Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://ah.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/124909
題名: 交叉壓力之政治效應:以2016年總統選舉為例
Political impacts of Cross-Cutting Pressure—Analyzes from the 2016 Presidential Election
作者: 扈凱欽
Hu, Kai-Chin
貢獻者: 游清鑫
Yu, Ching-Hsin
扈凱欽
Hu, Kai-Chin
關鍵詞: 社會網絡
政治參與
交叉壓力
TEDS2016
日期: 2019
上傳時間: 7-Aug-2019
摘要: 交叉壓力(cross-pressure)的研究可追溯自早期哥倫比亞學派的Lazarsfeld等學者的論點,強調選民面臨交叉壓力下,投票決定的時間會因此而延長。不過這時期對於交叉壓力的描述多半是指選民面對宗教、階級、種族等不同歸屬的衝突。這樣的論點持續受到討論,但討論的內涵隨著時間的不同而有所轉變,到了1990、2000年代,交叉壓力的討論轉為以人際討論網絡的同質性、異質性來加以說明。例如Mutz使用「交叉重疊網絡」(cross-cutting network)持續探索交叉壓力對於選民行為的影響,並運用「政治的模稜兩可」以及「社會責任」這兩種選民面對交叉壓力時產生的心理歷程,解釋為何交叉壓力會減低選民的參與行為。相較於其他選舉研究的主題來講,國內在此一主題的研究數量相對較少,也讓此一方面的選民行為,無法更完整地被理解。本研究透過台灣選舉與民主化調查計畫(TEDS)「2016年總統與立法委員選舉面訪案」的資料來源,重新檢視交叉壓力相關理論內涵,並以民眾身處在省籍異質性與政治討論異質性所產生的交叉壓力為來源,探索民眾的交叉壓力與其政治認同、政治行為之間的關聯性。研究發現顯示省籍組成與受訪者的政治態度間存在關聯性,尤其在受訪者家庭背景的省籍組成屬於跨省籍的情況時,選民在政治態度會顯得模稜兩可。另外,受訪者身處的政治討論網絡環境,對於受訪者在投票行為上有顯著的影響,當受訪者所身處的政治討論網絡在政治立場上越分歧時,則受訪者越傾向不去投票,而且在決定投票對象的時間也會花費的更長,甚至更有可能會變更投票的對象。
參考文獻: 一、中文部分\n1.王甫昌,1993,〈族群通婚的後果:省籍通婚對於族群同化的影響〉。《人文及社會科學集刊》6(1):231-267。\n――—,1994,〈族群同化與動員〉。《中研院民族所集刊》77:1-34。\n2.吳親恩、林政楠,2010,〈省籍通婚與中國人、台灣人認同-家庭成員影響力的變化〉。《政治學報》(50):41-82。\n3.陳文俊,1997,〈族群、統獨立場,與公共政策: 台灣地方菁英個案分析〉。《國立中山大學社會科學季刊》1(1):29-76。\n4.吳重禮、鄭文智和崔曉倩,2006。〈交叉網絡與政治參與: 2001年縣市長與立法委員選舉的實證研究〉。《人文及社會科學集刊》18(4): 599-638。\n5.林聰吉,2007。〈社會網絡、政治討論與投票參與〉。《選舉研究》 14(2): 1-24。\n6.邱師儀,2012。〈避免衝突、交叉壓力與政治不活動〉。《臺東大學人文學報》2(2): 37-114。\n7.張佑宗、趙珮如,2006。〈社會脈絡、個人網絡與臺灣 2004年立法委員選舉選民的投票抉擇〉。《台灣民主季刊》3(2): 1-38。\n8.黃偉峰,1998。〈從公民投票經驗之比較研究檢證其基本假設-美英法瑞義為例〉。《選舉研究》5(1) :1-35。\n9.陳東升與陳端容,2002。〈跨族群政治討論網絡的形成及其影響因素〉,《台灣社會學》4: 119-157。\n10.劉自平、吳重禮、戴士展,2012。〈交叉壓力、意見表達與政黨認同: 2008年立法委員選舉的實證分析〉。《選舉研究》19(2): 1-36。\n11.蕭阿勤,高格孚,2004。〈風和日暖: 台灣外省人與國家認同的轉變〉。《 臺灣社會學刊》33 : 239-247.\n二、外文部分\n12.Berelson, B. R., Lazarsfeld, P. F., & MacPhee, W. N., 1954. Voting: A Study of Opinion Formation in a Presidential Campaign. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.\n13.Baker, K. L., 1973. “Political Participation, Political Efficacy, and Socialization in Germany.” Comparative Politics 6(1): 73-98.\n14.Balch, G. I, 1974. “Multiple Indicators in Survey Research: The Concept “Sense of Political Efficacy”.” Political Methodology 1(2) :1-43.\n15.Beck, P. A., Dalton, R. J., Greene, S., & Huckfeldt, R., 2002. “The Social Calculus of Voting: Interpersonal, Media, and Organizational Influences on Presidential Choices.” American political science review 96(1): 57-73.\n16.Cooper, E. and Jahoda, M, 1947. “The Evasion of Propaganda: How Prejudiced People Respond to Anti-Prejudice Propaganda.” The Journal of psychology 23(1): 15-25.\n17.Campbell, A., Converse, P. E., Miller, W. E., & Stokes, D. E., 1960. The American Voter. New York: John Wiley and Sons.\n18.Festinger, L., 1962. A Theory of Cognitive Dissonance (Vol. 2). PaloAlto, CA: Stanford University Press.\n19.Finkel, S. E., 1985. “Reciprocal Effects of Participation and Political Efficacy: A Panel Analysis.” American Journal of political science 29(4): 891-913.\n20.Green, M. C., Visser, P. S., & Tetlock, P. E., 2000. “Coping with Accountability Cross-Pressures: Low-effort Evasive Tactics and High-Effort Quests for Complex Compromises.” Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin 26(11): 1380-1391.\n21.Horan, P. M., 1971. “Social Positions and Political Cross- Pressures: A Re-Examination.” American Sociological Review 36 (August): 650-6.\n22.Hochschild, J. L., 1981. What`s Fair? : American Beliefs About Distributive Justice. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.\n23.Jennings, M. Kent and Richard G. Niemi, 1974, The Political Character of Adolescence. Princeton. NJ: Princeton University Press.\n24.Lazarsfeld, P. F., Berelson, B., and H. Gaudet, 1944. The People’s Choice: How the Voter Makes Up His Mind in a Presidential Campaign. New York: Columbia University press\n25.Lane, R. E., 1959. Political life: Why people get involved in politics. New York: Free Press\n26.Lavine, H., 2001, “The Electoral Consequences of Ambivalence toward Presidential Candidates.” American Journal of Political Science 45(4): 915-929.\nMacKuen, M. B., 1990. “Speaking of Politics: Individual Conversational Choice, Public Opinion, and the Prospects for Deliberative Democracy.” In Information and Democratic Politics, Edited by John A. F. and James H. K. Urbana, IL: University of Illinois Press, pp. 59-99.\n27.McLeod, J. M., Scheufele, D. A., & Moy, P., 1999. “Community, Communication, and Participation: The Role of Mass Media and Interpersonal Discussion in Local Political Participation. ” Political communication 16(3): 315-336.\n28.Mutz, D. C., 2002a, “Cross-Cutting Social Networks: Testing Democratic Theory in Practice.” American Political Science Review 96(1): 111-126.\n29.――, 2002b. “The Consequences of Cross-Cutting Networks for Political Participation.” American Journal of Political Science 46(4):838-855.\n30.Pierce, J. C., & Carey Jr, A., 1971. “Efficacy and Participation: A Study of Black Political Behavior.” Journal of Black Studies 2(2): 201-224.\n31.Pollock III, P. H., 1983. “The Participatory Consequences of Internal and External Political Efficacy: A Research Note.” Western Political Quarterly 36(3): 400-409.\n32.Tedin, K. L.,1974. “The Influence of Parents on the Political Attitudes of Adolescents.” American Political Science Review 68(4) : 1579-1592.\n33.Ulbig, S. G., & Funk, C. L., 1999. “Conflict Avoidance and Political Participation.” Political Behavior 21(3): 265-282.
描述: 碩士
國立政治大學
國家發展研究所
105261010
資料來源: http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#G0105261010
資料類型: thesis
Appears in Collections:學位論文

Files in This Item:
File SizeFormat
101001.pdf1.66 MBAdobe PDF2View/Open
Show full item record

Google ScholarTM

Check

Altmetric

Altmetric


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.