Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://ah.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/127632
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributorIssues & Studies
dc.creatorO&apos, KEVIN J.;BRIEN
dc.date2018-12
dc.date.accessioned2019-11-29T01:38:08Z-
dc.date.available2019-11-29T01:38:08Z-
dc.date.issued2019-11-29T01:38:08Z-
dc.identifier.urihttp://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/127632-
dc.description.abstractBringing knowledge about China to the disciplines has reduced the outsized role that research on Europe and America has on many topics. But mainstreaming China studies also leads to certain tradeoffs. How should we manage these tradeoffs and produce research that is both true to China and contributes to the social sciences? In the last 40 years, China scholars have developed many strategies to navigate the territory between area studies and the social sciences. I myself have vacillated about how China studies and political science should interact and inform each other. How are scholars addressing this issue now, in an era of mixed methods, sophisticated quantitative research, experiments and "big data?"
dc.format.extent176 bytes-
dc.format.mimetypetext/html-
dc.relationIssues & Studies, 54-4 , 11p.
dc.subjectArea studies ; social science ; China studies ; state of the field
dc.titleSpeaking to Theory and Speaking to the China Field
dc.typearticle
item.fulltextWith Fulltext-
item.cerifentitytypePublications-
item.grantfulltextopen-
item.openairetypearticle-
item.openairecristypehttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_18cf-
Appears in Collections:期刊論文
Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat
index.html176 BHTML2View/Open
Show simple item record

Google ScholarTM

Check


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.