resolution, 2(1), 51-60.\n\nKozinets, R. V. (2002). The field behind the screen: Using netnography for marketing research in online communities. Journal of marketing research, 39(1), 61-72.\n\nMacInnis, D. J., & Price, L. L. (1987). The role of imagery in information processing: Review and extensions. Journal of consumer research, 13(4), 473-491.\n\nMehrabian, A., & Russell, J. A. (1974). An approach to environmental psychology. the MIT Press.\n\nPark, C. W., & Lessig, V. P. (1977). Students and housewives: Differences in susceptibility to reference group influence. Journal of consumer Research, 4(2), 102-110.\n\nRogers Everett M. (1986). Communication technology: The new media in society.\n\nRoss, I. (1979). An information processing theory of consumer choice. Journal of Marketing (pre-1986), 43(000003), 124.\n\nSolomon, M. R. (1983). The role of products as social stimuli: A symbolic interactionism perspective. Journal of Consumer research, 10(3), 319-329.\n\nTsai, W. H. S., & Men, L. R. (2017). Social CEOs: The effects of CEOs’ communication styles and parasocial interaction on social networking sites. new media & society, 19(11), 1848-1867.\n\nWard, J. C., & Barnes, J. W. (2001). Control and affect: the influence of feeling in control of the retail environment on affect, involvement, attitude, and behavior. Journal of Business Research, 54(2), 139-144.\n\nWebster, C., & James III, B. F. (1994). The role of Hispanic ethnic identification on reference group influence. ACR North American Advances.p.458-463.\n\nWiener, N. (1961). Cybernetics or Control and Communication in the Animal and the Machine (Vol. 25). MIT press.\n\nWitt, R. E., & Bruce, G. D. (1972). Group influence and brand choice congruence. Journal of Marketing Research, 9(4), 440-443.\n\nWoodruff, R. B. (1997). Customer value: the next source for competitive advantage. Journal of the academy of marketing science, 25(2), 139-153.\n\nZeithaml, V. A. (1988). Consumer perceptions of price, quality, and value: a means-end model and synthesis of evidence. The Journal of marketing, 2-22.zh_TW
dc.identifier.doi10.6814/THE.NCCU.COMM.007.2018.F05-
item.openairecristypehttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_46ec-
item.openairetypethesis-
item.grantfulltextnone-
item.cerifentitytypePublications-
item.fulltextNo Fulltext-
Appears in Collections:學位論文
Show simple item record

Google ScholarTM

Check

Altmetric

Altmetric


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.