Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://ah.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/124236
題名: 韓國第五至第六共和國憲法之變遷:總統四年連任制爭議之視角
The changes in the Constitution of the Republic of Korea to the Sixth Republic : The perspective of the president`s four-year re-election system
作者: 郭安琪
Guo, An-Qi
貢獻者: 李明
Li, Ming
郭安琪
Guo, An-Qi
關鍵詞: 韓國憲法
韓國總統
韓國政治
四年制連任制度
韓國憲法修改
Korean constitution
Korean president
Korean politics
Four-year re-election System
Korean constitution amendment
日期: 2018
上傳時間: 1-七月-2019
摘要: 在本文中,筆者主要會通過選用法實證主義下的社會法學作為研究途徑的出發點,利用社會法學的分析方法中形式-現實-理想-現實的研究途徑,將應然的法與實然的法之間的關聯以及其轉換形式作為本文研究的最終落腳點。\n應然之法即應該存在但並未真實存在的法,實然之法即第五共和國和第六共和國的憲法規範條文所映射的含義。筆者將會通過對第五共和國憲法和第六共和國憲法的綜合性分析,最終將第五共和國和第六共和國憲法進行一定的評價。通過對第五共和國和第六共和國憲法的深入探究,筆者意圖推演出為何韓國第六共和國憲法最終取代第五共和國憲法。\n由於「實然-應然」這個環節需要借助具體制度進行分析,筆者將會以第六共和國憲法修正的焦點問題「四年制連任制度」作為研究對象,主要從四年制連任制度與社會現實的適應性,四年制連任制度與社會現實的衝突以及四年制連任制度與社會現實衝突的解決途徑這幾個方面進行論述。\n關於四年制連任制度與社會現實的適應性,筆者將會通過經濟,政治,民主文化進行列舉後進行歸納分析。關於四年制連任制度與社會現實的衝突性,筆者將會通過列舉分析韓國修憲的歷史,從而希望借助歷史的分析突破對於“4年連任制度等於總統無限期連任”命題的依賴。關於四年制連任制度與社會現實衝突的解決途徑,筆者將會從三個方面進行探究。首先,四年連任制度可以促使選民對政治體系中的政治執政者更加直接的予以課責。其次,四年制連任可以大大的提高當選者的政治責任感,同時相應的責任追究也會更加便利。最後,四年制連任的制度會使得總統和國會的選舉期間同時進行或者時間相一致。\n面對著四年制連任制度與社會現實的衝突,筆者將採取憲法的「規範讓位於現實的解決方法」作為此次研究的起點,分別從憲法解釋、憲法修改、違憲審查制度進行探究。筆者試圖通過不同的三個層次,從解釋經修改到審查,去完善憲法自身發展的體系,促使憲法可以在內部必然的自發的發展,從而推進憲法的改良優化。
In this thesis, As the starting point of the research, the author chooses the social law under the legal positivism and use the approach of form-reality-ideal-reality as the analytical method of social law. This thesis analyzes the relationship between the due law and the actual law so as to find its form of transformation as the final destination of this study.\nThe author makes a comprehensive analysis of South Korea’s Constitutions of the Fifth and the Sixth Republics. Through an in-depth study of the Constitutions of the Fifth and Sixth Republics, the author intends to deduce the reason why the Constitution of the Sixth Republic eventually replaced that of the Fifth Republic.\nAs the "reality-ought" needs to be analyzed with the help of specific systems, the author takes the "four-year re-election system" as the research objective, which focuses on the constitutional amendment of the Sixth Republic. As of the main discussion, the author finds the adaptability of the four-year re-election system to social reality, the conflict between them, and the ways to solve the conflict between the four-year re-election system and social reality.\nAs for the solution of the conflict between the four-year re-election system and social reality, the author mainly explores three aspects. First, the four-year re-election system can make voters more directly accountable to the political rulers in the political system. Secondly, four-year re-election can greatly improve the political responsibility of the elected, and the corresponding accountability will be more convenient. Thirdly, the four-year re-election system will lead to simultaneous or coincide time of presidential and congressional elections.\nFaced with the conflict between the four-year re-election system and social reality, the author adopts the "norm giving way to reality" of the Constitution as the starting point of study. The author tries to improve the system of constitutional development through three different levels, i.e., from interpretation, amendment to review. The aim is to promote the inevitable and spontaneous development of the Constitution in the interior, as well as the improvement and optimization of it.
參考文獻: 中文部分\n(一)書籍:\n王世傑,錢端升,《比較憲法》,商務印書館,2004年。\n尼可拉斯·盧曼,《社會法學》,上海世紀出版集團,2013年。\n任國松,《法律解釋方法的位序》,中國政法大學,2011年。\n向 容, 《法律解釋方法之適用問題研究》,中國政法大學,2010年。\n何勤華,《西方法學史綱》第三版,商務印書館,2016年。\n何勤華,《西方法律思想史》第二版,復旦大學出版社,2009年。\n吳明譯,森山茂德著 ,《韓國現代政治》,五南圖書出版公司,2005年。\n李 明,《南北韓政經發展與東北亞安全》,五南圖書出版公司,1998年。\n杜強強,《論憲法修改程序》,中國人民大學出版社,2008年。\n汪 棟,《憲法程序考論》,法律出版社,2016年。\n亞里士多德著,吳壽彭譯,《政治學》,商務印書館,1965年。\n林秋山,《韓國憲政與總統選舉》,商務印書館,2009年。\n金 首 ,《論法律解釋的方法》,對外經濟貿易大學,2006年。\n金榮秀, 《韓國憲法史》,學文社,2001年。\n孫謙、韓大元,《憲法实施的保障》,中國檢察出版社,2013年。\n曹中屏,張璉瑰等,《當代韓國史》,南開大學出版社,2005年。\n莫紀宏,《違憲審查的理論與實踐》,法律出版社,2006年。\n陳海瑩,《「韓國病」的政治解讀》,中國社會科學出版社,2015年。\n劉亞叢,《事實與解釋-在歷史與法律之間》,法律出版社,2010年。\n鄭繼永,《韓國政黨體系》,韓國研究文庫,2008年。\n權甯興,《憲法總論》,法文社,2000年。\n龔克瑜,《演進與超越.當代韓國政治》,知識產權出版社,2014年。\n\n(二)碩士論文\n申愛順, 《韓國違憲審查制度對我國的啓示》,延邊大學,碩士論文,2013年。\n安瑜娜,《論韓國總統彈劾制度》,延邊大學,碩士論文,2018年。\n李寶奇, 《從民主制度及違憲審查的發展解析韓國憲政歷程》,延邊大學,碩士論文,2006年。\n李寶奇, 《韓國修憲曆史及其政治制度變遷研究》,延邊大學碩士論文,2009年。\n杜強強,「法學方法與我國憲法學研究的轉型」,《法學研究》第 4 期,2012年。\n金 輝, 《關于韓國憲法修改中總統制的問題探討》,延邊大學,碩士論文,2009年。\n張慧霞,《憲法與社會現實的衝突與協調》,武漢大學,碩士論文,2005年。\n黃如玉, 《韓國憲法變遷中的憲法修改研究》,複旦大學,碩士論文,2009年。\n黃洋洋, 《「帝王總統」:韓國總統權力研究》,華中師範大學,碩士論文,2015年。\n劉時宇, 《韓國總統制下政策不連續性的原因分析》,北京外國語大學,碩士論文2017年。\n\n韓文部分\n(一)書籍\n민 진,《한국정책체계론》,대영문화사,2015년.\n정호선,《내가 대통령이라면》,행복한에너지,2016년.\n(二)期刊論文\n한태연,「韓國憲法에 있어서의 大統領制의實相」,《법학연구》,충남대학교,1993\n년,pp. 39-55.\n姜勝植,「大統領當選人에 대한 現職大統領의 憲法上 義務와 그 限界」,《고시계》,\n고시계사,2008년,pp. 70-78.\n김지형,「1987 년 헌법 개정과 이후 개헌 논의의 정치적 상관성」,《인문사회》,\n서원대학교,2017년,pp. 1375-1389.\n장영수,「현행헌법상의 정부형태와 대통령의 지위 및 권한에 관한 연구」,\n《공법학연구》,한국비교공법학회,2008년,pp. 173-193.\n김명식,「대통령 권한대행제도와 헌법개정」,《미국헌법연구》,미국헌법학회,\n2018년,pp. 39-66.\n김종철,「대통령의 헌법상의 지위와 권력비판의 올바른 방향」,《언론과법》,\n한국언론법학회,2005년,pp. 7-47.\n권영설,「한국의 대통령제와 그 헌법운용」,《중앙법학》,중앙법학회,\n2007년,pp. 7-42.\n한상범,「제 5 공화국 헌법의 특색」,《고시계》,고시계사,1981년,pp. 12-27.\n이승우,「憲法修正의 必要性과 그에 따른 憲法修正의方向」,《공법학연구》,\n한국비교공법학회,2007년,pp. 29-56.\n전학선,「대한민국 정부형태와 헌법개정」,《법학논총》,전남대학교,\n2016년, pp. 111-137.\n金哲洙,「韓國憲法의 制定과. 修正經過小考」,《법사학연구》,헌국법사학회,\n1981년,pp. 217-246.\n김명수,「헌법재판의 기능과 권력분립」,《공공사회연구》,한국공공사회학회,\n2011년,pp. 1-45.\n이상명,「현행 정부형태의 문제점과 헌법개정에 관한 고찰」,《한양법학》,\n한양법학회,2011년,pp. 683-699.\n이한태,「개헌의 필요성과 바람직한 정부형태」,《고시연구》,고시연구사,\n2010년,pp. 93-113.\n서희경,「한국 헌정사와 개헌」,《한국정치외교사논총》, 2014년,pp. 73-102.\n전찬희,「분권형 대통령제에 관한 연구」,《미국헌법연구》,2014년, pp. 487-510
描述: 碩士
國立政治大學
韓國語文學系
1065570103
資料來源: http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#G1065570103
資料類型: thesis
Appears in Collections:學位論文

Files in This Item:
File SizeFormat
010301.pdf1.28 MBAdobe PDF2View/Open
Show full item record

Google ScholarTM

Check

Altmetric

Altmetric


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.