Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://ah.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/120901
題名: 台灣新南向政策之產業發展機會—以優勢企業為例
The Opportunities under Taiwan`s New Southbound Policy—Using Competitive Firms as an example
作者: 余仁耀
Yu, Jen-Yao
貢獻者: 莊奕琦
Chuang, Yih-Chyi
余仁耀
Yu, Jen-Yao
關鍵詞: 新南向政策
半導體
電子
工具機
車用電子
工業4.0
New southbound policy
Semiconductor
Electronics
Machine tools
Automotive electronics
Industry 4.0
日期: 2018
上傳時間: 9-Nov-2018
摘要: 中國大陸致力推動一帶一路,目標著重在全球放貸興建基礎設施,與我國新南向政策透過我優勢與創新產業拓展市場不同,兩岸政策互不干擾,甚至一帶一路鐵公路與高鐵建設完成後,更有利我國產業在新南向國家發展,例如陸企在東協國家架設光纖電纜後,我國可增添智慧裝置,亦可在大眾運輸工具上加裝顯示裝置及物聯網設施。\n本研究先以東協及南亞國家為主體,探討其對中國大陸及台灣貿易關係,發現自2000年以來,其等對中國大陸機電產品貿易增長迅速,多為中間財,顯示彼此在該領域融入供應鏈漸深,此對我國相關產業經貿與投資恐造成排擠,因台灣重點產業為半導體、車用電子,再加上資通與視聽產品,佔整體出口約44%。此外,台灣上述產業亦面臨諸多挑戰:韓國三星致力發展晶片設計與製造、美中貿易戰威脅台灣設計大陸組裝而銷往美國之產業、中國大陸等多國政府均斥資培養科技人才、美英日以(色列)在開發AI晶片、AI應用及超級電腦已是全球龍頭等。\n此外,我國在全球供應鏈上的加工附加價值漸次提升,主要是因掌握關鍵技術,使我國專業ODM產品如晶片等,在全球市佔率約66%,換言之,國際知名品牌製程中需將產品送到台灣設計與加工,顯示台商產能、成本、交期及與品牌整體系統相容等均受肯定,而受益於產業聚落,此產業生態環境造就其他產業蓬勃發展,如IC晶圓ODM帶動IC封測、設計及設備廠的發展,而主機板與PC大廠的技嘉、華擎、仁寶、緯創亦跟進申請許多關鍵專利技術。\n本研究最後探討以我國優勢產業尋求新南向國家22億人口市場之商機,從電子產品在地化功能、交通工具及製造業升級等方面,找出該等國家需求,並彙整設廠成功台商,作為相關領域上下游廠商前往設廠之參考,另亦建議政府與同業公會以共同研發、舉辦論壇及設立學校等方式,協助我國科技與製程優勢產業往新南向國家發展。\n本研究採用描述統計及文獻分析法,從經貿數據等資料找出我優勢產業,再從各類文獻尋求前進新南向市場可行建議,如何發展新南向國家市場作為我國企業避險,同時嘉惠彼此企業。
Mainland China is promoting the One Belt and One Road Initiative and its focus is on infrastructure-building, while Taiwan’s New Southbound Policy focuses more on helping its industries find business opportunities. Therefore, the OBOR and the New Southbound Policy are not contradicting each other. They could even be complementary. For example, Taiwan’s ETC network system could be useful to public transportation in New Southbound countries.\nThis study is based on the ASEAN and South Asian countries and explores their trade relations with China and Taiwan. It found that since 2000, trade in mechanical and electrical products in China has grown rapidly, mostly in intermediate goods, showing that China and ASEAN are integrated in this field. As the supply chain is getting deeper, China’s trade with ASEAN countries may affect Taiwan’s business opportunities because Taiwan’s key industries were semiconductors, automotive electronics, and ICT products, which accounted for 44% of the total exports. In addition, those Taiwan sectors have faced other external challenges. For example, Samsung puts significant effort in developing new chips; US-China trade friction can impact the products that are ordered or designed in Taiwan, assembled in China and then sold to the US; Britain is developing IPU(Intelligence Processing Unit); China and Singapore have invested in developing the workforce of semiconductor industries; and Japan, the US and Israel are the world leaders in the development of AI chips, AI applications and supercomputers.\nIn addition, Taiwan`s processing added value in the global supply chain has gradually increased, mainly due to the mastery of key technologies. For example, Taiwan’s semiconductor fabrication held around 66% of market share in the world in 2017. Those well-known brands had to send their products to Taiwan to conduct value-added process because foreign buyers highly trusted its capacity, cost, timely delivery, and compatibility. Taiwan`s advantage, in turn, benefited the industry clusters. Therefore, Semiconductor fabrication ODM made PCB and PC corporates prosper.\nThis study further explored the business opportunities of Taiwan’s competitive industries, including electronics, transportation and manufacturing upgrades, to seek the market of 2.2 billion people in the New Southbound countries. We tried to identify the industrial needs of these countries and collected some evidences from Taiwanese companies which successfully extended their factories into New Southbound countries. Finally, we provide suggestions for Taiwanese government and business sectors. It is also recommended that the government and the trade associations assist the development of Taiwan`s science and technology and process industries to the New Southbound countries through joint research and development, forums and setting up education and training institutions.\nThis study uses the method of citation analysis to explore China’s OBOR and its impact. It uses a descriptive statistics method to find out about trade relations between China and Taiwan, and China and ASEAN countries. Then, it tries to identify Taiwan’s competitive industries and business opportunities in New Southbound countries. The suggestions which we come up with should benefit Taiwan’s corporates and the New Southbound countries.
參考文獻: Bibliography\nChinese Sources\nArne de Keijzer, Daniel Bursteins, translated by Ying Xiaorui and Huang Xiaoyuan, (1999), Huge dragon, Taipei, CWGV\nCai Baijun (2017), Vietnam is the latest migrating place for Taiwanese businessman,\nretrieve March 18, 2018, from: https://www.ettoday.net/news/20170519/\n918141.htm#ixzz5AQrUz3kF\nChen Bingqi (2016), Taiwan’s automotive and motocycle manufacturing industry in Vietnam and Indonesia: cooperation with Japan, Taiwan Economic Research Monthly, Vol 39, issue 10, page 62-67\nChen Chieg-hung (2017), Xi’s systemization arrangement takes effect-stablize domestic and expand abroad, “China Study” Vol. 51:4, page 1-20.\nChen Guili, Wu Chuntao, China’s farmer survey, Beijing: People`s Literature Publishing House\nChen Jianzhong (2015), Deciphering Chinese “BRI”’s strategy and outlook, Journal of PRC study, 49:6, page 34-52\nChen Tieyuan (2017), From Smart manufacturing to see the opportunities and chellenges of Taiwan’s industry. Retrieved Aug. 15, 2017 from: http://bulletin.dyu.edu.tw/file/S0088/43263.pdf\nChen Xiongbing (2011), ASEAN’s opportunities and challenges brought about from China’s economic rise, Wu-Hang Institute of Technology Journal, Vol. 24 issue 5, page 659-664\nChuang Jiahao,(2018), Joining the AI supply chain we have to implement the board level reliability verification, retrieved June 2nd, 2018, from: https://www.eettaiwan.com/news/article/20180518NT-iST-automotive-blr\nChuang Yih-chyi, (2010), The rise of China and its implications to the world economy, Journal of Chinese history and society, No.37, pp.3-21.\nChuang Yih-Chyi, (2015), China’s BRI strategy Taiwan’s opportunities and challenges, Taiwan Research Institute ‘A new round of cross-strait cooperation under the restructuring of China`s economy’ seminar, Taiwan Chamber of Commerce\nChuang Yih-chyi (2016), New Southbound Policy should solidify cross-strait first, retrieve Aug. 1, 2017 from: http://opinion.chinatimes.com/20160913006365-262105\nChuang Yih-Chyi, Liu Dongwei, (2012), The nexus between economic integration and political conflicts: The case study of Taiwan and China, Journal of Mainland China studies, Vol.55, No. 1, pp.23-39\nCSIS, IIE, translated by Lo Weiliang and Huang Wumei, (2006), China: The. Balance Sheet, Taipei: United Daily News Group\nDiao man peng (2017), Taiwan’s investment in ASEAN 6 countries increase largely, retrieved on Jan. 1, 2018 from: http://www.chinatimes.com/newspapers/20170425000051-260202\nDong Peng, Xue Dalong, (2015), A calm thought on BRI, Journal of obersation, volume 21, page. 21-34\nFang, Tien-sze, (2016), Forward to India to be bosses, Hsin Chu City: NTHU Press.\nFang, Tien-sze, (2017), Opportunities and challenges of building international connectivity: The Indian perspective on China’s “One Belt and One Road” Initiative, Journal of Mainland China Studies, pp. P87 - 108\nFeng Bin, (2015), One Belt One Road is the Chinese logic of global development, Taipei, Global Publishing Group\nFong bin (2015), BRI is China’s logics to develop globally, Taipei: Global Publishing Group\nGu Sujen(2018),Why Malaysia is coming close to high income country, CommonWealth, issue 647.\nGuo Zhenyuan (2015), BRI’s development and China’s Diplomacy, China Review, issue 212, page 16-20.\nHe Zewen, (2017), Working notes from youth to youth: Lores, industries, lives, and the observation of popular feelings. Taipei: SoulerBook.\nHenry M. Paulson, Wang Yuguang, Zhu Yuan, Zhu Qiwen, Wang Hui translated, (2017), Dealing with China, an insider unmasks the new economic superpower”, Taipei City: China Times Culture.\nHong Inshine, (2016), The developing theory of the political and economy of China`s characteristic socialism, Beijing: Economic Science Publisher\nHuang Yaling, (2016), New southbound to ASEAN and the disclosure of industrial business opportunity –Vietnam, Malaysia, and Thailand” Taipei: TETDC.\nHuang Zhonghong (2018), AI let robot be a tiger with wings added, Machinery\nIndustry, (2018/01), page 24-31\nITRI, (2017), Taiwan Automotive Electronics Industry Analysis, machine industry magazine, issue 406\nKang Yuping (2018), chairman of Foxconn Terry Gou spends dozen billion NTD on AI, can he make profit from conculting? Business Weekly, issue 1578 (2018.2.12-2018.2.18), page 48-49\nLi Yan-ting (2017), forge digital silkroad to promote communication and efficiency, retrieved July-29, 2017 from: http://opinion.cctv.com/2017/04/13/ARTIE5MdfB87x7IYhMYyrQmA170413.shtml\nLi Yihu(2015), International political review over BRI, “China Review”, May, 2015, Vol.209\nLi Zhirong(2015), BRI strategy’s diplomatic meanings, retrieved on Aug. 13,2017 from: http://hk.crntt.com/doc/1038/6/4/2/103864221.html?coluid=251&kindid=17133&docid=103864221&mdate=0615100748\nLi Zhenyu, Cheng Liquen (2018), The overview of Taiwan’s import and export trade. Financial Field, issue 68.\nLiang Hao-guang (2016), BRI Chinese business Go Out model and strategy study, retrieved Aug. 30, 2017 from: http://www.ydylcn.com/skwx_ydyl/initDatabaseDetail?siteId=1&contentId=6768015&contentType=literature\nLin Hongda, (2018), 5G is the chance to earn 10 times, Wealth Magazine, issue 550\nLin Shiyi, (2016), To join the 5G competition – Taiwan has to break through in 3 key areas, Global Views Monthly, the issue of Oct., 2016\nLin Tong (2015), What influence could Xi’s BRI strategy bring to regional politics and economy. How does Taiwan cope with it? Retrieved Aug. 2, 2017 from: http://www.npf.org.tw/3/14699\nLin Yuanqing, (2018), the increasing technology spies are mostly linking to Chinese enterprise, Wealth Magazine, issue549, pp.74-78\nLiu Jinshan, (2016), China’s problems in 2016, Hong Kong: WaiCanChuBan.\nLiu, Meng-chen (2017), China’s large M&A in recent year and its trend and implication, Economy Outlook, issue 169, page 56-61.\nLu Yanfeng (2017), Indonesian International plastic, processed food, package and medicine making machine exhibition, retrieved April 4, 2018 from: http://www.trademag1.org.tw/article-contentdata-102803-119645\nMa Zhiming, (2018), ZTE was out of stock because US does sell to it , business weekly, issue 1590\nMotoko Rich, (2017), As leaders argue, South Korea finds China is no longer an easy sell, retrieve date Aug. 1st, 2017 from: https://cn.nytimes.com/asia-pacific/20170309/china-south-korea-economy/zh-hant/\nNational Nano Device Laboratories (2017), Never compromise, retrieved on Jan. 1, 2018 from: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3dqoUffqyFs\nPRC’s National Development and Reform Commission, (2016), National New District Development Report 2016, Beijing: China Planning Press\nPu Xiaoyu, (2016), One Belt, One Road: Visions and challenges of China`s geoeconomic strategy, Journal of Mainland China Studies, volume 59 issue 3, page 111-132.\nQian Yinxin, (2015), Chinese BRI strategy, the study on its impact to cross-straits, Journal of prospects and exploration, Volume 14, No.7, page77-94.\nQiu Chuizheng, (2015), China’s strategy and policy to Taiwan’s sub-area cooperation: use Pingtan Comprehensive Experimental Area as an example, Taipei: Independent Author\nQiu Dong, (2009), The study of China’s economic reform and development, Beijing: Renmin University Publisher.\nShen Ruiwen (2018), To sell medical materials in India, through Keyman, retrieve April 4, 2018 from: https://money.udn.com/money/story/5612/2966564\nShi Yuxian, Xiao Ruisheng, (2017), New Southbound countries’ map – Thailand’s automotive components industry, ROC’s Ministry of Economic Affairs entrusted: IEK, Industrial Technology Research Institute conducted the research.\nSun Mingzeng (2016), 5 questions: from theory’s perspective to look at BRI, retrieved Aug. 14, 2017 from: http://big5.qstheory.cn/gate/big5/www.qstheory.cn/politics/2016-11/29/c_1120013605.htm\nSun Yeli (2017), Socialism with Chinese characteristics Political Economics New Development, retrieved Sep. 1, 2017 from: http://theory.people.com.cn/BIG5/n1/2017/0614/c40531-29337701.html\nTECO in Ho Chi Minh City, (2015), India is the rising lion in Asia, Economic Perspective Biweekly, issue 423, pp.94-95\nTaiwan External Trade Development Council (2018), retrieved March 31, 2018 from: https://www.taitraesource.com/\nTaiwan External Trade Development Council (2016), retrieved March 31, 2018 from: http://www.cna.com.tw/postwrite/Detail/194271.aspx#.W3jKDOgzbIU\nTai Wanping, Hong Baizhi (2012), International companies’ role in Thailand’s auto industry development process, Asia-Pacific Study Forum, issue 57, page 101-134\nTai Wanping(2016/03), industrialization without technology: Indonesia’s auto industry’s development and political economic analysis, Question and Research, Vol. 55 issue 1, 91-121\nWang Huizhen (2016), A study for the possibility of Taiwan’s Artificial joints enter into Indian market. National Cheng Kung University AMBA, Tainan.\nWang Mingxiang(2018)\nWang Yijun, (2016), One belt one road: oportunities and challenges, Beijing: People’s Publishing House.\nWang Yinian, (2015), The implication of China’s BRI strategy to global politics and economy pivot shifting, Journal of Prospects and exploration, volume 13, no. 3, page 31-39.\nWeng, Mingxian, (2016), Taiwan’s security challenges, New Taipei City: Tamkang University Press.\nWong Lishen, (2017), The four systems of the China`s characteristic socialism politics and economics, Academy of Social Sciences Special Issue, issue 396\nWong Sheiyu, (2012), Thailand’s flood influence IT industry chain globally, Financial Technology Age, issue 19, pp.11\nWu Chong-Bo, (2011), The development, policy, and outlooks of Indonesia’s automotive industry, Journal of South East Asia and South Asia study, Vol. 2011 no. 3 , pp.50-54\nWu Mingze, (2016), BRI, AIIB, and RMB’s internationalization, Joural of Economic outlook, No. 163, pp. 79-84.\nWu Xianzhong (2017), Taiwan’s auto-electronics industry innovation and competition strategy-A company as an example, National Chengchi University EMBA, Taipei.\nXiao Zhen-huan(2017), Indonesian medical materials’ regulation and the business opportunity, retrieved March 13, 2018 from: https://www.newsouthboundpolicy.tw/Content/upload/editor/otherfiles/%E5%8D%B0%E5%B0%BC%E9%86%AB%E7%99%82%E5%99%A8%E6%9D%90%E6%B3%95%E8%A6%8F.pdf\nWu Yushang, (2011), The evolvement of Chinese foreign investment regulation in the background of economy globalization, Taipei, CPTW.\nXiao Yupin (2016), <Identify trends, Precision marketing, make Taiwan’s brands outstanding>, Trade Insight, issue 434, page 54-56\nYan Jianfa, Huang Yijun (2013), From international political economics to look China’s achievements and difficulties of its economic development, Taiwan International Studies Quarterly, vol 9:3, page 71-92.\nZhang Dongsheng(2016), China’s High Speed Rail Diplomacy of its Go Out strategy: take Trans-Asian Railway as example, National Defense Magazine, Vol 31:4, page 87-112.\nZhang-zhang Li, Linqiu Li, (2006), China’s rise and its impact to Korea’s economy, Journal of WTO research, issue 4, pp. 155-188.\nZhang Zhengwen (2017), The innovative development of political economics of socialism with Chinese characteristics, retrieved on Aug. 14, 2017 from: https://www.iread.one/38696.html\nZhou Yangshan (2017), BRI and the pragmatic side of U.S., retrieved on July-31, 2017 from: http://opinion.chinatimes.com/20170617003605-262105\n\nforeign sources\nChristopher K. Johnson, (2016), President Xi Jinping’s `Belt and Road` initiative, retrieved May 27th, 2017 from: https://www.csis.org/analysis/president-xi-jinping%E2%80%99s-belt-and-road-initiative\nDavid Arase, <ONE BELT, ONE ROAD, AND THE CHINESE DREAM>, Retrieved Aug. 1 2017, from: http://asiancenturyinstitute.com/international/1138-one-belt-one-road-and-the-chinese-dream\nDavid Arase, One Belt, One Road, and the Chinese dream, , Retrieved Aug. 1 2017, from: http://asiancenturyinstitute.com/international/1138-one-belt-one-road-and-the-chinese-dream\nDavid Ellwood, (2006), The Marshall Plan: A strategy that worked, Journal of U.S. foreign policy agenda, pp.22-30.\nFinancial Times, 2017/7/17, <China`s railway diplomacy hits the buffers>, Retrieved Aug. 1 2017, from: https://www.ft.com/content/9a4aab54-624d-11e7-8814-0ac7eb84e5f1\nIndonesian Automobile Manufacturers Association (Gaikindo, 2017), Retrieved April. 18 2018, from: https://www.marklines.com/en/statistics/flash_sales/salesfig_indonesia_2017\nJames Kynge & Michael Peel & Ben Bland, China`s railway diplomacy hits the buffers, Retrieved Aug. 1 2017, from: https://www.ft.com/content/9a4aab54-624d-11e7-8814-0ac7eb84e5f1\nJonathan E. Hillman(2017), China’s Belt and Road initiative: five years later, Retrieved April. 6 2018, from: https://www.csis.org/analysis/chinas-belt-and-road-initiative-five-years-later-0\nJonathan E. Hillman(2018), The rise of China-Europe railways, Retrieved April. 6 2018, from: https://www.csis.org/analysis/rise-china-europe-railways\nJoseph S. Nye Jr., How sharp power threatens soft power, Retrieved March. 22 2018, from: https://www.foreignaffairs.com/articles/china/2018-01-24/how-sharp-power-threatens-soft-power\nMarkline, Indonesia - Flash report, sales volume, 2017, Retrieved April. 18 2018, from: https://www.marklines.com/en/statistics/flash_sales/salesfig_indonesia_2017\nMarkLines Data Center, (2017), Retrieved April. 18 2018, from: https://www.marklines.com/en/statistics/flash_sales/salesfig_thailand_2017\nMarklines, Thailand - Flash report, Sales volume, 2017, Retrieved April. 18 2018, from: https://www.marklines.com/en/statistics/flash_sales/salesfig_thailand_2017\nMichael Green, China’s Maritime Silk Road: Strategic and Economic Implications for the Indo-Pacific Region, , Retrieved April. 18 2018, from: https://www.csis.org/analysis/chinas-maritime-silk-road\nOECD, Economic outlook for Southeast Asia, China and India 2018, Retrieved Aug. 2 2017, from: https://www.oecd.org/dev/SAEO2018_Preliminary_version.pdf\nSally Ward-Foxton, Made in China 2025: make or break for Europe?, Retrieved Aug. 2 2017, http://www.eetimes.com/document.asp?doc_id=1332059\nSzenarien und Strategien für Deutschland, China 2030, Retrieved Aug. 2 2017, from: https://www.bertelsmann-stiftung.de/fileadmin/files/BSt/Publikationen/GrauePublikationen/Studie_DA_China_2030_Szenarien_und_Strategien_fuer_Deutschland.pdf\nTheresa Fallon, (2015), The new silk road Xi Jinping’s grand strategy for Eurasia, Journal of American foreign policy interests, no 37, pp. 140-147\nWTO, Trade in value-added and global value chains: statistical profiles, Retrieved Nov. 15, 2017 from: https://www.wto.org/english/res_e/statis_e/miwi_e/countryprofiles_e.htm
描述: 碩士
國立政治大學
亞太研究英語碩士學位學程(IMAS)
1029260021
資料來源: http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#G1029260021
資料類型: thesis
Appears in Collections:學位論文

Files in This Item:
File SizeFormat
002101.pdf4.22 MBAdobe PDF2View/Open
Show full item record

Google ScholarTM

Check

Altmetric

Altmetric


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.