Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
https://ah.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/122149| 題名: | 具SOAR結構化筆記之合作數位閱讀標註對於學習者的閱讀理解成效、閱讀動機以及閱讀態度之影響研究 The effects of collaborative reading annotation system with SOAR structured note function on learner`s reading comprehension, reading motivation and reading attitude |
作者: | 林子郁 Lin, Tzu-Yu |
貢獻者: | 陳志銘 Chen, Chih-Ming 林子郁 Lin, Tzu-Yu |
關鍵詞: | SOAR結構化筆記 合作數位閱讀標註 閱讀理解 閱讀動機 閱讀態度 SOAR structured notes Collaborative digital reading annotations Reading comprehension Reading motivation Reading attitude |
日期: | 2018 | 上傳時間: | 23-Jan-2019 | 摘要: | 數位閱讀對於生活在數位時代的現在人而言，已經是一種越來越重要的素養，特別是針對需要運用閱讀素養來學習新知的孩童而言。本研究旨在探討有無使用具SOAR結構化筆記之合作數位閱讀標註系統的實驗組與控制組五年級學生，在此種數位閱讀環境之中進行數位閱讀，在閱讀理解成效、閱讀動機及閱讀態度的效果。此外，本研究亦探討在此種數位閱讀環境之中，不同性別、認知風格、閱讀先備能力高低及原本筆記習慣有無的學習者，在有無使用具SOAR結構化筆記之合作數位閱讀標註的閱讀理解成效、閱讀動機及閱讀態度效果。\n研究結果發現：(1)實驗組學習者在閱讀理解成效的表現上顯著優於控制組學習者，效果量達中等效果。(2)場地相依型實驗組學習者在閱讀理解成效的表現上顯著優於場地相依型的控制組學習者，效果量達中等效果。(3)原無筆記習慣實驗組學習者在閱讀理解成效的表現上顯著優於控制組學習者，效果量達大效果。然而本研究未發現實驗組和控制組學習者在閱讀動機和閱讀態度上存在顯著差異。\n基於上述研究結果，本研究提出幾點在教學實施及進行具SOAR結構化筆記之合作數位閱讀標註系統時提昇閱讀理解成效的閱讀行為設計。此外，本研究也提出幾點未來研究方向，以便讀者可以根據本研究進行更深入的探討。 Digital reading is becoming a kind of more and more important literacy for modern people living in the digital age, particularly for children who need to use their reading literacy to learn new knowledge. This study aims to examine the effects of the Grade 5 learners in the experimental group and control group who respectively used the collaborative digital reading annotation system with and without the support of SOAR structured notes to conduct digital reading activity on reading comprehension, reading motivation and reading attitude in a digital reading environment. In addition, this study also examines the effects of the learners with different genders, cognitive styles, reading abilities and reading habits who used the collaborative digital reading annotation system with and without the support of SOAR structured notes on readers’ reading comprehension, reading motivation and reading attitude in a digital reading environment.\nThe experimental results of the study confirmed that: (1) the reading comprehension performance of the learners in the experimental group was significantly better than the learners in the control group learners, and the effect size was moderate. (2) the reading comprehension performance of the learners with field-dependent cognitive style in the experimental group was significantly better than the learners with field-dependent cognitive style in the control group learners, and the effect size was moderate. (3) the reading comprehension performance of the learners without noting habit in the experimental group was significantly better than the learners without noting habit in the control group, the effect size was large. However, this study did not get any significant differences between the learners in the experimental group and control group in reading motivation and reading attitude.\nBased on the above research results, this study proposes several suggestions in terms of teaching implementation and design of digital reading for promoting the reading comprehension performance when performing digital reading activity with the support of collaborative digital reading annotation system with SOAR structured notes. Moreover, this study also presents several future research directions so that the readers can do their research in more depth based on the study. |
參考文獻: | 中文文獻\n江欣怡(2016)。雲端高互動閱讀學習平台。科學發展，521，72-73。\n邱美虹(2017)。國際PISA調查中男女學生表現之評比【專論】。性別平等教育季刊，80，24-34。\n吳裕益(1987)。認知能力與認知型態個別差異現象之探討。國立高雄師範學院教育學系及教育研究所教育期刊，7，51-98。\n吳佳玲、張俊彥(2002)。高一學生地球科學問題解決能力與其先備知識及推理能力關係的初探研究。科學教育學刊，10(2)，135-156。\n林珊如(2010)。數位時代的閱讀：青少年網路閱讀的爭議與未來。圖書資訊學刊，8(2)，29-53。\n張菀真、辜玉旻。國小高、低閱讀能力學童圖文閱讀的理解策略。臺北市立教育大學學報，42(2)，93-122。\n柯華葳、曾玉村、洪儷瑜、王宣惠、陳秀芬、陸怡琮…張菀真(2017)。閱讀理解策略教學。臺中市：教育部國民及學前教育署。\n柯華葳、張郁雯、詹益綾、丘嘉慧(2017)。PIRLS 2016 臺灣四年級學生閱讀素養國家報告。桃園市:國立中央大學。\n莊惠茹(2012)。「創造數位出版、圖書館與讀者三贏的數位閱讀時代」。全國新書資訊月刊，158，13-15。\n陳世娟、邵婉卿(2015)。臺灣成年民眾數位閱讀載具與閱讀行為之現況調查。大學圖書館，19(1)，41-69。\n陳志銘、陳佳琪(2008)。數位典藏支援數位學習現況與發展。臺灣圖書館管理季刊，4(2)，9-23。\n陳志銘、韋祿恩、吳志豪(2011)。認知型態與標註品質對閱讀成效之影響與關聯研究：以數位閱讀標註系統為例。圖書與資訊學刊，3(1)，1-25。\n陳銹陵、陳明溥、韓宜娣(2011)。鷹架類型與先備知識對高職電腦軟體應用課程之成效探討。數位學習科技期刊，3(1)，101-120。\n陳勇汀(2011)。合作式閱讀標註之知識萃取機制研究（未出版之碩士論文）。國立政治大學，臺北市。\n課文本位閱讀理解教學研發團隊(2012)。閱讀理解策略成分與年級對照表。107年12月26日下載於：http://pair.nknu.edu.tw/pair_system/Search_index.aspx?PN=Reader。\n呂淑華、張芬芬(2013)。分享式閱讀教學對國小二年級學童閱讀態度及理解之成效研究。教育研究與發展期刊，9(2)，91-116。\n陳柏霖、洪兆祥、余民寧(2013)。網路閱讀態度、網路閱讀行為及網路閱讀素養之橫斷面研究。教育科學研究期刊，58(3)，23-50。\n陳品華(2013)。大學生課堂筆記策略教學方案之成效。教育研究集刊，59(1)，73-112。\n陳志銘、蔡雁農(2013)。互動式擴增實境系統支援國小圖書館利用教育。臺北市立圖書館館訊，30(3)，30-49。\n陳怡君(2017)。具SOAR結構化筆記功能之合作數位閱讀標註系統對於國小學生閱讀理解成效之影響研究(未出版之碩士論文）。國立政治大學：臺北市。\n陳金萬(2017)。數位革命翻轉閱讀教學趨勢。書香遠傳，132，32-39。\n陳明蕾(2018)。課文本位閱讀策略教學對國小學童閱讀表現與策略使用覺知情形之影響。教育心理學報，49(4)，581-609。\n教育部(2010)。閱讀理解策略教學手冊。臺北市：教育部。\n教育部(2016)。2016-2020資訊教育總藍圖。臺北市：三民書局。\n游雅婷(2016)。課文本位閱讀理解教學：亮點學校成功模式。新北市：國家教育研究院。\n劉宜芳、柯華葳(2017)。線上閱讀研究之回顧與展望。教育科學研究期刊，62(2)，61-87。\n劉佩雲、簡馨瑩、宋曜廷(2003)。教育研究資訊，11(6)，135-158。\n蔡銘修、陳振元(2014)。情境模擬於數位學習之重要性：著重學生該做什麼。2014大學遠距教學認證成果發表暨學術研討會，臺北市劍潭海外青年活動中心教學大樓。\n駐德國代表處教育組(2015)。OECD研究報告分析男女生學習成就影響因素(2015)。教育部電子報，669。取自https://goo.gl/JB2m4T。\n賴阿福(2016)。數位學習科技新趨勢。T&D飛訊，215，1-18。\n謝進昌(2014)。教室內數位閱讀學習與評量【專論】。教育人力與專業發展，31(3)，1-6。\n謝進昌(2015)。有效的中文閱讀理解策略： 國內實徵研究之最佳證據整合。教育科學研究期刊，60(2)，33-77。\n\n英文文獻\nAvcıYücel, Ü. & KoçakUsluel, Y. (2016). Knowledge building and the quantity, content and quality of the interaction and participation of students in an online collaborative learning environment, Computers & Education, 97, 31-48.\nBaker, A.R., Lin, T. J., Chen, J., Paul, N., Anderson, R. C., & Jahiel, K. N. (2017). Effects of teacher framing on student engagement during collaborative reasoning discussions, Computers & Education, 51, 253-266.\nBold, M. R., & Wagstaff, K. L. (2017). Marginalia in the digital age: Are digital reading devices meeting the needs of today`s readers? Library & Information Science Research, 39, 16-22.\nBouckenooghe, D., Cools, E., Clercq, D. D., Vanderheyden, K., & Fatima, T. (2016). Exploring the impact of cognitive style profiles on different learning approaches: Empirical evidence for adopting a person-centered perspective, Learning and Individual Differences, 51, 299-306.\nChen, I. J., & Yen, J. C. (2013). Hypertext annotation: Effects of presentation formats and learner proficiency on reading comprehension and vocabulary learning in foreign languages, Computers & Education, 63, 416-423.\nChen, L. H. (2010). Web-based learning programs: Use by learners with various cognitive styles, Computers & Education, 54, 1028-1035.\nChen, Y. C., Hwang, R. H., & Wang, C. Y. (2012). Development and evaluation of a Web 2.0 annotation system as a learning tool in an e-learning environment, Computers & Education, 58, 1094-1105.\nDaher, T. A., & Kiewra, K. A. (2016). An investigation of SOAR study strategies for learning from multiple online resources, Computers & Education, 46, 10-21.\nEmerson, T. L. N., English, L., & McGoldrick, K. M. (2016). Cooperative learning and personality types, Computers & Education, 21, 21-29.\nFrey, I. G., Deutscher, M., & Renkl, A. (2018). Student teachers` prior knowledge as prerequisite to learn how to assess pupils` learning strategies, Teaching and Teacher Education, 1-15.\nGlover, I., Xu, Z., & Hardaker, G. (2007). Online annotation-Research and practices, Computers & Education, 49, 1308-1320.\nHahnel, C., Goldhammer, F., Kröhnea, U., & Naumann, J. (2017). Reading digital text involves working memory updating based on task characteristics and reader behavior, Learning and Individual Differences, 59, 149-157.\nHuang, C. S. J., Su, A. Y. S., Yang, S. J. H., & Liou, H. H.(2017). A collaborative digital pen learning approach to improving students` learning achievement and motivation in mathematics courses, Computers & Education,107, 31-44.\nHwang, W.Y., Wang, C. Y., & Sharples, M. (2007). A study of multimedia annotation of Web-based materials, Computers & Education, 48, 680-699.\nJairam, D., & Kiewra, K. A. (2010). Helping Students Soar to Success on Computers: An Investigation of the SOAR Study Method for Computer-Based Learning, Journal of Educational Psychology, 102(3), 601-614.\nJairam, D., & Kiewra, K. A.(2009). An Investigation of the SOAR Study Method, Journal of Advanced Academics, 20(4), 602-629.\nJairam, D., Kiewra, K. A., Kasson, S. R., Hazley, M. P., & Marxhausen, K. (2014), SOAR versus SQ3R: a test of two study systems, Learning & Instruction, 42, 409-420.\nJanuchta, M. K., Hoffler, T., Thoma, G. B., Prechtl, H., & Leutner, D. (2017). Visualizers versus verbalizers: Effects of cognitive style on learning with texts and pictures e An eye-tracking study, Computers in Human Behavior, 68, 170-179.\nKasson, S. C. (2012). Which Study Method Works Best? A Comparison of SOAR and SQ3R for Text Learning, College of Education and Human Sciences, 165.\nLi, L. Y., & Tsai, C. C. (2017). Accessing online learning material: Quantitative behavior patterns and their effects on motivation and learning performance, Computers & Education, 114, 286-297.\nMangen, A., Walgermo, B. R., & Bronnick, W. K. (2013). Reading linear texts on paper versus computer screen: Effects on reading comprehension, International Journal of Educational Research, 58, 61-68.\nMcDonough, K., & Foote, J. A. (2015). The impact of individual and shared clicker use on students` collaborative learning, Computers & Education, 86, 236-249.\nMefoh, P. C., Nwoke, M. B., Chukwuorji, J. C., & Chijioke, A. O. (2017). Effect of cognitive style and gender on adolescents’ problemsolving ability, Thinking Skills and Creativity, 25, 47–52.\nMiura, M. (2017). ReactiveWebATN: Web-based Handwriting Note Sharing System for Distance Learning, Procedia Computer Science, 112, 1326-1333.\nMizrachi, D. (2015). Undergraduates` Academic Reading Format Preferences and Behaviors, The Journal of Academic Librarianship, 41(3), 301-311.\nSung, Y.T., Chang, K.E., & Liu, T. C. (2016). The effects of integrating mobile devices with teaching and learning on students` learning performance: A meta-analysis and research synthesis, Computers & Education, 94, 252-275.\nVolkova, E. V., & Rusalov, V. M. (2016). Cognitive styles and personality, Personality and Individual Differences, 99, 266-271.\nWakefield, J., Frawley, J. K., Tyler, J., & Dyson, L. E. (2018). The impact of an iPad-supported annotation and sharing technology on university students` learning, Computers & Education, doi: 10.1016/j.compedu.2018.03.013.\nYang, C. C., Tseng, S. S., Shih, W.C., & Liang, T. (2012). A cross-text annotation sharing mechanism for engancing students’ comprehension of poetry, The Turkish Online Journal of Educational Technology, 11(4), 13-24.\nYang, X., Li, J., & Xing, B. (2018). Behavioral patterns of knowledge construction in online cooperative translation activities, The Internet and Higher Education, 36, 13-21.\nYeh, S. W., & Lo, J. J. (2009). Using online annotations to support error correction and corrective feedback, Computers & Education, 52, 882-892.\nZhang, S., Liu, Q., Chen, W., Wang, Q., & Huang, Z. (2017). Interactive networks and social knowledge construction behavioral patterns in primary school teachers` online collaborative learning activities, Computers & Education, 104, 1-17. | 描述: | 碩士 國立政治大學 圖書資訊學數位碩士在職專班 105913011 |
資料來源: | http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#G0105913011 | 資料類型: | thesis |
| Appears in Collections: | 學位論文 |
Files in This Item:
| File | Size | Format | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 301101.pdf | 6.29 MB | Adobe PDF2 | View/Open |
Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.