Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://ah.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/125747
題名: 我國自願離職者與初次尋職者之就業安全權益之探討
A Study on the Employment Security Rights of Voluntary Resignees and First-time Job-Seekers in Taiwan
作者: 黃美禎
Huang, Mei-Chen
貢獻者: 成之約
Cheng, Chih-Yue
黃美禎
Huang, Mei-Chen
關鍵詞: 自願性離職
初次尋職者
全球化
就業安全
失業給付
就業保險法
就業服務法
Voluntarily resigned
First-time job-seeking
Globalized
Employment security
Unemployment pay
Employment Insurance Act
Employment Service Act.
日期: 2019
上傳時間: 5-Sep-2019
摘要: 在現今全球化與勞動力彈性化的時代,失業問題是世界各國迫切解決問題之一,然也因受到全球化之影響,就業型態日趨多元,失業風險也隨之複雜,包括非自願性失業、轉銜性失業、部份性失業等多種樣態,而失業將對個人、社會、經濟產生多種負面影響且不利於國家未來之發展,現代國家為使降低失業所面臨的危害,保障人民工作權,促進國民就業,免於失業恐懼與危險而建構就業安全體系,該體系以就業服務、職業訓練與失業保險所構成,近年更以積極性的勞動市場政策為解決問題的政策主軸,根據我國憲法保障人民工作權、促進國民就業的精神,而陸續制定職業訓練法、就業服務法及就業保險法,完成就業安全體系的建構。\n\n細看上開法令之內涵係以非自願離職者為適用主體,含括失業給付、提早就業獎助津貼、職業訓練生活津貼,就業諮詢等,惟我國勞動市場尚有許多勞工看似自願性離職,實質內涵係因勞動條件低落、雇主經營不善而被迫縮減工時與工資等情況或因轉銜至下一工作之情況而成為失業者,卻無法受到就業安全制度之保障而造成更複雜的問題,如淪為長期失業者、不完全就業者或怯志工作者,而這群自願性離職者於在職期間參加就業保險,繳納保險費,卻因非屬「非自願離職」而無法在面臨失業風險時,透過就業安全制度維持生存權渡過經濟難關及維持其勞動力。\n\n另因我國就業保險法請領給付之要件之一為被保險人保險年資合計滿一年以上,然初次尋職者因尚未進入勞動市場,顯然無法達到領取失業給付之資格,依據調查29歲以下失業者的失業原因以「初次尋職」佔約4成5,初次尋職者亦多數為青年在畢業離開學校後進入勞動市場尋職,在無法順利銜接進入勞動市場而又無就業安全網的涵蓋,勢必會對這群初次尋職的青年造成極大的社會生活適應難題與經濟困境,進而衍生社會問題,數據統計過去10年來我國長期失業者的結構變化趨勢是:高學歷、青年、初次尋職的長期失業人數,出現逐漸增加的趨勢。國際勞工組織ILO第168號「促進就業和失業保護公約」有特別訂定「新尋職者的特別條款」認為初次尋職者恐面臨比一般失業者更困難的失業風險而應納入保護。\n\n參考德國失業保險,不論勞工是非自願性或自願性失業,均可向勞工局登記失業救濟金及職業訓練,日本亦有針對自願離職者給予津貼,惟兩者仍有些許差別性,我國僅以非自願離職者為就業安全保障主體,而未隨時代的改變擴大適用對象,恐造成就業安全之漏洞,另對於初次尋職者因轉銜進入勞動市場求職期間所得安全兩國均有給予一定的協助措施,我國現行的制度及限制對勞工之生存權、未來職涯發展產生威脅,規範不足實有探討之必要性,使我國就業安全制度更臻完備。
In today’s globalized and labor flexible era, unemployment is an urgent problem that every country in the world needs to solve. However, under the influence of globalization, employment patterns are changing rapidly and unemployment risks are becoming more complex. These risks include involuntary unemployment, transitive unemployment, and partial unemployment. Unemployment creates different negative impacts on the individual, society, and the economy and is disadvantageous for future national development. To reduce the harm posed by unemployment, to ensure the working rights of the people, to promote public employment, and to eliminate the fears and dangers of unemployment, modern countries have established employment security systems. This system is composed of the employment service, employment training, and unemployment insurance. In recent years, governments have used a proactive labor market policy to solve problems. Taiwan has gradually established the Vocational Training Act,Employment Service Act, and the Employment Insurance Act and completed the building of an employment security system based on the constitutional spirit of guaranteeing people’s right to work and to promote employment among the people.\n\nIf we look carefully at these laws, they are mainly centered on involuntary resignees and include items such as unemployment pay, early employment reward subsidy, career training and living expense subsidies, and employment consultations. Unfortunately, although many people in Taiwan’s labor market look like they voluntarily resigned, the reality is that they became unemployed because of poor labor conditions, as a result of decreased work hours and payment from poor employer management, or transfer to the next job. In circumstances like these, workers are not protected by the employment security system, which produces more complicated problems such as long-term unemployment, atypical employment, or workers working under fear. This group of voluntary resigneesparticipated in employment insurance while they were employed, but cannot use the employment security system when they face unemployment risk or use the system to maintain their living or employability because they are not technically “involuntary resignees.”\n\nIn addition, one of the payment conditions for Taiwan’s Employment Insurance Act is that the insured must have one year or more of insured period. Obviously, first-time job seekers who have never been in the labor market cannot obtain unemployment payment qualification. According to a survey of the unemployed under 29 years of age, about 45% gave “first-time job-seeking” as the reason for unemployment. First-time job seekers are mostly young people that have graduated and are just entering the labor market to search for employment. However, some are unable to successfully enter the labor market but are also not covered by the employment security net. As a result, this group of first-time job-seeking youths faces tremendous social adjustment and economic difficulties, which then derive into social problems. Based on statistics from the last decade, Taiwan’s long-term unemployment structure shows an increasing number of highly educated workers, youths, and first-time job seekers who are unemployed for longperiods. The C168 - Employment Promotion and Protection against Unemployment Conventionfrom the International Labor Organization (ILO)provides a special provision (Special Provisions For New Applicants For Employment), which asserts that first-time job seekers may face even more unemployment risk than general unemployed people and should be included for protection.\nIn contrast to Germany’s unemployment insurance, where laborers can apply for unemployment relief or job training from the labor department no matter whether they areinvoluntary or voluntarily unemployed, or Japan’s policy where voluntary resignees can apply for subsidies (although the amount may be different), Taiwan mainly focuses on involuntary resignees in regards to employment security insurance. If the scope of suitable subjects is not expanded to keep up with the times, an employment security loophole may be created. Furthermore, the current deficiencies in Taiwan’s income security assistance for first-time job seekers as they transition into the labor market and the threat towards labor survival and career development caused by the current system and its limitations must be explored so that Taiwan’s employment security system can be made more complete.
參考文獻: 一、書籍(依作者姓氏筆畫排列)\n1.王振寰、瞿海源,(2009),社會學與台灣社會(第三版),臺北市:巨流圖書\n2.林萬億,(2006),我國憲法與社會權的實踐,部門憲法,臺北市:元照出版有限公司。\n3.李庚霈,(2004),就業安全理論與實務(初版),臺北市:揚智文化。\n4.成之約、潘世偉、李健鴻、辛炳降、張玉燕、陳秋蓉(2012),勞動政策(初版),新北市:國立空中大學。\n5.法治斌、董保城,(2012),憲法新論(五版),臺北市:元照出版有限公司。\n6.施世駿,(2006),比較福利國家:國際比較中的德國社會國(初版),臺北市:巨流圖書有限公司。\n7.黃越欽,(2006),勞動法新論(修訂三版),臺北市:翰蘆圖書出版有限公司。\n8.黃越欽著、王惠玲監修、黃鼎佑增修,(2012),勞動法新論(修訂四版),臺北市:翰蘆圖書出版有限公司。\n9.張晉芬,(2013),勞動社會學(增訂版),台北市:政大出版社。\n10.蔡漢賢、李明政,(2011),社會福利新論(三版),臺北市:松慧有公司。\n11.楊通軒,(2012),就業安全法-理論與實務(初版),臺北市:五南圖書出版公司。\n12.衛民、許繼峰,(2010),勞資關係平衡效率與公平(二版),新北市:前程文化。\n二、學位論文\n1.王光隆,(2008),台灣就業保險現況與問題之研究-以非自願性失業勞工觀點探討就業保險問題,朝陽科技大學保險金融管理系碩士論文。\n2.洪湘婷,(2013),初次尋職青年失業之就業促進與所得保障議題之初探,國立中正大學勞工關係研究所碩士論文。\n3.徐郁涵,(2015),我國就業保險法制之研究-兼論南韓法制,國立中正大學勞工關係研究所碩士論文。\n4.陳彥蓁,(2012),台灣公立就業服務站三合一就業服務流程及功能之探討,國立政治大學勞工研究所碩士論文。\n5.陳芊方,(2011),臺灣、德國失業保險給付制度之比較研究,中國文化大學勞工關係學系碩士論文。\n6.蔡玉菁,(2001),日本雇用保險制度之研究,淡江大學日本研究所碩士論文。\n7.劉曉菁,(2016),「我國青年就業政策評估-以「明師高徒」計畫為例」,中正大學勞工關係學係碩士論文。\n8.蕭嫚琳,(2017),日本勞動市場法制之原理探討-兼論臺日青年就業度之比較,政治大學法律科技整合研究所碩士論文。\n三、中文期刊論文\n1.石發基,台灣就業保險制度之演進 ,2010海峽兩岸社會保障學術研討會就業保障制度論文集,第2-7頁,2010年9月。\n2.李碧涵、蕭全政,(2016),從制度觀點探討個體和性別的不等平,國立臺灣大學國察發展研究所15卷2期。\n3.李健鴻,(2012),後工業社會的失業風險調控:台灣因應金融危機的就業政策與治理困境分析,政大勞動學報,第28期。\n4.李健鴻,(2012),長期失業者問題探討及因應策略(身心障礙者就業訓練),就業安全半年刊,101年第2期。\n5.李健鴻,(2010),「積極促進」治理下就業保險失對給付制度的實踐困境,臺灣民主季刊,卷7:2,第125-176。\n6.李健鴻,(2008),差序治理體制與矛盾:台灣就業體制變革分析,台灣社會福利學刊,第200802期,頁109-145。\n7.李健鴻,(2001),當前青年失業的原因、問題與對策,就業安全半年刊,100年第1期。\n8.李孟玢,(1998),論世界人權宣言之基本性質與法律效力,國立中正大學法學集刊,第199807期,頁333-361。\n9.邵惠玲,(2008),社會福利國之昨日與今日-以德國社會保險的法制發展為例,財產法暨經濟法,第16期,頁123-166。\n10.林佳和,(2012),金融危機下的德國勞動市場對策:理解與判讀的嘗試,就業與勞動關係季刊第2卷第1期,頁102-120。\n11.林宗弘,(2009),台灣的後工業化:階級結構的轉型與社會不平等1992-2007,台灣社會學刋第43期,頁93-158。\n12.徐廣正(2015),失業給付請領條件之商榷,臺灣勞動季刊 41期,頁46-57。\n13.黃台心;劉洪禎;胡聚男,(2018),考慮樣本選擇下分析兩性勞工薪資低付問題: 關聯結構隨機邊界法之應用,經濟論文叢刊,46卷3期,頁401-450。\n14.郭振昌(2018),就業保險法積極勞動市場政策的國際趨勢與啟發,新社會政策,第60期,頁27-34。\n15.羅至美(2017),從德國哈茨改革法案反思後歐債危機的歐盟經濟治理,政治科學論叢,第71期,頁41-74。\n16.鐘琳惠,從歐盟經濟談台灣青少年就業與失業問題,就業安全半年刊96年第1期。\n17.劉躍斌、黃琳,(2003),「德國的失業保障政策研究」,德國研究,第3期18卷總第67期,頁29-33。\n四、研究計畫\n1.中華經濟研究院(2013),歐洲當前經貿政策對台灣經濟之影響與因應,經濟部委託研究報告。\n2.辛炳隆、李淑媛、蕭晴惠,(2018),協助改善青年就業困境之研究,勞動部委託研究計畫。\n3.勞動部,(2016),105年15-19歲青年勞工就業狀況調查,勞動部委託全國意向顧問股份有限公司辦理。\n4.行政院勞工委員會勞工保險局,(2011),考察日本勞災保險承保及雇用保險制度實務作業。\n5.張家春,(2014),103年度建構我國尊嚴勞動指標及報告,勞動部委託研究計畫。\n6.蕭晴惠、林國榮,(2014),青年就業讚計畫執行成效評估,行政院勞工委員會職業訓練局委託研究計畫。\n7.行政院勞工委員會,(2000),國際勞工公約,行政院勞工委員會編印。\n五、政府機關及網路資料\n1.行政院主計總處中華民國統計網,網址: https://www.dgbas.gov.tw/mp.asp?mp=1\n2.勞動部法令查詢系統,網址:http://laws.mol.gov.tw/\n3.勞動部勞工保險局,網址:https://www.bli.gov.tw/0022903.html\n4.勞動部統計專區,網址:https://www.mol.gov.tw/statistics/\n5.勞動部勞動力發展署,網址:https://www.wda.gov.tw/Default.aspx\n6.立法院公報,(2002),第91卷,第28期。\n7.日本厚生勞動省,網址:https://www.hellowork.go.jp/insurance/insurance_range.html\n8.德國社會法典就業促進:https://www.sozialgesetzbuch-sgb.de/sgbiii/16.html.\n9.李允傑,(2012),台灣青年就業狀況相對良好,財團法人國定政策研究基金\n(檢自:https://www.npf.org.tw/1/10231)\n10.陳蓓,(2011),德國「Agenda 2010」 初探,台灣新社會智庫。(檢自:\nhttp://www.taiwansig.tw/index.php/%E6%94%BF%E7%AD%96%E5%A0%B1%E5%91%8A/%E5%85%A9%E5%B2%B8%E5%9C%8B%E9%9A%9B/3864-%E5%BE%B7%E5%9C%8B%E3%80%8CAgenda%202010%E3%80%8D%20%E5%88%9D%E6%8E%A2)\n六、外文文獻\n1.ILO,Convention No.44,1934。\n2.ILO,Convention No.102,1952。\n3.ILO,Convention No.168,1988。\n4.ILO,Recommendation No.67,1944。\n5.wold happiness report 2017,網址http://www.taaa.org.tw/uploads/editors/news_list/606243881.pdf\n6.Blau, P. M., & Duncan, O. D. (1967). The American Occupational Structure. New York: John Wiley and Sons.\n7.Esping-Andersen, G. (1999) Social Foundations of Postindustrial Economies, London: Oxford University,p103.\n8.Esping-Andersen, G(1990)De-Commodification in Social Policy. The Welfare State as a System of Stratification., Three Worlds of Welfare Capitalism, Cambridge, UK: Polity Press, p. 35-78.\n9.联邦德国基本法(GG)http://www.recht-harmonisch.de/GG-chinesisch.pdf\n10.姚玲珍(2011),德國社會保障制度(第一版),上海人民出版社。\n11.渡邊 信 (1999),改正雇用保険制度の理論,頁191-192,日本:財団法人財形福祉協会。\n12.宮本 みち子,成人期への移行モデルの転換と若者政策,人口問題研究,68-1,頁35,2012。\n13.高畠淳子,「就職てきない若者-雇用.教育.所得保障の観点からの検討」,載:労働者像の多様化と労働法・社会保障法,頁2-23,2015年3月。
描述: 碩士
國立政治大學
勞工研究所
101262026
資料來源: http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#G0101262026
資料類型: thesis
Appears in Collections:學位論文

Files in This Item:
File SizeFormat
202601.pdf1.53 MBAdobe PDF2View/Open
Show full item record

Google ScholarTM

Check

Altmetric

Altmetric


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.