Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://ah.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/121274
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor金融系zh_TW
dc.creatorLee, Chi‐Chuanen_US
dc.creator黃台心zh_TW
dc.creatorHuang, Tai‐Hsinen_US
dc.date2018-08
dc.date.accessioned2018-12-07T09:33:56Z-
dc.date.available2018-12-07T09:33:56Z-
dc.date.issued2018-12-07T09:33:56Z-
dc.identifier.urihttp://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/121274-
dc.description.abstractThis paper estimates and compares the cost efficiency of the Chinese banking industry among different ownership types for the period 2003–2014, using the stochastic metafrontier model. We find that foreign banks have the lowest cost frontier, while state‐owned commercial banks undertake the least sophisticated technology. Moreover, the results of the upward trend in the technology gap ratio (TGR) and in metafrontier cost efficiency support that a more open financial market is able to enhance banking efficiency. As for the role of environmental conditions, off‐balance sheet items, non‐performing loans, and financial market structure significantly impact the TGRs of different bank types. (JEL C51, G21, D24)en_US
dc.format.extent379889 bytes-
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdf-
dc.relationContemporary Economic Policy,
dc.titleWhat Causes the Efficiency and the Technology Gap under Different Ownership Structures in the Chinese Banking Industry?en_US
dc.typearticle
dc.identifier.doi10.1111/coep.12409
dc.doi.urihttps://doi.org/10.1111/coep.12409
item.cerifentitytypePublications-
item.openairecristypehttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_18cf-
item.grantfulltextrestricted-
item.openairetypearticle-
item.fulltextWith Fulltext-
Appears in Collections:期刊論文
Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat
coep.12409.pdf370.99 kBAdobe PDF2View/Open
Show simple item record

Google ScholarTM

Check

Altmetric

Altmetric


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.