Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:

Title: 情婦敘家常——PTT第三者板論述分析
Mistresses’ Chitchat about Marriage: A Discourse Analysis on PTT Third-Person Forum
Authors: 林薇晨
Lin, Wei-Chen
Contributors: 方念萱
Fang, Nien-Hsuan
Lin, Wei-Chen
Keywords: 情婦
Marriage norms
Decriminalization of adultery
Discourse analysis
Date: 2019
Issue Date: 2019-07-01 11:14:58 (UTC+8)
Abstract:   基於通姦除罪化尚未完成的台灣社會情境,筆者試圖透過情婦的自述探究情婦、婚家、婚外情三者之間的關係。筆者針對PTT第三者板的情婦文章進行論述分析,並且整理出情婦的八種論述方式,其中包括三種關於情婦污名的論述:「你說……」論述、「責問」論述、「貶妻」論述,三種關於情婦實踐的論述:「指南」論述、「老掉牙」論述、「認錯」論述,以及兩種關於情婦如何看待婚家常規的論述:「認輸」論述、「共生」論述。根據這八種情婦論述方式,筆者歸納出四點:(一)情婦時時針對自己的悖德身分進行合理化與去污名化,即使在匿名網路空間依舊如此;(二)情婦習於內化已婚情人的男性視角,導致情婦實踐成為情感勞動與陰柔美德的結合;(三)情婦善於強調浪漫愛與婚家常規的連結,暗暗呼應社會大眾對於傳統親密關係的想像;(四)情婦經常開啟情婦文章與情婦文章之間的互文性,從而建構出情婦群體的支持網絡與社會認同。
  Based on the social context in Taiwan that the decriminalization of adultery is still unfulfilled, this thesis attempts to explore the relationship among mistress, marriage and extramarital affair through the mistresses’ self-reports. A discourse analysis on the articles written by mistresses in PTT Third-Person Forum is conducted, and eight patterns of the mistresses’ discourses are sorted out, including three patterns about the stigma on mistresses: “You Said…” Discourse, “Retorting” Discourse and “Wife-Degrading” Discourse, three patterns about the everyday practices of doing mistress: “Guiding” Discourse, “Cliché” Discourse and “Apologizing” Discourse, and two patterns about how mistresses perceive the marriage norms: “Surrendering” Discourse and “Coexistence” Discourse. According to these discourses, four points are summed up: (1) mistresses rationalize and destigmatize their immoral identities from time to time, even in the anonymous online space; (2) mistresses accustom themselves to internalize the male viewpoints of their married lovers, making their everyday practices a combination of emotional labor and feminine virtue; (3) mistresses prefer to emphasize the connection between romantic love and marriage norms, implicitly echoing the public imagination for conventional intimacy; (4) mistresses often unfold the intertextuality among the mistresses’ articles, thus constructing the support network for and the social identity of the mistress group.
Reference: 1.《鏡週刊》社會組(2017.05.02)。〈【女作家之死】師生畸戀 林奕含父母為護女不提告〉,《鏡週刊》。上網日期:2018年4月14日,取自
3.王志弘、許妍飛譯(2006)。《社會認同》。台北:巨流。(原書Jenkins, R. [1996]. Social Identity)
5.何定照、高瑟濡譯(2007)。《液態之愛:論人際紐帶的脆弱》。台北:商周。(原書Bauman, Z. [2003]. Liquid Love: On the Frailty of Human Bonds)
8.谷風出版社編輯部譯(1989)。《家庭、私有制和國家的起源》。台北:谷風。(原書Engels, F. [1884]. Der Ursprung der Familie, des Privateigenthums und des Staats: im Anschlub an Lewis H. Morgan's Forschungen)
9.周素鳳譯(2001)。《親密關係的轉變:現代社會的性、愛、慾》。台北:巨流。(原書Giddens, A. [1992]. The Transformation of Intimacy: Sexuality, Love and Eroticism in Modern Societies)
12.邱瑞鑾譯(2015)。《第二性》。台北:貓頭鷹。(原書Beauvoir, S. D. [1949]. Le Deuxieme Sexe)
13.洪保鎮譯(2018)。《第三者的誕生:出軌行為的再思》。台北:時報。(原書Perel, E. [2017]. The State of Affairs: Rethinking Infidelity)
14.奚修君譯(2001)。《情婦:有關「她」的神話、歷史與詮釋》。台北:藍鯨。(原書Griffin, V. [1999]. The Mistress: Histories, Myths and Interpretations of the ‘Other Woman’)
15.徐江敏、李姚軍譯(1992)。《日常生活中的自我表演》。台北:桂冠。(原書Goffman, E. [1956]. The Presentation of Self in Everyday Life)
17.栗筱雯譯(2007)。《婚外情的公式》。台北:大塊文化。(原書Moore, J. H. [2004]. Infidelity: Exploding the Myths)
19.曾凡慈譯(2010)。《污名:受損身分的管理筆記》。台北:群學。(原書Goffman, E. [1963]. Stigma: Notes on the Management of Spoiled Identity)
21.黃欣柏、張文川(2017.05.19)。〈通姦除罪化 司改分組會議通過〉,《自由時報》。上網日期:2018年4月14日,取自
22.黃欣儀譯(2003)。《情與慾》。台北:匡邦文化。(原書Mary, M. [2001]. 5 Lugen, die liebe betreffend)
25.廖彥博譯(2015)。《情婦史(上卷):從聖經、中國後宮、歐洲皇室,到殖民者情婦的故事》。台北:時報。(原書Abbott, E. [2003]. Mistresses: A History of the Other Woman)
26.廖彥博譯(2015)。《情婦史(下卷):從納粹德國、革命中的古巴,到六〇年代情婦的故事》。台北:時報。(原書Abbott, E. [2003]. Mistresses: A History of the Other Woman)
27.趙旭東、方文譯(2005)。《現代性與自我認同:晚期現代的自我與社會》。台北:左岸文化。(原書Giddens, A. [1991]. Modernity and Self-Identity: Self and Society in the Late Modern Age)
28.劉志原(2017.05.18)。〈【司改放送頭】通過林奕含條款 通姦除罪化〉,《鏡週刊》。上網日期:2018年4月14日,取自
29.羅愛萍、王蜂譯(2018)。《夾縫中的女人》。台北:寶瓶文化。(原書Richardson, L. W. [1985]. The New Other Woman: Contemporary Single Women in Affairs with Married Men)
30.Amato, P. R., & Previti, D. (2003). People's Reasons for Divorcing: Gender, Social Class, the Life Course, and Adjustment. Journal of Family Issues, 24(5), 602-626.
31.Atwood, J. D., & Seifer, M. (1997). Extramarital Affairs and Constructed Meanings: A Social Constructionist Therapeutic Approach. American Journal of Family Therapy, 25, 55-75.
32.Betzig, L. (1989). Causes of Conjugal Dissolution: A Cross-cultural Study. Current Anthropology, 30(5): 654-676.
33.Blow, A. J., & Hartnett, K. (2005). Infidelity in Committed Relationships I: A Methodological Review. Journal of Marital and Family Therapy, 31(2), 183-216.
34.Burns, A. (1999). IV. Power between Women: The Constructed Otherness of ‘Other Women’. Feminism & Psychology, 9(4), 410-413.
35.Conley, T. D., Ziegler, A., Moors, A. C., Matsick, J. L., & Valentine, B. (2013). A Critical Examination of Popular Assumptions About the Benefits and Outcomes of Monogamous Relationships. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 17(2), 124-141.
36.DePompo, P., & Butsuhara, M. (2016). The “Other” Side of Infidelity: The Experience of the “Other” Partner, Anxious Love, and Implications for Practitioners. Psychological Thought, 9(1), 41-57.
37.Garfinkel, H. (1967). Studies in Ethnomethodology. New Jersey: Prentice Hall.
38.Gee, J. P. (2014). An Introduction to Discourse Analysis: Theory and Method. London: Routledge.
39.James, W., & Kedgley, S. J. (1973). The Mistress. London: Abelard-Schuman.
40.Jeanfreau, M. M., Jurich, A. P., & Mong, M. D. (2014). An Examination of Potential Attractions of Women's Marital Infidelity. The American Journal of Family Therapy, 42(1), 14-28.
41.Orth, P. (1972). An Enviable Position: The American Mistress from Slightly Kept to Practically Married. New York: David McKay.
42.Schmitt, D. P. (2005). Sociosexuality from Argentina to Zimbabwe: A 48-nation Study of Sex, Culture, and Strategies of Human Mating. Behavioral & Brain Sciences, 28, 247-275.
43.Spivak, G. C. (1988). Can the Subaltern Speak?. In Nelson, C. & Grossberg, L. (Eds.), Marxism and the Interpretation of Culture (pp. 271-313). Basingstoke: Macmillan Education.
44.Utley, E. A. (2016). Rethinking the Other Woman: Exploring Power in Intimate Heterosexual Triangular Relationships. Women's Studies in Communication, 39(2), 177-192.
45.Whisman, M. A., Dixon, A. E., & Johnson, B. (1997). Therapists’ Perspectives of Couple Problems and Treatment Issues in Couple Therapy. Journal of Family Psychology, 11, 361-366.
Description: 碩士
Source URI:
Data Type: thesis
Appears in Collections:[傳播學院傳播碩士學位學程] 學位論文

Files in This Item:

File SizeFormat
015101.pdf2688KbAdobe PDF691View/Open

All items in 學術集成 are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved.

社群 sharing