Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://ah.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/125768
題名: 不動產持有稅與住宅價格關係之研究-以桃園市中壢區為例
Research on property tax and housing price - A case study in Zhongli, Taoyuan
作者: 林雯琪
Lin, Wun-Ci
貢獻者: 陳奉瑤
林雯琪
Lin, Wun-Ci
關鍵詞: 不動產持有稅
有效稅率
資本化
特徵價格模型
Property tax
The effective tax rate
Tax capitalization
Hedonic price model
日期: 2019
上傳時間: 5-Sep-2019
摘要: 不動產稅制的核心為持有稅(地價稅及房屋稅),健全的持有稅可穩定房價,促進不動產有效利用與強化地方財政,然而目前臺灣不動產市場同時存在…等諸多複雜的結構問題,顯示地價稅及房屋稅的改革,為稅改的重要之重。此兩者差別持有稅制,其資本化效果將受到土地與建物價值比率不同影響。本研究採用2012年至2017年桃園市中壢區實價登錄資料,透過土地貢獻說進行土地與建物價格分離後,以統計分析(獨立樣本t檢定與皮爾森積差相關係數)及特徵價格模型,解析不同土地價值比率之建物持有稅有效稅率差異、持有稅與住宅價格之相關性及持有稅對住宅價格影響程度。\n\n研究結果顯示,於不同土地價值比率之公寓與透天厝,持有稅、地價稅及房屋稅之有效稅率皆有顯著差異;至於持有稅與住宅(公寓、透天厝)價格之相關性,持有稅、地價稅之有效稅率與交易單價分別呈現高度與中度負相關,房屋稅有效稅率與交易單價呈現低度正相關;而持有稅對住宅價格之影響情形,持有稅、地價稅之有效稅率對住宅價格的影響皆為負向,房屋稅有效稅率對住宅價格的影響則不具顯著性。
The core of the real estate tax system is the property tax. Sound property tax system can stabilize housing prices, promote the effective use of real estate and strengthen local finance. However, Taiwan’s real estate market currently has a lot of complicated problems. The Property Tax in Taiwans a differential property tax system. This study uses the actual price registration data from 2012 to 2017, and separates land price and building price by the land contribution theory. We adopts independent sample t-test, Pearson product-moment correlation coefficient and hedonic price model. The results show that there is a significant difference between the effective tax rate of property tax, land price tax and housing tax of the apartment and the single-house; as for the correlation of property tax and housing price (apartment and single-house), the effective tax rate of property tax and transaction price are highly negative correlation , the effective tax rate of land tax and transaction price are moderate negative correlation, and the effective tax rate of housing tax is low-positive correlated with transaction price. Both of the property tax and the effective tax rate of property tax and land tax have a negative impact on housing price, and the effective tax rate of housing tax has no significant effect on housing price.
參考文獻: 一、中文文獻\n(一)期刊\n方劭元、梁仁旭、陳奉瑤,2013,「銷售模式對商用不動產價格之影響─以台北市辦公室為例」,『土地經濟年刊』,24:97-116。\n王宏文, 2010,「台北市地價稅公平性之研究」,『行政暨政策學報』,51:47-76。\n杜宇璇、宋豐荃、曾禹瑄、葛仲寧、陳奉瑤,2013,「台灣特徵價格模型之回顧分析」,『土地問題研究季刊』,12(2):44-57。\n李春長、童作君,2010,「住宅特徵價格模型之多層次分析」,『經濟論文叢刊』, 38(2):289-325。\n林子欽、李汪穎、陳國華,2011,「公寓建物之折舊估算與房屋稅負」,『都市與計畫』,38(1):31-46。\n林祖嘉、馬毓駿,2007,「特徵方程式大量估價法在台灣不動產市場之應用」,『住宅學報』,16(2):1-22。\n林森田、陳荔芬,1993,「地方公共設施效益與土地稅負擔資本化之研究」,『政大學報』,67:423-457。\n林聖豪、謝靜琪,2018,「地價稅及房屋稅在地方政府財政支出中所扮演之角色—以美國佛羅里達州財產稅個案為例」,『土地問題研究季刊』,17(2):40-49。\n花敬群,2014,「臺灣不動產稅制改革問題與方向」,『財稅研究』,43(5):61-77。\n黃明聖、林元興、黃淑惠,2017,「善用地價稅促進土地利用」,『財稅研究』,46(3):27-46。\n陳德翰、王宏文,2013,「臺北市財產稅公平性之研究」,『台灣土地研究』,16(2):89-139。\n張碧珠,2013,「房屋街路等級調整率之探討」,『當代財政』,26:92-96。\n彭建文、吳森田、吳祥華,2007,「不動產有效稅率對房價影響分析—以台北市大同區與內湖區為例」,『台灣土地研究』,10(2):49-66。\n華宜昌,1994,「最適房地價稅率及其在臺灣政策應用之探討」,『人文及社會集刊』,6(2):63-77。\n華宜昌,1997,「地價稅的意義與住宅建設」,『住宅學報』,5:57-58。\n楊松齡、游適銘,2010,「房地價格分離之剩餘歸屬探討─由產權結構之觀點」,『台灣土地研究』,13(1):1-23。\n謝靜琪,2004,「土地稅達成地利共享、地盡其利的目標嗎?」,『財政研究』,36:59-84。\n蘇惠屏,2017,「房屋稅條例課稅制度之分析─以評定現值及稅率為中心」,『財稅研究』,46(3):47-73。\n(二)書籍\n林森田,1996。『土地經濟理論與分析』。臺北:林森田。\n(三)碩博士論文\n林詩堯,2002,「台灣地區有效財產稅率之推估」,政治大學財政學系研究所碩士論文:臺北市。\n陳美辰,2015,「地方支出及財產稅對房價影響之實證分析」,高雄應用科技大學財富與稅務管理系研究所碩士論文:高雄市。\n陳揚仁,2016,「財產稅相關議題之研究-以台北市自用住宅為例」,政治大學財政學系研究所博士論文:臺北市。\n黃朝琴,1994,「我國財產稅評價制度公平性之探討」,政治大學財政學系研究所碩士論文:臺北市。\n鄭維瑩,2013,「不動產稅制對不動產價格影響分析─論不動產稅制改革」,臺北大學不動產與城鄉環境學系研究所碩士論文:新北市。\n魏妙芳,2015,「現行財產稅制的公平性研究─以屏東縣住宅為例」,屏東大學不動產經營學系研究所碩士論文:屏東縣。\n\n二、外文文獻\n(一)期刊\nBrasington, D. M., 2001, “Capitalization and Community Size”, Journal of Urban, 50, 385-395.\nBrueckner, J. K., 2001, “Do Local Government Engage in Strategic Property-Tax Competition?”, National Tax Journal, 54(2),203-229.\nCharlot, S., Paty, S., Visalli, M., 2013, “Assessing the impact of local taxation on property prices: a spatial matching contribution”, Applied Economics, 45(9), 1151-1166.\nDusansky, D., Ingber, M., Karatjas, N., 1981, “The impact of property taxation on housing values and rents”, Journal of Urban Economics, 10(2), 240-255.\nHamilton, B. W., 1975, “Zoning and Property Taxation in a System of Local Governments”, Urban Studies, 12, 205-211.\nMikesell, J., 1999, “Public Fiscal Administration.Belmont, CA: The Wandsworth Group”, Thomas Learning, 387-418.\nMieszkowski, P., 1972, “The Property Tax: An Excise Tax or a Profit Tax? ”, Journal of Public Economics, 1, 73-96.\nOates, W. E., 1969, “The effect of property taxes and local public spending on property values : An empirical study of tax capitalization and the Tiebout hypothesis”, Journal of Political Economy, 77, 957-971.\nPalmon, O., Smith, B. A., 1998, “New Evidence on Property Tax Capitalization”, Journal of Political Economy, 106(5), 1099-1111.\nPollakowski, H. O., 1973, “The Effects of Property Taxes and Local Public Spending on Property Values: A Comment and Further Results”, Journal of Political Economy, 81, 994-1003.\nRichardson, D. H. and Thalheimer, R., 1981, “Measuring the Extent of Property Tax Capitalization for Single Family Residences”, Southern Economic Journal, 47(3), 674-689.\nRosen, S., 1974, “Hedonic Prices and Implicit Markets: Product Differentiation in Pure Competition”, The Journal of Political Economy, (82)1, 34-55.\nSirmans, S. G., Macpherson, D. A., and Zietz, E. N., 2005, “The composition of hedonic pricing models”, Journal of real estate literature, 13(1), 1-44.\nTiebout, C. M., 1956, “A Pure Theory of Local Expenditure”, Journal of Political Economy, 64, 416-424.\nWilson, J. D., 1999, “Theories of Tax Competition”, National Tax Journal, 52(2), 269-304.\nYinger, J., 1982, “Capitalization and the theory of local public finance”, Journal of Political Economy, 90, 917-1043\nYu, M., 1989, “Detection and Remedies of Multicollinearity in Multiple Regression Analysis”, Journal of Education and Psycholog, 12, 385-407.\nZodrow, G. R., 2001, “The property tax as a capital tax: A room with three views”, National Tax Journal, 54(1), 139-156.\nZodrow, G. R., Mieszkowski, P., 1986, “Pigou, Tiebout, Property Taxation, and the Underprovision of Local Public Goods”, Journal of Urban Economics ,19, 356-370.\n(二)書籍\nBloom, H. S., Ladd, H. F., and Yinger, J., 1983. Are property taxes capitalized into house values?, In Local Provision of Public Services (pp. 145-163). Academic Press.\nYinger, J., Bloom, H. S., Mills, E. S., 1988. Property taxes and house values : the theory and estimation of intrajurisdictional property tax capitalization, Boston : Academic Press.\n\n三、網頁參考\n內政部不動產資訊平台http://pip.moi.gov.tw/v2/e/scre0105.aspx,取用日期:2019年5月1日。\n內政部地政司https://www.land.moi.gov.tw/chhtml/content/65?mcid=2942,取用日期:2019年4月28日。\n信義房價指數https://www.sinyinews.com.tw/quarterly,取用日期:2019年4月28日。
描述: 碩士
國立政治大學
地政學系碩士在職專班
104923013
資料來源: http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#G0104923013
資料類型: thesis
Appears in Collections:學位論文

Files in This Item:
File SizeFormat
301301.pdf1.19 MBAdobe PDF2View/Open
Show full item record

Google ScholarTM

Check

Altmetric

Altmetric


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.