Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://ah.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/128656
題名: 社群媒體上的女性凝視:以Instagram為例
The Female Gaze on Social Media: Taking Instagram as The Example
作者: 黃家茹
Huang, Chia-Ju
貢獻者: 康庭瑜
Kang, Ting-Yu
黃家茹
Huang, Chia-Ju
關鍵詞: 女性凝視
社群媒體
展演
監控
female gaze
social media
performance
surveillance
日期: 2019
上傳時間: 5-二月-2020
摘要: 網美經濟已成為顯著的消費現象,這種以女性為主要消費者的商業操作是在社群媒體時代的新興凝視框架下所形成的。本研究由凝視的角度出發,探究社群媒體上的女性凝視如何運作、其中的凝視與自己所協商出的意義如何展演在日常生活中及社群媒體上,以及何種權力關係蘊藏其中。本研究使用深度訪談法,探討女性在Instagram上的凝視與展演經驗。研究結果顯示,女性凝視確實存在於日常生活與社群媒體中,並與男性凝視有所差別。除此之外,女性凝視所建構出的認同是不同於過往大眾媒體時代的幻想功能,而是使女性閱聽人能投射在現實生活中並投入更多不同的情感。而在展演建構上,女性閱聽人除了受到凝視的客體影響,也會受到想像的觀眾及實際的觀眾回饋所塑造。女性在凝視與展演的過程中一直進行著作為主體與客體的掙扎,也因此不斷對自我與他人進行監控與協商。本研究發現了在新興世代中的年輕女性群體裡已有一種新的凝視標準,這種標準融合了部分的男性凝視標準、消費主義、後女性主義的理想女體等標準,並藉由在社群媒體上的凝視和展演進行監控。
The economy of “internet beauty celebrity” (Wangmei) has become a significant consumer phenomenon. Compared to celebrity in the mass media era, internet beauty celebrity is subject to a new mode of gaze on social media. Drawing on the theories of gaze, this study explores how women gaze and are gazed upon on social media. In-depth interviews are conducted to explore women’s experience of gaze and performance on Instagram. The results show that female gaze is largely different from male gaze. Identities constructed through gaze on social media are different from those in the mass media era. On social media, female audiences project ideal images onto their real lives and invest more interpersonal emotions. Women’s performance of their daily lives on social media is shaped by the performance of internet beauty celebrity and by other imaginary and actual audience of their social media accounts. In the process of gazing and performing, women constantly switch between the position of being a subject and an object. They monitor themselves and other women. Overall this study finds that there is a new mode of gaze among women of younger generations. This mode of gaze integrates certain logics of conventional male gaze, consumerism, and ideal female body of post-feminism.
參考文獻: Meghan Murphy(2017)。〈非「蕩婦羞辱」,「仇女」是也〉。《基進女性之聲》。上網日期:2017年7月12日。取自:\nhttps://radfemtw.wordpress.com/2015/07/12/%E9%9D%9E%E3%80%8 C%E8%95%A9%E5%A9%A6%E7%BE%9E%E8%BE%B1%E3%80%8D%EF%BC%8C%E3%80%8C%E4%BB%87%E5%A5%B3%E3%80%8D%E6%98%AF%E4%B9%9F%E3%80%80%EF%BC%8Fmeghan-murphy/\nKantar(2016)。〈Instagram在亞太地區及台灣使用率成長兩倍〉。《動腦雜誌》2016年10月13日。上網日期:2016年10月13日。取\n自:http://www.brain.com.tw/news/articlecontent?ID=43844\n方念萱(2004)。〈評介林宇玲:《網路與性別》〉。《女學學誌》。17:243-250\n王右君(2010)。〈網路交友平台上的女性自我敘事與性別展演〉。《女學學誌:婦女與性別研究》。27:201-249\n李明璁(2015)。〈韓國流行音樂的視覺性、身體化與性別展演:以「少女時代」的MV產製與消費挪用為例〉。《新聞學研究》。122:37-78\n吳宇泓(2015)。〈社群網站採用因素與自我揭露研究:從臉書到\nInstagram〉。世新大學廣播電視電影學研究所碩士論文\n林宇玲(2010)。〈解讀全球資訊網上的台灣女性網站:由網路論述表現看性別與科技之關係〉。《婦女與兩性學刊》。11:1-33\n林若吟(2012)。〈賽伯女性主義初探—以多人線上角色行為遊戲玩家為\n例〉。中國文化大學中山與中國大陸研究所碩士論文\n林秀雲(譯)(2016)。社會科學研究方法(原作者:Earl Babbie)。台北市:雙葉書廊。(原著出版年:2015)\n張新木(譯)(2017)。景觀社會(原作者:Guy Debord)。南京市:南京大學出版社。(原著出版年:1967)\n陳佳婧(2003)。〈網路空間.人際關係:線上線下.生活世界〉。《資訊社會研究》。4:141-179\n陳保年(2017)。〈運用劇場理論探討社群媒體使用者的自我呈現—以\nInstagram中的女性路跑活動為例〉。世新大學公共關係暨廣告學\n系碩士學位論文\n敖鵬(2017)。〈「網紅」為什麼這樣紅?〉。《文化縱橫》2017年2月號。上網日期:2017年7月28日。取自:\nhttps://www.xcnnews.com/cul/146681.html\n張懷慈、胡克強(2018)。〈人人都是網美!店面裝潢好看又好拍 配件變身主角搶商機〉。三立新聞網。2018年7月20日。取自:\nhttps://www.setn.com/News.aspx?NewsID=406232&From=Search&Key= %E7%B6%B2%E7%BE%8E\n康庭瑜(2007) 。〈流動女體的跨國敘事:旅英台籍女性的身體美學與認同型構〉。台灣大學社會學系暨研究所碩士論文\n曾武清(2004)。〈臥虎藏龍「藏」了什麼?從女性主義電影理論「男性凝視」觀點談武俠電影新類型〉。中華傳播學會2004年會論文\n黃厚銘(2002):網路上的身分認同。《資訊社會研究》。 2,226-228\n黃海榮(2007)。〈「男性凝視」與色情〉。《文化研究@嶺南》\n黃燦然(譯)(2010)。論攝影(原作者:Susan Sontag)。台北市:麥田。(原著出版年:1977)\n黃宛瑜(譯)(2016)。觀光客的凝視3.0(原作者:John Urry&Jonas\nLarsen)。台北市:書林出版有限公司。(原著出版年:2011)\n張玉佩、葉孟儒(2008)。〈美貌的詛咒:男性凝視在網路相簿的權力探\n索〉。《資訊社會研究》。15:249-274\n盧沛樺、張玉佩(2010)。〈性別差異政治:女性運動員的媒體再現與認同糾葛〉。《中華傳播學刊》。17:47-78\n謝明珊(譯)(2010)。身體與社會理論(原作者:Turner Bryan S.)。新北市:韋伯文化國際。\n賴明政、鄭厚謙(2017)。〈你相信網紅嗎?網紅推薦口碑說服效果〉。《CMR行銷研究學術研討會》\n譚天、吳佳真(譯)(1998)。虛擬化身—網路世代的身份認同(原作者:Sherry Turkle)。台北市:遠流。(原著出版年:1995)\n蘇柔郡、吳筱玫(2018)。〈高中女生使用Instagram之日常美學:符擔性 觀點〉。《新聞學研究》。135:139-191\n\nAbercrombie, N., & Longhurst, B. (1998). Audiences: A sociological theory of peformance and imagination. London: Sage.\nAlmazan,Bain.(2015) College students’ perceptions of slut-shaming discourse on campus.Research in Higher Education Journal,28:1-9\nAbidin, C. (2016). “Aren’t These Just Young, Rich Women Doing Vain Things Online?”: Influencer Selfies as Subversive Frivolity. Social Media &Society.\nBerger, J., Dibb, M., & BBC Enterprises. (1972). Ways of seeing. London: BBC Enterprises.\nBordo, S. (2003). Unbearable weight: feminism, Western culture, and the body. 10th anniversary ed. Berkeley, Calif.: University of California Press.\nBrickell, C. (2012). Sexuality, power and the sociology of the internet. Current Sociology, 60(1), 28–44\nBrydges, T., & Sjöholm, J. (2019). Becoming a personal style blogger: Changing configurations and spatialities of aesthetic labour in the fashion industry. International Journal of Cultural Studies, 22(1), 119–139.\nCwynar-Horta,J. (2016)The Commodification of the Body Positive Movement in Instagram. Culture/Politics/Technology,8(2):36-56\nDavid Lyon. (2003). Surveillance as social sorting : privacy, risk, and digital discrimination. London ; New York :Routledge.\nDijck,J. (2013) ‘You have one identity’: performing the self on Facebook and LinkedIn . Media,Culture & Society,35(2):199-215\nDuffy,B,E., Chan,N,K.(2019) “You never really know who’s looking”: Imagined surveillance across social media platforms. New media & Society ,21:119-138\nElias,A,S.,Gill,R.(2018) Beauty surveillance: The digital self-monitoring cultures of neoliberalism. European Journal of Cultural Studie,.21(1):59-77\nFardouly,J.,Holland,E.(2018)Social media is not real life:The effect of attaching disclaimer-type labels to idealized social media images on woman’s body image and mood. New media & Society,20(11)4311-4328\nGill, R. (2008). Empowerment/Sexism: Figuring Female Sexual Agency in Contemporary Advertising. Feminism & Psychology, 18(1),35–60\nHuppatz-K.(2009).Reworking Bourdieu’s “Capital”: Feminine and female capitals in the field of paid caring work. Sociology,431:45-66\nHou.(2018)Social media celebrity and the institutionalization of YouTube. The International Journal of Research into New Media Technologies,1-20\nJung, J. and S.-H. Lee (2006) ‘Cross-cultural Comparisons of Appearance Self-schema, Body Image, Self-esteem, and Dieting Behavior Between Korean and US Women’, Family and Consumer Sciences Research Journal 34: 350–65.\nKeith Wilcox, Andrew T. Stephen, (2013).Are Close Friends the Enemy? Online Social Networks, Self-Esteem, and Self-Control, Journal of Consumer Research, Volume 40:1: 90–103\nLamb, S., Brown, L. M. (2006). Packaging girlhood: Rescuing our daughters from marketers` schemes. New York: St. Martin`s Press.\nLupton, Deborah (2014) Quantified sex: a critical analysis of sexual and reproductive self-tracking using apps. Culture, Health & Sexuality, 17 (4), pp. 440-453\nLyon, D. (2017). Surveillance culture:Engagement,Exposure,and Ethnics in Digital Modernity. International Journal of Communication,11, 824–842\nMulvey, Laura. (1975)Visual Pleasure and Narrative Cinema.” Film Theory and Criticism : Introductory Readings. Eds. Leo Braudy and Marshall Cohen. New York: Oxford UP, 1999: 833-44.\nMcRobbie,A.(2009)The Aftermath of Feminism: Gender,Culture and Social Change.London:Sage Publications\nMarwick,Boyd.(2011)To See and Be Seen:Celebrity Practice on Twitter. The International Journal of Reseach into New Media Technologies.17(2)139-158\nMarwick,A,E.(2015)Instafame:Luxury Selfies in the Attention Economy.Public Culture,27:137-160\nNorth-L.(2009).Rejecting the ‘F-word’ How ‘feminism’ and ‘feminists’ are understood in the newsroom. Journalism,106:739-757\nOlszanowski, M. (2014). Feminist self-imaging and instagram: Tactics of circumventing sensorship. Visual Communication Quarterly, 21(2), 83–95\nPark, Eunsung.(2019). Instagram. Magazine B\nPeek, Holly. (2014)The selfie in the digital age: from social media to sexting. Psychiatric Times, 28\nRingrose,R.,Walkerdine,V (2008) Regulating The Abject, Feminist Media Studies,8:3, 227-246\nRiley,S.,Evans,A.,Mackiewicz,A.(2016)It’s just between girls:Negotiating the postfeminist gaze in women’s ‘looking talk’. Feminism & Psychology,26(1)94-113\nStacey,J. (1993)Star Gazing:Hollywood Cinema and Female\nSpectatorship. Routledge:London\nScenft,M.(2008)Camgirls:Celebrity & Community in the Age of Social Networks.New York:Peter Lang Schwartz,R.,Halegoua,G,R.(2015) The spatial self: Location-based identity performance on social media. New media & Society,17(10)1643- 1660\nSastre . (2016) "Towards A Radical Body Positive: Reading The Online BodyPositive Movement". Publicly Accessible Penn Dissertations. 2569\nSlobe.(2018) Style,stance,and social meaning in mock white girl. Forthcomong in Language in Society 2018\nTiidenberg,K.,Cruz,E,G.(2015) Selfies, Image and the Re-making of the Body.Body & Society,21(4):77-102\nWinch. (2013). Girlfriend and postfeminist Sisterhood.\nBasingstoke: Palgrave.\nWendt, B. (2014). The allure of the selfie: Instagram and the new self-portrait. Amsterdam: Institute of Network Cultures\nWang.(2017).“We are Famouse on the Internet?”: A Studyof the Chinese Phenomenon of Wanghong.Master’s Thesis in Digital Culture,University of Bergen.
描述: 碩士
國立政治大學
傳播學院傳播碩士學位學程
105464028
資料來源: http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#G0105464028
資料類型: thesis
Appears in Collections:學位論文

Files in This Item:
File SizeFormat
402801.pdf2.66 MBAdobe PDF2View/Open
Show full item record

Google ScholarTM

Check

Altmetric

Altmetric


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.