Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
https://ah.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/122321| 題名: | 互動式網頁數位學習成效之研究—以數位單眼模擬器學習基礎攝影為例 Research on digital learning effectiveness of interactive website - a case study of learning basic photography on digital camera simulator |
作者: | 謝孟霖 Hsieh, Meng-Lin |
貢獻者: | 陳聖智<br>廖峻鋒 Chen, Sheng-Chih<br>Liao, Chun-Feng 謝孟霖 Hsieh, Meng-Lin |
關鍵詞: | 互動式網頁 數位學習 自主學習 攝影學習 使用者介面 學習成效 Interactive website Digital learning Self-learning Learning photography User interface Learning effectiveness |
日期: | 2019 | 上傳時間: | 12-Feb-2019 | 摘要: | 21 世紀是數位化的世紀，數位相機是每個家庭中皆能看見的科技產品，加上智慧型拍照手機與修圖軟體的普及化，拍照成為一項全民運動，然而，基礎攝影的觀念卻不如相機的硬體普及。攝影的數位自主學習浪潮，在中文化的資訊中，目前僅存在單純圖文式的教學網站，然而學習攝影的過程，如果不能同時感受各種攝影參數對成像的即時變化，無法讓學習者感同身受地有效學習。\n本研究設計互動式基礎攝影學習網站，作為攝影的數位自主學習系統/輔助學習系統，以互動式網頁（Interactive Website）為主要載體，發展全中文的互動式學習、評量系統。本研究規劃的互動式基礎攝影學習網站系統由三部分構成：全中文攝影教學網站、數位單眼模擬器、數位學習評價系統組成。在在本研究的實驗中，透過實際建置靜態攝影觀念呈現網頁、選用現行的單眼相機模擬器CameraSim Pro、設計數位問卷形式之測驗與問卷調查等方式，邀請受測者參與實驗，記錄受測者之學習行為與測驗數據加以驗證，並討論其數位學習成效。\n在研究方法中，採用前實驗法與調查研究法，試圖以兩種研究方法探討下列研究問題：數位學習如何提升學習基礎攝影之成效？如何讓本身無持有實體相機的使用者，透過數位學習提升基礎攝影學習成效？如何以客觀、科學化的方式評估攝影的數位學習成效。本研究透過攝影知識呈現網頁與相機模擬器，提供本身無持有實體相機的使用者（本研究的目標使用者為攝影生手）t攝影知識觀念的學習與等同實體相機的對焦、曝光、取景構圖操作練習，以兩種研究方法記錄受測者於實驗中的表現行為與數據，並以 SAS 統計軟體進行科學化的分析，試圖找到客觀詮釋研究問題的方法。\n在前實驗法中，採用單組前後測設計為實驗方法，以數據結果討論數位學習系統之學習成效的客觀依據。實驗結果顯示 7 位受測者中有 6 位受測者的前後測表現達到顯著差異，故推論互動式網頁的數位學習方式能正向提升受測者對基礎攝影觀念的了解程度與單眼相機操作的正確性。在調查研究法中，設計問卷調查與訪談調查，以數位問卷蒐集受測者的基本資料與對攝影的認知程度。實驗結束後兩個月進行簡易的觀察訪談，記錄受測者後續的攝影作品與攝影理念，簡易評論受測者在實驗後實行拍攝行為的成果。所有受測者皆有出色的表現，其作品在對焦、曝光、取景構圖三種性質皆達到一定的正確水準。挑出受測者進行深度訪談，了解受測者學習攝影的初衷、拍攝照片之動機與接受本研究之數位學習後對於攝影行為的改變。 The 21st century is a digitalized age. Digital cameras have become the technological products that can be seen in every family. However, the concept of basic photography is not as well-known as the popularization of camera hardware itself. There are only static websites with images and texts in all the Chinese photography-learning websites. However, learning photography requires the acquaintance of changes between every parameter. Therefore, interactive websites with dynamic changes of camera could effectively help learners understand the concept of photography.\nThis study designed an interactive website as a digital self-learning system and learning support system. The website system was fully in Chinese, with interactive learning and evaluation functions. The system was consisted of 3 parts: Websites of photography concepts, Digital camera simulator and Learning evaluation system. By creating websites, using the existed software CameraSim Pro and designing on-line surveys, this study conducted experiments of learning effectiveness.\nThe research purpose was to enhance digital learning effectiveness by using the website system, and meanwhile, trying to find out a moderate method that subjectively evaluate learning effectiveness. In the research method, this study applied experiment method and survey method. For experiment method, this study applied single-group pretest-posttest design. In both pretest and posttest, subjrsects participated the photography knowledge test and the camera simulator test. After collecting answers and behavior data from the experiments, this study computeid the statistical significance, reliability and validity. As a result, 85.7%g csubjeic ts showed significant differences (protest V.S. pretest). By interpreting the statistical result, this study found it an effective learning way by learning photography on interactive website. For the survey method, this study designed on-line questionnaires for user satisfaction, SUS (System Usability Scale) and user information, and additionally, interviewed subjects after the experiment for the extreme experimental results.\nIn conclusion, by interpreting all the statistical data, questionnaires data and interviews after experiments, interactive websites with camera simulator could enhance the digital learning effectiveness of photography. |
參考文獻: | 中文文獻\n吳美美（2004）。數位學習現況與未來發展。圖書館學與資訊科學期刊，30（2），92-106。\n宋曜廷/主編、宋曜廷、吳昭容、劉子鍵、廖遠光、洪煌堯、吳心楷、籃玉如、周倩、廖楷民、辛靜婷、潘佩妤/合著（2012）。數位學習研究方法。台北市：高等教育出版社。\n李漢岳、楊介銘、宋曜廷（2017）。數位學習實驗研究品質評估與現況分析：以行動學習為例。教育科學研究期刊，62（2），31-60。\n岳修平（譯）（1998）。教學心理學 : 學習的認知基礎（原作者：Gagne, E.D., Yekovich, C.W., & Yekovich, F.R.）。台北市：遠流文化。\n林守德（2010）。你真的學會了嗎？數位學習的新武器：能夠自動評估學習成效的系統。科學人雜誌，104，23。台北市：遠流文化。\n林俊吉（2016）。攝影－影像造型與敘事。中華開放教育平台。Retrieved from https://www.openedu.tw。\n邱弘昇、趙貞怡（2012）。應用網路實況平臺進行自主學習之學習成效研究。資訊傳播研究，2（2），59-75。\n唐大論、莊賢智（2004）。新聞圖文左右空間配置對視線影響之初探。銘傳大學設計國際學術研討會。\n張基成、林冠佑（2016）。從傳統數位學習到遊戲式數位學習―學習成效、心流體驗與認知負荷。教育科學研究期刊，24（3），221-248。\n許峻誠（2011）。數位典藏藝術類網站頁面之使用者經驗研究。藝術教育研究，22，79-103。\n陳彙芳、范懿文（2000）。認知負荷對多媒體電腦輔助學習成效之影響研究。資訊管理期刊，2（2），45-60。\n陳嘉皇（譯）（2003）。自我調整學習 : 教學理論與實務（原作者：Dale H. Schunk, Barry J. Zimmerman）。台北市：心理文化。\n陸維元（2012）。完形理論應用於大學攝影教學之學習成效評估。藝術教育研究，24，73-106。\n游本寬（2008）。美國大學攝影教育現況兼窺探其數位化的未來。美學教育學刊，161，68-79。\n黃中憲（譯）（2001）。國家地理攝影精技 : 教你如何拍出精彩照片（原作者：Burian, P. K. & Caputo, R.）。台北市：大地地理。\n黃鈴池（2005）。數位化時代臺灣攝影教育策略之研究。台南女院學報，24（1），279-300。\n楊心怡（2013）。從認知負荷觀點探討鷹架輔助遊戲式學習於人體血液循環之研究。教育與傳播科技研究，106，65-78。\n楊玉東（2010）。陳述性知識與程序性知識的教學策略。天津師範大學學報（基礎教育版），11（3），18-22。\n楊奕農、柴蕙質（2002）。非同步網路學習成效及影響因素之計量分析：經濟\n楊建榮（2012）。攝影教學中網路資源的運用與思考。電影評介，4，98-100。\n葉盈秀（2006）。數位學習教學平台視覺介面之設計與發展。淡江大學教育科技學系碩士班碩士論文。\n資策會教育處講師群(2003)。數位學習最佳指引。台北市:資策會教育處。\n鄒景平（2006）。數位學習的四項要素。研習論壇期刊，71，24-29。\n劉錫權（2001）。試探視覺傳達設計的範疇裡進行之基礎攝影課程視覺素養的養成教育目標及方法。朝陽設計學報，2，1-9。\n樊文強（2012）。基於關聯主義的大規模網路開放課程（MOOC）及其學習支持。遠距教學期刊，3，31-36。\n學課程個案研究。科學教育學刊，10（2），193-210。\n賴吉欽、施威銘研究室合著（2006）。DSLR 單眼數位相機聖經。台北市：旗標。\n賴建都（1998）。網際網路廣告訊息設計之研究。廣告學研究，11，19-36。\n賴建都、黎佩芬（2011）。網路重度使用者對網頁訊息認知與瀏覽模式之研究－以台灣購物網站商品訊息呈現為例。電子商務學，13（3），517-553。\n謝顒丞、李政家（2005）。大學校院攝影設計課程規劃之研究。師大學報，50（1），105-129。\n韓艷輝（2010）。應用ADDIE模型進行多媒體互動英語學習資源的教學設計—對純再現非正式學習環境的個案研究。現代遠距離教育，1，1-3。\n顏春煌（2007）。漫談數位學習的理論。空大學訊，385，91-96。\n顧大維（2005）。從數位教學平台使用的迷思：看教學設計在數位學習應扮演的角色。教育研究月刊，131，118-126。\n\n英文文獻\nAnderson, J. R. (1983). Architecture of cognition. Cambridge, MA:Harvard University Press.\nBangor, A. (2009). Determining what individual SUS scores mean: Adding an adjective rating scale. Journal of usability studies, 4(3), 114-123.\nBilyk, R. (2005). Elearning that goes beyond text and graphics. T.H.E. Journal, 33(2), 36-38.\nBrown, J. S., Collins, A. and Duguid, P. (1989). Situated Cognition and the Culture of Learning. Educational Researcher, 18(1), 32-42.\nCampbell, D. T., Stanley, J. C., & Gage, N. L. (1963). Experimental and quasi-experimental designs for research. Boston: Houghton Mifflin.\nChang, M. M. (2005). Applying self-regulated learning strategies in a web- based instruction-An investigation of motivation perception. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 18, 217-230.\nCheng, Y. & Wang, S. H. (2011). Applying a 3D virtual learning environment to facilitate stu- dent’s application ability - The case of marketing. Computers in Human Behavior, 27(1), 576- 584.\nCross, J. (2004). An informal history of eLearning. On the Horizon, 12(3), 103-110.\nDownes, S. (2005, October). E-learning 2.0. e-learning magazine. Retrieved from https://elearnmag.acm.org.\nDrave, W. A. (2000). Teaching online. River Falls. Wisconsin: LERN Books.\nDeterding, S., Sicart, M., Nacke, L., O`Hara, K., and Dixon, D. (2011). Gamification-using game-design elements in non-gaming contexts. In Proceedings of CHI Extended Abstracts, 2425-2428.\nDeterding, S., Khaled, R., Nacke, L., Dixon, D. (2011). Gamification: Toward a Definition, CHI 2011 Gamification Workshop Proceedings, Vancouver, BC, Canada.\nFlatla, D., Gutwin, C., Nacke, L., Bateman, S., Mandryk, R. (2011). Calibration Games: Making Calibration Tasks Enjoyable by Adding Motivating Game Elements, UIST 2011, Santa Barbara, California\nGeorge, D., & Mallery, P. (2003). SPSS for Windows step by step: A simple guide and reference. 11.0 update (4th ed.). Boston: Allyn & Bacon.\nGregory, S., Lee, M. J. W., Dalgarno, B. and Tynan, B. (2016). Learning in Virtual worlds: Research and applications. Published by AU Press, Athabasca University.\nHorner, G. (2016). The Photography Teacher’s Handbook. New York, NY: Focal Press.\nHedman, L., & Sharafi, P. (2004). Early use of internet-based educational resources: Effects on students’ engagement modes and flow experience. Behaviour & Information Technology, 23(2), 137-146.\nKennedy, L. M., Akers, C. & Jackson, R. B. (2017). Using an Experiential Learning Design to Teach Photography in Agricultural Communications. Journal of Applied Communications, 101(4). Retrieved from https://newprairiepress.org/\nKirkpatrick, D. L. (1994). Evaluation training programs: The four levels. San Francisco: Berrett-Koehler.\nMayer, R. E. (1992). Cognition and instruction: Their historic meeting within educational psychology. Journal of Educationl Psychology, 84, 405-412.\nMolenda, M. (2003). In Search of the Elusive ADDIE Model. Performance Improvement, 42(5), 34-36.\nMuntean, C. I. (2011). Raising engagement in e-learning through gamification. The 6th International Conference on Virtual Learning ICVL 2011, 323-329\nNi, B., Xu, M., Cheng, B., Wang, M., Yan, S. and Tian, Q. (2013). Learning to Photograph: A Compositional Perspective. IEEE Transactions on Multimedia, 15(5), 1138-1151.\nOrwin, L. M. (2011). Learning in Virtual Worlds. What activities are the best fit for highly immersive virtual worlds? Retrieved from http://learning-in-virtual-worlds.wikispaces.com/best-fit\nPass,F., Renkl, A., & Sweller, J. (2003). Cognitive load theory and instructional design : recent development. Educational Psychology, 38(1), 1-4.\nRand, G., Stevens, J.A. & Horner, G. (2015). Teaching Photography: Tools for the Imaging Educator. New York.\nReynaldo, J. & Santos, A. (1999). Cronbach`s Alpha: A Tool for Assessing the Reliability of Scales. Tools of trade, 37(2). Retrieved from https://joe.org/joe/\nRosenberg, Marc J. (2001). E-Learning: Strategies for Delivering Knowledge in the Digital Age. NY: McGraw -Hill.\nSauro, J. (2011). SUStisfied? Little-Known System Usability Scale Facts. User Experience Magazine, 10(3). Retrieved from http://uxpamagazine.org/sustified/\nSauro, J. (2011). When designing usability questionnaires, does it hurt to be positive? Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. 2215-2224.\nShiffrin, R.M. & Schneider, W. (1977). Controlled and automatic human information processing: II. Perceptual learning, automatic attending, and a general theory. Psychological Review, 84, 127-190.\nSim, R. (1997). Interactivity: A forgotten art? Computers in Human Behavior, 13(2), 157-180.\nSiemens, G. (2005). Connectivism: A Learning Theory for the Digital Age. Instructional Technology & Distance learning, 1, 3-10.\nWedemeyer, C. A. (1981). Learning at the back door: Reflections on non- traditional learning in the lifespan. Madison, WI: University of Madison Press.\nYalcinalp, S., Sen, N. and Koroglu, F. (2012). Higher education students’ behaviors as Avatars in a web based course in second life. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 4534-4538. \nYin, W., Mei, T., Chen, C. W. and Li, S. (2014). Socialized Mobile Photography: Learning to Photograph With Social Context via Mobile Devices. IEEE Transactions on Multimedia, 16(1). Retrieved from https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/ | 描述: | 碩士 國立政治大學 數位內容碩士學位學程 104462011 |
資料來源: | http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#G0104462011 | 資料類型: | thesis |
| Appears in Collections: | 學位論文 學位論文 |
Files in This Item:
| File | Size | Format | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 201101.pdf | 31.39 MB | Adobe PDF2 | View/Open |
Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.