Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
https://ah.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/125933| 題名: | 政治態度、社會信任與移民政策偏好: 來自東亞三國之調查資料檢證 Political Attitudes, Social Trust, and Support for Immigration: Evidence from Three East Asian Countries |
作者: | 葛佳琪 Gonzalvo, Pauline Joyce |
貢獻者: | 吳文欽 Wu, Wen-Chin 葛佳琪 Pauline Joyce Gonzalvo |
關鍵詞: | 政治態度 民族主義 墨守傳統 社會信任 與移民政策偏好 東亞 Political Attitudes Defensive Nationalism Social Traditionalism Social Trust Support for Immigration East Asia |
日期: | 2019 | 上傳時間: | 5-Sep-2019 | 摘要: | 國際移民以超過三倍的成長速度，從1960年的7700萬人增加到2017年的近2.58億， 其中亞洲最近首次超過歐洲，成為向內和向外移民增幅最大的地區。移民的湧入可能會影響 各國的政策制定且可能加深社會衝突，並連帶影響勞動力市場，教育體系和衛生相關問題。 但移民是否會深切地影響國內政治，以及如何影響，很大程度取決於土生土長的龐大族群對 移民和移民議題本身的態度。移民的相關研究正不斷擴大，特別是現在比以往任何時候更受 重視，移民儼然成為全世界政府所需面臨的緊急社會、經濟和政治問題。然而，多數研究都 聚焦在「移民國家」，譬如美國和加拿大，澳洲和紐西蘭，以及近日最受討論的歐洲國家。\n\n為了將經濟發達國家的「西方」領域與亞洲國家現有的文獻連接起來，本研究側重於 使用亞洲動態調查第4波，以對三個民主及新興工業化東亞國家進行研究，對其政治因素和移 民態度進行實證分析。 與傳統的定居社會相比，移民政策據說更受東亞公眾輿論的制約，儘 管當地生育率一直很低，也面臨人口迅速老化以及勞動力下降等問題，政府也沒有馬上從移 民身上尋求解決之道。此論文的主要提問是:政治意向和意識形態是否會影響非傳統移民地 如日本、韓國和台灣當地人民對移民的支持?結果顯示，伴隨教育，居住地和收入，民族主 義和傳統主義是預測三個國家對移民看法的重要因素。社會信任在日本很受重視，但總體來 說，與移民看法的關聯相當薄弱。\n\n就其本質而言，移民與公民身份和世界主義都是相關聯的，它定義了誰是這個國家的人，且法律也標示了界線，清楚劃分「我們」和「他們」的區別。此論文的研究結果證實了\n之前的看法，認為在東亞，文化威脅被視為比經濟威脅更嚴重。除了解決傳統和非傳統移民社會之間的研究差距，此論文的主題對於東亞國家目前的移民政策也是相當重要，期待能引出一條道路或給予啟發。 International migration more than tripled in size from 77 million in 1960 to almost 258 million in 2017, with Asia recently overtaking Europe as the region with the largest movements in both inward and outward migration. Migrant inflows can potentially influence countries’ policy- making processes and escalate societal conflicts, as well as impact the labor market, education system and health sector. But whether it profoundly affects domestic politics, and how exactly it does, hinges importantly on the attitudes of native-born groups toward immigrants and immigration itself. Relevant research is ever-expanding, especially now more than ever that migration has become a pressing social, economic and political issue for governments all over the world. However, most studies are concentrated on ‘immigrant nations’, such as the US and Canada, Australia and New Zealand, and more recently, European states.\n\nIn an attempt to bridge existing literature on the ‘Western’ realm of economically advanced countries with its Asian counterparts, this study focuses on an empirical analysis of political factors and immigration attitudes using individual-level survey data from the Asian Barometer Wave 4 in three democratic and newly-industrialized East Asian countries. Compared to traditional settler societies, immigration policies are said to be more constrained by public opinion in East Asia, whose governments have been slow to turn to immigration despite having consistently low fertility rates, a rapidly aging population, and a declining labor force. The main question being asked is: do political and ideological attitudes influence support for immigration in nontraditional immigrant destinations such as Japan, South Korea, and Taiwan? Results suggest that defensive nationalism and social traditionalism are significant predictors of immigration views across all three countries. Social trust is significant in Japan, but overall, seems to have a weak positive relationship with immigration views in East Asia.\n\nThe outcome of this study supports previous works in contending that in East Asia, the concept of cultural threat is more significant than economic threat. In addition to addressing the research gap between traditional and nontraditional immigrant societies, the topic of this study may also be vital in informing current immigration policies in East Asian countries. |
參考文獻: | Agresti, A. (2018). Statistical methods for the social sciences (5th ed.). London: Pearson.\nAlesina, A. & La Ferrara, E. (2000). Participation in heterogeneous communities. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 115 (3), 847-904.\nAltemeyer, R.A. (1981). Right-Wing Authoritarianism. Winnipeg, Canada: University of Manitoba.\nAgence-France Presse (AFP). (2014, April 10). South Korea imposes new restrictions on marriages to foreigners. The Straits Times. Retrieved from https://www.straitstimes.com/asia/east-asia/south-korea-imposes-new-restrictions-on-marriages-to-foreigners\nBarber, C., Fennelly, K., & Torney-Purta, J. (2013). Nationalism and support for immigrants’ rights among adolescents in 25 countries. Applied Development Science, 17 (2), 60-75. doi: 10.1080/10888691.2013.774870\nBarnes, K. (2015). National identity and attitudes toward immigrants: The role of social comparison and perceptions of competition (unpublished doctoral dissertation). The University of Western Ontario, Canada.\nBélanger, D. (2010). Marriages with foreign women in East Asia: bride trafficking or voluntary migration. Population and Societies, 469, 1-4.\nBélanger, D., Lee, H.K., Wang, H.Z. (2010). Ethnic diversity and statistics in East Asia: ‘Foreign brides’ surveys in Taiwan and South Korea. Ethnic and Racial Studies, 33 (6), 1108-1130.doi: 10.1080/01419870903427507\nBerinsky, A.J. (2012). Introduction. In A. Berinsky (Ed.), New directions in public opinion, 1-16. New York: Routledge.\nBierbrauer, G., & Klinger, E.W. (2002). Political ideology, perceived threat, and justice towards immigrants. Social Justice Research, 15 (1), 41-52.\nBisheh, J.Z. (2017). A comparative analysis of divergent immigrant policies for foreign elderly care workers in Japan and South Korea (unpublished Master’s Thesis). The University of Texas at Austin, Texas.\nBraithwaite, V. (1982). The structure of social values: Validation of Rokeach’s two-value model. British Journal of Social Psychology, 21, 203-211.\nBrooks, C., Manza, J., & Cohen, E. (2016). Political ideology and immigrant acceptance. Socius: Sociological Research for a Dynamic World, 2, 1-12. doi: 10.1177/2378023116668881\nCampbell, A.L. (2012). Public opinion and public policy. In A.J. Berinsky (Ed)., New directions in public opinion, 271-291. New York: Routledge.\nCeobanu, A.M., & Escandell, X. (2010). Comparative analyses of public attitudes toward immigrants and immigration using multinational survey data: A review of theories and research. Annual Review of Sociology, 36, 309-328. doi: 10.1146/annurev.soc.012809.102651\nChandler, C.R., & Tsai, Y.M. (2001). Social factors influencing immigration attitudes: an analysis of data from the General Social Survey. The Social Science Journal, 38, 177-188.\nChang, A.C.H., & Welsh, B. (2016). A globalization backlash? Public views of immigration in East Asia, Working Paper Series: No.166. Asian Barometer Survey Conference, August 8-11, 2016. Taiwan: Asian Barometer.\nChen, Y.H., & Yi, C.C. (2013). The perception of social distance in a multi-ethnic society: The case of Taiwan. In E. Fong, L.H.N. Chiang, and N. Denton (Eds.), Immigrant adaptation in multi-ethnic societies: Canada, Taiwan, and the United States (pp. 170-198). New York: Routledge.\nChung, E.A. (2010). Immigration and Citizenship in Japan. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.\nChung, E.A. (2014). Japan and South Korea. In J.F. Hollifield, P.L. Martin, & P.M. Orrenius (Eds.), Controlling immigration: A global perspective (3rd ed., pp. 399-421). Palo Alto: Stanford University Press.\nCohrs, J.C., & Stelzl, M. (2010). How ideological attitudes predict host society members’attitudes towards immigrants: Exploring cross-national differences. Journal of Social Issues, 66 (4), 673-694. doi: 10.1111/j.1540-4560.2010.01670.x \nConverse, P. (1975). The nature of belief systems in mass publics. In D. Adapter (Ed.), Ideology and discontent, 206-261. New York: The Free Press.\nCosta, D. L., & Kahn, M. E. (2003). Civic engagement and community heterogeneity: An economist’s perspective. Perspectives on Politics, 1 (1), 103-11.\nDelhey, J., & Newton, K. (2005). Predicting cross-national levels of social trust: Global pattern or nordic exceptionalism?. European Sociological Review, 21 (4), 311-27.\nDuckitt, J., Bizumic, B., Krauss, S.W., & Heled, E. (2010). A tripartite approach to right-wing authoritarianism: The Authoritarianism-Conservatism-Traditionalism Model. Political Psychology, 31 (5), 685-715. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9221.2010.00781.x\nFederico, C.M. (2012). Ideology and public opinion. In A. Berinsky (Ed.), New directions in public opinion, 79-100. New York: Routledge.\nFeldman, S. (2003). Values, ideology, and the structure of political attitudes. In D. O. Sears, L. Huddy, & R. Jervis (Eds.), Oxford handbook of political psychology (pp. 477-508). New York, NY, US: Oxford University Press.\nFeldman, S., & Huddy, L. (2014). Not so simple: The multidimensional nature of diverse origins of political ideology. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 37 (3), 312-313. doi: 10.1017/S0140525X13002562.\nFisher, Stephen (2009), “Right (-wing),” in I. McLean & A. McMillan (Eds.), Oxford concise dictionary of politics. Oxford: Oxford University Press.\nFord, R. (2011). Acceptable and unacceptable immigrants: How opposition to immigration in Britain is affected by migrants’ region of origin. Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies, 37 (7), 1017-1037. doi: 10.1080/1369183X.2011.572423\nGaynor, B. (2016). Changing from within: Immigration and Japan. CALL: Irish Journal for Culture, Arts, Literature and Language, 1 (1), 1-18. doi: doi:10.21427/D7J01J\nGiovanni, F., Margalit, Y., Hiroyuki, N. (2016). Countering public opinion to immigration: the impact of information campaigns, IZA DP No. 10420. Bonn, Germany: IZA Institute of Labor Economics.\nGottdiener, M. & Budd, L. (2005). Key concepts in urban studies. London: SAGE Publications.\nGundelach, B., & Manatschal, A. (2016). Ethnic diversity, social trust, and the moderating role of subnational integration policy. Political Studies, 65 (2), 413-431.\nGreen, D., & Kadoya, Yoshihiko. (2013). English as a gateway? Immigration and public opinion in Japan. ISER Discussion Paper No. 883. Retrieved from SSRN: https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=2320269\nGreen, D., & Kadoya, Yoshihiko. (2015). Contact and threat: Factors affecting views on increasing immigration in Japan. Politics and Policy, 43 (1). doi: 10.1111/polp.12109\nGreen, E.G.T., Sarrasin, O., Fasel, N., & Staerklé, C. (2011). Nationalism and patriotism as predictors of immigration attitudes in Switzerland: A municipality-level analysis. Swiss Political Science Review, 17 (4), 369-393. doi: 10.1111/j.1662-6370.2011.02030.x\nHa, S.E., & Jang, S. (2015). Immigration, threat perception, and national identity: Evidence from South Korea. International Journal of Intercultural Relations, 44, 53-62. doi: 10.1016/j.ijintrel.2014.12.001\nHainmueller, J., & Hopkins, D.J. (2014). Public attitudes toward immigration. Annual Review of Political Science, 17, 225-249. doi: 10.1146/annurev-polisci-102512-194818\nHarteveld, E., Kokkonen, A., & Dahlberg, S. (2017). Adapting to party lines: The effect of party affiliation on attitudes to immigration. West European Politics, 40 (6), 1177-1197. doi: 10.1080/01402382.2017.1328889\nHawley, G. (2011). Political threat and immigration: Party identification, demographic context, and immigration policy preference. Social Science Quarterly, 92 (2), 404-422. doi: 10.1111/j.1540-6237.2011.00775.x\nHeinrich, H.A. (2018). Causal relationship or not? Nationalism, patriotism, and anti-immigration attitudes in Germany. Sociology of Race and Ethnicity. doi: 10.1177/2332649218788583\nHerreros, F., & Criado, H. (2009). Social trust, social capital and perceptions of immigration. Political Studies, 57, 337-355. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9248.2008.00738.x\nHetherington, M. (2012), Partisanship and polarization. In A. Berinsky (Ed.), New directions in public opinion, 101-118. New York: Routledge.\nHiroyuki, N. (2017). Attitudes toward immigration in an ageing society: Evidence from Japan, RIETI Discussion Paper Series 17-E-095. Tokyo, Japan: Research Institute of Economy, Trade and Industry.\nHlavac, M. (2011). Political ideology and individual-level attitudes towards immigration in the European Union: Evidence from the European Values Study, 2008/2009 (unpublished Master’s Thesis). Georgetown University, Washington D.C.\nHsia, H.C. (2007). Imaged and imagined threat to the nation: The media construction of the ‘foreign brides’ phenomenon’ as social problems in Taiwan. Inter-cultural Asia Studies, 8, 55-85. doi: 10.1080/14649370601119006\nHuddy, L., & Khatib, N. (2007). American patriotism, national identity, and political involvement. American Journal of Political Science, 51 (1), 63-77. doi: 10.1111/j.1540-5907.2007.00237.x\nIida, T., Matsubayashi, T., & Ueda, Michiko. (2012). Immigration and support for conservative parties in Japan. 2012XXII World Congress of Political Science, Madrid, Spain.\nInglehart, R. (1999). Trust, well-being and democracy. In M.E. Warren (Ed.), Democracy and trust (pp. 88-120). Cambridge University Press.\nJewell, R.T., Melgar, N., Molina, D.J., Rossi, M. (2009). Attitudes toward immigrants: A cross-country perspective, No. 03/09. Uruguay: Unibersidad de la Républica.\nJeong, H.O. (2013). Do national feelings influence public attitudes toward immigration? Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies, 39 (9), 1461-1477. doi: 10.1080/1369183X.2013.815428\nKage, R., Rosenbluth, F.M., & Tanaka, S. (2018). Varieties of public attitudes towards immigration: Evidence from survey experiments in Japan. Retrieved from https://ssrn.com/abstract=3229608\nKaltenthaler, K., & Miller, W.J. (2013). Social psychology and public support for trade liberalization. International Studies Quarterly, 57 (4), 784-790.\nKartikasari, N. (2013). Effects of labor immigration policies on Indonesian migrant workers in Japan and South Korea (unpublished Doctoral Dissertation). National Graduate Institute for Policy Studies, Tokyo.\nKazemipur, A. (2006). A Canadian exceptionalism? Trust and diversity in Canadian cities. Journal of International Migration and Integration, 7 (2), 219-240.\nKesler, C., & Bloemraad, I. (2010). Does immigration erode social capital? The conditional effects of immigration-generated diversity on trust, membership, and participation across 19 countries, 1981-2000. Diversity and Democratic Politics, 43 (2), 319-347.\nKey, V.O. (1961). Public Opinion and American Democracy. New York: Alfred A. Knopf.\nKiehne, E., & Ayon, C. (2016). Friend or foes: The impact of political ideology and immigrant friends on anti-immigrant sentiment. Journal of Sociology and Social Welfare, 43 (3), 135-154.\nKim, A.E. (2009). Demography, migration, and multiculturalism in South Korea. The Asia Pacific Journal: Japan Focus, 7 (6).\nKim, A.E. (2009). Global migration and South Korea: foreign workers, foreign brides, and the making of a multicultural society. Ethnic and Racial Studies, 32 (1), 70-92. doi: 10.1080/01419870802044197\nKim, B.J., & Torres-Gil, F. (2008). Aging and immigration: The case of South Korea (with a look at Italy and Japan). American Society on Ageing, 4, 80-86.\nKimura, K. (2016). Why do immigration policies differ between Japan and Korea. Sociology Study, 6 (8), 490-507. doi: 10.17265/2159‐5526/2016.08.002\nKinder, D.R. (1998). Opinion and action in the realm of politics. In D.T. Gilbert, S.T. Fiske, & g. Lindzey (Eds.), Handbook of Social Psychology (pp. 778-867). New York: Oxford University Press.\nKnack, S., & Keefer, P. (1997). Does social capital have an economic payoff? A cross-country investigation. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 112 (4), 1251-88.\nKobayashi, T., Collet, Christian, Iyengar, S., & Hahn, K. (2015). Who deserves citizenship? An experimental study of Japanese workers toward immigrant workers. Social Science Japan Journal, 18 (1), 3-22. doi: 10.1093/ssjj/jyu035\nKu, S.C.Y., & Kironska, K. (2016). Migration in East and Southeast Asia. New Jersey: World Scientific.\nLahav, G., & Courtemanche, M. (2011). The ideological effects of framing threat on immigration and civil liberties. Political Behavior, 34 (3), 1-29. doi: 10.1007/s11109-011-9171-z\nLatcheva, R. (2010). Cognitive interviewing and factor-analytic techniques: A mixed method approach to validity of survey items measuring national identity. Quality and Quantity, 45 (6), 1175-1199. doi: 10.1007/s11135-009-9285-0\nLee, B. (2010). Comparing immigration policies in Japan and Korea: A historical-institutionalist approach (unpublished Doctoral Dissertation). The State University of New Jersey, New Jersey.\nLee, K. (2017). Alienating ethnic kin: Assessing immigration integration policies for the Brazilian Nikkeijin and Jeosonjok marriage migrants in Korea. Cornell International Affairs Review, 10, 63-104.\nLee, K.K. (1998). Huddled masses, muddled laws: Why contemporary immigration policy fails to reflect public opinion. Westport, CT: Praeger Publishers.\nLee, Y.J, Seol, D.H., & Cho, S.N. (2006). International marriages in South Korea: The significance of nationality and ethnicity. Journal of Population Research, 23 (2).\nLim, T. (2009). Who is Korean? Migration, immigration, and the challenge of multiculturalism in homogenous societies. The Asia-Pacific Journal: Japan Focus, 7 (30).\nLin, Y.C. (2016). International marriage matchmaking agencies and women’s premarital preparation in a Taiwanese context. In S.C.Y. Ku, & K. Kironska (Eds.), Migration in East and Southeast Asia (pp. 265-279). New Jersey: World Scientific.\nLloyd, C., & Metzer, J. (2013). Settler colonization and societies in world history: Patterns and concepts. In C. LLloyd, J. Metzer, & R. Sutch, Settler economies in world history, 1-34. Leiden, Netherlands: Brill.\nLuedtke, A. (2005). European integration, public opinion and immigration policy. European Union Politics, 6 (1), 83-112.\nMedeiros, M.A., Figueiredo, D., Batista, M., Campos, C.R., Rosendo, S.V., & Coêlho, N. (2018). Ideology and immigration patterns in European Union (1988-2015). 25th World Congress of Political Science, Brisbane, Australia, July 21-25, 2018.\nMendoza, J.J. (2015). Latino/a immigration: A refutation of the social trust argument. In H. Bauder and C. Matheis (Eds.), Migration and Policy Practice: Interventions and Solutions (pp. 37-57). Palgrave Macmillan.\nMummendey, A., Klink, A., & Brown, R. (2001). Nationalism and patriotism: National identification and out-group rejection. British Journal of Social Psychology, 40 (2), 159-172. doi: 10.1348/014466601164740\nNagy, S.R. (2015). Immigration best practices: Why pragmatic immigration policies are beneficial for immigrants and for Japan. In S.R. Nagy, Japan’s demographic revival: Rethinking migration, identity and sociocultural norms, 363-386. Singapore: World Scientific.\nNational Institute of Population and Social Security Research. (2017). Population Statistics of Japan 2017. Retrieved from http://www.ipss.go.jp\nNeiman, M., Johnson, M., & Bowler, S. (2006). Partisanship and views about immigration in Southern California: Just how partisan is the issue of migration? International Migration, 44 (2), 35-56. doi: 10.1111/j.1468-2435.2006.00363.x \nNguyen, Q., & Bernauer, T. (2018). Does social trust affect public support for international trade? Insights from an experiment in Vietnam. Political Studies, 67 (2), 440-458.\nNho, C.R., & Lee, E. (2016). Trends in marriage migration and the well-being of Southeast Asian wives in Korea. Journal of Social Welfare and Human Rights, 4 (2), 17-33. doi: 10.15640/10.15640/jswhr.v4n2a2\nNippon Communications Foundation. (2018, April 12). International marriages in Japan decline from 2006 peak. Retrieved from https://www.nippon.com/en/features/h00173/\nNorris, P. (Ed.). (1999). Critical citizens: Global support for democratic governance. Oxford: Oxford University Press.\nOh, J.E., Kang, D.K., Shin, J.J., Lee, S.L., Lee, S.B., Chung, K. (2012). Migration profile of the Republic of Korea, IOM MRTC Research Report Series No 2011-01. Gyeonggi-do, Republic of Korea: The IOM Migration Research and Training Centre.\nOrcés, D.M. (2009). Democratic values and public opinion toward immigrants: The case of Ecuador. Latin American Politics and Society, 51 (4), 131-155.\nPage, B.I., & Shapiro, R.Y. (1983). Effects of public opinion on policy. The American Political Science Review, 77 (1), 175-190. doi: 10.2307/1956018\nPark, G.Y. (2017, March 22). More Koreans get married late – or not at all. The Korea Herald. Retrieved from http://www.koreaherald.com/view.php?ud=20170322000863\nPark, Y.B. (2017, March 1). South Korea carefully tests waters on immigration, with a focus on temporary workers. Washington, DC: Migration Policy Institute. Retrieved from https://www.migrationpolicy.org\nPedersen, A., Attwell, J., & Heveli, D. (2005). Prediction of negative attitudes toward Australian asylum seekers: False beliefs, nationalism, and self-esteem. Australian Journal of Psychology, 57 (3), 148-160. doi: 10.1080/00049530500125157\nPedersen, A., & Walker, I. (1997). Prejudice against Australian aborigines: Old fashioned and modern forms. European Journal of Social Psychology, 27 (5), 561-587.\nPeffley, M., & Rohrschneider, R. (2003). Democratization and political tolerance in seventeen countries: A multi-level model of democratic learning. Political Research Quarterly, 56 (3), 243-257.\nPehrson, S., Vignoles, V., & Brown, R. (2009). National identification and anti-immigrant prejudice: Individual and contextual effects of national definitions. Social Psychology Quarterly, 72 (1), 24-38. doi: 10.1177/019027250907200104\nPettigrew, T.F., & Meertens, R.W. (1995). Subtle and blatant prejudice in Western Europe. European Journal of Social Psychology, 25 (1), 57-75. doi: 10.1002/ejsp.2420250106\nPevnick, R. (2009). Social trust and the ethics of immigration policy. The Journal of Political Philosophy, 17 (2), 146-167.\nPower, J. (2019, May 11). Why South Korea and Japan are slowly learning to accept foreign workers. Retrieved from https://www.scmp.com/week-asia/economics/article/3009799/how-korea-and-japan-learned-stop-worrying-and-love-foreign\nPutnam, R. (2000). Bowling Alone. New York: Simon and Schuster.\nPryce, D.K. (2018). U.S. citizens’ current attitudes toward immigrants and immigration: A study from the General Social Survey. Social Science Quarterly, 99 (4), 1467-1483. doi: 10.1111/ssqu.12514\nRokeach, M. (1973). The structure of human values. New York: Free Press.\nRothstein, B., & Uslaner, E. (2005). All for one: Equality, corruption, and social trust. World Politics, 58 (1), 41-72. doi: 10.1353/wp.2006.0022\nSandelind, C. (2012). The renaissance of nationalism and attitudes to immigration. ECPR Graduate Conference, Bremen, Germany, July 4-6, 2012.\nSandovici, M.E., Jakobsen, T.G., Strabac, Z. (2012). Political nationalism and attitudes towards immigration: The interaction of knowledge and policy. International Journal on Minority and Group Rights, 19, (2). doi: 10.1163/157181112X639041\nSchatz, R.T., Staub, E., Lavine, H. (1999). On the varieties of national attachment: Blind versus constructive patriotism. Political Psychology, 20 (1), 151-74.\nSchwartz, S.H. (1994). Are there universal aspects in the structure and content of human values? Journal of Social Issues, 50, 19-46.\nSears, D.O. (1993). Symbolic politics: A socio-psychological theory. In S. Iyengar & W. McGuire (Eds.), Explorations in political psychology (pp. 113-149). Durham, NC: Duke University Press.\nSegovia, F., & Defever, R. American public opinion on immigrants and immigration policy. Public Opinion Quarterly, 74 (2), 375-394. doi: 10.1093/poq/nfq006\nSeol, D.H., Skrentny, J.D. (2009). Why is there so little migrant settlement in East Asia? International Migration Review, 43 (3). DOI: 10.1111/j.1747-7379.2009.00778.x\nShim, K, & Le, Y.S. (2018). Risk preferences and immigration attitudes: Evidence from four East Asian countries. International Migration, 56 (5), 190-203. doi: 10.1111/imig.12481\nShipper, A.W. (2008). Fighting for Foreigners: Immigration and Its Impact on Japanese Democracy. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.\nSipinen, J., & Bäck, M. (2016). Generalized trust and perceptions of immigration in Europe. ECPR General Conference, Prague, Czech Republic, September 7-10, 2016.\nSkenderovic, D. (2007). Immigration and the radical right in Switzerland: Ideology, discourse, and opportunities. Patterns of Prejudice, 41 (2), 155-176. doi: 10.1080/00313220701265528\nSniderman, P.M., Hagendoorn, L, & Prior, M. (2004). Predisposing factors and situational triggers: exclusionary reactions to immigrant minorities. American Political Science Review, 98 (1), 35-49. doi: 10.1017/S000305540400098X\nStaedicke, S., Batalova, J., & Zong, J. (2016, December 6). Top 10 of 2016 – Issue # 9: On the brink of demographic crisis, governments in East Asia turn slowly to immigration. Washington, DC: Migration Policy Institute. Retrieved from https://www.migrationpolicy.org\nStatistics Korea. (2017). Marriage and divorce statistics (2000-2017). Retrieved from http://kostat.go.kr\nStolle, D., Soroka, S., & Johnston, R. (2008). When does diversity erode trust? Neighborhood diversity, interpersonal trust, and the mediating effect of social interactions. Political Studies, 56, 57-75. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9248.2007.00717.x\nStrand, W. (2004). Opening the hermit kingdom. History Today, 54 (1). Retrieved from https://www.historytoday.com/archive/opening-hermit-kingdom\nStrauss, C. (2012). Making sense of public opinion: American discourses about immigration and social programs. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.\nTaiwan Ministry of the Interior, Department of Statistics. (2018). Statistical yearbook of the Interior. Retrieved from https://www.moi.gov.tw/files/site_stuff/321/2/year/year_en.html\nTaiwan Ministry of the Interior, National Immigration Agency. (2018). Statistics on the number of foreign residents living in Taiwan with valid residence permit. Retrieved from https://www.immigration.gov.tw/5382/5385/7344/7350/8883/\nTajfel, H., & Turner, J. (1979). An integrative theory of intergroup conflict. In W.G. Austin, & S. Worschel (Eds.), The social psychology of intergroup relations (pp. 33-47). Monterey, CA: Brooks/Cole Publishing.\nTakenaka, A. (2012). Demographic challenges for the 21st century: Population ageing and the immigration “problem” in Japan. Anthropology & Ageing Quarterly, 33 (2), 38-43.\nTakenoshita, H. (2016). Immigration challenges in Japan: How has Japanese society coped with immigration? In E. Healy, D. Arunachalam, & T. Mizukami (Eds.), Creating social cohesion in an independent world: Experiences of Australia and Japan (pp. 95-112). Palgrave Macmillan.\nTierney, R. (2008). Inter-ethnic and labour community coalitions in class struggle in Taiwan since the advent of temporary migration. Journal of Organizational Change Management, 21 (4), 482-496. doi: 10.1108/09534810810884876\nTierney, R. (2011). The class context of temporary migration, racism and civic nationalism in Taiwan. Journal of Contemporary Asia, 41, (2), 289-314. doi: 10.1080/00472336.2011.553047\nThompson, D. (2018, February 2). How immigration became so controversial: Does the hot-button issue of 2018 really split the country? Or just the Republican party? The Atlantic. Retrieved from https://www.theatlantic.com\nTomiura, E., Ito, B., Mukonoki, H., & Wakasugi, R. (2018). Individual characteristics, behavioral biases, and attitudes toward immigration. Review of International Economics, 24 (5), 1081-1095.\nTsay, C.L., & Tsai, P.L. (2003). International labour migration and foreign direct investment in East Asian development: Taiwan and Japan compared. Tamkang University Institutional Repository. Chiba, Japan: Institute of Developing Economics.\nUeffing, P., Rowe, F., Mulder, C.H. (2015). Difference in attitudes towards immigration between Australia and Germany: The role of immigration policy. Comparative Population Studies, 40 (4), 437-464. doi: 10.12765/CPoS-2015-18en\nUnited Nations, Department of Economic and Social Affairs. (1998). Recommendations on statistics of international migration (series M, no. 58, rev. 1). New York: United Nations.\nUnited Nations, Department of Economic and Social Affairs, Population Division. (2017). World population prospects: The 2017 revision. Retrieved from https://population.un.org/wpp/Download/Standard/Population/\nUnited Nations, Department of Economic and Social Affairs, Population Division. (2017). Trends in international migrant stock: The 2017 revision. United Nations database, POP/DB/MIG/Stock/Rev.2017.\nUslaner, E. (2002). The moral foundations of trust. Cambridge University Press.\nvan der Linden, M., Hooghe, M., de Vroome, T., & Van Laar, C. (2017). Extending trust to immigrants: Generalized trust, cross-group friendship and anti-immigrant sentiments in 21 European societies. PLoS One, 12 (5).\nVore, A. (2015, September 25). ‘Immigrant’ vs. ‘migrant’, what’s the difference? The San Diego Union-Tribune. Retrieved from https://www.sandiegouniontribune.com\nWang, H.Z., & Bélanger, D. (2008). Taiwanizing female immigrant spouses and materializling differential citizenship. Citizenship Studies, 12 (1), 91-106. doi: 10.1080/13621020701794224\nWingate, K.M. (2012). Embracing immigration: Contemporary Japanese college students perceptions of foreign labor in Japan (unpublished Master’s Thesis). Seton Hall University, New Jersey. Retrieved from https://scholarship.shu.edu/theses/231\nWu, W.C. (2019). Big government sentiment and support for protectionism in East Asia. International Political Science Review, 40 (1), 73-89.\nZaslove, A. (2004). Closing the door? The ideology and impact of radical right populism on immigration policy in Austria and Italy. Journal of Political Ideologies, 9 (1), 99-118. doi: 10.1080/1356931032000167490 | 描述: | 碩士 國立政治大學 國際研究英語碩士學位學程(IMPIS) 106862021 |
資料來源: | http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#G1068620211 | 資料類型: | thesis |
| Appears in Collections: | 學位論文 |
Files in This Item:
| File | Size | Format | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 021101.pdf | 2.19 MB | Adobe PDF2 | View/Open |
Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.