Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://ah.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/124988
題名: 能量與熵的世界:扎米亞京《我們》與歐威爾《一九八四》的比較研究
The World of Energy and Entropy: A Study of E. Zamjatin’s “We” in contrast to G. Orwell’s “1984”
作者: 李勁楚
Li, Jin-Chu
貢獻者: 宋雲森
Sung, Yun-Sheng
李勁楚
Li, Jin-Chu
關鍵詞: 反烏托邦
扎米亞京
我們
一九八四
能量與熵
比較文學
Dystopia
Evgenij Zamjatin
We
Nineteen Eighty-Four
Energy and entropy
Comparative literature
日期: 2019
上傳時間: 7-Aug-2019
摘要: 在二十世紀三大反烏托邦小說中,蘇聯作家扎米亞京的《我們》是最早發表的一篇,對人們重新思考工業文明對人性的扭曲、以及蘇俄早期的意識形態理論與實踐都有很重要的啟示意義。\n本論文從英加登文學審美理論、提格亨比較文學理論、弗萊神話原型批評理論以及扎米亞京的能量與熵文學理念入手,結合扎米亞京創作《我們》之時的生平經歷、時代背景及文學思想,對《我們》進行了較為詳盡的解讀。除此之外,本論文將《我們》與同為三大反烏托邦小說之一的歐威爾《一九八四》進行了整體與細節的比較,除了發現多處相似與巧合之處外,《一九八四》對《我們》的理解也具有重要的參考價值。\n《我們》是扎米亞京諷刺藝術的集大成之作,其中無論是單一國的意識形態,還是男主角Д-503的思想理念,都與作家本人完全相反,但他卻在結局上賦予了單一國與Д-503以勝利;扎米亞京將自己的希望寄寓於女主角I-330身上,卻為她安排了悲劇性的失敗收場。這樣的寫作藝術不僅與扎米亞京本人崇尚的新現實主義、綜合主義的行文風格與思維有關,筆者認為,也與創作的時代背景有著重要的聯繫。
Amid the three main dystopian novels in the first half of the twentieth century, Evgenij Zamjatin’s “We” was the first one to be written and published, which is believed to have a significant impact on other ones. This novel has suggestive significance, inspiring people to rethink the alienation of human nature in the industrial age, and the theory and practice of Lenin’s ideology in the early period of Soviet Russia.\nBy the use of Roman Ingarden’s theory of art, Paul Tieghem’s theory of comparative literature, Northrop Frye’s theory of literary criticism, Evgenij Zamjatin’s theory of energy and entropy, as well as the discourse of Zamjatin’s life experience, his literary thoughts and the general era background by the 1920s, a detailed interpretation of “We” was given in this thesis. Furthermore, a comparison of “We” with another influential dystopian work – George Orwell’s “Nineteen Eighty-Four” was made in general outlook and in matters of detail. Other than many alike worldviews, plots and details, “Nineteen Eighty-Four” was found helpful in understanding what Zamjatin wanted to express in “We”.\nIn “We” Zamjatin epitomized his art of vivid satire. On one hand, whether the ideology of the Single State, or the thought and faith of Д-503 are completely in contradiction to Zamjatin’s own; however, in the end the Single State and Д-503 won; on the other hand, resting his hope on the heroine I-330, Zamjatin ironically arranged for her a thorough failure. This type of writing technique is not only relative to the neorealism and synthetism in definition of literature, which Zamjatin strongly advocated, but also, with serious possibility, is in connection with the era background at that time.
參考文獻: 一、中文文獻\n\n(一)書籍\n1. 中共中央馬克斯恩格斯列寧斯大林著作編譯局(譯)。《蘇聯共產黨代表大會、代表會議和中央全會決議彙編》(第一分冊)。北京:人民出版社,1964。\n2. 列寧。《列寧全集第二版(第十一卷)》。中共中央馬克思恩格斯列寧斯大林著作編譯局編譯。北京:人民出版社,1987。\n3. 列寧。《列寧全集第二版(第十二卷)》。中共中央馬克思恩格斯列寧斯大林著作編譯局編譯。北京:人民出版社,1987。\n4. 列寧。《列寧全集第二版(第十八卷)》。中共中央馬克思恩格斯列寧斯大林著作編譯局編譯。北京:人民出版社,1988。\n5. 列寧。《列寧全集第二版(第二十三卷)》。中共中央馬克思恩格斯列寧斯大林著作編譯局編譯。北京:人民出版社,1990。\n6. 列寧。《列寧全集第二版(第三十五卷)》。中共中央馬克思恩格斯列寧斯大林著作編譯局編譯。北京:人民出版社,1985。\n7. 列寧。《列寧全集第二版(第三十七卷)》。中共中央馬克思恩格斯列寧斯大林著作編譯局編譯。北京:人民出版社,1986。\n8. 希羅多德。《歷史(上下)》。王以鑄譯。陝西師範大學出版社,2008。\n9. 阿格諾索夫,符·阿(Agenosov, V. V.)。《20世紀俄羅斯文學》。北京:中國人民大學出版社。2001。\n10. 喬治.歐威爾(George Orwell)。《一九八四》。王憶琳譯。臺北縣:華文網,2006。\n11. 喬治.歐威爾(George Orwell)。《一九八四》。徐立妍譯。台北市:遠流,2012。\n12. 喬治.歐威爾(George Orwell)。《一九八四》。萬仞譯。臺北市:壬寅,1967。\n13. 喬治.歐威爾(George Orwell)。《一九八四》。董樂山譯。臺北市:志文,1991。\n14. 博立約(Anatole Leroy-Beaulieu)。《帝俄和俄羅斯(上)》。劉增泉譯。臺北市:編譯館,民89(2000)。譯自:Leroy-Beaulieu, Anatole. L’Empire des tsars et les Russes. Paris: Librairie Hachette et Cie, 1890.\n15. 提格亨(P. van Tieghem)。《比較文學論》。戴望舒譯。台北市:台灣商務印書館, 1995。譯自:Paul van Tieghem. La littérature comparée, 1931.\n16. 葉·伊·扎米亞京。《明天》。閆洪波譯。北京:東方出版,2000。\n17. 葉甫蓋尼·扎米亞京。《我們》。范國恩譯。上海:譯林出版社,2013。\n18. 路易斯·費希爾。《列寧的一生》。彭卓吾譯。北京:北京圖書館出版社,2002。\n19. 諾斯羅普·弗萊。《批評的解剖》。陳慧、袁憲軍、吳偉仁譯。天津:百花文藝出版社,2006。譯自:Northrop Frye. Anatomy of Criticism: Four Essays. 1957.\n20. 歐威爾(George Orwell)。《一九八四》。邱素慧譯。臺北縣:書華,1994。\n21. 薩米爾欽(Zamyatin, E. I.)。《反烏托邦與自由(原名:我們)》。台北市:志文。吳憶帆譯。1997。\n22. 羅曼·英加登(Roman Ingarden)。《對文學的藝術作品的認識》。臺北市:商鼎文化。陳燕谷、曉末譯。1991年,IV。譯自:Roman Ingarden. Cognition of Literary Work of Art. Trans. by Ruth Ann Crowley, Kenneth Olsen. Northwest University Press, 1980.\n23. George Orwell。《一九八四》。劉紹銘譯。臺北市:東大,民80(1990)。\n\n(二)期刊論文\n24. 余自游。<悖論與悲劇反烏托邦小說《我們》研究>。成都:《中外文化與文論》,第十二輯,2005,262-272。\n25. 李然,溫玉霞。<「熵」與「能」:《我們》中的兩類主題隱喻及其文化解讀>。西安:《外語教學》,第40卷,第2期,2019,109-112。\n26. 吳澤霖。<扎米亞京的”我們”開禁的再思考>。北京:《俄羅斯文藝》,第2期,2000,57-60。\n27. 金雁。<一月劇變:超過十月革命的大事件>。北京:《炎黃春秋》,第7期,2008,72-79。\n28. 林精華。<中國知識份子對蘇俄革命的誤讀>。香港:《二十一世紀評論》,總第一〇三期,10月號,2007年,26-39。\n29. 張惠娟。<反烏托邦文學的諧擬特質>。臺北市:《中外文學》,17 (8) ,1989,131-146。\n30. 許耀桐。<民主集中制與民主制關係辯正>。武漢:《學習與實踐》,第5期,2010,54-60。\n31. 傅麗玉。<從世界觀探討臺灣原住民中小學教育>。台北市:《科學教育學刊》,第七卷第一期,1999,71-90。\n32. 劉雪飛。<誰是「斯基泰人」──論西方古典作家筆下的斯基泰人>。北京:《世界民族》第1期,2011,84-92。\n33. 蘇建華。<Cyborg、烏托邦:個人解放的騙局!?>。新竹:《資訊社會研究》,第3期,7月,2002,113-147。\n\n(三)專書論文\n34. 宋雲森。<從語言文化學的視角論扎米亞京小說中的顏色詞>。《第一屆斯拉夫語言、文學暨文化-國立政治大學斯拉夫語文學系2008年國際學術研討會論文集》。台北市:國立政治大學斯拉夫語文學系,2009,1-31。\n35. 宋雲森。<論扎米亞京小說我們中之悲劇與反諷──神話原型批評之分析>。《「文化轉向」與外國文學研究》。北京:北京大學出版社,2013,147-160。\n36. 陳慧。<一部不可取代的煌煌學術巨著──《批評的解剖》再版譯序>。諾斯羅普·弗萊。《批評的解剖》。陳慧、袁憲軍、吳偉仁譯。天津:百花文藝,2006,1-12。\n\n(四)學位論文\n37. 王嘯林。《扎米亞京小說創作中的彼得堡文本──以<洞穴>、<馬邁>和<龍>為例》。北京外國語大學碩士學位論文,2018。\n38. 白辰韜。《走進<我們>的藝術世界》。齊齊哈爾大學碩士學位論文,2014。\n39. 田曉慶。《<我們>的新現實主義特徵分析》。東北師範大學碩士學位論文,2011。\n40. 朱濤。《反烏托邦經典<我們>中的時空》。南京師範大學碩士學位論文,2007。\n41. 余自游。《悖論與悲劇──反烏托邦小說<我們>研究》。四川大學碩士學位論文, 2005。\n42. 邱欣敏。《我叛逆,故我存在──<我們>與存在主義小說》。南京師範大學碩士學位論文,2003。\n43. 陳又宇。《從語言文化學的視角論札米亞京小說中「火」與「水」的概念》。國立政治大學碩士學位論文,2010。\n44. 張雨萌。《<我們>的數學化特徵》。齊齊哈爾大學碩士學位論文,2015。\n45. 程倩。《末世論關懷下的小說<我們>》。華東師範大學碩士學位論文,2009。\n46. 管玲玲。《長篇小說<我們>創作中的「陌生化」藝術分析》。南京師範大學碩士學位論文,2005。\n\n(五)網路資料\n47. 那烏科夫、科薩科夫斯基編。《1921年的喀琅施塔得》。北京:人民出版社,2009。https://www.marxists.org/chinese/reference-books/kronstadt-1921/1-05.htm (26th May 2019)\n48. 馬克思、恩格斯。<共產黨宣言>。《馬克思恩格斯選集》第一卷。北京:人民出版社,1995,248-307。https://www.marxists.org/chinese/big5/marxists/marx-engels/18480000.htm (13th May 2019)\n49. 譚修雯。<熵(entropy)>。《圖書館學與資訊科學大辭典》。國家教育研究院:雙語詞彙、學術名詞暨辭書資訊網。1995。\nhttp://terms.naer.edu.tw/detail/1680044/?index=4 (7th January 2019)\n\n\n二、英文文獻\n\n(一)書籍\n1. Brown, E. J. Brave New World, 1984, and We: An Essay on Anti-Utopia. Ardis Essay Series, No.4. Ann Arbor, MI: Ardis, 1976.\n2. Clausewitz, Carl von. The Essential Clausewitz: Sections from On War. Edited by Joseph I. Greene. Mineola, NY: Dover Publications, 2003.\n3. Fried, Marvin Benjamin. Austro-Hungarian War Aims in the Balkans during World War I. New York, NY: Palgrave Macmillan, 2014.\n4. Frye, Northrop. Anatomy of Criticism: Four Essays. Princeton, NJ: PrincetonUniversity Press, 1957.\n5. Lindstrom, Thaïs S. A Concise History of Russian Literature: from 1900 to the Present, Volume II. New York, NY: New York University Press. 1978.\n6. Orwell, George. 1984, A Novel. New York, NY: New American Library, 1981.\n7. Russell, Bertrand. The Practice and Theory of Bolshevism. Second Edition. London: Allen and Unwin, 1949.\n8. Shane, Alex M. The Life and works of Evgenij Zamjatin. Berkeley and Los Angeles: University of California Press, 1968.\n9. Struve, Gleb. Russian Literature under Lenin and Stalin. Norman, OK: University of Oklahoma Press, 1971.\n10. Todd, Emmanuel. The Explanation of Ideology: Family Structures and Social Systems. Trans. by David Garrioch. Oxford, UK: Basil Blackwell, 1988.\n11. Zamyatin, Yevgeny. A Soviet Heretic: Essays by Yevgeny Zamyatin. Ed. & trans. by Mirra Ginsburg. Chicago & London: The University of Chicago Press, 1970.\n12. Zamyatin, Yevgeny. We. Trans. by Mirra Ginsburg. New York, NY: Eos, 1999.\n13. Zelnik, Reginald E. (ed.) Workers and Intelligentsia in Late Imperial Russia: Realities, Representations, Reflections. Berkeley, CA: University of California, Berkeley, 1999.\n\n\n(二)期刊論文\n14. Chang, Hui-Chuan. Zamyatin’s “We”: A Reassessment. Taipei: Humanitas Taiwanica, (58), 2003, pp. 231-250.\n15. Connors, James. Zamyatin’s “We” and The Genesis of “1984”. Baltimore, MD: Modern Fiction Studies, 21(1), 1975, pp. 107-124.\n16. Ehre, Milton. Zamjatin’s Aesthetics. Columbus, OH: Slavic and East European Journal. Vol. 19, No. 3 (1975), pp. 288-296.\n17. Engelstein, Laura. Combined Underdevelopment: Discipline and the Law in Imperial and Soviet Russia. Oxford, UK: The American Historical Review, Vol. 98, No.2 (Apr. 1993), pp. 338-353.\n18. Geertz, Clifford. Ethos, World-View and the Analysis of Sacred Symbols. Yellow Springs OH: The Antioch Review. Vol. 17, No. 4 (Winter, 1957), pp.421-437.\n19. Gurova, Olga. Ideology of Consumption in Soviet Union: From Asceticism to the Legitimating of Consumer Goods. Bloomington, NI: Anthropology of East Europe Review, Volume 24, No. 2, 2006, pp. 91-98.\n20. Ingarden, Roman. Aesthetic Experience and Aesthetic Object. Hoboken, NJ: Philosophy and Phenomenological Research, Vol. 21, No. 3 (Mar. 1961), pp. 289-313.\n21. Irrer, Joseph. “We” and “1984”: A Study in Conflicts. Amaranthus, Vol. 1978, Issue 1, Article 26, 1978, pp. 51-54.\n22. Lawall, Sarah. René Wellek and Modern Literary Criticism. Durham, NC: Comparative Literature, Vol. 40, No.1, 1988, pp. 3-24.\n23. Layton, Susan. Zamjatin and Literary Modernism. Columbus, OH: The Slavic and East European Journal, Vol. 17, No. 3 (1973), pp. 279-287.\n24. Shane, Alex M. Zamjatin’s Prose Fiction. Columbus, OH: The Slavic and East European Journal, Vol. XII, No. 1 (1968), pp. 14-26.\n25. Voronsky, Alexander. Evgeny Zamyatin. Trans. by Paul Mitchell. Ann Arbor, MI: Russian Literature Triquarterly, 2 (Winter 1972), pp. 153-175.\n26. Wegner, Phillip E. On Zamyatin’s We: A Critical Map of Utopia’s ‘Possible Worlds’. University Park, PA: Utopian Studies, Vol. 4, No. 2, 1993, pp. 94-116.\n27. Wellek, René. Comparative Literature in General Education. Baltimore, MD: The Journal of General Education, 2(3), 1948, pp. 215-218.\n28. Wellek, René. René Wellek and Modern Literary Criticism: Response. Durham, NC: Comparative Literature, Vol. 40, No. 1, 1988, pp. 25-28.\n29. Willems, Joachim. The religio-political strategies of the Russian Orthodox Church as a ‘politics of discourse’. London: Religion, State & Society, 34:3, 2006, pp. 287-298.\n\n(三)專書論文\n30. Zelnik, Reginald E. “Workers and Intelligentsia in the 1870s: The Politics of Sociability”, in: Zelnik, Reginald E. (ed.) Workers and Intelligentsia in Late Imperial Russia: Realities, Representations, Reflections. Berkeley, CA: University of California, Berkeley, 1999, pp. 16-54.\n\n(四)網路資料\n31. Clausewitz, Carl von. On War (1827). Trans. by Colonel J. J. Graham.\nhttps://www.marxists.org/reference/archive/clausewitz/works/on-war/index.htm (1st June 2019)\n32. Crénologie. https://www.universalis.fr/dictionnaire/crenologie/ (17th May 2019)\n33. Orwell, George. Freedom and Happiness (Review of ‘We’ by Yevgeny Zamyatin). The Orwell Foundation, 1946. https://www.orwellfoundation.com/the-orwell-foundation/orwell/essays-and-other-works/freedom-and-happiness-review-of-we-by-yevgeny-zamyatin/ (15th June 2018)\n34. Orwell, George. Why I Write. The Orwell Foundation, 1946.\nhttps://www.orwellfoundation.com/the-orwell-foundation/orwell/essays-and-other-works/why-i-write/ (20th September 2018)\n35. Orwell, George & Hawkins, Desmond. The Proletarian Writer. The Orwell Foundation. https://www.orwellfoundation.com/the-orwell-foundation/orwell/essays-and-other-works/the-proletarian-writer/ (30th May 2019)\n36. Oxford English Dictionary (3rd edition). Dystopia. 2001. http://www.oed.com/view/Entry/58909?redirectedFrom=dystopia#eid (19th January 2018)\n37. Oxford English Dictionary (3rd Edition). Greenhouse. 2001. https://www.oed.com/view/Entry/81202?redirectedFrom=greenhouse#eid (3rd June 2019)\n\n\n\n\n三、俄文文獻\n\n(一)書籍\n1. Замятин Е. И. Бич Божий: Романы, повести. СПб: изд-во «Азбука-классика», 2006.\n2. Кузнецов Ф. Ф. (под ред.) Русская литература XX века: очерки, портреты, эссе, часть 1. М.: «Просвещение». 1991.\n3. Любимова М. Ю. et al. Евгений Замятин и культура XX века: исследования и публикации. Под ред. Зайцев, В. Н. et al. СПб: Российская национальная библиотека, 2002.\n4. Суханов Н. Н. Записки о революции. В 3 томах. М.: Изд-во политической литературы, 1991.\n5. Фишер, Луи (Fischer, Louis). Жизнь Ленина. Перевод Омри Ронена. London: Overseas Publications Interchange, 1970. Trans. from: Louis Fischer. The Life of Lenin. N.Y.: Harper & Row, 1964.\n6. Шнейберг Л. Я., Кондаков И. В. От Горького до Солженицына: Пособие по литературе для поступающих в вузы. М.: Издательство «Высшая школа». 1993.\n\n(二)期刊論文\n7. Ахметова Г. А. Роман Е. Замятина «Мы» в контексте русской классики (М. Салтыков-Щедрин, Ф. Достоевский) // Российской гуманитарный журнал. Т. 2, № 1. 2013, с. 57-64.\n8. Борода Е. В. Вариативность антиномии «энтропия - энергия» в романе Е. И. Замятина «Мы» // Вестник ТГУ, выпуск 4 (60), 2008, с. 254-258.\n9. Мохаммед, Аль-Кааби. Государство и личность в романе-антиутопии Е. Замятина “Мы” // Научный форум: Филология, искусствоведение и культурология, № 4(15), 2018, с. 59-66.\n10. Половцев Д. О. Личность и общество в романе Евгения Замятина «Мы» // Библиотека журнала «Социальное воспитание»: Выпуск первый, Витебск, 2014, 3-55.\n\n(三)專書論文\n11. Ерыкалова И. Истина любви // Замятин, Е. И. Бич Божий: Романы, повести. СПб: изд-во «Азбука-классика», 2006, с. 5-44.\n12. Ким Сонг Иль. Евгений Замятин в Южной Корее // Евгений Замятин и культуры XX века: исследования и публикации. СПб: Российская национальная библиотека, 2002, с. 451-454.\n\n(四)學位論文\n13. Малышева С. Ю. Российское временное правительство 1917 года. Отечественная историография // Казанский государственный университет, 2000.\n\n\n\n\n(五)網路資料\n14. Блок А. А. Скифы (1918). Викитека.\nhttps://ru.wikisource.org/wiki/Скифы_(Блок) (13th May 2019)\n15. Замятин Е. И. Автобиография (1922). Викитека.\nhttps://ru.wikisource.org/wiki/Автобиография_(Замятин,_1922) (12th May 2019)\n16. Замятин Е. И. Завтра (1918).\nhttp://az.lib.ru/z/zamjatin_e_i/text_1919_zavtra.shtml (24th May 2019)\n17. Замятин Е. И. О литературе, революции, энтропии и прочем (1923).\nhttp://az.lib.ru/z/zamjatin_e_i/text_1923_o_literature.shtml (25th May 2019)\n18. Замятин Е. И. О синтетизме (1922).\nhttp://az.lib.ru/z/zamjatin_e_i/text_1922_o_sintetizme.shtml (5th June 2019)\n19. Замятин Е. И. Очерк новейшей русской литературы (1918).\nhttp://az.lib.ru/editors/z/zamjatin_e_i/text_1918_ocherk.shtml (23th May 2019)\n20. Замятин Е. И. Рай (1921). http://az.lib.ru/z/zamjatin_e_i/text_1921_ray.shtml (24th May 2019)\n21. Замятин Е. И. Сирин. http://az.lib.ru/z/zamjatin_e_i/text_1914_sirin.shtml (22nd May 2019)\n22. Замятин Е. И. Скифы ли? (1922)\nhttp://az.lib.ru/z/zamjatin_e_i/text_1918_skify.shtml (13th May 2019)\n23. Замятин Е. И. Я боюсь (1921).\nhttp://az.lib.ru/z/zamjatin_e_i/text_1921_ya_bous.shtml (24th May 2019)\n24. Кириллов В. Т. Железный Мессия.\nhttp://az.lib.ru/k/kirillow_w_t/text_1922_messiya.shtml (29th May 2019)\n25. Ленин В. И. За хлеб и за мир. // В. И. Ленин: Полное собрание сочинений, пятое издание, том 35. М.: Изд-во политической литературы, 1974, с. 169-170. http://uaio.ru/vil/35.htm (22nd June 2019).\n26. Ленин В. И. О либеральном и марксистском понятии классовой борьбы. // В. И. Ленин: Полное собрание сочинений, пятое издание, том 23. М.: Изд-во политической литературы, 1973, с. 236-241. http://uaio.ru/vil/23.htm (21st May 2019)\n27. Ленин В. И. Партийная организация и партийная литература. // В. И. Ленин: Полное собрание сочинений, пятое издание, том 12. М.: Изд-во политической литературы, 1973, с. 99-105. http://uaio.ru/vil/12.htm (29th May 2019)\n28. Ленин В. И. Письмо в ЦК, МК, ПК и членам Советов Петра и Москвы большевикам. // В. И. Ленин: Полное собрание сочинений, пятое издание, том 34. М.: Изд-во политической литературы, 1969, с. 340-341.\nhttp://uaio.ru/vil/34.htm (22nd June 2019);\n29. Ленин В. И. Социалистическая партия и беспартийная революционность. // В. И. Ленин: Полное собрание сочинений, пятое издание, том 12. М.: Изд-во политической литературы, 1968, с. 133-141. http://uaio.ru/vil/12.htm (5th June 2019)\n30. Ленин В. И. Эмпириокритицизм и исторический материализм. // В. И. Ленин: Полное собрание сочинений, пятое издание, том 18. М.: Изд-во политической литературы, 1968, с. 333-378. http://uaio.ru/vil/18.htm#s356 (22nd May 2019)\n31. Российская национальная библиотека. Рукописное наследие Евгения Ивановича Замятина. http://expositions.nlr.ru/ex_manus/zamjatin/index.php (30th May 2019)\n32. Солженицын А. И. Из Евгения Замятина // Новый мир, № 10, 1997.\nhttp://magazines.russ.ru/novyi_mi/1997/10/solgen-pr.html (18th June 2018)
描述: 碩士
國立政治大學
俄羅斯研究所
106263015
資料來源: http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#G0106263015
資料類型: thesis
Appears in Collections:學位論文

Files in This Item:
File SizeFormat
301501.pdf3.96 MBAdobe PDF2View/Open
Show full item record

Google ScholarTM

Check

Altmetric

Altmetric


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.