Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
https://ah.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/120338| 題名: | 結構式筆記分享對於英語閱讀理解成效及閱讀焦慮感之影響研究 The Effects of Sharing Note on English Reading Comprehension and Reading Anxiety |
作者: | 簡璐嘉 Chien, Lu-Chia |
貢獻者: | 陳志銘 Chen, Chih-Ming 簡璐嘉 Chien, Lu-Chia |
關鍵詞: | SOAR 結構化筆記 筆記分享 認知風格 SOAR method Note sharing Cognitive styles |
日期: | 2018 | 上傳時間: | 1-Oct-2018 | 摘要: | 本研究針對八年級三十九位學生，採用Kiewra (2005) 提出的SOAR結構化筆記，探討結構化筆記分享對於英語閱讀理解及英語閱讀焦慮感的影響。實驗組共十七位學生，待閱讀英語文章後，開始製作筆記，並於閱讀他人筆記後，進行自我筆記的修改。控制組共二十二位學生，待閱讀英語文章後，進行筆記製作而無分享及觀看他人筆記行為。實驗結果:\r\n1. 結構化筆記分享能提升英語閱讀理解力。\r\n2. 結構化筆記分享能提升場獨立的學習者的英語閱讀理解力。\r\n3. 結構化筆記分享能提升低先備知識學習者的英語閱讀理解力。\r\n4. 結構化筆記分享能降低場獨立的學習者的英語閱讀焦慮感。\r\n基於上述研究結果，本研究亦針對英語教學者提出相關建議與後續研究的方向。 This study investigated the effects of sharing SOAR method study note, which were proposed by kiewra (2005), on English reading comprehension and English reading anxiety for EFL Grade 8 students. Thirty-nine students participated in SOAR method note making after reading English material online. They were separated into a control group (N=22), which were not allowed to share or read their peers’ note after making their note, and an experimental group (N=17), which were permitted to read their peers’ note and revise their own note after the note-making activity. The results indicate that students in the experimental group who shared the note outperformed those in the control group who did not share their note. Also, students with field-independent cognitive style or with low prior knowledge who shared the note with their peers made more progress than those with field-independent cognitive style or with low prior knowledge who did not share the note with their peers. In addition, students with field-independent cognitive style who shared the note with their peers had lower anxiety than those with field-independent cognitive style who did not share any notes. Limitations and instructional suggestions were also discussed in the final conclusion. |
參考文獻: | Abraham, R. (1985). Field independence-dependence and the teaching of grammar. TESOL Quarterly, 20, 689-702.\r\nAckerman, R. & Goldsmith, M. (2011). Metacognitive regulation of text learning: on screen versus on paper. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Applied, 17, 18-32.\r\nAnderson, L.W., and D. Krathwohl (Eds.) (2001). A Taxonomy for Learning, Teaching and Assessing: a Revision of Bloom`s Taxonomy of Educational Objectives. Longman, New York.\r\nAsterhan, C. S., & Bouton, E. (2017). Teenage peer-to-peer knowledge sharing through social network sites in secondary schools. Computers & Education, 10, 16-34.\r\nAusburn, L. J., & Ausburn, F. B. (1978). Cognitive styles: Some information and implications for instructional design. Educational Communication and Technology, 26, 337-354.\r\nBaker, W. (2004). Learning strategies in reading and writing: EAP contexts. RELC Journal, 35(3), 299-328.\r\nBatista, G. (2005). Teaching units to lower language anxiety for 8th and 9th grade ESL students in Puerto Rico. Unpublished master thesis, University of Puerto Rico Mayaguez Campus.\r\nBauer, A., & Koedinger, K. (2006). Pasting and encoding: Note-taking in online course. In Proceedings of Advanced Learning Technologies, 2006. Sixth International Conference on (pp. 789-793)\r\nBrown, H. D. (2000). Principles of language learning and teaching (4th ed.). Addison Wesley Longman, Inc.\r\nBruning, R., Schraw, G. J., Norby, M., & Ronning, R. R. (2004). Cognitive psychology and instruction (4th ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.\r\nCarell, Patricia L., Pharis, B. G., & Liberto, J. C. (1989). Metacognitive straegy training for ESL reading. TESOL Quarterly, 23 (4), 647-678.\r\nChen, Y. C. (2017). A Study on the Effects of Collaborative Reading Annotation System with SOAR Note Function on Reading Comprehension Performance. E-learning Master Program of Library and Information Studies, National Chengchi University, Taipei.\r\nChen, Y. F. (2013).The Effects Different Collaborative Learning Modes on Primary School’ Reading Performance. E-learning Master Program of Library and Information Studies, National Chengchi University, Taipei.\r\nChen, Y. T. (2011). A Study on Developing Knowledge Extraction Mechanisms from Cooperative Reading Annotation. Graduate Institute of Library, Information and Archival Studies. National Chengchi University, Taipei.\r\nDavis, J. K. (1991). Education implications of field-dependenceindependence. In Wapner, S. & Demick, J. Field dependenceindependence:Cognitive style across the life span (pp. 149-175). Hillsdale, NJ, US : Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.\r\nDevine, J. (1988). A case study of two models of reading and reading performance. In Carrell et al. (Eds.), Interactive approaches to second language reading (pp. 127–139). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.\r\nDi Vesta, F. J., & Gray, G. S. (1972). Listening and Note taking. Journal of Educational Psychology, 63 (1), 8-14.\r\nDunkel, P. (1988). The content of L1 and L2 students’ lecture notes and its relation to test performance. TESOL Quarterly, 22, 259-281.\r\nEden, S., & Eshet-Alkalai, Y. (2013). The effect of format on performance: editing text in print versus digital formats. British Journal of Educational Technology, 44(5), 846–856.\r\nEshet-Alkalai, Y., & Geri, N. (2007). Does the medium affect the message? The influence of text representation format on critical thinking. Human Systems Management, 26, 269–279.\r\nFatemi, A. H., Vahedi, V. S., & Seyyedrezaie, Z. S. (2014). The effects of top-down/bottom-up processing and field-dependent/field-independent cognitive style on Iranian EFL learners’ reading comprehension. Theory and Practice in Language Studies, 4 (4), 686-693\r\nFaust, J. L., & Paulson, D. R. (1998). Active learning in the college classroom. Excellence in College Teaching, 9 (2), 3-24.\r\nGoodman, K. S. (1970). Behind the eyes: what happens in reading. In K. S. Goodman & O. S. Niles (Eds.), Reading: Process and Program. Urbana, IL.:National Council of Teachers of English.\r\nGrabe, W. (1991). Current developments in second language reading research. TESOL Quarterly, 25 (3), 375-406\r\nHorwitz, E. K., Horwitz, M., & Cope, J. A. (1986). Foreign language classroom anxiety. Modern Language Journal, 70, 125-132.\r\nHuang, H. (2001). Chinese university foreign language students’ anxiety about reading in English. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Washington, Washington State.\r\nJackson, S. E., Chuang, C. H., Harden, E. E., Jiang, Y., & Joseph, J. M. (2006). Toward developing human resource management systems for knowledge-intensive teamwork. In J. M. Joseph (Ed.), Research in personnel and human resources management, Vol. 25. (pp. 27-70). Amsterdam: JAI.\r\nJairam, D., & Kiewra, K. A. (2010). Helping students soar to success on computers: An investigation of the SOAR study method for computer-based learning. Journal of Educational Psychology, 102 (3), 601-614.\r\nJairam, D., & Kiewra, K. A. (2010). Helping students soar to success on computers: An investigation of the SOAR study method for computer-based learning. Journal of Educational Psychology, 102 (3), 601-614.\r\nJairim, D., & Kiewra, K. A. (2009). An investigation of the SOAR study method. Journal of Advanced Academics, 20 (4), 602-609.\r\nJohn, N. A. (2012). Sharing and Web 2.0: The emergence of a keyword. New Media & Society, 15, 167-182.\r\nJunco, R. (2012). Too much face and not enough books: The relationship between multiple indices of Facebook use and academic performance. Computers in Human Behavior, 28 (1), 187-198.\r\nKagan, J. (1966). Reflection-impulsivity: The generality and dynamics of conceptual tempo. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 71, 17-24.\r\nKam, M., Wang, J., Iles, A., Tse, E., Chiu, J., Glaser, D., Tarshish, O. & Canny, J. (2005). Livenotes: A system for cooperative and augmented note taking in lectures. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI conference on Human factors in computing systems, Portland, Oregon, USA. ACM.\r\nKatayama, A. D. & Crooks, S. M. (2003). Online notes: Differential effects of studying complete or partial graphically organized notes. The Journal of Experimental Education, 71(4), 293-312\r\nKern, R. G. (1997). L2 Reading Strategy Training: A Critical Perspective. Unpublished paper presented at the AAAL Conference, Orlando, Florida, March 10, 1997.\r\nKiewra, K. A. (1987). Notetaking and review: The research and its implications. Journal of Instructional Science, 16, 233-249.\r\nKiewra, K. A. (2005). Learn how to study and SOAR to success. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson.\r\nKiewra, K. A., & Benton, S. L. (1988). The relationship between information-processing ability and notetaking. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 13, 33-44.\r\nKiewra, K. A., & Frank, B. M. (1988). Encoding and external storage effects of personal lecture notes, skeletal notes, and detailed notes for field-independent and field-dependent learners. Journal of Educational Research, 81, 143-148.\r\nKiewra, K. A., Benton, S. L., I., Risch, N., & Christensen, M. (1995). Effects of note taking format and study technique on recall and relational performance. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 20 (2), 172-187.\r\nKiewra, K. A., DuBois, N. F., Christian, D., McShane, A., Meyerhoffer, M., & Roskelley, D. (1991). Note-taking functions and techniques. Journal of Educational Psychology, 83, 240-245.\r\nKirschner, P. A. (2015). Facebook as learning platform: Argumentation superhighway or dead-end street. Computers in Human Behavior, 53, 621-625.\r\nKnight, S. L., Padron, Y. N., & Waxman（1985）. The cognitive reading strategies for ESL students. TESOL Quarterly, 19:4, 789-792.\r\nKrashen, S. D. (1985). The input hypothesis: issues and implications. Longman Inc., New York.\r\nLanday, J. A. (1999). Using note-taking appliances for student to students collaboration. In Proceedings of Frontiers in Education Conference, 1999. FIE ’99. 29th Annual (pp. 12C14/15-12C14/20 vol.12)\r\nLin, H. C. (2011). A Study on different tolerance of ambiguity of elementary school students in English reading with annotation system. E-learning Master Program of Library and Information Studies, National Chengchi University, Taipei.\r\nLin, M. (2014). An English diagnosis and review system based on brainwave attention recognition technology for the paper-based learning context with digital-pen support. Department of Industrial Education, National Normal University, Taipei.\r\nLin, M. H. (2016). The effects of the cognitive reading strategy scaffold on junior high school students’ reading comprehension. E-learning Master Program of Library and Information Studies, National Chengchi University, Taipei.\r\nLin, Y. T. (2012). A study on promoting learning performance of literary Chinese reading using reading annotation system. E-learning Master Program of Library and Information Studies, National Chengchi University, Taipei.\r\nLiu, Z. (2005). Reading behavior in the digital environment: changes in reading behavior over the past 10 years. Journal of Documentation, 61(6), 700-712.\r\nLo, J. J., Yeh, S. W., & Sung, C. S. (2013). Learning paragraph structure with online annotations: an interactive approach to enhancing EFL reading comprehension. System, 41, 413e427.\r\nLucassen, T., Muilwijk, R., Noordzij, M. L., & Schraggen, J. M. (2013). Topic familiarity and information skills in online credibility evaluation. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 64(2), 254-256. doi: 10.1002/asi.22743\r\nMacIntyre, P. D. & Gardner, R. C. (1991). Methods and results in the study of anxiety and language learning: A review of the literature. Language Learning 41, 85-117.\r\nMagno, Carlo (2010). The Effect of Scaffolding on Children’s Reading. TESOL Journal, 3, 92-98.\r\nMahdavi, A., & Azimi, S. (2012). The Effects of Cognitive Strategies i.e. Note-Making and Underlining on Iranian EFL Learners’ Reading Comprehension. International Journal of Applied Linguistics & English Literature, 1(6), 1-6.\r\nMatsuda, S., & Gobel, P.(2004). Anxiety and predictors of performances in the foreign language classroom. System, 32, 21-36.\r\nMayer, R. E. (1996). Learning strategies for making sense out of expository text: The SOI system of guiding three cognitive processes in knowledge construction. Educational Psychology Review, 8, 357-371.\r\nMiyake, N., & Masukawa, H. (2000). Relation-making to sense-making: Supporting college students’ constructive understanding with an enriched collaborative note-sharing system. In B. J. Fishman & S.F. O’Connor-Divelbiss (Eds.), Fourth international conference of the learning sciences. NJ: Erlbaum\r\nO’neill, M. E. (2005). Automated use of a wiki for collaborative lecture notes. In Proceedings of The 36th SIGCSE Technical Symposium on Computer Science Education, St. Louis, Missouri, USA. ACM.\r\nOxford, R. L. (1990). Language learning strategies: what every teacher should know. Boston: Heinle & Heinle.\r\nPaivio, A. (1971). Imagery and verbal processes. New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston.\r\nRichardson, A. (1977). Verbalizer–visualizer, a cognitive style dimension. Journal of Mental Imagery, 1, 109-126.\r\nRickards, J. P., Fajen, B. R., Sullivan, J. F., & Gillespie, G. (1997). Signaling, Note-taking, and field independence-dependence in text comprehension and recall. Journal of Educational Psychology, 89, 508-517.\r\nRowe, K. J. (1991). The influence of reading activity at home on students’ attitudes towards reading, classroom attentiveness and reading achievement: An application of structural equation modeling. British Journal of EducationalPsychology, 61, 19-35.\r\nSaito, Y. & Horwitz, E. K. & Garza, T. J.(1999). Foreign language reading anxiety. The Modern Language Journal, 83 (2), 202-218.\r\nSellers, V. D. (2000). Anxiety and reading comprehension in Spanish as a foreign language. Foreign Language Annals, 33, 512-521.\r\nSingh, G., Denoue, L., & Das, A. (2004). Collaborative note taking. In L. Denoue (Ed.), Proceedings of The 2nd IEEE International Workshop on Wireless and Mobile Technologies in Education (pp. 163-167).\r\nSparks, R. L., & Ganschow, L. (1996). Anxiety about foreign language learning among high school women. Modern Language Journal, 80, 199-212.\r\nSullivan, J. F., & Gillespie, G. (1997). Signaling, Note-taking, and field independence-dependence in text comprehension and recall. Journal of Educational Psychology, 89, 508-517.\r\nTierney, R. J. & Readence. E. J., (2005). Reading Strategies and Practices (Sixth ed.). Boston: Pearson Education, Inc.\r\nTürk, E., & Erçetin, G. (2014). Effects of interactive versus simultaneous display of multimedia glosses on L2 reading comprehension and incidental vocabulary learning. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 27(1), 1e25.\r\nWitkin, H. A. & Goodenough, D.R. (1977). Field-dependence and interpersonal behavior. Psychological Bulletin, 84, 661-689\r\nWitkin, H. A., Dyk, R. B., Fattuson, H. F., Goodenough, D. R., & Karp, S. A. Psychological differentiation: studies of development. Potomac, Md.: Erlbaum, 1974.\r\nWitkin, H. A., Lewis, H. B., Hertzman, M., Machover, K., Bretnall, P. M., & Wapner, S. (1954). Personality through perception: An experimental and clinical study. New York: Harper & Brothers.\r\nWitkin, H.A., Moore, C.A., Oltman, P., Goodenough, D.R., Friedman, F., Owen, D.R., & Raskin, E. (1977). Role of field dependent and field independent cognitive styles in academic evolution. Journal of Educational Psychology, 69, 197-211.\r\nWu, C. Y., Chen, S. W., Chen, C. H., & Chiu, C. H. (2009). The effect of integrating web 2.0 technology in collaborative note-taking on elementary students’ science learning. In A. E.-M. 2009 (Ed.), Proceedings of World Conference on Educational Multimedia, Hypermedia & Telecommunications, Honolulu, HI, USA, Jun 22-26\r\nWu, Y. Y. (1991). Individual differences in cognitive facotrs. Educational Review, 7, 253-300.\r\nYang, Y. F. & Lin, Y. Y. (2015). Online Collaborative note-taking strategies to foster EFL beginners’ literacy development. Graduate school of Applied Foreign Languages, National Yunlin University of Science & Technology.\r\nYoung, D. J. (1991). Creating a low-anxiety classroom environment: What does language anxiety research suggest . Modern Language Journal, 75, 426-437.\r\nYoung, D. J. (2000). An investigation into the relationship between L2 reading anxiety and L2 reading comprehension, and self-reported level of comprehension, topic familiarity, features of a L2 text and reading ability in the L1 and L2. In R. P. Leow & C. Sanz (Eds.), Spanish applied linguistics at the turn of the millennium (pp. 141-156). Somerville, MA: Cascadilla Press. | 描述: | 碩士 國立政治大學 圖書資訊學數位碩士在職專班 99913015 |
資料來源: | http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#G0099913015 | 資料類型: | thesis |
| Appears in Collections: | 學位論文 |
Show full item record
Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.