Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
https://ah.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/120584| 題名: | 不可忤逆的安全號令： 威權領導與安全績效之探討 Unbreakable obedience of safety regulation: The study of authoritarian leadership and safety performance |
作者: | 郭泓毅 Kuo, Hong-Yi |
貢獻者: | 郭建志 Kuo, Chien-Chi 郭泓毅 Kuo, Hong-Yi |
關鍵詞: | 職業安全 威權領導 團隊安全規範 安全行為 安全績效 Occupational safety Authoritarian leadership Safety norm Safety performance |
日期: | 2018 | 上傳時間: | 17-Oct-2018 | 摘要: | 近年來在職業安全的領域中，領導研究是重要的議題之一，因其是為影響部屬安全行為展現的關鍵因子。然而，過往安全領導之研究多以西方領導模式為主，例如轉型式領導或交易型領導，以華人領導模式為主的研究仍屬少數。因此，本研究嘗試引入華人文化中的威權領導，探討其在安全情境中所扮演的角色。本研究主張威權領導(專權領導與尚嚴領導)會透過個人層次的部屬安全行為與團隊層次的安全規範兩個中介變項，影響部屬個人的安全績效。本研究採用問卷調查法，以五人以上的團隊為單位，研究資料共有45個團隊，包含220位部屬之有效樣本，利用階層線性模型分析跨層次的中介效果。結果發現：(1)專權與尚嚴領導透過安全行為影響安全績效且皆顯著，其中專權產生負向效果；尚嚴則為正向效果；(2)專權與尚嚴領導透過安全規範影響安全績效的中介效果之假設並未獲得支持；(3)安全規範透過部屬安全行為影響安全績效的中介效果達顯著。本結果說明專權領導可能因過分強調個人權威展現與對部屬的控制引發部屬畏懼與反感，對部屬個人安全行為與規範產生負向效果，而降低安全績效。另一方面，尚嚴領導基於有依據且明確的準則、高度要求與嚴格監控，對安全行為與規範均有正向的效果，並提升安全績效。因此，本研究建議企業在安全領導層面上，應避免採用強調控制的專權領導，而應發展尚嚴的領導模式，訂定高度的要求與嚴密的監控。本研究作為華人領導與安全研究的橋梁，期望能協助企業減少職業災害的發生， 並創造更安全的工作環境。 In recent years, leadership has identified as a key factor to improve workplace safety, and there are a great number of studies in the western countries which have supported the positive effects of appropriate leadership on employee safety performance. However, not so many researches have focused on the leadership style in China, such as paternalistic leadership. To better fill this gap, the resent study aims to examine the relationship between authoritarian leadership in safety-specific field and safety outcomes. The study has investigated the relationships between authoritarian leadership and safety performance, and mediated by safety behaviors and safety norms, yet discussed the different effects of Juan-chiuan and Shang-ya leaderships. Nevertheless, the study argued that safety behaviors mediates the relationship between safety norms and safety performance. Questionnaires were distributed to first-line production employees (n=220, N=45). Hierarchical Linear Modeling (HLM) is used to estimate the relationship between independent variables’ cross-level effect. The result suggests that the relationship between authoritarian leadership and safety performance which is mediated by safety behaviors is significant. However, the hypothesis of the mediation effect of safety norms on authoritarian leadership to safety performance is not supported. Moreover, the relationship between safety norms and safety performance which is mediated by safety behaviors is significant. |
參考文獻: | 吳宗祐、周麗芳、鄭伯壎（2008）：〈主管的權威取向及其對部屬順從與畏懼的知覺對威權領導的預測效果〉。《本土心理學研究》， 30， 65-115。\n吳宗祐、廖紘億（2013）：〈華人威權領導總是導致部屬負面結果嗎？由「不確定管理理論」探討威權領導對分配不公平與程序不公平之交互作用與部屬工作滿意度之關係的調節效果〉。 《中華心理學刊》， 55（1）， 1-22。\n周婉茹、周麗芳、鄭伯壎、任金剛（2010）：〈 專權與尚嚴之辨：再探威權領導的內涵與恩威並濟的效果〉。《本土心理學研究》， 34， 223-284。\n周婉茹、鄭伯壎、連玉輝（2014）：〈威權領導：概念源起、現況檢討及未來方向〉。《中華心理學刊》， 56（2）， 165-189。\n周麗芳、周婉茹、嚴珮瑜（2011）：〈威權領導的前因與後果: 主管與部屬間的壓力移轉〉。《第七屆華人心理學家學術研討會》， 台北 Taipei, Taiwan。\n林夙豐、蘇秦玉（2008）：〈教練領導風格對高中排球選手團隊承諾及滿意度影響之研究〉。《運動與遊憩研究》，2（3），37-49。\n林姿葶、鄭伯壎、周麗芳（2014）：〈家長式領導：回顧與前瞻〉。《本土心理學研究》。42，3-82。\n曹常成、郭建志（2011）：〈安全領導與誘因對企業安全效能之探討〉。行政院勞工委員會勞工安全衛生研究所。\n郭均誠、林姿葶、周婉茹、鄭伯壎（2015）：〈領導者之差序對待幅度與部屬效能: 平均德行領導的調節效果〉。《本土心理學研究》，43，125-172。\n郭建志、曹常成、楊婷如（2014）：〈真誠領導與安全效能：安全氣候知覺與安全誘因經驗之研究〉。《勞工安全衛生研究季刊》， 22（3），235-248。\n彭台光、高月慈、林鉦棽（2006）：〈 管理研究中的共同方法變異：問題本質，影響，測試和補救〉。《管理學報》， 23（1）， 77-98。\n黃光國（1999）：〈華人的企業文化與生產力〉。《應用心理研究》， 1，163-185。\n楊國樞（1993）：〈我們為什么要建立中國人的本土心理學?〉。《本土心理學研究》，1，6-88。\n楊國樞（1997）：〈心理學研究的本土契合性及其相關問題〉。《本土心理學研究》， 8， 75-120。\n樊景立、鄭伯壎（2000）：〈家長是領導的文化基礎〉。《本土心理學研究》，13，127-180。\n蔡英美（2005）：〈家長式領導三元模式的主要效果與互涉作用對運動團隊滿意度的預測〉。《輔仁大學體育學刊》，4，99-108。\n鄭伯壎（1995）：〈 家長權威與領導行為之關係：一個台灣民營企業主持人的個案研究。《中央研究院民族學研究所集刊》，79，105-159。\n鄭伯壎（2004）：〈 華人文化與組織領導：由現象描述到理論驗證〉。《本土心理學研究》， 22，195-251。\n鄭伯壎、周麗芳、黃敏萍、樊景立、彭泗清（2003）：〈 家長式領導的三元模式：中國大陸企業組織的證據〉。《本土心理學研究》，20， 209-250。\n鄭伯壎、樊景立、周麗芳（2006）：〈 家長式領導: 模式與證據〉。\nBandura, A. (1989). Human agency in social cognitive theory. American psychologist, 44(9), 1175-1184.\nBarling, J., Loughlin, C., & Kelloway, E. K. (2002). Development and test of a model linking safety-specific transformational leadership and occupational safety. Journal of Applied psychology, 87(3), 488-496.\nBarling, J. E., & Frone, M. R. (2004). The psychology of workplace safety. American Psychological Association.\nBaron, R. M., & Kenny, D. A. (1986). The moderator–mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: Conceptual, strategic, and statistical considerations. Journal of personality and social psychology, 51(6), 1173-1182.\nBass, B. M., Avolio, B. J., Jung, D. I., & Berson, Y. (2003). Predicting unit performance by assessing transformational and transactional leadership. Journal of applied psychology, 88(2), 207-218.\nBass, B. M., & Stogdill, R. M. (1990). Bass & Stogdill`s handbook of leadership: Theory, research, and managerial applications: Simon and Schuster.\nBlau. (1964). Exchange and power in social life. Transaction Publishers.\nBorman, W. C., & Motowidlo, S. (1993). Expanding the criterion domain to include elements of contextual performance. Personnel Selection in Organizations; San Francisco: Jossey-Bass, 71-98.\nChang, S.-J., van Witteloostuijn, A., & Eden, L. (2010). From the Editors: Common method variance in international business research. Journal of International Business Studies, 41(2), 178-184.\nChen, C.-F., & Chen, S.-C. (2014). Measuring the effects of Safety Management System practices, morality leadership and self-efficacy on pilots’ safety behaviors: Safety motivation as a mediator. Safety Science, 62, 376-385.\nChen, P. Y., Huang, Y. H., & DeArmond, S. (2005). Occupational health psychology: Opportunities and challenges for psychologists in the 21st century. Research in Applied Psychology, 27, 13-56.\nChen, S. C. (2017). Paternalistic leadership and cabin crews’ upward safety communication: The motivation of voice behavior. Journal of Air Transport Management, 62, 44-53.\nChristian, M. S., Bradley, J. C., Wallace, J. C., & Burke, M. J. (2009). Workplace safety: a meta-analysis of the roles of person and situation factors. Journal of applied psychology, 94(5), 1103-1127.\nChughtai, A. A. (2015). Creating safer workplaces: The role of ethical leadership. Safety Science, 73, 92-98.\nCialdini, R. B., Kallgren, C. A., & Reno, R. R. (1991). A focus theory of normative conduct: A theoretical refinement and reevaluation of the role of norms in human behavior. In Advances in experimental social psychology ,24, 201-234.\nCialdini, R. B., & Trost, M. R. (1998). Social influence: Social norms, conformity and compliance.\nClarke, S. (2013). Safety leadership: A meta-analytic review of transformational and transactional leadership styles as antecedents of safety behaviours. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 86(1), 22-49.\nCohen, S. G., & Bailey, D. E. (1997). What makes teams work: Group effectiveness research from the shop floor to the executive suite. Journal of management,, 23(3), 239-290.\nConchie, S. M. (2013). Transformational leadership, intrinsic motivation, and trust: a moderated-mediated model of workplace safety. Journal of Occupational Health Psychology, 18(2), 198-210.\nConchie, S. M., Taylor, P. J., & Donald, I. J. (2012). Promoting safety voice with safety-specific transformational leadership: The mediating role of two dimensions of trust. Journal of Occupational Health Psychology, 17(1), 105-115.\nConner, M., Smith, N., & McMillan, B. (2003). Examining Normative Pressure in the Theory of Planned Behaviour: Impact of Gender and Passengers on Intentions to Break the Speed Limit. Current Psychology, 22(3), 252-263.\nCurington, W. P. (1986). Safety regulation and workplace injuries. Southern Economic Journal, 51-72.\nDeJoy, D. M. (1994). Managing safety in the workplace: An attribution theory analysis and model. Journal of Safety Research, 25(1), 3-17.\nDeutsch, M., & Gerard, H. B. (1955). A study of normative and informational social influences upon individual judgment. The journal of abnormal and social psychology, 51(3), 629-636.\nEhrhart, M. G., & Naumann, S. E. (2004). Organizational Citizenship Behavior in Work Groups: A Group Norms Approach. Journal of applied psychology, 89(6), 960–974.\nEid, J., Mearns, K., Larsson, G., Laberg, J. C., & Johnsen, B. H. (2012). Leadership, psychological capital and safety research: Conceptual issues and future research questions. Safety Science, 50(1), 55-61.\nFeldman, D. C. (1984). The development and enforcement of group norms. Academy of management review, 9(1), 47-53.\nFugas, C. S., Melia, J. L., & Silva, S. A. (2011). The "is" and the "ought": How do perceived social norms influence safety behaviors at work? Jouranl of Occupational Health Psychology, 16(1), 67-79.\nGriffin, M. A., & Neal, A. (2000). Perceptions of safety at work: A framework for linking safety climate to safety performance, knowledge, and motivation. Journal of Occupational Health Psychology, 5(3), 347-358.\nHackman, J. R., & Morris, C. G. (1975). Group tasks, group interaction process, and group performance effectiveness: A review and proposed integration. Advances in experimental social psychology, 8, 45-99.\nHofmann, D. A., Burke, M. J., & Zohar, D. (2017). 100 years of occupational safety research: From basic protections and work analysis to a multilevel view of workplace safety and risk. Journal of applied psychology, 102(3), 375-388. doi:10.1037/apl0000114\nHofmann, D. A., Morgeson, F. P., & Gerras, S. J. (2003). Climate as a Moderator of the Relationship Between Leader–Member Exchange and Content Specific Citizenship: Safety Climate as an Exemplar. Journal of applied psychology, 88(1), 170-178.\nHofmann, D. A., Morgeson, F. P., & Gerras, S. J. (2003). Climate as a moderator of the relationship between leader-member exchange and content specific citizenship: safety climate as an exemplar. Journal of applied psychology, 88(1), 170-178.\nHofmann, D. A., & Stetzer, A. r. (1998). The role of safety climate and communication in accident interpretation: Implications for learning from negative events. Academy of Management Journal, 41(6), 644-657.\nHuang, Y. H., Chen, P. Y., Krauss, A. D., & Rogers, D. A. (2004). Quality of the execution of corporate safety policies and employee safety outcomes: assessing the moderating role of supervisor safety support and the mediating role of employee safety control. Journal of Business and Psychology, 18(4), 483-506.\nHuang, Y. H., Sinclair, R. R., Lee, J., McFadden, A. C., Cheung, J. H., & Murphy, L. A. (2018). Does talking the talk matter? Effects of supervisor safety communication and safety climate on long-haul truckers` safety performance. Accid Anal Prev, 117, 357-367. doi:10.1016/j.aap.2017.09.006\nJehn, K. A. (1995). A multimethod examination of the benefits and detriments of intragroup conflict. Administrative science quarterly, 256-282.\nJiang, H., Chen, Y., Sun, P., & Li, C. (2017). Authoritarian leadership and employees’ unsafe behaviors: The mediating roles of organizational cynicism and work alienation. Current Psychology. doi:10.1007/s12144-017-9726-1\nKath, L. M., Marks, K. M., & Ranney, J. (2010). Safety climate dimensions, leader–member exchange, and organizational support as predictors of upward safety communication in a sample of rail industry workers. Safety Science, 48(5), 643-650.\nKatz, & Kahn. (1978). The social psychology of organizations (Vol. 2). New York: Wiley.\n.\nKelloway, Mullen, & Francis. (2006). Divergent effects of transformational and passive leadership on employee safety. Journal of occupational health psychology, 11(1), 76-86.\nLee, J., Huang, Y., Cheung, J. H., Chen, Z., & Shaw, W. S. (2018). A systematic review of the safety climate intervention literature: Past trends and future directions. Journal of Occupational Health Psychology.\nLekka, C., Healey, N., & Hill, H. (2012). A review of the literature on effective leadership behaviours for safety. Health and Safety Executive.\nLin, T. T., Cheng, B. S., Chou. L. F., & Chen, C. H. (2012). Unpacking examining the relationship between CEO leadership style and performance: Does competence matter? In Best Paper Proceedings of the Academy of Management Annual Meetings, Boston, MA, 3-7 August 2012. Briarcliff Manor, NY: Academy of Management.\nLindell, M. K., & Whitney, D. J. (2001). Accounting for common method variance in cross-sectional research designs. Journal of applied psychology, 86(1), 114-121.\nLittle, T. D., Cunningham, W. A., Shahar, G., & Widaman, K. F. (2002). To Parcel or Not to Parcel: Exploring the Question, Weighing the Merits. Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 9(2), 151-173. doi:10.1207/s15328007sem0902_1\nLu, C.-S., Hsu, C.-N., & Lee, C.-H. (2016). The Impact of Seafarers’ Perceptions of National Culture and Leadership on Safety Attitude and Safety Behavior in Dry Bulk Shipping. International Journal of e-Navigation and Maritime Economy, 4, 75-87.\nMathieu, J. E. T., S. R. (2007). A framework for testing meso‐mediational relationships in organizational behavior. Journal of Organizational Behavior: The International Journal of Industrial, Occupational and Organizational Psychology and Behavior, 28(2), 141-172.\nNeal, A., & Griffin, M. A. (2006). A study of the lagged relationships among safety climate, safety motivation, safety behavior, and accidents at the individual and group levels. Journal of applied psychology, 91(4), 946-953.\nNielsen, B., Morten, Jarle, E., Kathryn, M., & Gerry, L. (2013). Authentic leadership and its relationship with risk perception and safety climate. Leadership & Organization Development Journal, 34(4), 308-325.\nNorthouse, P. G. (2017). Introduction to leadership: Concepts and practice. Sage Publications.\nReason, J. (2000). Human error: models and management. Bmj, 320(7237), 768-770.\nRedding. (1990). The spirit of Chinese capitalism. Walter de Gruyter, 22.\nSchaubroeck, J. M., Shen, Y., & Chong, S. (2017). A dual-stage moderated mediation model linking authoritarian leadership to follower outcomes. Journal of applied psychology, 102(2), 203-214.\nSeo, H.-C., Lee, Y.-S., Kim, J.-J., & Jee, N.-Y. (2015). Analyzing safety behaviors of temporary construction workers using structural equation modeling. Safety Science, 77, 160-168.\nSinclair, R. R., Martin, J. E., & Sears, L. E. (2010). Labor unions and safety climate: Perceived union safety values and retail employee safety outcomes. Accident Analysis & Prevention, 42, 1477–1487\nVinodkumar, M. N., & Bhasi, M. (2010). Safety management practices and safety behaviour: assessing the mediating role of safety knowledge and motivation. Accid Anal Prev, 42(6), 2082-2093.\nVroom, V. H. (1964). Work and motivation. New York Wiley.\nWang, C.-H., & Yen, C.-D. (2014). Leadership and turnover intentions of Taiwan TV reporters: the moderating role of safety climate. Asian Journal of Communication, 25(3), 255-270.\nWestaby, J. D., & Lowe, J. K. (2005). Risk-taking orientation and injury among youth workers: examining the social influence of supervisors, coworkers, and parents. Journal of applied psychology, 90(5), 1027-1035.\nWu, Li, Chen, & Shu. (2008). Interaction effects of organizational and individual factors on safety leadership in college and university laboratories. Journal of Loss Prevention in the Process Industries, 21(3), 239-254.\nWu, M., & Xu, E. (2012). 24 Paternalistic leadership: from here to where? Handbook of Chinese organizational behavior: Integrating theory, research and practice, 449-466.\nWu, T.-C., Chang, S.-H., Shu, C.-M., Chen, C.-T., & Wang, C.-P. (2011). Safety leadership and safety performance in petrochemical industries: The mediating role of safety climate. Journal of Loss Prevention in the Process Industries, 24(6), 716-721.\nZohar, & Luria. (2005). A multilevel model of safety climate: cross-level relationships between organization and group-level climates. Journal of applied psychology, 90(4), 616-628.\nZohar, D. (1980). Safety climate in industrial organizations: Theoretical and applied implications. Journal of applied psychology, 65(1), 96-102.\nZohar, D. (2000). A group-level model of safety climate: Testing the effect of group climate on microaccidents in manufacturing jobs. Journal of applied psychology, 85(4), 587-596.\nZohar, D. (2002). Modifying Supervisory Practices to Improve Subunit Safety: A Leadership-Based Intervention Model. Journal of applied psychology, 87(1), 156-163.\nZohar, D. (2010). Thirty years of safety climate research: Reflections and future directions. Accident Analysis & Prevention, 42(5), 1517-1522.\nZohar, D., & Luria, G. (2003). The use of supervisory practices as leverage to improve safety behavior: A cross-level intervention model. Journal of Safety Research, 34(5), 567-577.\nZohar, D., & Luria, G. (2005). A multilevel model of safety climate: cross-level relationships between organization and group-level climates. Journal of applied psychology, 90(4), 616-628. | 描述: | 碩士 國立政治大學 心理學系 105752014 |
資料來源: | http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#G0105752014 | 資料類型: | thesis |
| Appears in Collections: | 學位論文 |
Files in This Item:
| File | Size | Format | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 201401.pdf | 1.62 MB | Adobe PDF2 | View/Open |
Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.