Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
https://ah.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/125893| 題名: | 中國和中東歐國家合作的影響 - 通往歐洲的門戶或修正主義的後門? Impact of Cooperation of China and Central Eastern European Countries - Gateway to Europe or Backdoor to Revisionism? |
作者: | 沃鐵克 Kusak, Wojciech Krzysztof |
貢獻者: | 劉復國 Liu, Fu-Kuo 沃鐵克 Kusak, Wojciech Krzysztof |
關鍵詞: | 中國 歐盟 中東歐國家 一帶一路 16+1 China European Union Central and Eastern Europe Belt and Road Initiative 16+1 Power 17+1 Regionalism Multilateralism |
日期: | 2019 | 上傳時間: | 5-九月-2019 | 摘要: | There is an ongoing academic debate over the rise of China, and its impact on the future international landscape. What can be observed in the past two decades, is that China increased its skills to navigate the complex political landscapes of selected states and regional platforms, including localized forms of multilateralism (or so-called multi-bilateralism). These platforms can be claimed to work towards the re-conceptualization of China’s rise in Europe, and a larger global scale.\nOne of the significant grounds of this phenomenon is the engagement between China and Europe. The comprehensive cooperation between China and the EU started over a decade ago in the belief that its strategic engagement with Beijing will influence it on the domestic and foreign policy arena, to the image desired by the European continent. In the past 10 years, the stated relationship was based on the policy of so-called unconditional engagement, which meant nothing more than allowing China to have a chance of making one-sided use of all its liberties and market rules governing countries within the EU. One of the turning points of that relationships was the 2008 financial crisis, which while putting more pressure on Beijing to support the stability of the international governance systems, gave the country (rich in financial means) a chance to increase its engagement with its neighboring countries, and started a new chapter in its political and economic relationships around the globe, including Europe.\nQuestions asked in regards to these relationships are largely bipolar, and generally depend on the perspective of China and the West. This view, on the European side, poses a degree of fragmentation, largely associated with differences in the conceptualization of understanding of a strategic bilateral relationship, bilateral relationships of individual stakeholders, regional engagement, and the different platforms of implementation of policies on the two continents. Among stated differences, one important issue is how to uphold the necessary level of regional political independence of Europe, and how to accommodate sub-regional engagement of China in line with “building of new international relations of new era” on one side, and the commitment to the Western world order based on the widely accepted values and present form of international governance system on the other.\nThe second half of 2010’s witnessed an increase in cross-regional multi-bilateral (or multilateral) formats, including areas of South-East Asia, Caribbean, Africa, and Europe that are often based on the perception of policymakers in Beijing. They can contribute to the simplification of China’s policy implementation in the areas of geographic and political significance to China, especially in the neighborhood regions to its “major-country diplomacy” fronts (Russia, European Union, and the U.S.). One of first of such formats is the Cooperation between China and Central Eastern European Countries, or 16+1, which became an important element in the Sino-European landscape.\nIn a nutshell, this research aims to determine and assess the concepts and structure of stated multi-bilateral 16+1 cooperation, located in the frontline of the West versus East relations. The questions being asked during this research are related to the impact of Cooperation between China and Central and Eastern European Countries, with the application of additional theoretical framework – utilizing elements of the neo-tributary perspective of international relations – that may help to assess 16+1 role in Chinese revisionism of contemporary international relations. The main research question is what impact the China-CEEC Cooperation generates on the development of the cross-regional EU-China strategic partnership, therefore is it complementary, constitutes a part of the wider sub-regional relationship between European Community and PRC, or perhaps on contrary creates negative impact or no impact at all. The time perspective of the research centered between 2012 (the year of mechanism establishment) and the end of the first quarter of 2019 (8th China-CEEC Summit). The first 7 years before the first mechanism enlargement by accepting Greece as a “full-fledged member” it’s also the time that ended the “16+1” and started the “17+1” cooperation.\nThere are three levels of analysis applied in this work, exploring the Belt and Road, 16+1 sub-regional engagement and bilateral relationships within the title process, with the use of theories of complex interdependence, neo-liberalism, ideas of regionalism and thoughts on neo-functionalism. It aims to assess the stake in support of the new international relations of China and explore the impact of 16+1 process on the EU-China relationship. Since it is discussing an ongoing process, it does not aim at providing a definitive conclusion, but rather streamline the first stage of 16+1 presence.\nThe first level of analysis streamlines the ideas behind the largest outside platform of external engagement of China, the Belt and Road Initiative (BRI). It draws the shared elements between that initiative and 16+1 explaining the contemporary shifts influencing certain political courses that are discussed over the following pages. The second level is based on an analysis of the 16+1 cooperation mechanism itself from the (multilateral) regional level. It assesses its multi-bilateral nature, and present conditions calling for a new form of sub-regionalization explained in institutionalization pieces of evidence of a discussed cooperation format. The third level touches upon the bilateral aspects of cooperation between China and CEEC’s, with the EU implications, to allow in the assessment of the impact on the cross-regional overall relationship. The last part is the analysis of findings from the stated three levels of analysis based on two frameworks, of which one underlines the impact of the 16+1 cooperation and the other one help to contextualize a claimed presence of China’s revisionism in Europe. The above steps may also help to evaluate whether any preliminary motives originally existed as the objective of this mechanism and if they serve a wider purpose in the context of the whole Eurasian landmass. | 參考文獻: | Books:\n\nBabbie, E. (2009) The Practice of Social Research (12th edition). Wadsworth Publishing\nBates, G. (2007) Rising China – China’s New Security Diplomacy. Brookings Institute Press.\nBialic, D. Magdalena, L. (2014). The Clusters Phenomenon in Selected Central Eastern Countries. Cambridge Scholars Publishing.\nBjornar, S.-T., Wrenn, Y., Lanteigne, L., Lanteigne, M. (2018) China and Nordic Diplomacy. Routledge Focus Series, Routledge.\nDrahokoupil, J. (2017). Chinese investment in Europe: corporate strategies and labour relations, Brussels: ETUI.\nFrankel, J. A. (1997). Regional Trading Blocs in the World Economic System. Washington. Institute for International Economics.\nGaens, B., Khandekar, G. (2018). Inter-Regional Relations and the Asia-Europe Meeting (ASEM). Palgrave Macmillan.\nGilpin, R., Gilpin, J. M. (2001). Global Political Economy: Understanding the International Economic Order. Princeton University Press.\nHaas, E. B. (1958). The Uniting of Europe: Political. Economic and Social Forces 1950-1957, Notre Dame, Indiana: University of Notre Dame Press.\nHaas, E. B. (1975) The Obsolescence of Regional Integration Theory. Research series - Institute of International Studies. Berkeley: University of California. no. 25.\nHeilmann S. (ed.). (2017). China’s Political System, Mercator Institute for China Studies (MERICS). Rowman Littlefield.\nHerrmann, R. K., Risse, T., Brewer, M. B. (2004). Transnational Identities: Becoming European in the EU. New York: Rowman & Littlefield.\nIkenberry, G. J., Mastanduno, M. (2003). International Relations theory and the Asia-Pacific. Columbia University Press.\nIkenberry, G. J. (2011) Liberal Leviathan: The Origins, Crisis, and Transformation of the American World Order. Princeton University Press.\nKang, D. C. (2010). East Asia Before the West: Five Centuries of Trade and Tribute. Columbia University Press.\nKeohane, R. (2002). International Institutions and State Power: Essays in International Relations Theory. Boulder. Westview Press.\nLe Corre, P., Sepulchre, A., Emanuel, S. (2016) China`s Offensive in Europe. Washington, D.C.: Brookings Institution Press.\nLowell, D., Fukui, H., Lee, P.N.S., (2000). Informal Politics in East Asia. Cambridge University Press.\nLukes, S. (2005). Power - A Radical View (Second Edition). British Sociological Association. Palgrave Macmillan.\nNye, J. S. (1990). Bound to Lead: The changing Nature of American Power. N.Y. Basic Book.\nOverholt, W. H. (2008). Asia, America, and the Transformation of Geopolitics. Cambridge University Press.\nPieke, F. (2016). Knowing China: A Twenty-First Century Guide. Cambridge University Press.\nPreston, P. W. (1997). Political and Cultural Identity, Citizens and Nations in Search of its Place in the World. University of Toronto Press.\nReilly, B. (2005). Democracy and Diversity – Political Engineering in the Asia-Pacific. Oxford University Press.\nRicardo, D. (1821). On the principles of political economy and taxation. London: J. Murray.\nRiggirozzi, P., Tussie, D. (2012). The Rise of Post-hegemonic Regionalism. Springer.\nRobles, A. C. (2008) The Asia-Europe meeting: the theory and practice of interregionalism. London: Routledge contemporary Asia Series.\nRoy, A. (1988). The Soviet Union and the Strategy of Non-Alignment in the Third World. Cambridge University Press.\nRuggie, J. G., (1992). Multilateralism: The Anatomy of an Institution”, International Organization, Vol. 46, No. 3, pp. 561-598.\nScully, R., Jones, R. W. (2010). Europe Regions and European Regionalism. Palgrave Macmillan.\nSoberbaum, F. (2011). The Routledge Handbook of Asian Regionalism, chapter in a book edited by Beeson M. and Stubbs R., Routledge.\nSolis, M., Stallings, B., Katada, S. N. (2009). Comparative Regionalism: FTA Diffusion in the Pacific Rim. Palgrave Macmillan.\nStefanova, B. M. (2018), The European Union and Europe’s New Regionalism – the Challenge of Enlargement, neighborhood, and Globalization. Palgrave Macmillan.\nXi, Jinping. (2014). The Governance of China, State Council Information Office, PRC.\nXi, Jinping. (2018). The Governance of China II, State Council Information Office, PRC.\nXing, Li. (ed.). (2019). Mapping “One Belt One Road Initiative”. International Political Economy Series. Palgrave Macmillan. 2662-2438.\n\nAcademic Journals:\n\nAndrijauskas, K. (2016). The Grand Strategic Nature of China’s Current International Infrastructure-related Projects. China Think Tanks Book Series. volume on China-CEEC Cooperation and the Belt and Road Initiative. CASS.\nBaldwin, D. A. (1980). Interdependence and power – a conceptual analysis. International Organizations. 34-4.\nBlum, G. (2008). Multilateralism, and the Architecture of International Law, Harvard International Law Journal. 49(2), 323-379.\nCarey, S. (2002). Undivided Loyalties: Is National Identity an Obstacle to European Integration?. European Union Politics. 3. 387-413.\nChapman, T. L. (2007). International security institutions, domestic politics, and institutional legitimacy. Journal of Conflict Resolution. 51. 134–166.\nCharron, A., Diener, A. C., (2015). Political Geography, New Regionalism, and Rescaling Identity. SAIS Review vol. 35 no. 2 (Summer–Fall).\nCombes K. (2012). Between Revisionism and Status Quo: China in International Regimes. China’s behavior in the global trade, non-proliferation and environmental regimes. POLIS Journal. University of Leeds. 2011/2012(6).\nCorbetta, R., Dixon, W. J. (2004) Multilateralism, Major Powers, and Militarized Disputes”. Political Research Quarterly. p. 5-14, March.\nCorterssi, N. P. (2009). Experiments in Soft Balancing: China- Led Multilateralism in Africa And the Arab World. Caucasian Review of International Affairs. 3(4).\nCsillag, T., Szelenyi, I., (2015) Drifting from liberal Democracy: neo-conservative ideology of Managed Illiberal Democratic Capitalism in Post-Communist Europe. Intersections. 1(1).\nEckersley, R. (2012). Moving Forward in the Climate Negotiations: Multilateralism or Minilateralism?. Global Environment Politics. 12(2). p. 24-42.\nFang, S. (2008). The informational role of international institutions and domestic politics. American Journal of Political Science. 52. p. 304–321.\nFinnemore, M. (2005) Fights about rules: The role of efficacy and power in changing multilateralism. Review of International Studies. 31. p. 187–206.\nGao, G. (2017) The Development of Sino-Romanian Relations After 1989. Global Economic Observer. Nicolae Titulescu University of Bucharest. Faculty of Economic Sciences; Institute for World Economy of the Romanian Academy, vol. 5(1), June.\nGnoinska, M. K. (2017). Socialist friends should help each other in crises’: Sino-Polish relations within the Cold War dynamics, 1980-1987. Cold War History. 17(2). 143-159.\nGoddard, S.E. (2018), Embedded Revisionism: Networks, Institutions, and Challenges to World Order. International Organizations. 72(4). pp. 763-797.\nGóralczyk. B. (2017) China’s interests in Central and Eastern Europe: enter the dragon. European View. 16. p.153–162.\nHala, M. (2018). Forging a new Eastern Bloc. Journal of Democracy. 29(2).\nHemmer, C., Katzenstein, P. J., (2002). Why is there no NATO in Asia? Collective identity, regionalism, and the origins of multilateralism. International Organization. 56(3). p. 575–607.\nJia, R. (2016). Prospect and Forecast of “16+1” Local Cooperation”. Division of European Science and Technological Institute of European Studies (IES), Chinese Academy of Social Sciences, PRC.\nJohnston, A. I. (2012). What (If Anything) Does East Asia Tell Us About International Relations Theory?. Annual Review of Political Science. 15. p.53-78.\nKahler, M. (1992). Multilateralism with small and large numbers. International Organization. 46(3) Summer, pp. 681-708.\nKaplan, R. (2010). The geography of Chinese Power – how far will China reach on land and sea?. Foreign Affairs. 89(3), pp.22-41.\nKarns, M. P. (2008). Multilateralism Matters Even More. SAIS Review of International Affairs. 28(2).\nKasciunas, L. (2016). Russia’s Tools of Influence in Lithuania as a Stakeholder. China-CEEC Think Tanks Book Series, vol. on Stakeholders in China CEEC Cooperation.\nKastner, S. L., Saunders, P. C. (2010). Is China a status quo or revisionist state? “Leadership travel as an empirical indicator of foreign policy priorities. International Studies Quarterly. 56(1), pp.163–177.\nKeohane, R. O. (1990). Multilateralism: An agenda for research. International Journal. 45(4), pp.731–764.\nKeohane R. O., Martin L. L. (1995). The Promise of Institutionalist Theory. International Security. 20(1). pp. 39-51.\nKotarski, K., Kos-Stanišić, L. (2016). Levels of Sino-Croatian Economic Relations. Original Research Article Received: 27 October, Faculty of Political Sciences, University of Zagreb.\nKowalski, B. (2017). China’s foreign policy towards Central and Eastern Europe: The “16+1” format in the South–South cooperation perspective: Cases of the Czech Republic and Hungary. Cambridge Journal of Eurasian Studies. 1.\nKrugman, P. R. (1980) Scale economies, product differentiation, and the pattern of trade”. The American Economic Review. 70 (5). pp.950–959.\nLi, X. (2016). The Expansion of China’s Global Hegemonic Strategy: Implications for Latin America. JCIR Special Issue. https://doi.org/10.5278/ojs.jcir.v4i2.1587.\nLiu, Z.K. (2017). China-CEEC Cooperation: China’s Building of New Type of International Relation. CIRR. (78). pp.19-34.\nMarch, J. G., Olsen, J. P. (1998). The Institutional Dynamics of International Political Orders. International Organization. 52(4): 943-69.\nMatura, T. (2016). German’s Relations and Policies towards CEEC as the Stakeholder. China-CEEC Think Tanks Book Series, vol. on Stakeholders in China CEEC Cooperation.\nMatura, T. (2019). China–CEE Trade, Investment and Politics. Europe-Asia Studies, 71(3). pp.388-407.\nMináriková, J. (2019). New Possibilities of International Cooperation with China\n(A Report on Ucm’s Business and Academic Trip), Communication Today.\nMoga, T. (2009). The Contribution of the Neofunctionalism and Intergovernmentalism Theories to the Evolution of the European Integration Process. Journal of Alternative Perspectives in the Social Sciences. 1.\nOshiba, R. (2013). Multilateral Diplomacy and Multilateralism – The United Nations, the G8, the G20, and Bretton Woods Institutions. Japanese Diplomacy Series. Japan Digital Library.\nPavlicevic, D. (2017). The Key Stakeholders on the Serbia’s Relationship with China: Beyond China-Centric Explanations. China-CEEC Think Tanks Book Series, volume on Stakeholders in China CEEC Cooperation.\nPeleo, A. S. (2015). “Kazakhstani” Identity, Eurasian Regionalism and Shanghai Cooperation Organization: Biopolitics of Forced Migration, Modernity and Multilateralism. Contemporary Chinese Political Economy and Strategic Relations: An International Journal. 1(2) pp.247-302.\nPleschová, G. (2015). China’s engagement in Central and Eastern Europe: regional diplomacy in pursuit of China’s interests. International Issues & Slovak Foreign Policy Affairs. 24(3), pp.15-26.\nPoznańska, J. Poznański, K. (2015). Comparison of Patterns of Convergence Among “Emerging Markets” of Central Europe, Eastern Europe And Central Asia. Comparative Economic Research. 18(1).\nPan, S.Y., Lo, J. T.Y. (2017) Re-conceptualizing China’s rise as a global power: a neo-tributary perspective. The Pacific Review. 30(1). pp.1-25.\nRana, W. (2015). Theory of Complex Interdependence: A Comparative Analysis of Realist and Neoliberal Thoughts. International Journal of Business and Social Science. 6(2).\nRees, N. (2009). Eu-China relations: historical and contemporary perspective. European Studies. 27. pp. 31-46.\nSattar, N. (2013). EU-China Strategic Relations: Challenges and Prospects. Journal of European Studies. 29(2).\nSnidal, D. (1991) Relative Gains and the Pattern of International Cooperation. American Political Science Review, 85(3). pp. 701-726.\nSweet, A. S. (2012). Neofunctionalism and Supranational Governance (unabridged version). Faculty Scholarship Series. 4628.\nSzelenyi, I. (2013) Varieties of Social Structure During and After Socialism, Chinese Sociological Review. 46. pp.3-31.\nTaneja, P. (2009). China’s search for energy security and EU-china relations. European Studies. 27. p. 259-273.\nWang, J. (2018) Xi Jinping’s ‘Major Country Diplomacy:’ A Paradigm Shift?. Journal of Contemporary China. DOI: 10.1080/10670564.2018.1497907\nWang, S. (2016) China’s People-to-people Diplomacy and Its Importance to China-EU Relations: A Historical Institutionalism Perspective. JCIR. 4(1).\nWedgwood, R. (2000). Unilateral Action in the UN System. European Journal of International Law. 11(2). pp.349-359.\nWeiss, T. Řiháčková, V. (2010). Promoting Multilateralism? Conceptualizing Multilateralism in The Czech Foreign Policy”. Perspectives. 18 (1).\nWeber, S. (1992). Shaping the Postwar Balance of Power: multilateralism in NATO. International Organization. 46(3). pp. 633-680.\nWebber, D. (2010). The regional integration that didn’t happen – cooperation without integration in early twenty-first century East Asia. The Pacific Review. 23(2). pp.313-333\nLi, X. (2016). The Expansion of China’s Global Hegemonic Strategy: Implications for Latin America. JCIR Special Issue. https://doi.org/10.5278/ojs.jcir.v4i2.1587.\nZhang, Y.J. (2001). System, empire and state in Chinese international relations, Review of International Studies. 27. pp.43-63.\n\n \nReports and Internet publications:\n\nBenner, T., Gaspers, J., Ohlberg, M., Poggetti, L., Shi-Kupfer, K. (2018). Authoritarian Advance – Responding to China’s Growing Political Influence in Europe. Mercator Institute for China Studies MERICS, Global Public Policy Institute GPPI.\nBergsten, C. F. (1990). The World Economy After the Cold War. Foreign Affairs.\nBhatty, A. M. (1996). Great powers and South East-Asia: Post-Cold War Trends. Pan Geographic Ltd.\nBouchard, C. Peterson, J. (2011). Conceptualizing Multilateralism – Can We All Just Get Along? Multilateralism and the EU in the Contemporary Global Order (MERCURY). E-paper No.1.\nBrady, A.M. (2017). Magic Weapons – China’s political influence activities under Xi Jinping. Department of Political Science and International Relations, University of Canterbury, Christchurch, New Zealand.\nBrown, K., Wood, P. (2009). China ODI: Buying into the Global Economy, XRG C-ODI Report, Exceptional Resources Group. extract prepared by the authors.\nCardenal, J. P., Kucharczyk, J., Meseznikov, G., Pleschova, G. (2017). Sharp Power – Rising Authoritarian Influence. National Endowment for Democracy.\nDostal, V., Eberle, J. (2015). Agenda for Czech Foreign Policy 2015. Association for International Affairs AMO.\nDostal, V. Jermanova, T. (2017). Agenda for Czech Foreign Policy 2017. Association for International Affairs AMO.\nFilippov, S., Saebi, T., (2008). Europeanisation Strategy of Chinese Companies: Its Perils and Promises. Maastricht, Economic and Social Research and Training Centre on Innovation and Technology. UNU-MERIT Working Papers.\nFox, J., Godement, F. (2009). A Power Audit of EU-China Relations, European Council on Foreign Relations (ECFR).\nGarcia-Herrero, A., Xu, J. (2019). The next step of the Belt and Road Initiative: Multilateralisation with Chinese characteristics. Bruegel.\nGlaser, B. (2019) China as a Selective Revisionist Power in the International Order, ISEAS YUSOF ISHAK INSTITUTE. 2019(21).\nGodement, F., Parello-Plesner, J., Richjard, A., (2011). The Scramble for Europe, policy brief. European Council on Foreign Relations (ECFR).\nGodement, F., Vasselier, A. (2017). China at the Gates – a New Power Audit of EU-China Relations. European Council on Foreign Relations (ECFR).\nHickman, J., Karásková, I. (2019) What Do Central and Eastern European Countries Want from China? Assessing 16+1 and Its Future. Association for International Affairs (AMO); National\nEndowment for Democracy.\nHuang, P. Liu, Z.K. (2017) The Cooperation Between China and Central and Eastern European Countires – 2012-2017. Chinese Academy of Social Sciences (CASS).\nHui, L., Rohr, C., Hafner, M., Knack, A. (2018) China Belt and Road Initiative – Measuring the impact of improving transport connectivity on international trade in the region – a proof-of-concept study, RAND Corporation.\nJakóbowski, J., Kaczmarski, M. (2017). Nietrafiona oferta Pekinu – „16+1” a chińska polityka wobec Unii Europejskiej. Center for Eastern Studies (OSW).\nKaczmarski, M. (2015). China on Central-Eastern Europe: ‘16+1’ as seen from Beijing. Center for Eastern Studies.\nKaraskova, I., Matura, T., Turcsanyi, R., Simalcik, M., (2018) Central Europe for Sale: The Politics of China’s Influence, Association for International Affairs (AMO.CZ), National Endowment for Democracy.\nKarnigschnig, M. (2017) Beijing’s Balkan backdoor. Politico. China Looks West Series.\nKowalski, B. (2018) 16+1+1: Beijing wants Germany to align with its strategy in Eastern Europe: In the face of German and EU opposition, China is trying to redefine its key initiative in CEE. SINOPSIS. Opinion.\nKynge, J., Peel, M. (2017). Brussels rattled as China reaches out to eastern Europe, Financial Times.\nLiu, Z.K. (2014) The Analysis of China’s Investment in V4’, in Current Trends and Perspectives in Development of China-V4 Trade and Investment. China-CEEC Think Tank Network.\nMakocki, M., Nechev, Z. (2017). Balkan Corruption: The China Connection, European Union Institute for Security Studies EUISS. Allert Issue 22-2017.\nMazarr, M. J., Heath, T. R. Cevallos, A. S. (2018). China and the International Order. Santa Monica, CA: RAND Corporation.\nMedeiros, E. S., Crane, K., Heginbotham, E., Rabasa, A., Seong, S. (2008) Pacific Currents – the responses of U.S. allies and security Partners in East Asia to China Rise. RAND Corporation.\nMoret, E. (2016). Effective minilateralism of the EU – What, when and how. European Union Institute for Security Studies.\nOkada, A. (2016) International cooperation and institution formation: A game theoretic perspective”, https://www.researchgate.net/.\nParello-Plesner, J., Li, B. (2018) The Chinese Communist Party’s Foreign Interference Operations: How the U.S. and Other Democracies Should Respond, Hudson Institute.\nPrzychodniak, M. (2018) The “EU effect”: How European Union influences state’s involvement in the “16+1” (China-CEEC) Initiative. Budapest: China-CEEC Institute.\nRepnikova, M., Kuo, K. (2018) Media and Ideology in Xi’s China. Center for Strategic and International Studies. China Reality Check Series – transcript.\nRamo, J. C. (2004) Beijing Consensus. The Foreign Policy Center.\nScobell, A., Lin, B., Shatz, H. J., Johnson, M., Hanauer, L., Chase, S. M., Cevallos, A., Rasmussen, I., Chan, A., Warner, E., Ma, L. (2018) At the Dawn of Belt and Road – China in the Developing World. RAND Corporation.\nSpechler, M. C., Spechler, D. R. (2010). Is Russia Succeeding in Central Asia, Elsevier Limited on behalf of the Foreign Policy Research Institute.\nStanzel, A. (2016). China’s Investment in Influence: The Future of 16+1 Cooperation, European Council on Foreign Affairs.\nTamkin, E., Gramer, R. (2017). Tillerson Knocks China, Courts India Ahead of South Asia Trip. blog. Foreign Policy.\nVangeli, Anastas, (2016) How can China Tailor a Successful Approach to the Western Balkans? A comprehensive Analysis on the Role, Lessons from and the Potential Interactions with Influential Stakeholders in the Region. China-CEEC Think Tanks Book Series. vol. on Stakeholders in China CEEC Cooperation.\nZhang, Z.X. (2018). The Belt and Road Initiative: China’s New Geopolitical Strategy?. German Institute for International and Security Affairs (SWP).\n--------. (2010). Understanding the theory of international connectivity. Oxera Consulting Ltd.\n--------. (2015). Czech Foreign Policy: IIR Analysis, Institute of International Relations Prague\n--------. (2015). Between Minilateralism and Multilateralism – Opportunities and Risks of Pioneer Alliances in International Trade and Climate Politics, German Development Institute.\n--------. (2016). The Western Balkan’s Berlin process: A new impulse for regional cooperation. European Parliamentary Research Service.\n--------. (2016). China’s New Neighborhood Diplomacy – Seeking Stability Through Management and Planning, China Institute of International Relations.\n--------. (2017). China, the 16+1 format and the EU. European Parliamentary Research Service.\n--------. (2017). Meeting Asia’s Infrastructure Needs. Asian Development Bank.\n--------. (2018). China and the Age of Strategic Rivalry. Canadian Security Intelligence Service.\n-------- (2019) European Business in China - Business Confidence Survey 2019. European Union Chamber of Commerce in China.\n\n \nSpeeches and government-issued documents:\n\nJiang, Z. (2002). Build a Well-off Society in an All-Round Way and Create a New Situation in Building Socialism with Chinese Characteristics. Report to the 16th National Congress of the Communist Party of China.\nHu, J. (2007). Hold high the great banner of socialism with Chinese characteristics and strive for new victories in building a moderately prosperous society in all respects. Report to the 17th National Congress of the Communist Party of China.\n--------. (2013). EU-China 2020 Strategic Agenda for Cooperation. European External Action Service\n--------. (2013). The Bucharest Guidelines for Cooperation between China and Central and Eastern European Countries. Ministry of Foreign Affairs People`s Republic of China.\nXi, J. (2013). Speech and Proposes to Build a Silk Road Economic Belt with Central Asian Countries, Kazakhstan, accessible at Ministry of Foreign Affairs People`s Republic of China.\n--------. (2014). Final Declaration by the Chair of the Conference on the Western Balkan. Berlin: Bundesregierung.\n--------. (2014). The Belgrade Guidelines for Cooperation between China and Central and Eastern European Countries. Ministry of Foreign Affairs People`s Republic of China.\nXi, J. (2017). The Leading Role of the Asia-Pacific in Meeting Global Economic Challenges. keynote Speech at the APEC CEO Summit in Manila.\n--------. (2015). The Suzhou Guidelines for Cooperation between China and Central and Eastern European Countries. Ministry of Foreign Affairs People`s Republic of China.\n--------. (2015). The Medium-Term Agenda for Cooperation between China and Central and Eastern European Countries. Ministry of Foreign Affairs People`s Republic of China.\n--------. (2015). Vision and Actions on Jointly Building Silk Road Economic Belt and 21st-Century Maritime Silk Road. National Development and Reform Commission.\nWang, Y. (2016). Build a New Type of International Relations Featuring Win-Win Cooperation--China`s Answer to the Question "Where Are the International Relations of the 21st Century Heading. Ministry of Foreign Affairs People`s Republic of China.\n--------. (2017). The Budapest Guidelines for Cooperation between China and Central and Eastern European Countries. Ministry of Foreign Affairs People`s Republic of China.\n--------. (2017). Joint communique of leader’s roundtable of Belt and Road Forum. Ministry of Foreign Affairs People`s Republic of China.\nXi, J. (2017). Jointly Shoulder Responsibility of Our Times. Promote Global Growth keynote speech at the Opening Session of the World Economic Forum Annual Meeting 2017.\nXi, J. (2017). Secure a Decisive Victory in Building a Moderately Prosperous Society in All Respects and Strive for the Great Success of Socialism with Chinese Characteristics for a New Era. Speech delivered at the 19th National Congress of the Communist Party of China, transcript, Xinhua News Agency, China.\nXi, J. (2018). Keeping Abreast of the Trend of the Times to Achieve Common Development, keynote speech at the BRICS Business Forum in Johannesburg.\nXi, J. (2018). keynote speech at the opening ceremony of the 2018 Beijing Summit of the Forum on China-Africa Cooperation.\nYang, J. (2019). Working for a Community with a Shared Future for Mankind by Promoting International Cooperation and Multilateralism. keynote speech at the 55th Munich Security Conference.\n--------. (2019). The Dubrovnik Guidelines for Cooperation between China and Central and Eastern European Countries. Ministry of Foreign Affairs People`s Republic of China.\n--------. (2019). Joint Communique of the Leaders` Roundtable of the 2nd Belt and Road Forum for International Cooperation. Ministry of Foreign Affairs People`s Republic of China.\n-------- (2019) EU-China – A strategic outlook. European Commission.\n-------- (2019) EU-China – A strategic outlook. European Commission.\n-------- (2019) China`s Policy Paper on the European Union. Ministry of Foreign Affairs of PRC\n\n \nInternet resources:\n\nCarnegie-Tsinghua Center for Global Policy - https://carnegietsinghua.org/\nCarnegie Moscow Center - https://carnegie.ru/?lang=en\nCenter for Eastern Studies, Poland - https://www.osw.waw.pl/en\nCenter for Strategic and International Studies - https://www.csis.org/\nChinese Academy of Social Sciences - http://casseng.cssn.cn/\nChina Institute of Contemporary International Relations - http://www.cicir.ac.cn/\nChina Institute of International Studies - http://www.ciis.org.cn/english/\nChina-CEEC Secretariat for Logistics Cooperation, Latvia - http://www.ceec-china-logistics.org/en/\nChina CEEC Secretariat for Maritime Cooperation, Poland - https://ceec-china-maritime.org/\nChina Daily - http://www.chinadaily.com/\nBloomberg - https://www.bloomberg.com/\nDelegation of the European Union to China - https://eeas.europa.eu/delegations/china_en\nDeutsche Welle - https://www.dw.com/\nEuropean Commission - https://ec.europa.eu/commission/index_en\nEuropean Council on Foreign Relations - https://www.ecfr.eu/\nEuropean Parliamentary Research Service - http://www.europarl.europa.eu/at-your-service/en/stay-informed/research-and-analysis\nEuropean Union Chamber of Commerce in China - https://europeanchamber.com.cn/\nEuropean Union Institute for Security Studies - https://www.iss.europa.eu/\nEUROSTAT - https://ec.europa.eu/eurostat\nFinancial Times - https://www.ft.com/\nForeign Policy - https://foreignpolicy.com/\nGlobal Times - http://www.globaltimes.cn/\nMinistry of Commerce of Peoples Republic of China - http://english.mofcom.gov.cn/\nMinistry of Foreign Affairs of Peoples Republic of China - https://www.fmprc.gov.cn/mfa_eng/\nMinistry of Foreign Affairs of Poland - https://www.gov.pl/web/diplomacy\nMinistry of Foreign Affairs of Latvia - https://www.mfa.gov.lv/\nMinistry of Foreign Affairs of Romania - https://www.mae.ro/en\nMinistry of Foreign Affairs of Estonia - https://vm.ee/en\nMinistry of Foreign Affairs of Czech Republic - https://www.mzv.cz/en\nMinistry of Foreign Affairs of Croatia - http://www.mvep.hr/en/\nNational Chengchi University Library Databases - http://www.lib.nccu.edu.tw/\nNational Endowment for Democracy - https://www.ned.org/\nNational Development and Research Commission, China - http://www.ndrc.gov.cn/\nSecretariat for Cooperation between China and Central and Eastern European Countries - http://www.china-ceec.org/eng/\nShanghai Institute of International Studies - http://www.siis.org.cn/EnIndex\nShanghai Institute of European Studies - http://www.sies-cn.org/Index.aspx?Lan=EN\nSinopsis - https://sinopsis.cz/en/\nSouth China Morning Post - https://www.scmp.com\nPolitico - https://www.politico.com/\nRAND Corporation - https://www.rand.org/\nReuters - https://www.reuters.com/\nThe Diplomat - https://thediplomat.com/\nUnited Nations Development Programme - https://www.undp.org/content/undp/en/home.html\nWorld Economic Forum - https://www.weforum.org/\nXinhua News Agency - http://www.xinhuanet.com/english | 描述: | 博士 國立政治大學 亞太研究英語博士學位學程(IDAS) 99265510 |
資料來源: | http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#G0099265510 | 資料類型: | thesis |
| Appears in Collections: | 學位論文 |
Files in This Item:
| File | Size | Format | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 551001.pdf | 3.89 MB | Adobe PDF2 | View/Open |
Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.