Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://ah.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/119770
題名: 我國公共訓練機構自辦及委辦職前訓練之成效比較
A Comparative Study on the Performance of Self-administered and Out-sourced Pre-employment Training by Public Vocation Training Institute in Taiwan
作者: 湯弘達
貢獻者: 成之約
Cheng,Chih-Yu
湯弘達
關鍵詞: 職業訓練
公共(職業)訓練機構
委辦職前訓練
日期: 2018
上傳時間: 29-八月-2018
摘要: 由於就業安全的議題日益被重視,世界各國莫不積極以職業訓練等方式作為提升勞動力素質重要的途徑。然以我國以言,公立職業訓練機構本身所提供的職類與訓練容量已不能滿足產業多元化的需求,在政策上為了擴大職業訓練的種類與能量,委託民間機構辦理職業訓練就成為一個不可缺少的制度。\r\n世界各國的職業訓練體系各有不同,卻面臨共同的挑戰:必須以更符合成本效益的方式訓練更多的勞工,以因應複雜的生產體系和技術,以及協助勞工適應快速變遷的市場。以招收失/待業者為訓練對象的職前訓練,係透過訓練過程及輔導措施協助參訓者在結訓後儘快投入就業市場,正是解決失業問題的有效方式之一,因此每當失業問題被提起時,職前訓練的訓後就業率總是特別受到關注,本研究在產出成效的比較上也是以訓後就業率為主軸。\r\n本研究採用文獻分析法、比較研究法與深度訪談法,探討自辦與委辦職前訓練在投入人力、過程差異、學員訓後就業等成效的比較,先藉由蒐集到的資料比較出兩者過去執行成效的差異,再透過深度訪談了解差異的原因及發掘問題之所在,最後做成結論與建議,以提供訓練制度修正及訓練機構辦理職前訓練提升成效作法之參考。\r\n經由本研究之文獻探討與訪談發現分析,歸納建議摘要如下:\r\n一、自辦與委辦職前訓練應在價值、職類與對象作適當區隔。\r\n二、委辦職前訓練費用的部分規定有不合理現象待修正。\r\n三、適當的KPI可引導訓練計畫正向發展。\r\n四、可研訂對優良訓練單位的獎勵措施。\r\n五、建議訓練單位掌握內部作業、就業市場環境及參訓學員等因素,以提升成效。
As the issue of employment security is increasingly concerned, countries around the world are taking vocational training as an important measure to improve the quality of the workforce. However, in Taiwan, the job category and training capacity provided by the public vocational training institutions can no longer handle the industrial diversification. In order to expand the variety and capacity of the vocational training, it is essential to outsource the vocational training to the private organizations.\r\n\r\nThe vocational training systems vary from country to country, but the common challenges are: how to conduct more cost-effective training to more workers, how to help workers to overcome complex production systems and technologies, and how to assist workers in adapting the rapidly changing markets etc.\r\n\r\nThe target of the Pre-employment training for the unemployed people is conducting the training and counseling measures to help participants to return to the job market as soon as possible after training. This is one of the most effective ways to resolve the unemployment problem, so when the question about unemployed was raised, the after training employment rate was always the center of the attention. This is why this research is based on the effectiveness comparison of the after training employment rate.\r\n\r\nThis research adopted the approach of the Literature analysis, Comparative research and In-depth interviews to compare the manpower input, training process and after training employment rate etc. between insourcing and outsourcing pre-employment training.\r\n\r\nBy comparing the collected data to identify the differences of effectiveness, then following in-depth interviews to discover the problems.\r\n\r\nFinally make conclusions and recommendations for the future training system modification and to provide the solution to the training institutions to improve pre-employment training effectiveness.\r\nBased on the literature analysis and interview analysis of this study, the suggestions are summarized as follows:\r\n1.Insourcing and Outsourcing pre-employment training should be appropriately defined in terms of value, category and object.\r\n2.Some regulations of the pre-employment training expenses are unreasonable and need to be adjusted.\r\n3.The accurate KPI can lead to positive development of the training program.\r\n4.The incentive program should be designed to reward the out-performed training units.\r\n5.To enhance the training effectiveness, it is recommended that the training unit to master the internal operations, to observe the employment market and the training participants etc.
參考文獻: 李允傑、張其恆、王方、郭振昌、吳俊明(2005),職業訓練與就業安全,新北市;空大。\r\n李庚霈(2004),就業安全理論與實務(初版),臺北市:揚智文化。\r\n李庚霈(2015),就業安全理論與實務(二版),新北市:揚智文化。\r\n陳聰勝等(1997),各國職業訓練制度,臺北市:五南圖書出版公司。\r\n陳聰勝(2002),人力資源開發運用的理念與實施-提升國家競爭力的策略,臺北市;五南圖書出版公司。\r\n黃越欽(2006),勞動法新論(修訂三版),臺北市:翰蘆圖書出版有限公司。\r\n黃越欽著、王惠玲監修、黃鼎佑增修(2012),勞動法新論(修訂四版),臺北市:翰蘆圖書出版有限公司。\r\n詹火生、彭台臨、陳聰憲、郭振昌(1998),職業訓練與就業服務,新北市:空大。\r\n齊若蘭譯(2003),Jim Collins原著,從A到A+,臺北市;遠流出版社。\r\n吳麗珠(2015)政府辦理委外職業訓練推動產訓合作之研究,國立臺北科技大學技術與職業教育研究所碩士論文。\r\n邱欣怡(2001),我國職業訓練制度之研究-公共職訓委託民間辦理,國立政治大學勞工研究所碩士論文。\r\n許焜仁(2009),職訓局所屬職業訓練師制度變革影響之研究,國立臺北科技大學技術與職業教育研究所碩士論文。\r\n陳麗卿(2014)我國委外職業訓練制度之研究。國立中正大學勞工關係研究所碩士論文。\r\n曹慧貞(2006)知識經濟對職業訓練制度之挑戰及其因應,政大勞工研究所碩士論文。\r\n潘盈竹(2008),職業訓練委外政策之評估-以泰山職訓中心的訓練需求為例。銘傳大學公共事務學系碩士論文。\r\n成之約(2006),公立職業訓練中心轉型的省思與展望,就業安全半年刊,95年第1期。\r\n孫仲山(2009),中長期失業者職業訓練成效之影響因素與評估研究,行政院勞工委員會職業訓練局泰山職業訓練中心委託國立高雄師範大學研究案。\r\n孫仲山、李純德(2007),職業訓練學員學習成效的影響因素-學員屬性的周密化分析高雄師大學報。\r\n陳貞夙/吳亭芳(2017),身心障礙者參與融合式職業訓練後肢就業情況探討,就業安全半年刊,第16卷。\r\n簡錫鍇(2008),公共職業訓練委外效益評估之探討,人事月刊第46卷第2期。\r\n行政院主計總處網頁,最後瀏覽日:2018年4月12日。網址:\r\nhttps://www.dgbas.gov.tw/ct.asp?xItem=42601&ctNode=5624&mp=1。\r\n勞動部網站,最後瀏覽日:2018年5月18日。網址:https://www.mol.gov.tw/。\r\n勞動部勞動力發展署(2014)影響失業者職業訓練訓後就業成效因素研析,勞動部勞動力發展署委託全國意向顧問股份有限公司辦理。\r\n勞動部勞動力發展署(2015) ,iCAP職能發展應用平台說明手冊。\r\n勞動部勞動力發展署(2017)產業與訓練之鏈結-職訓措施成效分析暨規劃建議第三季分析報告,勞動部勞動力發展署委託財團法人中華經濟研究院研究案。\r\n勞動部勞動力發展署(2018)勞動部勞動力發展署106年業務報告,勞動部勞動力發展署編印。\r\nBaldwin,T.T.&Ford,K.J(1998).Transfer of Training:A Review and Directions for Furture Research. Personnel Psychology,41(1).\r\nGary Dessler (2000),Human Resoure Management.\r\nILO,1991, General Surveys: Human Resources Development: Introduction, part II, pharagraph7、8.\r\nILO,C142 Human Resources Development Convention, 1975.\r\nILO,R150 Human Resources Development Recommendation, 1975.\r\nILO,R195 Human Resources Development Recommendation, 2004.\r\nRaymond A. NOE(2017),Employee Training and Development(Seventh Edition ).
描述: 碩士
國立政治大學
勞工研究所
101262024
資料來源: http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#G0101262024
資料類型: thesis
Appears in Collections:學位論文

Files in This Item:
File SizeFormat
202401.pdf10.9 MBAdobe PDF2View/Open
Show full item record

Google ScholarTM

Check

Altmetric

Altmetric


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.