政大學術集成


Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://ah.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/120312


Title: 重新審視印尼與台灣的合作:一個歷史制度的視角
Indonesia-Taiwan Cooperation Revisited: A Perspective of Historical Institutions
Authors: 周榮佳
Aditya, Rangga
Contributors: 劉復國
Liu, Fu-Kuo
周榮佳
Rangga Aditya
Keywords: 印尼與台灣的關係
機構渠道
TETO-IETO
合作
路徑依賴
Indonesia-Taiwan relation
Institutional channel
TETO-IETO
Cooperation
Path dependence
Date: 2018
Issue Date: 2018-10-01 12:19:38 (UTC+8)
Abstract: 印尼與台灣之間缺乏外交承認並不妨礙兩個實體在各個領域的合作。台北經濟貿易辦事處(TETO)和印度尼西亞經濟貿易辦事處(IETO)等機構渠道的存在使印尼和台灣能夠保持互動。實際上,機構渠道起著舉足輕重的作用,但目前缺乏關注這一機構渠道的研究。過去的研究強調國內情況,國家利益或國際社會的變化,但從未在評估印尼與台灣關係時討論制度問題。

本研究試圖從制度角度分析印尼與台灣的關係,尋求機構渠道的建立,加強合作的作用以及對印尼和台灣合作的影響。為了找到答案,本研究將採用歷史制度主義理論,其中以關鍵時刻和路徑依賴為主要變量。

本研究使用IETO和TETO的案例研究作為方法。通過定量和定性方法收集數據。定量地,將利用官方文本的內容分析和收集現有的二級數據來收集所有相關數據。通過深入訪談和政策分析收集定量數據,以獲得印尼與台灣關係決策者,官員和專家的主要數據。

本研究認為,印度 - 台灣的製度性渠道是通過過去發生的一系列事件建立起來的,這些事件迄今為止產生了路徑依賴。路徑依賴允許機構渠道創造互利合作而不損害彼此的利益。此外,機構渠道使印度尼西亞和台灣能夠根據機構渠道本身質量的提高獲得更多合作。
The absence of diplomatic recognition between Indonesia and Taiwan does not hinder both entities to secure cooperation in various fields. The existence of the institutional channel, namely Taipei Economic and Trade Office (TETO) and Indonesia Economic and Trade Office (IETO), makes it possible for Indonesia and Taiwan to maintain interaction. Indeed, the institutional channel plays a pivotal role but there is a lack of research focusing on this institutional channel at this time. Past researches emphasized on either the domestic situation, national interests, or changing of international community, but never discussed the institutional matters in assessing Indonesia and Taiwan relation.

This research attempts to analyze Indonesia-Taiwan relation from institutional perspective by seeking clarification on the establishment of the institutional channel, its role to increase the cooperation as well as its impact to Indonesia and Taiwan’s cooperation. In order to find the answers, this research will employ historical institutionalism theory, which consists of critical juncture and path dependence as the main variables.

This research is using a case study of IETO and TETO as the methodology. Data is collected through quantitative and qualitative methods. Quantitatively, a content analysis of official texts and collecting existing secondary data will be utilized to collect all relevant data. The quantitative data is gathered through in-depth interview and policy analysis in order to obtain primary data from the policy makers, officials, and experts of Indonesia-Taiwan relation.

This research argues that Indonesia-Taiwan institutional channel was established through a series of event occurred in the past which created path dependence among them up to now. The path dependence allows the institutional channel to create mutually beneficial cooperation without harming each other’s interests. Additionally, the institutional channel enables Indonesia and Taiwan to secure more cooperation in line with the increasing quality of the institutional channel itself.
Reference: Aditya, Rangga. “The (In)visibility of Taiwan-Indonesia Relations: Indonesian Students on the Sideline.” Conference Proceeding, The 12th European Association of Taiwan Studies Annual Conference, (Poland: Krakow, 2015).
Albert, Mathias. et al. “Introduction: differentiation theory and international relations.” in Bringing Sociology to International Relations: World Politics as Differentiation Theory, edsited by Mathias Alberts. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2013.
Andrew Hsia, interview by author, 9 September 2014.
Beech, Hannah. “U.S. Stood By as Indonesia Killed Half-Million People, Paper Shows.” New York Times, 18 October 2017.
BKPM. “Perkembangan Realisasi Investasi PMA Berdasarkan Laporan Kegiatan Penanaman Modal (LKPM) Menurut Negara Triwulan 3 2013.” accessed on October 3, 2014. http://www7.bkpm.go.id/contents/p16/statistics/ 17#.VDE8ivmSxqU.
---------. “Perkembangan Realisasi Investasi PMA Berdasarkan Laporan Kegiatan Penanaman Modal (LKPM) Menurut Negara Triwulan 3 2013.” accessed on October 3, 2014. http://www7.bkpm.go.id/contents/p16/statistics/ 17#.VDE8ivmSxqU.
Capoccia, Giovanni. “Critical Juncture and Institutional Change.” in Advances in Comparative Historical Analysis in the Social Sciences, edited by J. Mahoney and K. Thelen. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Center for Political Studies (P2P) LIPI. “Feasibility Study of Economic Cooperation Arrangement Between Indonesia-Taiwan.” A Policy Paper, (Jakarta: 2012).
Chen, Xiangming. “Taiwan Investments in China and Southeast Asia: Go West, but Also Go South.” Asian Survey, Vol. 35, No.5, (May 1996).
Collier, David and Ruth Berins Collier. Shaping the Political Arena: Critical Junctures, the Labor Movement and Regime Dynamics in Latin America. New Jersey: Princeton University Press, 1991.
David, Paul. “Path Dependence, Its Critics, and the Quest for ‘Historical Economics.” in Evolution and Path Dependence in Economic Ideas: Past and Present, edited by P. Garrouste and S. Ioannides. UK: Elgar, 2000.
Dougherty, James E. and Robert L. Pfaltzgraff, Jr. Contending Theories of International Relations: A Comprehensive Survey 4th Edition. New York: Addison Wesley Longman, Inc., 1997.
Drezner, Daniel W. ed. Locating the Proper Authorities the Interaction of Domestic and International Institutions. University of Michigan Press, 2003.
Faustina, Anselma. “The High Number of Indonesian Missing Workers in Taiwan: Policy Incompatibility between Taipei and Jakarta.” Master Thesis, Taipei: National Chengchi University, 2015.
“Foreign Policy Guidelines.” accessed on September 29, 2014. http://www.mofa.gov.tw/en/cp.aspx?n=B7411BDCD003C9EC.
Grieco, Joseph M. “Anarchy and the Limits of Cooperation: A Realist Critique of the Newest Liberal Institusionalism.” International Organization 42 (3). Cambridge, MA, The MIT Press, 1988.
Haas, Ernst B. Beyond the Nation-state: Functionalism and International Organization. Stanford University Press, Jan 1, 1964.
Hall, Peter A. and Rosemary C. R. Taylor. “Political Science and the Three New Institutionalism.” Political Studies, Vol. 44 (5), (1996).
Hauswedell, Peter Christian. “Sukarno: Radical or Conservative? Indonesian Politics 1964-5.” Indonesia, No. 15 (Apr., 1973).
Hsieh, Sung-Ching. “Case Studies on Taiwan Cooperative Agribusiness-scale Production and Marketing of Asparagus and Mushrooms in Indonesia.” Indonesia Report, International Cooperation and Development Fund (2003).
IETO Taipei official, interview by author, 24 September 2014.
Indonesia Law No. 1 Year 1987.
Indonesia Ministry of Foreign Affairs’ Officer, interview by author, April 23, 2016.
Indonesia Presidential Decree No. 43 Year 1973.
Indonesia Presidential Decree No. 48 Year 1994.
Indorf, Hans H. Impediments to Regionalism in Southeast Asia: Bilateral Constraints Among ASEAN Member States. Institute of Southeast Asian Studies, 1984.
International Cooperation and Development Fund. “ICDF Annual Report 2014.” ICDF, Taipei (2014).
“Ini Perbandingan Gaji PRT Indonesia di 3 Negara.” accessed on January 5, 2015. https://www.liputan6.com/bisnis/read/2936807/ini-perbandingan-gaji-prt-indonesia-di-3-negara.
Irawan, Andi. “The Political Economy of Indonesia and Cross-Straits Relations.” in Ensuring Interests: Dynamics of China-Taiwan Relations and Southeast Asia, edited by Ho Khai Leong and HouKok Chung. Malaysia: Institute of China studies, 2006.
Jensen, Carsten S. Neo-functionalism In European Union Politics. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2003.
Jie, Chen. Foreign Policy of the New Taiwan: Pragmatic Diplomacy in Southeast Asia. Northampton, M.A.: Edward Elgar Publishing, Inc., 2002
Kabinawa, Luh Nyoman Ratih Wagiswari. “Economic and Socio-Cultural Relations between Indonesia and Taiwan: An Indonesian Perspective, 1990-2012.” Master Thesis, National Sun Yat-sen University, Taiwan, 2013.
Katznelson, Ira. “Periodization and Preferences: Reflections on Purposive Action.” in Comparative Historical Analysis in the Social Science, edited by James Mahoney and Deitrich Rueschemeyer. New York: Cambridge Press, 2003.
Keohane, Robert O. After Hegemony: Cooperation and Discord in the World Political Economy. New Jersey: Princeton University Press, 1984.
------------------------. Lisa L. Martin. “The Promise of Institutionalist Theory.” International Security, Vol. 20, No. 1. (Summer, 1995.
“Kerja di Taiwan Dapat Gaji Berapa?.” accessed on December 3, 2014. https://finance.detik.com/berita-ekonomi-bisnis/d-3992995/mau-tahu-kerja-di-taiwan-dapat-gaji-berapa-cek-di-sini.
Klintworth, Gary. New Taiwan, New China: Taiwan’s Changing Role in the Asia-Pacific Region. New York: St. Martin’s Press, 1995.
Ku, Samuel C.Y. “Indonesia’s Relations with China and Taiwan: From Politics to Economics.” Asian Perspective, Vol. 26, No.4, (2002).
----------------------. “Southeast Asia and Cross-strait Relations: The Policy of Separation of Politics and Economics.” Journal of Contemporary China, Vol.7, No.19, (1998).
----------------------. “Taiwan’s Diplomatic Maneuvers in the Asia-Pacific: A Perspective of Complex Interdependence.” Issues & Studies, Vol. 34, No. 6, (June 1998).
----------------------. “The Political Economy of Taiwan’s Relations with Southeast Asia: The Southward Policy.” Contemporary Southeast Asia, Vol. 7, No.3, (December 1995).
----------------------. Taiwan’s Southward Policy and Its Changing Relations with Southeast Asia 1990-1997. Singapore: East Asian Institute, National University of Singapore, 2005.
Larus, Elizabeth Freund. “Taiwan’s Quest for International Recognition.” Issues & Studies, Vol 42, No. 2, (June 2006).
Lee, Kuo-hsiung. “The Republic of China and Southeast Asia: More Than Economy.” in Foreign Policy of the Republic of China on Taiwan: An Unorthodox Approach, edited by Yu San Wang (New York: Praeger, 1990).
Leifer, Michael. “Taiwan and South-East Asia: The Limits to Pragmatic Diplomacy.” The China Quarterly, Vol.165, (March 2001).
Leong, Ho Khai. “New Directions in Taiwan-Southeast Asia Relations: Economics, Politics and Security.” Pacific Focus, Vol. X, No. 1, (Spring 1995).
Lin, Chun Hung. “Critical Assessment of Taiwan’s Trade and Investment Relationship with ASEAN Countries in the Past, Present and Future.” Miskolc Journal of International Law, Vol. 7, No.1, (2010).
LIPI. Mencermati kembali enam dekade politik luar negeri Indonesia. Pusat Penelitian Politik, 2007.
Mahoney, James and Dietrich Rueschemeyer. ed. Comparative Historical Analysis in the Social Science. New York: Cambridge Press, 2003.
Memorandum of Understanding between The Government of the Republic of Indonesia and the Government of the People’s Republic of China on the Resumption of Diplomatic Relations, 8 August 1990.
Minister of Trade Decree No. 1030.1/M-DAG/KEP/8/2009.
MOL. “Workforce Development Agency.” accessed on October 3, 2014. http://statdb.mol.gov.tw/html/mon/c12030.pdf.
Nasution, Anwar. Macroeconomic Policies in Indonesia: Indonesia economy since the Asian financial crisis of 1997. Routledge, 2014.
Niou. Emerson M. S. and Peter C. Ordeshook, “Realism versus Neoliberalism: A Formulation.” American Journal of Political Science, Vol. 35, No. 2, May, 1991. Dallas: Midwest Political Science Association, 1991.
Pegg, Scott. “De Facto States in the International System.” Working Paper No. 21, Institute of International Relations, The University of British Columbia, (February 1998).
“Penandatanganan MoU on Morotai Development Project.” accessed on September 19, 2014. http://www2.kdei-taipei.org/index.php/ berita/item/290-penandatanganan-mou-on-morotai-development-project/.
Percival, Bronson. The Dragon Looks South; China and Southeast Asia in the New Century. London: Praeger Security International, 2007.
“Pertemuan Kedua Steering Committee pada Morotai Development Project antara Indonesia dan Taiwan.” accessed on September 19, 2014. http://www2.kdei-taipei.org/index.php/berita/item/312-pertemuan-kedua-steering-committee-pada-morotai-development-project-antara-indonesia-dan-taiwan.
Peters, B. Guy. Institutional Theory in Political Science: The New Institutionalism, Bloomsbury Publishing. USA: 2011.
Powell, Walter W. and Paul J. DiMaggio. eds. The New Institutionalism in Organizational Analysis. University of Chicago Press, Oct 25, 1991.
Putnam, Robert D. “Diplomacy and Domestic Politics: The Logic of Two-Level Games.” International Organization, Vol. 42, No. 3. (Summer, 1988).
Samsudin. Mengapa G30S/PKI gagal?: suatu analisis. Yayasan Obor Indonesia, 2004.
Schimmelfenning, Frank and Daniel C. Thomas. “Normative Institutionalism and EU Foreign Policy in Comparative Policies.” Making EU Foreign Policy, 2011.
“Sejarah Singkat.” accessed on September 30, 2014. http://www2.kdei-taipei.org/index.php/2014-08-11-03-58-09/sejarah-singkat.
Shepsle, Kenneth. “Institutional Equilibrium and Equilibrium Institutions.” in Political Science: The Science of Politics, edited by Herbert F. Weisberg. Washington D.C.: American Political Science Association and Agathon Press, 1981.
Suryadinata, Leo. ed. Political Thinking of the Indonesian Chinese, 1900-1995: A Sourcebook. Institute of Southeast Asian Studies, NUS Press, 1997.
“Taipei Economic and Trade Office in Surabaya opened December 21.” accessed on March 19, 2016. https://www.mofa.gov.tw/en/News_Content.aspx?n=1EADDCFD4C6 EC567&s=EEEB5D3E13C0D8D5.
“Taiwan Bakal Buka Kantor Perwakilan di Surabaya.” accessed on February 2, 2016. http://www.beritasatu.com/dunia/172304-taiwan-bakal-buka-kantor-perwakilan-di-surabaya.html.
“The Taipei Economic and Trade Office (TETO) Jakarta, Indonesia.” accessed on September 30, 2014. http://www.roc-taiwan.org/id/ ct.asp?xItem=468203&CtNode=4821&mp=292&xp1=.
Wu, Linjun. “Taiwan and ASEAN Economic Community: A Context for Economic Statecraft in an Asian Regional Free Trade Area.” Issues & Studies, 44, no. 4 (December 2008).
Description: 博士
國立政治大學
亞太研究英語博士學位學程(IDAS)
100265510
Source URI: http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#G0100265510
Data Type: thesis
Appears in Collections:[International Doctoral /Master’s Program in Asia Pacific Studies ] 學位論文

Files in This Item:

File SizeFormat
551001.pdf1796KbAdobe PDF0View/Open


All items in 學術集成 are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved.


社群 sharing