Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://ah.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/125997
題名: 專科學校教師與高年級學生資訊需求與圖書館電子資源使用研究:以新生醫護管理專科學校為例
Case Study on Information Needs and Using Library Electronic Resource for Faculty and Junior College Students at Hsin Sheng Junior College of Medical Care and Management
作者: 楊宗桓
Yang, Tsung-Huan
貢獻者: 王梅玲
Wang, Mei-Ling
楊宗桓
Yang, Tsung-Huan
關鍵詞: 專科學校圖書館
電子資源
使用者研究
滿意度
junior college libraries
electronic resources
user study
customer satisfaction
日期: 2019
上傳時間: 5-Sep-2019
摘要: 面對數位化資源的蓬勃發展,使用者對數位化資訊的接受度與使用率日漸攀升,專科學校圖書館必須要瞭解現今使用者對數位化資訊的需求及尋求行為上的改變。本研究透過文獻分析法,蒐集國內外有關研究主題資料,設計「電子資源重要性與滿意度問卷」,共5 個構面32 項指標。使用問卷調查法針對新生醫護管理專科學校護理科教師與五專高年級學生進行研究。\n本研究的研究目的為:(一)探討護理科教師與高年級學生教學與學習的資訊需求。(二)探討護理科教師與高年級學生圖書館與電子資源使用與滿意度現況。(三)探討護理科教師與高年級學生認知電子資源重要性與圖書館電子資源使用滿意度的落差。\n由調查結果歸納五點結論:(一) 護理科教師與高年級學生的資訊需求有明顯差異。圖書館需要從不同的資訊需求進行評估,針對研究需求與學業需求的電子資源產品做不同的規劃。(二)護理科教師對於圖書館與電子資源使用滿意度低於五專高年級學生。電子資源館藏無法兼顧教師族群研究需求,圖書館未來需要逐步規劃符合研究需求的電子資源。(三)護理科教師的資訊需求以教學與學術研究為主,學生以準備課業報告居多,教師的資訊需求明顯未能滿足,是圖書館需要重視與改善的重點。(四)圖書館應定期針對教師與學生舉辦電子資源利用教育與推廣服務,讓更多師生認識電子資源館藏。(五)如何落實電子資源利用教育,進一步融入教師課程與學生實習歷程,是圖書館需要長期持續努力的方向。\n根據結論建議圖書館應定期舉辦電子資源利用教育,讓讀者熟悉使用方式。透過定期舉辦滿意度調查,瞭解讀者的需求。藉此調整方向採購符合師生需求的電子資源館藏。
Due to the prosperous growth of digital resources nowadays, the numbers of people who use digital information keep rising. The Junior college libraries must understand more about the information needs and the change of search behaviors of the users of digital information. By using document analysis, the study collected data from relevant research in both domestic and overseas, designing a questionnaire of the importance and satisfaction of electronic resources with 5 dimensions and 32 indicators. By using the questionnaire survey, the study further conducted research on the nursing faculty and senior students of Hsin Sheng Junior College of Medical Care and Management.\n\nThe main purposes of the study are:\n1. To find out the information needs of teaching and learning for the nursing facultyand senior students.\n2. To find out the current situation of using the library and electronic resources for the nursing faculty and senior students.\n3. To find out the differences between the nursing faculty and senior students in understanding the importance of electronic resources and the satisfaction of using the electronic resources.\n\nThe study obtained the following five conclusions and suggestions:\n1. There is a huge difference in information needs between nursing faculty and senior students. The library needs to evaluate the different demands of information and\nthen make different plans for the products of electronic resources regarding research and academic demands.\n2. The satisfaction of using the library and electronic resources by the nursing faculty is lower than senior students, indicating that the library resources in current are not able to meet both the faculty and students` demands. The library needs to make a future plan for electronic resources step by step to meet the research demands of the\nfaculty.\n3. The purposes of using electronic resources by the nursing faculty are mainly focusing on teaching and academic researches, while for students who use electronic resources are mainly to prepare school works and reports. This obviously indicates that the faculty’s demands are not being well satisfied in current situation. This is the point that the library needs to improve in the future.\n4. The library should regularly host events to promote the services of the library instruction of electronic resources for both the faculty and students, getting more people to know how to use the electronic collections in the correct way.\n5. It is a long-term goal for the library to achieve in the future that how to carry out the library instruction of electronic resources and have it further involved in both\nthe courses and internship educations.\n\nSuggestions were proposed with the conclusions of this study that the library should regularly host events for faculty and students to promote the library instruction of electronic resources, getting readers familiar to know how to use it. Also, by regularly conducting satisfaction surveys, the library will be able to know readers’demands in time and further adjust the procurement plan of electronic resources to meet both faculty and students’demands.
參考文獻: 一、中文\n于第、王秀惠(2001)。技術學院餐旅類科學生資訊需求及資訊尋求行為之研究:以景文技術學院為例。景文技術學院報,11(下),1-14。\n王梅玲(2006)。電子計量應用在電子期刊評鑑。圖書與資訊學刊,(57),1-18。doi:10.6575/JoLIS.2006.57.01\n王梅玲、李函儒(2015)。大學圖書館電子資源服務品質模式與應用研究。圖書館學與資訊科學,41(2),77-105\ndoi:10.6245/JLIS.2015.412/658\n王群雅 (2017)。電子資源館藏使用與滿意度研究:以臺北市立圖書館大直分館讀者為例 (未出版之碩士論文)。國立政治大學,臺北市。\n江子隆、賴玲玲(2012)。美國公共圖書館電子書閱讀器借閱政策初探。臺北市立圖書館館訊,29(3),56-74。\n李宜敏(1997)。護生資訊尋求行為及圖書館利用之研究:以國立台北護理學院護理系護生為例 (碩士論文)。淡江大學,台北縣。\n李函儒 (2014)。大學圖書館電子資源服務品質評鑑:以國立政治大學為例 (碩士論文)。國立政治大學,臺北市。\n李淑霞(1999)。圖書館讀者整體滿意度之調查研究──以行政院經建會圖書館為例。書苑季刊,41,41-77。\n李碧鳳(2001)。元智大學圖書館資料庫利用及服務現況:以教師及研究生為對象。書苑,49,69-80。\n周宏宏(2009)。服務品質、滿意度與再使用意願關係之研究:以真理大學圖書館為例。真理大學人文學報,(7),74-103。doi:10.29962/TOJA.200904.0004\n邱銘心(2012)。資訊需求。圖書館學與資訊科學大辭典。[Online]. Available:http://terms.naer.edu.tw/detail/1679179/ (2019-05-20)\n胡亦君(2006)。大專校院圖書館電子資源推廣服務實施探討 (未出版之碩士論文)。國立中興大學,臺中市。\n洪妃 (2014)。從體育研究生資訊需求探討館藏使用與滿意度研究 (未出版之碩士論文)。國立政治大學,臺北市。\n洪榮照、鄧英蘭、蘇雅敏(2010)。臺中教育大學研究生對電子資源館藏使用情形之研究。臺中教育大學學報,24(2),151-171。\n張芳菁(2006)。技專校院圖書館電子資源推廣利用之研究:以崑山科技大學為例。圖書與資訊學刊,1(4),87-100。\n張育蓉(2012)。使用情緒分析於圖書館使用者滿意度評估之研究(碩士論文)。國立中興大學,台中市。\n莊佳伶(2004)。臺灣地區藝術大學學生對電子資料庫使用行為之研究 (未出版之碩士論文)。國立臺灣藝術大學,臺北縣。\n陳建文、陳美文(2006)。圖書館服務品質對使用者滿意度與再使用意願之研究:以某大學為例。教育資料與圖書館學,44(1),61-82。\n黃慕萱、陳明君(2000)。檢索背景對檢索技巧及檢索結果之影響。圖書與資訊學刊,34,11-32。\n葉慶玲(1999) 。石牌醫學園區護理人員資訊尋求行爲硏究 (未發表的碩士論文)。輔仁大學:臺北縣。\n葉慶玲(2000) 。護理人員資訊尋求行爲硏究。大學圖書館,4 (2),93-114 。\n楊芸菁(2013)。國立空中大學學生圖書館電子館藏使用意圖研究(未出版之碩士論文)。國立臺灣師範大學,臺北市。\n楊春暉(2006)。ERIC資料庫之服務品質研究(未出版之碩士論文)。國立臺灣師範大學,臺北市。\n賴玲玲(2012)。資訊尋求行為。圖書館學與資訊科學大辭典。[Online]. Available:http://terms.naer.edu.tw/detail/1679134/ (2019-05-20)\n賴施雯(2011)。Medline醫學資料庫之好用性評估(未出版之碩士論文)。國立臺灣大學,臺北市。\n劉美慧、林信成(2001)。從資訊需求談大學圖書館讀者利用教育。臺北市立圖書館館訊,19(2),20-41。\n劉煌裕、舒榮輝(2008)。大學圖書館電子資源之需求分析與行銷策略之研究。教育資料與圖書館學,45(3),331-356。\n謝寶煖(1998)。行銷圖書館與資訊服務。圖書與資訊學刊,(27),40-54。\n羅美英(2003)。技專校院學生資訊尋求行為及圖書館利用之研究-以德霖技術學院為例 (未出版之碩士論文)。臺北市立師範學院,臺北市。\n羅思嘉(2000)。資訊行為探索-以國立成功大學學生為例:從資訊搜尋行為看資訊環境對讀者資訊行為的影響。中國圖書館學會會報,64,141-160。\n蘇諼、李惠萍(2004)。資訊行為研究之研究方法探討。輔大圖書館學刊,32,45-62。\n\n二、英文\nAdeyoyin, S. O. (2005). Strategic planning for marketing library services. Library Management, 26(8/9), 494-507.\nBlixrud, J. C. (2002). Measures for electronic use: The ARL e-metrics project. Paper presented at the statistics in practice: measuring & managing, IFLA Satellite Conference, 73-84.\nBystrom, K. & Jarvelin, K.(1995). Task complexity affects information seeking and use. Information Processing & Management, 31(2), 196-197.\nCaballero, C. (2002).Strategic planning as a prerequisite to strategic marketing in libraries and information agencies.In Owens, I. (Eds.), Strategic Marketing in Library and Information Science (pp.33-59). Binghamton, NY: Haworth Information Press.\nDervin, B., & Nilan, M. (1986). Information Needs and Uses. Annual Review of Information Science and Technology, 21, 3-33.\nGilbert, S. (1976). The Information Needs of Nursing Staff: A Survey Carried out in the Salop Area Health Authority (MSc thesis, University of Sheffield, UK).\nHart, J. L., Coleman, V., & Yu, H. (2000). Marketing electronic resources and services : surveying faculty uses as a first step. The Reference Librarian, 31(67-68), 41-55.\nKaur, B., & Verma, R. (2009). Use of electronic information resources : a case study of Thapar University. Journal of Library & Information Technology, 29(2), 67-73 .\nKayongo, J., & Helm, C. (2010). Graduate students and the library : a survey of researchpractices and library use at the University of Notre Dame. Reference & User Services Quarterly, 49(4), 341-349 .\nKrikelas, J. (1983). Information-seeking behavior: Patterns and concepts. Drexel Library Quarterly, 19(2), 5-20.\nLiu, G., & Winn, D. (2009). Chinese graduate students and the Canadian academic library : A user study at the University of Windsor. The Journal of Academic Librarianship, 35(6), 565-573.\nNoh, Y. (2010). A study on developing evaluation criteria for electronic resources in evaluation indicators of libraries. Journal of Academic Librarianship, 36(1), 41-52.\nNoh, Y. (2012). A study measuring the performance of electronic resources in academic libraries. Aslib Proceedings, 64(2), 134-153.\nPride, W. M., & Ferrel, O. C. (1991). Marketing: Concepts and strategies. Boston: Houghton Mifflin.\nTaylor, R. S. (1968). Question-negotiation and information seeking in libraries. College and Research Libraries, 29(3), 178-194.\nTenopir, C. (2003). Use and users of electronic library resources : An overview and analysis ofrecent research studies. Retrieved from http://www.clir.org/wp-content/uploads/sites/6/pub120.pdf\nWilson, T.D. (1999). Model in information behavior research. Journal of Documentation, 55(3), 249-257.\nWisniewski, J., & Fichter, D. (2007). Electronic resources won’t sell themselves: Marketing tips. Online, 31(1), 54-57.
描述: 碩士
國立政治大學
圖書資訊學數位碩士在職專班
1019130101
資料來源: http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#G1019130101
資料類型: thesis
Appears in Collections:學位論文

Files in This Item:
File SizeFormat
010101.pdf1.08 MBAdobe PDF2View/Open
Show full item record

Google ScholarTM

Check

Altmetric

Altmetric


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.