Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:

Title: Number of Meanings and Number of Senses: An ERP Study of Sublexical Ambiguities in Reading Chinese Disyllabic Compounds
Authors: Huang, Hsu-Wen
Lee, Chia-Ying
Contributors: 心腦中心
Keywords: Chinese compounds;ERPs;N400;homonymy;polysemy;sublexical semantic ambiguity
Date: 2018-03
Issue Date: 2018-09-14 16:06:17 (UTC+8)
Abstract: In English, an extensive body of work in both behavioral and neuropsychological domains has produced strong evidence that homonymy (words with many distinct meanings) and polysemy (many related senses) are represented, retrieved, and processed differently in the human brain. In Chinese, most words are compounds, and the constituent characters within a compound word can have different meanings and/or related senses on their own. Thus, in order to resolve lexical ambiguity in Chinese, one has to consider the composition of constituent characters, as well as how they contribute to whole word reading, known as "sublexical ambiguity." This study investigates how two types of sublexical ambiguity affect Chinese word processing. The number of meanings (NOM) and the number of senses (NOS) corresponding to the first character of Chinese compounds were manipulated in a lexical decision task. The interactions between NOM and NOS were observed in both behavioral results and N400s, in which NOM disadvantage effect was found for words with few-senses only. On the other hand, the NOS facilitation effect was significant for words with multiple-meanings (NOM > 1) only. The sublexical ambiguity disadvantage suggested that semantically unrelated morphemes are represented as separate entries. For characters with multiple meanings, one orthographic form is associated with more than one morphemic representation. In contrast, the sublexical sense advantage supported the idea that semantically related senses that shared a morphological root are represented within a single entry. The more senses listed in a morphological root, the stronger representation will be formed. These results suggest that two types of sublexical ambiguities are represented and processed differently in Chinese word recognition models and also demonstrate that how they interact with each other in the mental lexicon.
Relation: Frontiers in Psychology, 9, Article 324
PMID: 29651260
Data Type: article
DOI 連結:
Appears in Collections:[心智‧大腦與學習研究中心 ] 期刊論文

Files in This Item:

File Description SizeFormat
fpsyg-09-00324.pdf1464KbAdobe PDF225View/Open

All items in 學術集成 are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved.

社群 sharing