Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://ah.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/127234
題名: 中國學派創造過程:背景,概觀與案例分析
Theoretical Construction and the Fledgling `Chinese School` of IR in China: Background, Overview and Case Study Analysis
作者: 黃軻
Pickett, Kristopher William
貢獻者: 薛健吾
Hsueh, Alex Chienwu
黃軻
Kristopher William Pickett
關鍵詞: 國際關係
國際關係理論
閻學通
秦亞青
趙汀陽
中國學派
International Relations
International Relations Theory
Yan Xuetong
Qin Yaqing
Zhao Tingyang
Chinese School
日期: 2019
上傳時間: 6-Nov-2019
摘要: 在中國學術界的某些領域,尤其是在國際關係領域,人們熱切希望建立一所中國的國際關係學院。本文試圖通過對秦亞青和閻學通的理論進行考察和檢驗來提取中國國際關係理論的主要理論成分。此外,這項工作也突出了,但沒有考驗,他們的作品和趙廷陽的理論。它也試圖了解這對更廣泛的國際關係辯論有何意義(如果有的話)。本文首先分析了中國理論建構的歷史趨勢和更廣泛的IR領域的演變。接下來,概述了西方或傳統的IR理論。其次是對秦亞青和嚴學通的主要理論要素的綜合分析。最後兩部分通過中國使用武力的歷史和當代案例來檢驗這些理論的有效性。歷史案例包括:朝鮮戰爭1950-1953,中國台灣海上戰爭1954年,中國台灣海峽戰爭1958年,中印戰爭1962年,中越戰爭1979年和約翰遜南礁戰爭1988年。同期案件該研究通過調查美國海軍EP-3偵察機事件,USNS Impeccable 事件以及南沙群島特徵組中的中國島嶼建設項目來調查南海爭端。在所有測試的案例中,證明CIRT無法解釋中國使用武力,發現現實主義是解釋中國在歷史上和同時使用武力的更好指標。
In certain areas of Chinese academics, most notably in the field of IR, there has been an ardent push for constructing a Chinese school of international relations. This work is an attempt to extract the major underlying theoretical components of Chinese International Relations Theory by examining and testing both Qin Yaqing and Yan Xuetong’s theoreties. In addition, this work also highlights, but does not test, they works and theories of Zhao Tingyang. It is also and attempt to understand what, if any, significance this has for the wider IR debate. This work first analyzes the historical trend for theoretical construction within China and the evolution of the field of IR more broadly. Next, an overview of Western, or traditional, theories of IR is outlined. Followed by this is a comprehensive analysis of Qin Yaqing and Yan Xuetong’s major theoretical elements. The final two sections test the validity of these theories both through historical and contemporary cases of China’s use of force. The historical cases tested are: The Korean War 1950-1953, China-Taiwan Offshore Island War 1954, China-Taiwan Strait War 1958, Sino-Indian War 1962, Sino-Vietnamese War 1979 and The Johnson South Reef Skirmish 1988. The contemporaneous case study investigates the South China Sea disputes by surveying the U.S. Navy EP-3 surveillance plane incident, the USNS Impeccable incident and Chinese island building project in the area of the Spratly feature group. In all cases tested, it is demonstrated that CIRT fails to explain China’s use of force, finding that realism is a better indicator of interpreting China’s use of force both historically and contemporaneously.
參考文獻: “A Look at China’s SAM Shelters in the Spratlys.” Asia Maritime Transparency Initiative. February 23, 2017. https://amti.csis.org/china-sam-shelters-spratlys/\n\nAbi-Habib, Maria. “How China Got Sri Lanka to Cough Up a Port,” New York Times. June 25, 2018. https://www.nytimes.com/2018/06/25/world/asia/china-sri-lanka-port.html\n\nAllison, Graham. Destined for War: Can China and America Escape the Thucydides Trap? New York: Houghton Mifflin Harcourt, 2017. Kindle edition.\n\nAnitav Acharya and Barry Buzan, “Why Is There No Non-Western International Relations Theory? An Introduction,” International Relations of the Asia-Pacific Vol. 7 (2007): 287-312.\n\nAcharya, Amitav and Barry Buzan. “Why is There No Non-Western International Relations Theory? Ten Years on.” International Relations of the Asia-Pacific Vol. 0 (2017): 1-30.\n\nAnderlini, Jamil, Wang Feng and Tom Mitchell. “Xi Jinping Delivers Robust Defense of Globalisation at Davos.” Financial Times January 17, 2017, https://www.ft.com/content/67ec2ec0-dca2-11e6-9d7c-be108f1c1dce\n\nAnderson, Benedict. Imagined Communities: Reflections on the Origins and Spread of Nationalism. London: Verso, 2006.\n\nBorah, Jayshree. “Book Review: Ancient Chinese Thought, Modern Chinese Power.” China Report Vol. 51, No. 1 (2015): 76-86.\n\nCallahan, William A. “Chinese Visions of World Order: Post-hegemonic or a New Hegemony?” International Studies Review 10 (2008): 749-761.\n\nChan, Tara Francis. “China Is Not Even Pretending Anymore in the South China Sea – It Put 400 Buildings on One of the Disputed Islands.” Business Insider. May 24, 2018. https://businessinsider.com/china-400-buildings-subi-reef-south-china-sea-2018-5\n\nChen, Albert H.Y. “The Concept of ‘Datong’ in Chinese Philosophy as an Expression of the Idea of the Common Good.” Faculty of Law the University of Hong Kong No. 20 (2011): 1-20.\n\nChen Jian. China’s Road to the Korean War: The Making of the Sino-American Confrontation. New York: Columbia University Press, 1994.\n\n“China Has Reclaimed 3,200 Acres in the South China Sea, Say Pentagon.” The Guardian. May 13, 2016. https://www.theguardian.com/world/2016/may/13/pentagon-report-china-reclaimed-3200-acres-south-china-sea\n\n“China is Spending Billions to Make the World Love It.” The Economist March 23, 2017. http://www.economist.com/news/china/21719508-can-money-buy-sort-thing-china-spending-billions-make-world-love-it.\n\nChurchill, Owen. “US Is Making ‘Serious Strategic Misjudgment’ In Its Accusations against China, Beijing’s Top Diplomat Says.” South China Morning Post, September 29, 2018. https://www.scmp.com/news/china/diplomacy/article/2166275/beijings-top-diplomat-says-us-making-serious-strategic.\n\nConfucius. The Analects. Translated by Annping Chin. New York: Penguin Books, 2014.\n\nCopeland, Dale C. The Origins of Major War. Ithaca, New York: Cornell University Press, 2000.\n\nCummings, Bruce. Korea’s Place in the Sun: A Modern History. New York: Norton, 2005. Kindle Edition\n\nDo, Thuy T. “China’s rise and the ‘Chinese dream’ in international relations theory.” Global Change, Peace & Security Vol. 27, No. 1 (2015): 21-38.\n\nDomonoske, Camila. “China Sends Aircraft Carrier into Taiwan Straight, A Provocative Move.” NPR January 11, 2017. Accessed January 14, 2017. http://www.npr.org/sections/thetwo-way/2017/01/11/509279132/china-sends-aircraft-carrier-into-taiwan-strait-a-provocative-move.\n\nDoyle, Michael W. “Three Pillars of the Liberal Peace.” American Political Science Review Vol. 99, No. 3 (2005): 463-466.\n\nEno, Robert. The Great Learning and The Doctrine of the Mean: An Online Teaching Translation (2016): http://www.indiana.edu/~p374/Daxue-Zhongyong.pdf.\n\nFincher, Leta Hong. Betraying Big Brother: The Feminist Awakening in China. London: Verso, 2018. Kindle edition.\n\nFels, Enrico and Truong-Mihn Vu eds. Power Politics in Asia’s Contested Waters: Territorial Disputes in the South China Sea. New York: Springer: 2016.\n\nFord, John. “The Obstacles to China’s Bid for Soft Power.” The Diplomat January 28, 2017, http://thediplomat.com/2017/01/the-obstacles-to-chinas-bid-for-soft-power/\n\nFriedberg, Aaron L. “The Future of U.S.–China Relations: Is Conflict Inevitable.” International Security Vol. 30, No. 2 (Autumn, 2005): 7-45.\n\nGarver, John W. China’s Quest: The History of the Foreign Relations of the People’s Republic of China. New York: Oxford University Press, 2016.\n\nGarver, John W. “The Security Dilemma in Sino-Indian Relations.” India Review 1:4, (2007), 1-34.\n\nGlaser, Charles L. “Realists as Optimists: Cooperation as Self-Help.” International Security Vol. 19, No. 3 (Winter 1994-95): 50-90.\n\nGlobal Times, “China’s 58 Partners around The World,” July 29, 2014. www.globaltimes.cn/content/873141.shtml\n\nHayton, Bill. The South China Sea: The Struggle for Power in Asia. New Haven: Yale University Press, 2014.\n\n“How Much Trade Transits the South China Sea?” China Power chinapower.csis.org/much-trade-south-china-sea/\n\nHuang, Yufan. “Q. and A.: Yan Xuetong Urges China to Adopt a More Assertive Foreign Policy.” New York Times February 9, 2016. https://www.nytimes.com/2016/02/10/world/asia/china-foreign-policy-yan-xuetong.html?_r=0\n\nIkenberry, G. John. “Liberal Internationalism 3.0: America and the Dilemmas of Liberal World Order.” Perspectives on Politics Vol. 7 No. 1 (2009): 71-87.\n\nIsh-Shalom, Piki. “Theory as a Hermeneutical Mechanism: The Democratic-Peace Thesis and the Politics of Democratization.” European Journal of International Relations Vol. 12 (2006): 565-598.\n\nJervis, Robert. Perception and Misperception in International Politics. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 2017.\n\nJi Guoxing. “The Legality of the ‘Impeccable Incident.’” China Security Vol. 5, No. 2 (Spring 2009): 16-21.\n\nJohnston, Alastair Iain. “How Assertive Is China’s New Assertiveness?” International Security Vol. 37, No. 4 (Spring 2013): 7-48.\n\nJohnston, Alastair Iain. “What (If Anything) Does East Asia Tell Us About International Relations Theory?” Annual Review of Political Science No. 15 (2012): 53-78.\n\nKnoblock, John. Xunzi: A Translation and Study of the Complete Works Vols. 1-3. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press, 1994.\n\nKristensen, Peter M. and Ras T. Nielsen. “Constructing a Chinese International Relations Theory: A Sociological Approach to Intellectual Innovation.” International Political Sociology 7 (2013): 19-40.\n\nLaFond, Eugene C. “South China Sea.” Encyclopaedia Britannica www.britannica.com/place/South-China-Sea\n\nLam Peng Er. “China, the United States, Alliances and War: Avoiding the Thucydides Trap?” Asian Affairs: An American Review Vol. 42 No. 2 (2016): 36-46.\n\nLevy Jack S. and William R. Thompson. Causes of War. West Sussex, United Kingdom: Wiley-Blackwell, 2010.\n\nLiang Shoude, “Constructing an International Relations Theory with ‘Chinese Characteristics.’” International Political Studies in China Vol. 49, No. 1 (1997): 23-39.\n\nLidarev, Ivan. “History’s Hostage: China, India and the War of 1962.” The Diplomat August 21, 2012. http://thediplomat.com/2012/08/historys-hostage-china-india-and-the-war-of-1962/\n\nLiff, Adam P. and G. John Ikenberry, “Racing Toward Tragedy? China’s Rise, Military Competition in the Asia Pacific, and the Security Dilemma.” International Security Vol. 39, No. 2 (Fall 2014): 52-91.\n\nMason, Katrina “China Military to Set up First Overseas Base in Horn of Africa。” Financial Times. April 1, 2016, accessed November 14, 2016, https://www.ft.com/content/59ad20d6-f74b-11e5-803c-d27c7117d132\n\nMcClory, Jonathan. “The Soft Power 30: A Global Ranking of Soft Power 2016.” Portland (2016): 1-120.\n\nMearsheimer, John J. “Can China Rise Peacefully?” The National Interest October 25, 2014. http://nationalinterest.org/commentary/can-china-rise-peacefully-10204\n\nMearsheimer, John J. “The False Promise of International Institutions” International Security Vol. 19, No. 3 (Winter 1994-1995): 5-49.\n\nMorton, Katherine. “China’s Ambition in the South China Sea: Is a Legitimate Maritime Order Possible?” International Affairs 92: 4 (2016): 909-940.\n\nNye, Joseph S. Jr. “Soft Power.” Foreign Policy No. 80 (Autumn, 1990): 153-171.\n\nNye, Joseph S. Jr., “Why China Is Weak on Soft Power.” Harvard Kennedy School Belfer Center January 17, 2012, http://www.belfercenter.org/publication/why-china-weak-soft-power\n\nOba, Mie. “TPP, RCEP, AND FTAAP: Multilayered Regional Economic Integration and International Relations.” Asia Pacific Review Vol. 23, No. 1 (2016): 100-114.\n\nOwen, John M. “How Liberalism Produces Democratic Peace.” International Security Vol. 19, No. 2 (Autumn 1994): 87-125.\n\nPermanent Court of Arbitration. “The South China Sea Arbitration (The Republic of the Philippines v. the People’s Republic of China).” The Hague (July 12, 2016): 1-11.\n\nPetty, Martian. “Vietnam Protesters Denounce China on Anniversary of Naval Battle.” Reuters March 14, 2016, https://www.reuters.com/article/us-southchinasea-vietnam-idUSKCN0WG0C9\n\nQin Yaqing. “A Relational Theory of World Politics.” International Studies Review 18 (2016): 33-47.\n\nQin Yaqing. A Relational Theory of World Politics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2018. Kindle edition.\n\nQin Yaqing. “Continuity through Change: Background Knowledge and China’s International Strategy.” The Chinese Journal of International Politics (2014): 285-314.\n\nQin Yaqing. “Culture and global thought: Chinese international theory in the making.” Revista CIDOB d’Afers Internacionals no. 100 (December, 2012): 67-90.\n\n“Qin Yaqing on Rule vs. Relations, Drinking Coffee and Tea, and a Chinese Approach to Global Governance.” Theory Talks November 30, 2011. http://www.theory-talks.org/2011/11/theory-talk-45.html\n\nQin Yaqing. “Relationality and Processual Construction: Brining Chinese Ideas into International Relations Theory,” Social Sciences in China Vol. 30, No. 4 (2009): 5-20.\n\nQin Yaqing. “Why Is There No Chinese International Relations Theory?” International Relations of the Asia-Pacific Vol. 7 (2007): 313-340.\n\nRosato, Sebastian. “The Inscrutable Intentions of Great Powers.” International Security Vol. 39, No. 3 (Winter 2014/15): 48-88.\n\nSarkees, Meredith Reid. “The COW Typology of War: Defining and Categorizing Wars (Version 4 of the Data).” Correlates of War.\n\nSchneider, Florian. “Reconceptualising world order: Chinese political thought and its challenge to International Relations theory.” Review of International Studies 40 (2014): 683-703.\n\nShen Zhihua. Mao, Stalin and the Korean War: Trilateral Communist Relations in the 1950’s. trans. Neil Silver, New York: Routledge, 2012.\n\nSolomon, Feliz. “Sinzo Abe Moves Closer to Changing Japan’s Pacifist Constitution.” Time May 4, 2017 http://time.com/4766409/shinzo-abe-japan-constitution-military/\n\nSung Chul Jung and Kihyun Lee. “Offensive Realists Are Not Wrong: China’s Growth and Aggression, 1976-2001.” Pacific Focus Vol. 32, No. 1 (April 2017): 86-108.\n\nTaliaferro, Jeffery W. “Security Seeking under Anarchy: Defensive Realism Revisited.” International Security Vol. 25, No. 3 (Winter 00/01): 128-161.\n\nTatlow, Didi Kirsten. “Xi Jinping on Exeptionalism with Chinese Characteristics.” New York Times October 14, 2014, https://sinosphere.blogs.nytimes.com/2014/10/14/xi-jinping-on-exceptionalism-with-chinese-characteristics/?_r=0\n\n“Remarks of Premier Wen Jiabao” The Harvard Gazette. https://news.harvard.edu/gazette/story/2003/12/harvard-gazette-remarks-of-chinese-premier-wen-jiabao/\n\nThink in China. http://www.thinkinchina.asia/zhao-tingyang/; Harvard-Yenching Institute https://www.harvard-yenching.org/scholars/zhao-tingyang\n\n“Third Anniversary of the Lawyers Crackdown in China: Where are the Human Rights Lawyers?” Amnesty International July 9, 2018. https://www.amnesty.org/en/latest/campaigns/2018/07/china-human-rights-lawyers-crackdown-third-anniversary/.\n\nYahuda, Michael. “China’s New Assertiveness in the South China Sea.” Journal of Contemporary China Vol. 22, No. 81 (2013): 446-459.\n\nYan Xuetong. Ancient Chinese Thought, Modern Chinese Power. Translated by Edmund Ryden, Edited by Daniel A. Bell and Sun Zhe. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 2011.\n\nYan Xuetong. “Xunzi’s Thoughts on International Politics and Their Implications.” Chinese Journal of International Politics Vol. 2 (2008): 135-165.\n\nYung, Christopher D. and Patrick McNulty. “An Empirical Analysis of Claimant Tactics in the South China Sea.” Institute for National Strategic Studies No. 289 (August 2015): 1-12.\n\nWang Jiangli and Barry Buzan. “The English and Chinese Schools of International Relations: Comparisons and Lessons.” The Chinese Journal of International Politics Vol. 7, No. 1 (2014): 1-46.\n\nWang, Yuan-kang. Harmony and War: Confucian Culture and Chinese Power Politics. New York: Columbia University Press, 2011.\n\n“What Does China Really Spend on Its Military?” CSIS: China Power. Accessed October 16, 2018. https://chinapower.csis.org/military-spending/\n\nWike, Richard and Bruce Stokes. “Chinese Public Sees More Powerful Role in World, Names U.S. as Top Threat.” Pew Research Center October 5, 2016. http://www.pewglobal.org/2016/10/05/chinese-public-sees-more-powerful-role-in-world-names-u-s-as-top-threat/\n\nWortzel, Larry M. “Concentrating Forces and Audacious Action: PLA Lessons from the Sino-Indian War.” In Laurie Burkitt, Andrew Scobell and Larry M. Wortzel (eds.). The Lessons of History: The Chinese People’s Liberation Army at 75.\n\nXing Yuqing. “The Asian Infrastructure Investment Bank and China’s Role in Regional Economic Governance.” East Asian Policy 08, 25 (2016): 25-36.\n\nZannia, Neyla. “Taiwan Rejects Ruling on South China Sea with Taiping Islands Defined as ‘Rocks.’” The Online Citizen. July 14, 2016. https://www.theonlinecitizen.com/2016/07/14/taiwan-rejects-ruling-on-south-china-sea-with-taiping-island-defined-as-rocks/\n\nZeng et al. “Securing China’s Core Interests: The state of the Debate in China.” International Affairs 91:2 (2015): 245-266.\n\nZetter, Kim. “Burn after Reading: Snowden Documents Reveal Scope of Secrets Exposed to China in 2001 Spy Plane Incident.” The Intercept. April 10, 2017. https://theintercept.com/2017/04/10/snowden-documents-reveal-scope-of-secrets-exposed-to-china-in-2001-spy-plane-incident/\n\nZhang, Feng. “The Rise of Chinese Exceptionalism in International Relations.” European Journal of International Relations. Vol. 19, No. 2 (2013): 305-328.\n\nZhang Xiaoming. Deng Xiaoping’s Long War. The University of North Carolina Press Chapel Hill, 2015. Kindle Edition\n\nZhao Tingyang. “A Political World Philosophy in Terms of All-under-heaven (Tian-xia).” Diogenes 221 (2009): 5-18.\n\nZhao Tingyang. “Rethinking Empire from a Chinese Concept ‘All-Under-Heaven’ (Tian-xia, 天下).” Social Identities Vol. 12, No. 1 (January 2006): 29-41.\n\nZhiguo Gao and Bing Bing Jia. “The Nine-Dash Line in the South China Sea: History, Status, and Implications.” The American Journal of International Law Vol. 107, No. 98 (2013): 98-123.
描述: 碩士
國立政治大學
國際研究英語碩士學位學程(IMPIS)
104862020
資料來源: http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#G0104862020
資料類型: thesis
Appears in Collections:學位論文

Files in This Item:
File SizeFormat
202001.pdf1.2 MBAdobe PDF2View/Open
Show full item record

Google ScholarTM

Check

Altmetric

Altmetric


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.