Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://ah.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/121403
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor應物所
dc.creatorLin, G;Lin, YC;Wu, RC;Yang, LY;Lu, HY;Tsai, SY;Huang, YT;Huang, YL;Lu, KY;Ng, KK;Yen, TC;Chao, A;Lai, CH;Hong, JHen_US
dc.creator蔡尚岳zh_TW
dc.creatorTsai, Shang‐Yuehen_US
dc.date2018-06
dc.date.accessioned2018-12-17T07:14:38Z-
dc.date.available2018-12-17T07:14:38Z-
dc.date.issued2018-12-17T07:14:38Z-
dc.identifier.urihttp://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/121403-
dc.description.abstractBACKGROUND:A triage test to assist clinical decision-making on choosing primary chemoradiation for cervical carcinomas or primary surgery for endometrial carcinomas is important.PURPOSE OR HYPOTHESIS:To develop and validate a multiparametric prediction model based on MR imaging and spectroscopy in distinguishing adenocarcinomas of uterine cervical or endometrial origin.STUDY TYPE:Prospective diagnostic accuracy study.POPULATION:Eighty-seven women: 25 cervical and 62 endometrial adenocarcinomas divided into training (n = 43; cervical/endometrial adenocarcinomas = 11/32) and validation (n = 44; 14/30) datasets.FIELD STRENGTH/SEQUENCE:The 3T diffusion-weighted (DW) MR imaging and MR spectroscopy.ASSESSMENT:Morphology, volumetric DW MR imaging and spectroscopy (MDS) scoring system with total points 0-5, based on presence of the following MR features assessed independently by two radiologists: (a) epicenter at the cervix, (b) rim enhancement, (c) disrupted cervical stromal integrity, (d) mean volumetric apparent diffusion coefficient values (ADCmean) higher than 0.98 × 10-3 mm2 /s, (e) fatty acyl δ 1.3 ppm more than 161.92 mM. Histopathology as gold standard.STATISTICAL TESTS:Logistic regression and receiver operator characteristic (ROC) curves analysis.RESULTS:For both the training and validation datasets, the MDS score achieved an accuracy of 93.0% and 84.1%, significantly higher than that of morphology (88.4% and 79.5%), ADC value (74.4% and 68.2%), and spectroscopy (81.4% and 68.2%; P < 0.05 for all). The performances of the scoring were superior to the morphology in the training dataset (areas under the receiver operating characteristics curve [AUC] = 0.95 vs. 0.89; P = 0.046), but not in the validation dataset (AUC = 0.90 vs. 0.85; P = 0.289).DATA CONCLUSION:MDS score has potentials to improve distinguishing adenocarcinomas of cervical or endometrial origin, and warrants large-scale studies for further validation.en_US
dc.format.extent108 bytes-
dc.format.mimetypetext/html-
dc.relationJournal of Magnetic Resonance Imaging, Vol.47, No.6, pp.1654-1666
dc.subjectcervical carcinoma; diagnostic accuracy; diffusion-weighted imaging; endometrial carcinoma; magnetic resonance imaging; magnetic resonance spectroscopy
dc.titleDeveloping and validating a multivariable prediction model to improve the diagnostic accuracy in determination of cervical vs. endometrial origin of uterine adenocarcinomasen_US
dc.typearticle
dc.identifier.doi10.1002/jmri.25899
dc.doi.urihttp://dx.doi.org/10.1002/jmri.25899
item.fulltextWith Fulltext-
item.openairecristypehttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_18cf-
item.grantfulltextrestricted-
item.openairetypearticle-
item.cerifentitytypePublications-
Appears in Collections:期刊論文
Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat
index.html108 BHTML2View/Open
Show simple item record

Google ScholarTM

Check

Altmetric

Altmetric


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.