Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://ah.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/119051
題名: 論數位匯流時代網路影音服務之管制
On the Regulation of Internet Audio and Video Service in the Age of Digital Convergence
作者: 李獻德
LEE, HSIEN-TE
貢獻者: 蕭乃沂
李獻德
LEE, HSIEN-TE
關鍵詞: 數位匯流
管制架構
通知—取下
封網
兒少保護
Digital convergence
Regulatory framework
Notice-take down
Site-blocking
Children and youths protection
日期: 2018
上傳時間: 30-Jul-2018
摘要: 隨著網際網路的興起及蓬勃發展,民眾收看影音內容的態樣從傳統廣播電視轉移到網際網路,電腦、智慧型手機乃至平板電腦等都成為民眾收看影音內容的來源。因此本文以數位匯流時代網路影音服務之管制為內容,以內容分析法及訪談法探討如何在兼顧維護表現自由及保障社會公益之前提下,對於OTT影音服務內容為適當之管制,並訪談包括有線廣播電視系統經營者及OTT業者之員工、政府官員及教授共7人,經由不同之觀點,探討對於OTT業者之具體管制內容。\r\n本文以對於OTT業者管制之法源、OTT業者應負之責任、對於境外OTT業者之管制及兒少保護組成管制架構,研究發現在管制法源上,多數受訪者主張修正現行既有之法律,即現行法對於社會上之違法行為已有規範,自可適用於網路上之違法行為,僅須配合網際網路之特性修正即可。而有關OTT業者應負之責任,多數受訪者主張應區分為對自製之影音負完全責任,對採購之影音適度減輕責任,對網友上傳之影音履行「通知-取下」程序即可免責,此亦符合行為人對其行為負責之原則。對於境外OTT業者,多數受訪者主張可適度封網,但應限於違法次數頻繁且違法情節重大,作成封網決定之過程應合法、嚴謹、公開、透明,並應保障被封網者之救濟權益。對於兒少保護,多數受訪者主張應依其身體、心理、品行、學習、健康及人格發展等不同層面,制定具體明確之法律予以保護。\r\n本文最後針對政府機關、OTT業者及網路使用者分別提出建言,認為政府機關應整理並設計管制措施,落實到相關法令;OTT業者除遵循法令及保護兒少外,並應提供優質影音內容;網路使用者應拒絕收視違法影音內容,包容看待適度封網,並一同監督OTT業者。另外,本文建議後續研究可以擴大訪談對象以瞭解收視者需求,還有落實收視者個人資料保護,提升本國節目質量以培養兒少國家意識,以俾將來政府機關促進OTT產業發展並兼顧公共利益保障之參考。
With the rise and flourish of the Internet, people watch the appearance of audio-visual content from radio and television to the Internet, computers, smart phones and tablet computers have become the source of popular audio-visual content. So this paper takes the regulation of internet audio and video service in the age of digital convergence as content, and discusses how to use the content of analysis method and the interview method to discuss how to regulate the content of the OTT audio and video service under the premise of balancing the freedom of expression and safeguarding the public welfare. A total of 7, including staff, government officials and professors of the CATV broadcast systems operators and OTT, were interviewed, by different perspectives, to discuss the specific regulation of the OTT operators.\r\nThis paper is used for the regulate legal basis of the OTT operators, the responsibility of the OTT operators, the regulate for the overseas OTT operators and the protective structure of children and youths protection to compose the regulatory framework. The study found that in the regulate legal basis, most respondents advocated that the amendment of the existing law, that is,the existing law on the social violations of the norms, be applied to the network of illegal acts, only to be compatible with the internet characteristics. And the responsibility of the OTT operators, the majority of respondents advocated that should be divided into the full responsibility for the audio-visual, the moderate responsibility for the procurement of audio-visual, the user upload the audio-visual performance \"notice-take down\" procedure can be exempted, this also conforms to the perpetrator is responsible to his behavior for the principle. For the overseas OTT operators, the majority of respondents advocated that should be site-blocking, but should be limited to frequent violations of the law and the circumstances of the major, to make the process of making a site-blocking decision should be legal, rigorous, public, transparent, and should be protected by the network of legal remedy rights. For the protection of children and youths, the majority of respondents advocated that in accordance with the body, psychology, conduct, learning, health and personality development and other aspects, of the formulation of specific and clear laws to protect.\r\nAt last, this paper aims at government organs, OTT operators and network users respectively put forward recommendations, the government agencies should tidy up and design regulate measure to implement the relevant laws; OTT operators in addition to complying with the law and protection of children and youths, and should provide high-quality audio-visual content; network users should reject the viewing of illegal audio-visual content, inclusive teat of the site-blocking, and joint supervision OTT operators. In addition, this paper suggests that the follow-up study can enlarge the respondents to understand the needs of the viewers, and implement personal information protection, improve the quality of the Taiwan programs to cultivate national consciousness, so that the future government agencies to promote OTT industry development and take into account the protection of public interests reference.
參考文獻: 壹、中文部分\r\nAndrew L.Shapiro著,劉靜怡譯(2001)。控制權革命:新興科技對我們的最大衝擊。臉譜出版社,頁134-135。\r\n王郁琦(2004)。資訊、電信與法律。元照出版社。\r\n台灣通訊學會(2017)。視訊媒體競爭與相關法規-兼談政府對OTT TV的政策主題座談。2017通訊傳播前瞻與挑戰研討會。\r\n申雅君(2016)。NII執行長吳國維暢談「全球網際網路治理發展」。NCC NEWS,第9卷第10期,第2-5頁。\r\n江亦瑄,何吉森,谷玲玲,林翠絹,徐也翔,許文宜,陳彥龍,劉柏立,劉幼琍,賴祥蔚(2016)。OTT TV的創新服務、經營模式與政策法規。五南出版社。\r\n江雅綺(2016)。封鎖侵權網站?從英國法及歐盟判決論封網定暫時狀態處分之演進。政大智慧財產評論,國立政治大學智慧財產研究所。\r\n江耀國(2008)。通訊傳播匯流與管制落差。NCC2年通訊傳播嘉年華數位匯流論壇座談會。\r\n江耀國、黃銘輝、葉志良、高文崎(2011)。多元網路平台環境下影音內容之管理思維。國家通訊傳播委員會委託研究報告,GRB系統編號 PG10006-0321,2011年12月。取自:http://www.ncc.gov.tw/chinese/files/12022/2716_120222_1.pdf。\r\n何吉森(2010)。出席2009亞洲有線暨衛星廣播電視協會年會暨參訪香港廣播電視監理單位及相關業者報告。國家通訊傳播委員會。\r\n何吉森(2012),2012年國際內容管制圓桌論壇—赴韓國出席國際會議報告。國家通訊傳播委員會。\r\n何佩珊(2017)。台灣4大科技元年,誰將在2017起飛。數位時代,2017年1月24日。取自:https://www.bnext.com.tw/article/42898/taiwan-four-tech-trend-2017。\r\n吳泓怡、高福泉(2008)。中華電信MOD發展關鍵成功因素之研究。2008年ICIM第十九屆國際資訊管理學術研討會,暨南國際大學。\r\n呂理翔(2016)。管制與調控之間—評歐盟對OTT電視的新規範模式,OTT電視(Over-The-Top TV)的發展趨勢。法律規制暨改革方向學術研討會,世新大學法學院。\r\n李唯楨(2013)。網路著作權保護與侵害著作權法院管轄權之研究。高雄第一科技大學科技法律研究所碩士論文,未出版。\r\n李淳、顧振豪(2011)。歐盟通訊匯流管制革新經驗對我國之政策意涵—以歐盟與英國隨選視訊服務(VOD)規範為例。歐洲聯盟經貿政策之新頁。國立臺灣大學出版中心。\r\n李學文(2010)。Apple TV改版後即將消滅傳統電視產業?(上),2010年9月27日。取自:http://www.wahouse.com.tw/viewthread.php?id=5226&sch_st1=218&sch_st2=0&sch_st3=0。\r\n谷玲玲,戴豪君(2014)。美國數位電視與新媒體平台。數位電視與新媒體平台之政策與發展策略,劉幼琍主編。臺北揚智出版社。\r\n林佳瑩(2006)。著作權數位產業市場授權之研究。智慧財產權月刊,第95期,第9-25頁。\r\n邱莉玲(2017)。台娛樂媒體市場展望 5年成長上看900億。工商時報,2017年6月12日。取自:http://www.chinatimes.com/newspapers/20170612000100-260210。\r\n邵瓊慧(2016)。封鎖境外侵權網站之立法與案例發展。月旦法學雜誌,第252期,第187-209頁。\r\n洪爾謙(2014)。著作權法下管制侵權內容之法律研究—以封鎖境外網站為中心。國立清華大學科技法律研究所碩士論文,未出版。\r\n胡儀芳(2015)。2015年日本線上影音市場波濤洶湧 Netflix加入可望提高電視收視比重,2015年4月28日。取自:https://www.digitimes.com.tw/tech/rpt/rpt_show.asp?cnlid=3&v=20150428-164&n=1&cat=DHM。\r\n財團法人台灣經濟研究院(2014)。新興媒體內容治理架構之探討。國家通訊傳播委員會103年委託研究報告。\r\n國家通訊傳播委員會。我國通訊傳播管理法(草案)管制核心原則--中高度匯流環境下管制原則,2007年9月21日。取自:http://www.ncc.gov.tw/chinese/files/07092/566_3336_070921_1.doc。\r\n國家通訊傳播委員會。數位通訊傳播法草案條文_報院版,106年4月18日。取自:http://www.ncc.gov.tw/chinese/news_detail.aspx?site_content_sn=3861&is_history=0&pages=0&sn_f=37260。\r\n郭沐鑫(譯)(2016)。何謂德國電信媒體法中的「妨害人責任」(Störerhaftung)? 資訊工業策進會科技法律研究所,2016年8月24日。取自:https://stli.iii.org.tw/article-detail.aspx?tp=5&i=6&d=7596&no=57。\r\n陳怡靜、林怡君、孫玉達(2007)。數位時代著作權如何有效保護―美國網際網路服務提供者責任立法及著作權法第512條安全港條款的實務運用。智慧財產權月刊,第107期,第30-61頁。\r\n陳荻雅(2012)。YouTube使用者平均每分鐘上傳72小時的影片。數位時代,2012年5月22日。取自:https://www.bnext.com.tw/article/23290/BN-ARTICLE-23290。\r\n彭心儀、鄭嘉逸(2013)。新興媒體傳輸平台之管制概念初探 由OTT TV談起。網路通訊國家型科技計畫簡訊,第53期,第13-15頁,2013年7月。取自:http://www.ncp.org.tw/vanilla/index.php?id=251。\r\n彭正文(2016)。通訊傳播匯流架構與OTT/SMP管理。通訊傳播匯流五法研討會論文集-迎向通訊傳播新紀元。國家通訊傳播委員會,2016年6月18日。取自:http://www.ncc.gov.tw/chinese/files/16072/3758_36002_160726_1.pdf。\r\n彭芸(2015)。「後」電視時代:串流、競合、政策。風雲論壇出版社。\r\n曾俐穎、陳人傑(2015)。眼球經濟新藍海:影音OTT平台產業發展模式之研究。中華傳播學會年會暨第十二屆傳播與媒體生態學術研討會,2015年8月31日。取自:https://www.ttc.org.tw/userfiles/file/20150903/20150903055744_88013.pdf。\r\n黃惠敏(2007)。安全港真的安全嗎?從美國DMCA512條安全港條款看我國網路服務提供者責任限制之設計。萬國法律,第153期,第2-13頁。\r\n黃銘輝(2016)。略論我國對OTT平台影音內容的管制思維—從美國法上對OTT電視規管的困境談起。OTT電視(Over-The-Top TV)的發展趨勢、法律規制暨改革方向學術研討會,世新大學法學院。\r\n經濟部智慧財產局(2013)。新修正著作權法第六章之一「網路服務提供者(ISP)民事免責事由」修正條文之適用對象為何?2013年2月17日。取自:https://www.tipo.gov.tw/ct.asp?xItem=207032&ctNode=7193&mp=1。\r\n葉志良(2015)。OTT各國規管近況與侵權防治議題探討。國際OTT視訊服務產業發展與政策論壇,台灣通訊學會。\r\n葉志良(2015)。我國線上影音內容管制的再塑造:從OTT的發展談起。資訊社會研究,第29期,第49-97頁。\r\n葉志良(2016)。從網際網路規管意涵評釋電子通訊傳播法草案。通訊傳播匯流五法研討會論文集-迎向通訊傳播新紀元。國家通訊傳播委員會,2016年6月18日。取自:http://www.ncc.gov.tw/chinese/files/16072/3758_36002_160726_1.pdf.\r\n趙怡、褚瑞婷(2007)。數位匯流時代的傳播政策。財團法人國家政策研究基金會,2007年5月24日。取自:http://www.npf.org.tw/2/2348。\r\n劉幼琍(2004)。電訊傳播。雙葉書廊。\r\n劉幼琍(2013)。電訊傳播CEO的經營策略。威仕曼文化。\r\n劉柏立(2016)。如何提升我國OTT競爭優勢。台灣OTT業者整合策略可行性研討會。中華傳播管理學會。\r\n蔡欣怡(2010)。從加拿大媒體基金看我國有線廣播電視事業發展基金。公共電視研究發展部岩花館,2010年6月4日。取自:http://web.pts.org.tw/~rnd/p1/2010/06/Canada%20Media%20Fund.pdf。\r\n賴文智、王文君(2012)。從美國SOPA看網路著作權侵害防制立法的困境。智慧財產權,第167期,第6-32頁。\r\n謝進男(2007)。通訊與傳播營運與技術之數位匯流新趨勢。無線電技術季刊。卷期:45:4-46:1=180-181,第35-42頁。\r\n簡旭徵(2012)。傳播內容共同管理機制之探討。廣播與電視,第35期,第1 -26頁。\r\n簡啟煜(2014)。著作權法案例解析,2014年9月3版,元照出版公司。\r\n顏理謙(2017)。OTT大戰第二回合開打,抗盜版、拚獨家成兩大重點。數位時代,2017年1月24日。取自:https://www.bnext.com.tw/article/42892/virtual-reality-will-attract-more-users-in-2017。\r\n顏理謙(2017)。元年過後的OTT產業,決定大家一起組隊打怪了——兩大協會今年將成形。數位時代,2017年5月26日。取自:https://www.bnext.com.tw/article/44663/two-ott-associations-will-appear-this-year。\r\n\r\n貳、英文部分\r\nAudiovisual Media Services Directive (AVMSD).\r\nBEREC(2016).Report on OTT services. Retrieved January, 2016, from http://berec.europa.eu/eng/document_register/subject_matter/berec/download/0/5751-berec-report-on-ott-services_0.pdf.\r\nCampbell, T. (2014). 55% of US broadband households subscribe to OTT service. Retrieved September 26, 2014.\r\nCanadian Radio-television and Telecommunications Commission (2009). Amendments to the Exemption order for new media broadcasting undertakings. Retrieved October 22, 2009, from http://www.crtc.gc.ca/eng/archive/2012/2012-409.htm.\r\nCanadian Radio-television and Telecommunications Commission (2012). Community Content Standards and OTT Providers: Potential Challenges and Approaches. Retrieved March 23, 2012, from http://www.crtc.gc.ca/eng/publications/reports/rp120323.htm.\r\nCommunication of 14 December 1999 from the Commission to the Council, the European Parliament, the Economic and Social Committee and the Committee of the Regions: Principles and Guidelines for the Community’s udiovisual policy in the digital age, COM (1999) 657 final.\r\nCrum, R. (2013). Netflix new subscribers dampen upbeat earnings. Market Watch. RetrievedJuly 22, 2013, from http://www.marketwatch.com/story/netflixs-new-subscribers-dampen-upbeat-earningsnings-2013 -07 -22.\r\nDe Leusse,C.B.(2017).4 critical internet questions the G20 leaders will debate in 2017. Retrieved January 4, 2017, from http://www.internetsociety.org/blog/public-policy/2017/01/4-critical-internet-questions-g20-leaders-will-debate-2017\r\nDigital Single Market, Audiovisual & Media Services.\r\nDziadul,C.(2015).Connected TVs to drive OTT surge. Retrieved May 18, 2015, from http://www.broadbandtvnews.com/2015/05/18/connected-tvs-to-drive-ott-surge/European Commission/Strategy/Digital Single Market/General Principles.\r\nFrieden(2003), Adjusting the Horizontal and Vertical in Telecommunications Regulatory: A Comparison of the Traditional and a New Layered Approach , Federal Communications Law Journal; March 2003.\r\nJapan Internet Advertising Association(2014). ガイドライン.\r\nKorea Communications Standards Commission SafeNet(2014). Rating Standards. Retrieved Augest 25, 2014, from http://www.safenet.ne.kr/rstan.do.\r\nMattie,D.(2016). Best practices for stemming digital piracy. Paper presented at 2016 International Conference: Best Practices for Stemming Digital Piracy.\r\nNetflix(2014). How does Netflix decide the maturity rating on TV shows and movies?\r\nPark,Kyung-Sin(2015). Administrative internet censorship by Korea Communication Standards Commission. Soongsil Law Review,33.\r\nPenning, A. (2017, February 28). Streaming forum keynote: BT brings OTT and broadcast together. Retrieved February 28, 2017, from http://www.streamingmediaglobal.com/Articles/Editorial/Featured-Articles/Streaming-Forum-Keynote-BT-Brings-OTT-and-Broadcast-Together-116642.aspx.\r\nPuppis, M (2010). Media governance: A new concept for the analysis of media policy and regulation. Communication, Culture & Critique, 3 (2).\r\nReport on OTT services(2015),Body of European Regulators for Electronic Communications,BEREC. Retrieved October, 2015.\r\nRepublic of Korea Copyright Act of 1957 (Act No. 432 of January 28, 1957, as amended up to Act No. 9625 of April 22, 2009),from:http://www.wipo.int/wipolex/en/text.jsp?file_id=190144.\r\nResearch and Markets(2016). Global OTT TV and video forecasts. Retrieved October, 2017 from http://www.researchandmarkets.com/reports/3275692/global-ott-tv-and-video-forecasts.\r\nSavio, D.C.(2013), VoD pricing in Latam: A business perspective. Retrieved September, 2013 from http://www.snark.com.ar/wp-content/uploads/2013/09/ITS-2013-VOD-paper-Collico-Savio1.pdf.\r\nShimura, K. (2014). OTT Landscape in Japan. Retrieved March 22, 2014 from https://www.slideshare.net/zutaka/140321-ott-kazushimura.\r\nWebb, M.(2017).Towards equivalent media regulatory frameworks. Paper present at 5th annual meeting of the Broadcasting Regulatory Authorities forum of the organization of Islamic Cooperation. Bandung Indonesia.\r\nZDNet, “Netflix reveals the best and worst Australian ISPs”, Retrieved May 13, 2015, from http://www.zdnet.com/article/netflix-reveals-the-best-and-worst-australian-isps/?tag=nl.e551&s_cid=e551&ttag=e551&ftag=TRE7ed2633.\r\n\r\n叁、日文部分\r\n平林立彥(2011)。Over-The-Top-Video。2011年。取自:http://rp.kddi-research.jp/special/from31to40/no36。\r\n野口悠紀雄,遠藤諭(2008)。ジェネラルパーパス・テクノロジー―日本の停滞を打破する究極手段。
描述: 碩士
國立政治大學
行政管理碩士學程
104921056
資料來源: http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#G0104921056
資料類型: thesis
Appears in Collections:學位論文

Files in This Item:
File SizeFormat
105601.pdf2.07 MBAdobe PDF2View/Open
Show full item record

Google ScholarTM

Check

Altmetric

Altmetric


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.