Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://ah.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/128643
題名: 臺灣十二年國民基本教育課程綱要下國民中學英語課本與習作聽力活動之研究
An Evaluation of Listening Activities in Junior High School English Textbooks and Workbooks Based on Taiwan’s Twelve-Year Curriculum for Basic Education
作者: 陳婷婷
Chen, Ting-Ting
貢獻者: 黃怡萍
Huang, Yi-Ping
陳婷婷
Chen, Ting-Ting
關鍵詞: 學習表現
learning performance descriptors
日期: 2019
上傳時間: 5-二月-2020
摘要: 英語教科書與習作的聽力活動是了解學習者的英語聽力理解能\n力的主要管道之一。因此,本研究的目的是要探討市面上主要的三家英語教科書出版商的教科書與習作的編撰是否有根據十二年國民教育英語文課程綱要。於是,研究者使用英文科課程綱要所提出的國中階段十一項聽力學習表現來檢核各個版本的教科書和習作的聽力活動,並提出兩個研究問題:一、第一冊教科書和習作聽力活動學習表現分布情形;二、比較三家出版社聽力活動學習表現分布情形。研究結果顯示十一項聽力學習表現的分布如下:三家出版社皆最著重聽懂課堂中所學的字詞(52.5%)和基本句型的句子(34.8%);較少強調的是聽懂教室用語及日常生活用語(4.7%)和聽懂日常生活對話的主旨(6.8%);最少強調的是聽懂短文敘述的情境及主旨(0.8%)和大眾廣播(0.1%)及辨識句子語調所表達的情緒和態度(0.1%);然而,有四項學習表現沒有出現在三家出版社:聽懂歌曲、韻文、簡易故事、短劇和簡易影片的主要內容及了解歌謠、韻文的節奏和音韻。雖然本研究只分析第一冊,希望研究結果能使出版社在編輯其餘五冊聽力活動時,能考量每一項學習表現;此外,教育從業者能額外補充聽力活動是重要的,用以培養學習者全方位的聽力能力。
Listening activities in textbooks and workbooks are one of the major ways to understand learners’ listening comprehension. Thus, the aim of this study was to explore if listening activities in textbooks and workbooks from the three commercial publishers were designed based on the reformed English curricula. In this light, coursebook evaluation was explored via the checklist of the eleven types of the learning performance descriptors proposed by the English curricula. And the two research questions were proposed: (1) the incorporation of the learning performance descriptors in listening activities in the first volume, and (2) a comparison of the occurrence of the learning performance descriptors among the three sets. Results indicated that the occurrence of the learning performance descriptor were as follows: all of the three versions put the largest emphasis on understanding vocabulary (52.5%) and sentence patterns (34.8%), following the less focus on understanding classroom English and daily language (4.7%) and understanding the gist of conversation (6.8%), with the least focus on understanding the contexts and gist of narration (0.8%) and public announcements (0.1%), and recognizing emotion and attitude through sentence intonation (0.1%); however, four types were not found across the three versions: understanding the gist of songs, verses, simple stories, short dramas, simple videos, and understanding rhyme and rhythm of songs and verses. Although this study only analyzed the first volume, it might inform textbook editors to take each learning performance descriptor into account when editing the other five volumes. And teachers could acknowledge that providing extra listening activities is essential for developing the holistic listening competencies of learners.
參考文獻: Afshin, S., and Elham, H. (2015). Textbook evaluation: An analysis of listening comprehension parts in top notch 2A & 2 B. Advances in Language and Literary Studies. Vol. 6, No. 5, 183-189.\nAmir, M., and Siavash, Z. (2017). Local evaluation of an EFL textbook: ‘Mosaic 1: listening and speaking. Theory and Practice in Language Studies. Vol. 7, No. 10, 874-882.\nAnderson, L.W., and Krathwohl, D.R. (2001). A taxonomy for learning, teaching, and assessing: a revision of Bloom’s taxonomy of educational objectives. New York, NY: Longman.\nAzam, A., and Ali, D. (2016). EFL Teachers` Perceptions towards Textbook Evaluation. Theory and Practice in Language Studies, Vol. 6, No. 2, 260-267.\nBrown, H. Douglas. (2001). Teaching by principles: An interactive approach to language pedagogy. White Plains, NY: Longman.\nBrown, H. Douglas. (2010). Language Assessment, Principles and Classroom Practices, Second Edition. New York: Pearson Education, Inc.\nBrown, H. Douglas. (2014). Principles of Language Learning and Teaching, Sixth Edition. New York: Pearson Education, Inc.\nBuck, G. (2001). Assessing Listening. Cambridge University Press.\nBurns, A. (2009). Doing Action Research in English Language Teaching: A Guide for Practitioners. New York and London: Routledge.\nCohen, J. (1960). A Coefficient of Agreement for Nominal Scales. Educational and Psychological Measurement. Vol. 20, Issue 1, 37-46.\nCunningsworth, A. (1995). Choosing your coursebook. Oxford: Heinemann.\nField, J. (2004). An insight into listeners’ problems: too much bottom-up or too much top-down? System. 32 (2004) 363–377.\nGilman, R.A. (1984). What Practitioners Say About Listening: Research Implications for the Classroom. Foreign Language Annals. Vol. 17, No. 4, 331-334.\nGoh, C.C.M, & Burns, A. (2012). Teaching speaking: A holistic approach. New York: Cambridge University Press.\nGraham, D.B., Michelle, E.P., Michael, R., M.D.C., Jamie, L., & Lisa, A. (2015). Listening Competence in Initial Interactions II: Applying Trait Centrality to Discover the Relative Placement of Listening Competence Among Implicit Competency Theories. Communication Studies. Vol. 66, No. 5, 528-548.\nGülden, T. (2016). A study on appropriateness of listening activities in TFL course\nbooks related to the common European framework for references. International Journal of Languages’ Education and Teaching, Year 4, Issue 2, 125-142.\nHolger, L. (2016). Teaching how to apologize: EFL textbooks and pragmatic input.\nLanguage Teaching Research. Vol. 20 (6), 700-718.\nHsu, C.C. (2018). Analyzing Cultural Content in Junior-High-School English Textbooks in Taiwan. Unpublished master thesis, National Chengchi University, Taiwan.\nHughes, A. (2003). Testing listening. Testing for Language Teachers. Cambridge University Press.\nHua, Ma. (2006). On Developing Listening Competence of Non-English Majors. Sino-US English Teaching. Vol. 3, No. 5, 1-5.\nHuang, S.C. (2009). An Evaluation of Speaking Activities In Junior High School English Textbooks for the Nine-year Integrated Curriculum. Unpublished master thesis, National Chengchi University, Taiwan.\nHwang, W.Y., Shadiev, R., Hsu, J.L., Huang, Y.M., Hsu, G.L., & Lin, Y.C. (2016). Effects of storytelling to facilitate EFL speaking using Web-based multimedia system. Computer Assisted Language Learning. Vol. 29, No. 2, 215-241.\nJayakaran, M., Reza, H., and Vahid, N. (2011). Developing An English Language Textbook Evaluation Checklist. Contemporary Issues in Education Research, Vol. 4,No. 6, 21-27.\nJayakaran, M., and Vahid, N. (2012). Evaluative criteria of an English language textbook evaluation checklist. Journal of Language Teaching and Research. Vol. 3, No. 6, 1128-1134.\nJi, L.Z. (2003). Listening Activities for Effective Top-down Processing. The Internet TESL Journal. Vol. IX, No. 11. Retrieved from http://iteslj.org/Techniques/Lingzhu-Listening\nLopez-Medina, B. (2016). Developing a CLIL textbook evaluation checklist. LACLIL,\n9(1), 159-173.\nMaryam, M., and Azizeh, C. (2017). Analyzing listening and speaking activities of Iranian EFL textbook Prospect 3 through Bloom`s revised taxonomy. Advances in Language and Literary Studies. Vol. 8, No. 3, 38-43.\nMcGrath, I. (2002). Materials Evaluation and Design for Language Teaching. Edinburgh, Scotland: Edinburgh University Press.\nMohammad, M., and Heidar, A. (2014). Textbook Evaluation: A Case Study. Social and Behavioral Sciences, 98 (2014), 1148 – 1155.\nMOE. (2014). General Guidelines: Curriculum Guidelines of 12-Year Basic Education. Retrieved from https://www.naer.edu.tw/files/15-1000-14113,c639-1.php?Lang=zh-tw\nMorley, J. (1972). Improving aural comprehension. Ann Arbor, MI: University of\nMichigan Press.\nMumtaz, A., Humaira, Y., and Maimoona, Y. (2015). Evaluation of listening skill of\nELT textbook at secondary school level. Advances in Language and Literary Studies, Vol. 6, No. 3, 225-229.\nNation, I.S.P., and Webb, S. (2011). Researching and Analyzing Vocabulary. Heinle, Cengage Learning.\nNunan, D., and Neil, J. A. (ed.) (2008). Practical English language teaching: reading. New York: McGraw-Hill Companies.\nOECD. (2014). Competency Framework. Retrieved from http://www.oecd.org/careers/competency_framework_en.pdf\nPamela, C.B., and Christine, H. (1978). Listening Competence: A Prerequisite to Communication. The Modern Language Journal, Vol. 62, No. 3, 85-89.\nPeng, C.H. (2008). Exploring Genres of the Reading Texts: A Study on EFL Textbooks of Junior High School. Unpublished master thesis, National Chung Cheng University, Taiwan.\nReima, A. (2017). Improving ELL’s Listening Competence Through Written Scaffolds. TESOL Journal, Vol. 8, No. 4, 831-849.\nRichards, J.C. (1983). Listening comprehension: approach, design, procedure. TESOL Quarterly, 17(2), 219-240.\nRichards, J.C. (2001). Curriculum development in language teaching. Cambridge University Press.\nRichards, J.C., and Burns, A. (2012). Tips for teaching listening: A practical\napproach. White Plains: Pearson Education.\nRost, M. (2016). Teaching and researching listening. New York: Routledge.\nTsai, Y.H. (2018). A Study on the Listening Activities in the Taiwanese Senior High School English Textbooks. Unpublished master thesis, National Taiwan Normal University, Taiwan.\nUNESCO. (2015). UNESCO Competency Framework. Retrieved from https://en.unesco.org/sites/default/files/competency_framework_e.pdf\nWang, Y.T. (2011). A study on reading and writing competence indicators of the\ngrades 1-9English curriculum in junior high school English workbooks.\nUnpublished master thesis, National Chengchi University, Taiwan.\nWebb, S., and Nation, I.S.P. (2017). How Vocabulary is Learned. Oxford University Press.\nYouTube. (2013, April 19). How to Make Fruit Salad [Video file]. Retrieved from https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ADbpTpH4U7s\n\n張厚婷 (Chang H.T.) (2006) 。國小中年級審定版英語教科書之內容分析研究-以四家版本教科書為例 (未出版之碩士論文)。國立台中教育大學語文教育學系,台灣。\n周珮儀、林慶隆、范信賢、秦葆琦、蔡清田、鄭章華、鄭圓鈴 (Chou, Lin, Fan, Chin, Tsai, Chang, & Chang) (2015)。十二年國民基本教育教材。教科書研究,8 (3),頁:155-180。\n黃光雄、簡茂發 (Huang and Jian) (1996)。教育研究法。師大書苑。\n黃政傑、王麗雲、張淑惠、陳麗華、楊國揚 (Huang, Wang, Chang, Chen, & Yang) (2017)。符應十二年國教課綱之教科書編審。教科書研究,10 (3),159-185。\n林政逸 (Lin Jeng Yi) (2017)。十二年國教新課綱核心素養評量。台灣教育評論月刊,6 (3),28-29。\n林永豐 (Lin Yung Feng) (2017)。論十二年國民基本教育課程總綱學習重點的規劃思維與意涵。課程與教學季刊,20(1),105-126。\n呂秀蓮 (Lu Hsiu Lien) (2017)。十二年國教新課綱的使用:現況、困境與解決。教育研究月刊,278,95-109。\n教育部 (MOE)(2008)。國民中小學九年一貫課程綱要修正版。取自\nhttps://www.k12ea.gov.tw/files/97_sid17/%E7%B8%BD%E7%B6%B1.pdf\n教育部 (MOE) (2008)。國民中小學九年一貫課程綱要語文學習領域(英語)。取自 http://etrc.phc.edu.tw/uploads/links/25/2015012808310.pdf\n教育部 (MOE)(2014)。十二年國民基本教育課程綱要總綱。取自https://www.naer.edu.tw/ezfiles/0/1000/attach/87/pta_18543_581357_62438.pdf\n教育部 (MOE) (2018)。十二年國民基本教育課程綱要國民中小學暨普通高級中等學校語文領域-英語文。取自https://www.naer.edu.tw/ezfiles/0/1000/attach/23/pta_18518_3555074_59836.pdf\n國家教育研究院 (NAER) (2014)。十二年國民基本教育課程發展指引。\nhttps://www.naer.edu.tw/files/15-1000-5622,c1179-1.php\n國家教育研究院 (NAER) (2015)。十二年國民基本教育領域課程綱要核心素養發展手冊。取自 https://ws.moe.edu.tw/001/Upload/23/relfile/8006/51358/9df0910c-56e0-433a-8f80-05a50efeca72.pdf\n國家教育研究院 (NAER) (2017)。十二年國教總綱中英文摺頁簡介。 取自\nhttps://www.naer.edu.tw/files/15-1000-14181,c1582-1.php\n國家教育研究院 (NAER) (2019)。108學年度國民中小學教科圖書一覽表。取自\nhttp://censor.naer.edu.tw/BookSrhR.aspx?ASParam=S1VMdSUyMiUzYzcqaSUwYmZPQ0NnRUtYNSUzYTdyJTFlcXAlMTk=\n國家教育研究院 (NAER) (2019)。語文領域-英語文課綱Q&A。取自 https://www.naer.edu.tw/ezfiles/0/1000/img/67/214298723.pdf\n心理與教育測驗研究發展中心(RCPET)(2010)。國中教育會考,取自\nhttps://www.rcpet.ntnu.edu.tw/\n蔡清田 (Tsai Ching Tian) (2011)。課程改革中的「素養」。幼兒教保研究期刊,7,1-14。\n蔡清田 (Tsai Ching Tian) (2016)。「領域/科目核心素養」的課程設計。台灣教育評論月刊,5 (5),142-147。\n王蘊涵 (Wang Y.H.) (2014)。國中英語教科書中漫畫內容分析之研究 (未出版之碩士論文)。國立台中教育大學,台灣。\n王上嘉 (Wang Shang Jia) (2017)。華語文教材之練習設計與編寫研究 (未出版之碩士論文)。國立臺灣師範大學,台灣。\n葉錫南 (Yeh His Nan) (2016)。由十二年國教課綱草案展望未來中小學之英語文教科書。教科書研究,9 (3),143-168。\n黃玉珮 (主編) (2019)。i English 國民中學英語課本1上。台北市:佳音事業股份有限公司、翰林出版事業股份有限公司。\n黃玉珮 (主編) (2019)。i English國民中學英語習作1上。台北市:佳音事業股份有限公司、翰林出版事業股份有限公司。\n馮和平 (主編) (2019)。English國中英語1上課本。新北市: 康軒文教事業股份有限公司。\n馮和平 (主編) (2019)。English國中英語1上習作。新北市: 康軒文教事業股份有限公司。\n陳浩然 (主編) (2019)。Junior High School English國中英語1上課本。台南市:南一書局企業股份有限公司。\n陳浩然 (主編) (2019)。Junior High School English國中英語1上習作。台南市:南一書局企業股份有限公司。
描述: 碩士
國立政治大學
英語教學碩士在職專班
106951012
資料來源: http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#G0106951012
資料類型: thesis
Appears in Collections:學位論文

Files in This Item:
File SizeFormat
101201.pdf1.78 MBAdobe PDF2View/Open
Show full item record

Google ScholarTM

Check

Altmetric

Altmetric


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.