Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://ah.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/119090
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.advisor張興華zh_TW
dc.contributor.advisorJhang, Sing-Huaen_US
dc.contributor.author林庭旭zh_TW
dc.contributor.authorLin, Ting-Hsuen_US
dc.creator林庭旭zh_TW
dc.creatorLin, Ting-Hsuen_US
dc.date2018en_US
dc.date.accessioned2018-07-31T05:45:31Z-
dc.date.available2018-07-31T05:45:31Z-
dc.date.issued2018-07-31T05:45:31Z-
dc.identifierG0105352019en_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/119090-
dc.description碩士zh_TW
dc.description國立政治大學zh_TW
dc.description金融學系zh_TW
dc.description105352019zh_TW
dc.description.abstract本研究透過三個避險資產(Safe Haven)VIX──美國十年債期貨VIX、日圓期貨VIX、黃金ETF VIX向上或向下穿越自身月均線代表短期走強或走弱來衡量避險資產的狀態,同時藉由風險偏好差異帶來的資產供需改變所造成價格漲跌的概念,來預測股市價格動態,決定在每個時間點是否買進或賣出股市。其底層邏輯為:避險資產VIX向上穿越月均線代表短期走強、避險資產傾向下跌,在風險偏好上升之下,風險資產如股票市場則傾向於上漲。而我們確實證明了以避險資產VIX所產生之買賣訊號具有逆勢的效果,尤其是買進訊號,買進訊號發出前股市顯著下跌,發出後則股市顯著上漲,顯見其優秀的短期擇時能力。而我們將避險資產VIX產生的買賣訊號進行回溯測試,與技術指標交易策略、買進持有策略進行夏普值比較,結果顯示避險資產VIX策略風險溢酬(夏普值)除了美洲地區指數與部分產業外,較買進持有策略顯著改善,但搭配技術指標之混合策略效果並不好,原因是避險資產VIX策略對短線變動敏感,為避開下跌風險已犧牲許多交易機會,策略在市時間比例僅約40%,因此在搭配技術指標後無法改善風險溢酬。zh_TW
dc.description.abstractWe design a proxy to measure safe havens’ short term dynamic process by safe havens’ VIXs (Cboe 10-year U.S. Treasury Note Volatility Index, Cboe FX Yen Volatility Index, Cboe Gold ETF Volatility Index), and design the trading signal by the prices rise over or drop down from the 20-day moving average (MA) prices. The basic logic is that if prices of safe havens’ VIXs rise and cross over 20-day MA, it indicates a decreasing risk preference so safe havens tend to fall and equities tend to rise. Indeed, we have proved that the “contrarian” characteristic exists on the trading signal generated by safe havens’ VIXs, especially buy signals. The results showed that the equities dropped significantly before buy signals coming out, and the signals are followed by significantly equities rising, which indicates a good timing ability in short term. Furthermore, we run the back-test to the trading signals generated by the safe havens’ VIXs to get the Sharpe Ratio and compared them with technical indicators trading strategies and buy holding strategies, and the results showed that the risk premium (Sharpe Ratio) of safe havens’ VIX trading strategy is significantly better than buy-and-hold strategy, excepted for Americas index and some industries. However, the results are bad when combining the trading signal of safe havens’ VIXs and that of technical indices. The reason why this situation occurs is the lack of The proportion of strategy time. Safe havens’ VIX trading strategy is sensitive to short-term changes, so the strategy ignores many of the trading opportunities for avoiding from tremendous losses. Therefore, combining the signals from safe havens’ VIXs and technical indices is not a good idea in this case.en_US
dc.description.tableofcontents第一章 緒論 1\n第一節 研究背景與目的 1\n第二節 研究架構 5\n第二章 資料選用 6\n第三章 避險資產VIX對股市短期擇時能力 8\n第一節 定義待解決問題與避險資產VIX買賣訊號 8\n第二節 擇時能力實證結果 11\n第四章 改善股市交易策略風險控管的方法 15\n第一節 直接運用避險資產VIX做為交易訊號 15\n第二節 將VIX搭配股市技術指標做為交易訊號 20\n第五章 穩健度測試 28\n第一節 避險資產VIX擇時能力穩健度測試 28\n第二節 夏普值差異穩健度測試 31\n第六章 結論 33\n附錄A VIX與MSCI ACWI時間序列分析 34\n附錄B 避險資產發出買賣訊號前後之股市漲跌分析 36\n參考文獻 38zh_TW
dc.format.extent911219 bytes-
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdf-
dc.source.urihttp://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#G0105352019en_US
dc.subject避險資產zh_TW
dc.subject波動率指數zh_TW
dc.subject擇時zh_TW
dc.subject交易策略zh_TW
dc.subjectSafe havenen_US
dc.subjectVIXen_US
dc.subjectTimingen_US
dc.subjectTrading strategyen_US
dc.title避險資產VIX改善股市交易短期擇時能力zh_TW
dc.titleImproving timing ability of trading in stock market by Safe Haven’s VIXen_US
dc.typethesisen_US
dc.relation.referenceA Ang, RJ Hodrick, Y Xing, X Zhang. (2006). The cross‐section of volatility and expected returns. The Journal of Finance, pp. 259-299.\nA Ben-Rephael, S Kandel, A Wohl. (2012). Measuring investor sentiment with mutual fund flows. Journal of Financial Economics, pp. 363-382.\nA Ranaldo, P Söderlind. (2010). Safe Haven Currencies. Review of Finance, pp. 385–407.\nDG Baur, TK McDermott. (2010). Is gold a safe haven? International evidence. Journal of Banking and Finance, pp. 1886-1898.\nM Baker, J Wurgler. (2007). Investor sentiment in the stock market. Journal of economic perspectives, pp. 129-151.\nM Hood, F Malik. (2013). Is gold the best hedge and a safe haven under changing stock market volatility? Review of Financial Economics, pp. 47-52.\nMM Copeland, TE Copeland. (1999). Market timing: Style and size rotation using the VIX. Financial Analysts Journal, pp. 73-81.\nN Antonakakis, I Chatziantoniou, G Filis. (2013). Dynamic Co-movements of Stock Market Returns, Implied Volatility and Policy Uncertainty. Economics Letters.\nP. Hartmann, S. S. (2004). Asset Market Linkages in Crisis Periods. Review of Economics and Statistics, pp. 313-326.\nSharpe, W. F. (1994). The Sharpe Ratio. The Journal of Portfolio Management.\nSzado, C. E. (2009). VIX Futures and Options – A Case Study of Portfolio Diversification During the 2008 Financial Crisis. Providence College.zh_TW
dc.identifier.doi10.6814/THE.NCCU.MB.022.2018.F06-
item.openairecristypehttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_46ec-
item.fulltextWith Fulltext-
item.openairetypethesis-
item.grantfulltextopen-
item.cerifentitytypePublications-
Appears in Collections:學位論文
Files in This Item:
File SizeFormat
201901.pdf889.86 kBAdobe PDF2View/Open
Show simple item record

Google ScholarTM

Check

Altmetric

Altmetric


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.