Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://ah.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/128955
題名: 興起中的印太戰略思維與21世紀日印雙邊關係
The Emerging Strategic Thinking of Indo-Pacific and Japan-India Bilateral Relations in 21st Century
作者: 胡睿宸
Hu, Jui-Chen
貢獻者: 劉德海
Liou, To-Hai
胡睿宸
Hu, Jui-Chen
關鍵詞: 印太戰略
地緣政治
日印關係
東進政策
自由開放印太構想
Indo-Pacific strategy
Geopolitics
Japan-India relations
Act east policy
Free and open Indo-Pacific vision
日期: 2020
上傳時間: 2-Mar-2020
摘要:   「印太」地區作為地緣政治的新興概念,從原先傳統上相互獨立的印度洋地區和太平洋地區,整合為連續的地理區域,不論是政治上、經濟上、海洋事務上或各種區域合作上,在各個領域已受到廣泛的討論和研究。除了區域國家的國力提升之外,全球經濟、安全及戰略發展的重心轉移等等因素,都大幅提升了印太地區的重要性。基於各國意識到中國崛起與亞洲地區的經濟快速騰飛、印度洋區域戰略運輸的重要性,各個大國的戰略重心都相繼調整向印太地區,以體現印度洋與太平洋在國家戰略的重要性。「印太」思維正扮演著影響國際政經局勢的關鍵角色。\n\n  日本推動印太戰略的行動不遺餘力,首相安倍晉三先後提出的「俯瞰地球儀外交」、「安保鑽石」、「自由與繁榮之弧」構想,勾勒出日本外交與安保戰略,增強盟國間合作、強化防衛力量,並因應中國崛起的軍事力量與擴張。日本亦認為印度是日本外交戰略的重要支柱,印度近年來經濟發展快速、勞動人口高、國土龐大、同為民主國家,且地理位置佳,而中國皆被兩國視為戰略競爭對手。因此對日本而言,印度確為相當適合且應大力發展合作的重要國家。\n\n  後冷戰時期隨著印蘇關係的轉變,以及美國面對中國崛起的戰略調整,促成美印關係的正常化,加上印度國內經濟改革也帶來外資的奧援,印度實力增強與信心大增,其成為大國的渴望亦隨之提升也與傳統的不結盟政策偏離,改以多重結盟(multi-alignment)取代,但維持國家主權與戰略的獨立自主始終是印度的外交基本原則。莫迪上任後將原本的「東望政策」提升至「東進政策」,在亞洲扮演更積極的國家角色,提倡自由、開放與包容的印太地區,與日本及東協大幅合作,更避免過度偏向美國或中國等超級大國。\n\n  基於印度洋的重要性與印太地區新興國家的崛起,印太概念已是日本、印度、美國、東協、南韓、澳洲等相關國家政府高度重視的戰略思維。日印兩國間在各方面的合作及戰略同盟關係,基於互補性與共同利益之下,預期將會持續的友好、深化。
 As an emerging concept of geopolitics, the "Indo-Pacific" region has been integrated from the traditionally independent Indian Ocean and Pacific regions into a continuous geographical area. Various fields of Indo-Pacific have been extensively discussed and studied whether politically, economically, marine affairs or regional cooperation. In addition to the increase in national strength of regional countries, factors such as the shift of global economy, security and strategy development have greatly increased the importance of the Indo-Pacific region. Because of realizing the rise of China, the rapid economic growth of Asia, and the importance of strategic transportation in the Indian Ocean region, the strategic focus of each major country has been adjusted to the Indo-Pacific region to reflect the importance of the Indian Ocean and the Pacific in their national strategies. The "Indo-Pacific" thinking is playing a key role in affecting the international political and economic situation.\n\n Japan has vigorously promoted the Indian-Pacific strategy. Prime Minister Shinzo Abe`s "Diplomacy That Takes a Panoramic Perspective of the World Map," "Democratic Security Diamond," and "Arc of Freedom and Prosperity" concepts have outlined Japan`s diplomacy and security strategy, strengthened cooperation among allies, increased the force of defense, and responded to China`s rising military power and expansion. Japan has also considered India to be an important pillar of Japan`s diplomatic strategy. India`s rapid economic development in recent years, high labor population, huge land, democratic system, and good geographical location, and China is a common strategic competitor to both countries. Therefore, for Japan, India is indeed an important country that is quite suitable and should vigorously develop cooperation.\n\n Since the post-cold war period, with the change of India-Soviet relations, the United States` strategic adjustment in the face of China`s rise, the relationship between the United States and India have been normalized, and India`s domestic economic reforms have also attracted foreign investment and funds. India its diplomatic strategy has tended to develop strategic relations with the major powers because of the increase of strength and confidence. It also deviates from the traditional non-aligned policy and replaced it with multi-alignment, but maintaining the independence and autonomy of national sovereignty and strategy has always been India`s basic principle of diplomacy. Since taking office, Modi has upgraded the original "Look East Policy" to "Act East Policy", playing a more active national role in Asia, advocating a free, open and inclusive Indo-Pacific region, and cooperating significantly with Japan and ASEAN to avoid excessive tend to any of the superpowers such as the United States or China.\n\n Because of the importance of the Indian Ocean and the rise of emerging countries in the Indo-Pacific region, the Indo-Pacific concept has become strategic thinking that is highly valued by governments in Japan, India, the United States, ASEAN, South Korea, and Australia. Cooperation and strategic alliances between Japan and India in various aspects are expected to continue to deepen friendship based on complementarity and common interests.
參考文獻: 一、專書\nAbraham, Itty. “How India became territorial: foreign policy, diaspora, geopolitics”. Stanford: Stanford University Press, 2014.\nBaylis, John. “Contemporary strategy”. New York: Holmes & Meier, 1987.\nBhatia, Rajiv K. & Sakhuja, Vijay. “Indo-Pacific region: political and strategic prospects”. New Delhi: Vij Books India, 2014.\nBhatia, Rajiv K. & Sakhuja, Vijay. Indo Pacific Region: Political and Strategic Prospects. Delhi: Vij Books India Pvt Ltd, 2014.\nBolton, Kerry. “Geopolitics of the indo-pacific: emerging conflicts, new alliances”. London: Black House, 2013.\nDewan, Sandeep. “Perspectives of the Indo-Pacific Region: aspirations, challenges and strategy”. New Delhi: United Service Institution of India, 2014.\nFernando, Sithara. “United States-China-India: strategic triangle in the Indian Ocean Region”. New Delhi: KW Publishers, 2015.\nGanguly, Sumit. “India`s foreign policy: retrospect and prospect”. New Delhi: Oxford University Press, 2012.\nJain, Purnendra & Horimoto, Takenori. “Japan and the Indo-Pacific”, in Priya Chacko ed., New Regional Geopolitics in the Indo-Pacific: Drivers, Dynamics and Consequences. New York: Routledge, 2016.\nKhilnani Sunil. “Nonalignment 2.0: a foreign & strategic policy for India in the 21st century”. Haryana: Penguin Books, 2014.\nRozman, Gilbert. Togo, Kazuhiko and Ferguson, Joseph P. “Japanese strategic thought toward Asia”. New York: Palgrave Macmillan, 2007.\nScott, David. “Handbook of India`s international relations”. New York: Routledge, 2011.\nTellis, Ashley J., et al. Measuring National Power in the Postindustrial Age. Santa Monica CA: Rand Corporation, 2000.\n三菱総合硏究所著,《アジア新経済圏:ビジネスのキーポイントがズバリわかる!!インド篇》,東京:徳間書店,1997年。\n大衛‧哈維,《地理學中的解釋》,北京:商務印書館,1996年。\n小浜裕久,《ODAの経済学》,東京:日本評論社,1998年。\n方天賜等著,《南亞研究新視野:政治發展、國際關係、經濟社會》,臺北:五南圖書,2015年。\n比爾‧艾摩特(Bill Emmott)著;潘勛譯,《較勁:中國‧日本‧印度 三強鼎立的亞洲新紀元》,臺北:雅言文化,2009年。\n布里辛斯基著;林添貴譯,《大棋盤:全球戰略大思考》,臺北:立緒,1998年。\n弗格森(Niall Ferguson)等著;廖彥博譯,《中國將稱霸21世紀嗎?》,臺北:時報文化,2012年。\n田中明彥,《アジアのなかの日本》,東京:NTT出版,2007年。\n石之瑜,《社會科學方法新論》,臺北:五南圖書,2003 年。\n安倍晉三,《邁向美麗之國》,臺北:前衛出版社,2007年。\n朱浤源主編,《撰寫博碩士論文實戰手冊》,臺北:正中,1999年。\n朱雲鵬等著,《印度崛起》,臺北:高寶國際,2007年。\n西垣昭、下村恭民、辻一人,《開発援助の経済学─「共生の世界」と日本のODA》,東京:有斐閣,2010年。\n吳安家,《中共史學新探》,臺北:幼獅文化,1983 年。\n李文主编,《印度經濟數字地圖‧2011》,北京:科學出版社,2012年。\n李春益,「印度海軍戰略發展對亞太安全的影響」,國防大學八十六週年校慶基礎學術研討會論文集,桃園:國防大學,2011 年。\n李義虎,《地緣政治學:二分論及其超越》,北京:北京大學出版社,2007年。\n沈默,《現代地緣政治理論與實施》,臺北:三民書局,1987年。\n亞倫‧塞斯(Aaron Chaze)著;蕭美惠、林國賓譯,《印度:下一個經濟強權》,臺北:財訊出版,2007年。\n季辛吉著;林添貴、顧淑馨譯,《大外交》,臺北:智庫文化,1998年。\n拉斐奇‧多薩尼(Rafiq Dossani)著;張美霞、薛露然譯,《印度來了:經濟強國如何重新定義全球貿易》,北京:東方出版社,2009年。\n易君博,《政治學論文集》,臺北:臺灣省教育會,1980年。\n杭亭頓著;黃裕美譯,《文明衝突與世界秩序的重建》,臺北:聯經,1997。\n林承節,《印度史》,北京:人民出版社,2014年。\n林承節,《印度獨立後的政治經濟社會發展史》,北京:昆侖出版社,2003年。\n門倉貴史,《大図解インド経済の実力》,東京:日本経済新聞社,2006年。\n阿爾弗雷德‧塞耶‧馬漢,《海權論》,西安:陝西大學出版社,2007年。\n派克(Geoffrey Parker)著;劉從德譯,《地緣政治學:過去、現在和未來》,北京:新華出版社,2003年。\n馬加力,《關注印度:崛起中的大囯》,天津:天津人民出版,2002年。\n馬凱碩(Kishore Mahbubani)、孫合記,Jeffery Sng,《解讀東協》,臺北:遠流,2017年。\n堀本武功,《インド第三の大国へ-<戦略的自律>外交の追求》,東京:岩波書店,2015年。\n添谷芳秀,《日本の「ミドルパワー」外交:戦後日本の選択と構想》,東京:筑摩書房,2005年。\n添谷芳秀、田所昌幸編,《日本の東アジア構想》,東京:慶應義塾大学出版会,2004年。\n郭華倫,《中共問題論集》,臺北:政治大學國際關係研究中心,1976 年。\n野村總合硏究所著;黃瓊仙譯,《掌握亞洲大錢潮:前進大湄公河經濟圈戰略》,臺北:日月出版,2008年。\n陳牧民,《解讀印度:不確定的崛起強權》,臺北:五南,2016年。\n麥金德著;林爾蔚、陳江譯,《歷史的地理樞紐》,北京:商務印書館,2007年。\n斯皮克曼,《和平地理學》,北京:商務印書館,1965年。\n湯恩比著;陳曉林譯,《歷史研究》,臺北:遠流,1984年。\n黃文德主編,《研究方法與寫作參考指南》,新竹:玄奘大學,2008年。\n黃玉洤,《中國大陸的邊疆與安全:從陸權邁向海權的戰略選擇》,臺北:秀威資訊,2014年。\n黃俊傑,《大學之理念:傳統與現代》,臺北:國立臺灣大學出版中心,2015年。\n詹姆斯‧多爾蒂(James E. Dougherty)、小羅伯特‧普法爾茨格拉夫,Robert L. Pfaltzgraff Jr.,《爭論中的國際關係理論》,北京:世界知識出版社,1987年。\n雷嘉‧莫漢著;朱憲超、張玉梅譯,《翻攪乳海:中印海洋大戰略》,北京:中國民主法制出版社,2014年。\n劉從德,《地緣政治學—歷史、方法與世界格局》,武漢:華中師範大學出版社,1998年。\n劉雪蓮,《地緣政治學》,長春:吉林大學出版社,2002年。\n潘誠財,《小泉政府的外交政策》,臺北:五南,2017年。\n鄭瑞祥主编,《印度的崛起與中印關係》,北京:當代世界出版社, 2006年。\n鄭端耀等合著,《印度崛起》,臺北:政治大學國際關係研究中心, 2013年。\n蕭富元等著,《貧窮創新:印度改變世界》,臺北:天下雜誌,2008年。\n羅伯特‧卡普蘭著;吳兆禮、毛悅譯,《季風:印度洋與美國權力的未來》,北京:社會科學文獻出版社,2013年。\n羅伯特‧西格,《馬漢》,河北:解放軍出版社,1989年。\n顧長永、戴萬平、翁俊桔、蕭文軒,《亞太經貿市場:區域整合架構下的機遇與挑戰》,臺北:前程文化,2015年。\n\n二、期刊\nAbe, Nobuyasu. “Rebuilding the Nuclear Disarmament and Non-Proliferation Regime in the Post-US–India Deal World”, Asia-Pacific Review. Vol. 16, No. 1(2009), pp. 56-72.\nArase, David. “Japan, the Active State?: Security Policy after 9/11”, Asian Survey. Vol. 47, No. 4 (2007), pp. 560-583.\nAuslin, Michael. “The struggle for power in the Indo-Pacific”, Turkish Policy Quarterly. Vol.10, No. 3(2011), pp. 145-151.\nBerlin, Don. “The rise of India and the Indian Ocean,” Journal of the Indian Ocean Region. Vol. 7, No. 1(2011), p. 3.\nCarter, Ash. “The Rebalance and Asia-Pacific Security,” Foreign Affairs. Vol. 95, No. 6(2016), pp. 66-67.\nJoshi, Yogesh & Pant, Harsh V. “Indo-Japanese Strategic Partnership and Power Transition in Asia”, India Review. Vol. 14, No. 3(2015), pp.312-325.\nKhurana, Gurpreet S. “Security of Sea Lines: Prospects for India–Japan Cooperation”, Strategic Analysis. Vol. 31, No. 1(2007), pp.139-150.\nKotani, Tetsuo. “Lifeline at sea: Japan’s policy toward the Indian Ocean Region”, Journal of the Indian Ocean Region. Vol. 7, No. 2(2011), pp.220-234.\nMahbubani, Kishore. “An Asia-Pacific Consensus,” Foreign Affairs. Vol. 76, No. 5(1997), p. 149.\nMiyaoka, Isao. “Japan’s Dual Security Identity: A Non-combat Military Role as an Enabler of Coexistence”, International Studies. Vol. 48, No. 3&4(2011), pp.237–255.\nMochizuki, Mike M. “Japan`s shifting strategy toward the rise of China”, Journal of Strategic Studies. Vol. 30, No. 4-5(2007), pp. 739-776.\nMohan, C. Raja. “India and the Balance of Power”, Foreign Affairs. Vol. 85, No. 4(2006), pp. 17-32.\nNaidu, G. V. C. “Ballistic Missile Defence: Perspectives on India–Japan Cooperation”, Strategic Analysis. Vol. 31, No. 1(2007), pp.155-177.\nNaidu, G. V. C. “Whither the Look East Policy: India and Southeast Asia,” Strategic Analysis. Vol. 28, No. 2(2004), p. 337.\nPanda, Rajaram. “India–Japan Relations: Dawn of a New Relationship”, Indian Foreign Affairs Journal, Vol. 9, No. 2(2014), pp.178-188.\nScott, David. “India and the Allure of the ‘Indo-Pacific’”, International Studies. Vol. 49, No.3&4(2012), pp.1-24.\nScott, David. “The “Indo-Pacific”—New Regional Formulations and New Maritime Frameworks for US-India Strategic Convergence”, Asia-Pacific Review. Vol. 19, No.2(2012), pp.85-109.\nSikri, Rajiv. “India`s “Look East” Policy”, Asia-Pacific Review. Vol. 16, No. 1(2009), pp. 131-145.\nSingh, Sandeep. “From a Sub-Continental Power to an Asia-Pacific Player: India’s Changing Identity”, India Review. Vol. 13, No. 3(2014), pp.187-211.\nWu, Zhao-Li. “Indo-Pacific: Origin and Multinational Strategic Game-play”, Pacific Journal. No.111 (2014), p. 27.\nZimmerman, Erin. “Security cooperation in the Indo-Pacific: non-traditional security as a catalyst”, Journal of the Indian Ocean Region. Vol. 10, No. 2(2014), pp.150-165.\n文富德,〈印度經濟進入高速增長時期〉,《南亞研究季刊》,第2期(2007年),頁1-8。\n山崎恭平,「モディノミクスと日印経済関係拡大への期待」,国際貿易と投資季刊100期(2015年),頁71-91。\n文富德,「印度經濟進入高速增長時期」,南亞研究季刊2期(2007年),頁1-8。\n方天賜,「印度實施經濟改革以來的外交走向」,問題與研究40卷4期(2001年),頁81-96。\n方天賜,「印度對於中國大陸提出「一帶一路」的解讀及回應」,戰略安全研析31卷124期(2015年),頁44-50。\n王健民、吳光中,「淺談美國「重返亞太」對亞太地區及我國影響之研究」,黃埔學報71期(2016年),頁59-73。\n王簫軻,「安倍政權對外援助政策之重構」,全球政治評論5期(2017年),頁93-113。\n何思慎,「近期日印(度)關係發展及其對東亞戰略情勢之影響」,展望與探索12卷2期(2014年),頁17-23。\n何耀光,「從地緣理論看亞太戰略思想建構的歷史觀」,海軍學術双月刊44卷2期(2010年),頁11-36。\n李思嫺,「日印全球夥伴關係下的印太戰略思考」,歐亞研究4期(2018年),頁57-66。\n李瓊莉,「美國「重返亞洲」對區域主義之意涵」,全球政治評論第39期(2012年),頁87-103。\n初國華、張昌吉,「中國崛起之意涵及其區域政治效應」,全球政治評論30期(2010年),頁127-156。\n周茂林,「日印戰略關係再出發的意涵與啟示」,戰略安全研析14期(2006年),頁36-40。\n邱子軒,「中共和平發展戰略與和平崛起論之內涵比較」,國防雜誌21卷3期(2006年),頁95-105。\n邱奕宏,「歐巴馬主義與美國亞太政策」,APEC通訊200期(2016年),頁6-8。\n邵軒磊,「中國威脅論之解析-以日本相關研究文獻為例」,中國大陸研究55卷3期(2012年),頁85-105。\n金熙德,「日印安全宣言與價值觀外交」,當代世界12期(2008年),頁29-31。\n柯玉枝,「當前日本對外援助政策分析」,問題與研究40卷6期(2001年),頁31-52。\n洪銘德,「美國重返亞洲政策之研究」,全球政治評論51 期(2015年),頁147-165。\n員璇,「麥金德的地緣政治學」,世界博覽24期(2009年),頁81。\n孫相東,「地緣政治學論析」,理論學刊10期(2005年),頁29-30。\n高長、吳瑟致,「中國崛起對東亞區域主義的影響」,遠景基金會季刊10卷2期(2009年),頁1-48。\n高朗,「如何理解中國崛起?」,遠景基金會季刊7卷2期(2006年),頁53-94。\n張棋炘,「莫迪外交─從「東望」邁向「東進」」,國際與公共事務4期(2016年),頁67-102。\n曹金凱、陳出雲,地理的力量:地緣政治學,地圖1期(2008年),頁38-41。\n曹筱陽,「美國&quot;印太&quot;海上安全戰略部署及其影響」,現代國際關係8期(2014年),頁27-35。\n畢世鴻,「21世紀初日本的對印度戰略及其影響」,南亞研究3期(2012年),頁46-59。\n莫大華,「新古典地緣政治理論的再起:以中共「一帶一路」地緣政治經濟戰略布局為例」,國防雜誌31卷1期(2016年),頁1-20。\n郭育仁,「第二次安倍內閣之外交政策走向」,全球政治評論46期(2014年),頁43-64。\n郭武平、吳昆財、孫國祥、連錦水、蔡昌言,「中國和平崛起:國際社會之威脅或夥伴?」,歐洲國際評論2期(2006年),頁167-209。\n陳邦瑜、韋紅,「試論印太時代及中國的戰略應對」,印度洋經濟體研究2期(2015年),頁51-65。\n陳翔,「日印關係的發展現狀及前景探析」,國際研究參考10期(2015年),頁8-12。\n陳華昇,「印度「東進政策」及其對臺印關係之影響」,臺灣經濟研究月刊40卷2期(2017年),頁94-99。\n陸俊元,「從地緣政治看日本的安全戰略」,日本學刊3期(1995年),頁16-24。\n黃惠華,「美中戰略競爭與東協「印太展望」戰略意涵」,戰略安全研析157期(2019年),頁82-96。\n楊仕樂、朱永暉,「強權崛起:中國近二十五年綜合國力評估」,全球政治評論60期(2017年),頁51-73。\n楊武勳,「日本國際援助組織與運作現況」,淡江日本論叢26期(2012年),頁235-260。\n葉基仁,「川普全球戰略下的印度太平洋策略」,臺灣經濟研究月刊41卷1期(2018年),頁91-98。\n葛漢文,「印度的地緣政治思想」,世界經濟與政治論壇5期(2013年),頁19-36。\n熊琛然、武友德、趙俊巍、范毓婷,「印度領銜下的南亞地緣政治特點及其對中國的啟示」,世界地理研究25卷6期(2016年),頁38-47。\n趙青海,「“印太”概念及其對中国的含義」,現代國際關係7期(2013年),頁14-22。\n劉宗義,「沖突還是合作—&quot;印太&quot;地區的地緣政治和地緣經濟選擇」,印度洋經濟體研究4期(2014年),頁7-10。\n劉復國,「美印戰略關係的建構」,戰略安全研析11期(2006年),頁29-32。\n劉德海,「印度因應中國崛起與中國FTA策略的對策」,國際關係學報28期(2009年),頁191-208。\n蔡東杰,「日本援外政策發展:背景、沿革與演進」,全球政治評論32期(2010年),頁33-48。\n蔡東杰,「新世紀印度對大國之外交關係」,淡江國際與區域研究1卷1期(2012年),頁35-62。\n蔡憲昌,「從地緣戰略與國際局勢析論臺灣的戰略價值」,三民主義學報9期(1985年),頁335-356。\n鄧碧波、孫愛平,「馬漢海權論的形成及其影響」,軍事歷史6期(2008年),頁42-45。\n盧政鋒,「川普政府推動「一個自由與開放的印太」戰略之願景」,歐亞研究4期(2018年),頁35-46。\n蕭洋,「&quot;印-太戰略弧&quot;語境下澳大利亞安全空間的戰略重構」,江南社會學院學報15卷4期(2013年),頁16-20。\n謝奕旭,「21世紀美國東亞戰略的延續與變遷」,陸軍學術月刊12月號(2008年),頁6-22。\n\n三、各國政府官方資料\nAustralian Trade and Investment Commission, “ASEAN`S ECONOMIC GROWTH,” <https://www.austrade.gov.au/asean-now/why-asean-matters-to-australia/asean-economic-growth/#figure1content>.\nAustralian Trade and Investment Commission, “Australia’s trade and investment linked to Asia’s powerhouse economies,” <https://www.austrade.gov.au/news/economic-analysis/australia-s-trade-and-investment-linked-to-asia-s-powerhouse-economies>.\nDepartment of Commerce, Government of India, “Foreign Trade (ASEAN),” <http://commerce.gov.in/InnerContent.aspx?Id=74>.\nDepartment of Defence, Australian Government, “Defence White Paper 2013,” <http://www.defence.gov.au/whitepaper/2013/docs/WP_2013_we b.pdf>.\nMinistry of Economy, Trade and Industry(Government of Japan), “Japan and India Agree on Partnership in the Digital Industry,” <http://www.meti.go.jp/english/press/2018/1029_003.html>.\nMinistry of External Affairs, Government of India, “India - Japan Relations,” <https://www.mea.gov.in/Portal/ForeignRelation/14_Japan_N ov_2017.pdf>.\nMinistry of External Affairs, Government of India, “India-Japan Vision Statement,” <https://www.mea.gov.in/bilateral-documents.htm?dtl/30543 /IndiaJapan_Vision_Statement>.\nMinistry of External Affairs, Government of India, “Prime Minister’s Keynote Address at Shangri La Dialogue (June 01, 2018),” <https://www.mea.gov.in/Speeches-Statements.htm?dtl/29943/Prime+Mi nisters+Keynote+Address+at+Shangri+La+Dialogue+June+01+2018>.\nMinistry of Foreign Affairs, Government of Indonesia, “Introducing the Indo-Pacific Concept, Indonesia Set the Tone at the East Asia Summit,” <https://www.kemlu.go.id/en/berita/Pages/Introducing-the-Indo-Pacific-Concept,-Indonesia-Set-the-Tone-at-the-East-Asia-Summit.aspx>.\nU.S. Department of Defense, “The Quadrennial Defense Review Report 2010,” <http://www.defense.gov/qdr/qdr%20as%20of%2029jan10%201 600.PDF>.\nU.S. Department of State, “Joint Statement by President George W. Bush and Prime Minister Manmohan Singh,” <https://2001-2009.state.gov/p/sca/rls/pr/2005/49763.htm>.\nU.S. Navy, Marine Corps, and Coast Guard, “A Cooperative Strategy for 21st Century Seapower,” <https://www.navy.mil/local/maritime/150227-CS21R-Final.pdf>.\nU.S. White House, “The National Security Strategy of the United States of America 2010,” <http://nssarchive.us/NSSR/2010.pdf>.\nU.S. White House, “The National Security Strategy of the United States of America 2017,” <https://www.whitehouse.gov/wp-content/uploads/2017/12/NSS-Final-12-18-2017-0905.pdf>.\n中國國家外匯管理局,「外匯儲備數據」,<http://www.safe.gov.cn/wps/portal/sy/tjsj_lnwhcb>。\n中華人民共和國中央人民政府,「中共中央關於全面深化改革若干重大問題的決定」,<http://www.gov.cn/jrzg/2013-11/15/content_2528179.htm>。\n中華人民共和國外交部,「2015年12月14日外交部發言人洪磊主持例行記者會」,<https://www.fmprc.gov.cn/web/fyrbt_673021/t1324109.shtml>。\n中華人民共和國外交部,「核供应国集团」,<https://www.mfa.gov.cn/chn//pds/gjhdq/gjhdqzz/hgyjt/t410965.htm>。\n中華人民共和國國家發展和改革委員會,「推動共建絲綢之路經濟帶和21世紀海上絲綢之路的願景與行動」,<http://www.ndrc.gov.cn/gzdt/201503/t20150328_669091.html>。\n日本外務省,「「日印戦略的グローバル・パートナーシップ」に向けた共同声明」,<https://www.mofa.go.jp/mofaj/area/india/visit/0612_gps_ks.html>。\n日本外務省,「2014年版 政府開発援助(ODA)白書」,<https://www.mofa.go.jp/mofaj/gaiko/oda/shiryo/hakusyo/14_hakusho/honbun/b1/s1_1.html>。\n日本外務省,「2016年におけるDAC諸国の政府開発援助(ODA)実績(確定値)」,<https://www.mofa.go.jp/mofaj/gaiko/oda /about/yosan/page22_000871.html>。\n日本外務省,「Japan-India Vision Statement Fact Sheet」,<https://www.mofa.go.jp/files/000413509.pdf>。\n日本外務省,「アジア地域における対日世論調査」,<https://www.mofa.go.jp/mofaj/a_o/rp/page23_001789.html>。\n日本外務省,「アジア新時代における日印パートナーシップ~日印グローバル・パートナーシップの戦略的方向性~」,<https://w ww.mofa.go.jp/mofaj/kaidan/s_koi/asia_europe_05/india_partner.html>。\n日本外務省,「アジア新時代における日印パートナーシップ」,<http://www.mofa.go.jp/mofaj/kaidan/s_koi/asia_europe_05/india_partner.html>。\n日本外務省,「インド(India)基礎データ」,<https://www.mofa.go.jp/mofaj/area/india/data.html>。\n日本外務省,「一般会計ODA当初予算の推移(政府全体)」,<https://www.mofa.go.jp/mofaj/gaiko/oda/shiryo/yosan.html>。\n日本外務省,「日・インド包括的経済連携協定」,<https://www.mofa.go.jp/mofaj/gaiko/fta/j_india/jyobun.html>。\n日本外務省,「日・インド首脳会談(概要)」,<http://www.mofa.go.jp/mofaj/s_sa/sw/in/page3_000896.html>。\n日本外務省,「日・インド経済連携協定(交渉開始までの経緯)」,<https://www.mofa.go.jp/mofaj/gaiko/fta/j_india/j_india.html >。\n日本外務省,「日本国とインドとの間の安全保障協力に関する共同宣言」,<https://www.mofa.go.jp/mofaj/area/india/visit/0810_ahks.html>。\n日本外務省,「日印共同声明」,<https://www.mofa.go.jp/mofaj/files/000203259.pdf>。\n日本外務省,「日印共同研究会報告書」,<https://www.mofa.go.jp/mofaj/area/india/pdfs/jin_kenkyu.pdf>。\n日本外務省,「日印首脳会談」,<https://www.mofa.go.jp/mofaj/s_sa/sw/in/page3_001879.html>。\n日本外務省,「日印戦略的グローバル・パートナーシップの前進に関する共同声明」,<http://www.mofa.go.jp/mofaj/area/india/visit/0810_gpks.html>。\n日本外務省,「日本国とインドとの間の安全保障協力に関する共同宣言」,<http://www.mofa.go.jp/mofaj/area/india/visit/0810_ahks.html>。\n日本外務省,「日米安全保障協議委員会共同発表(2015.4.27)」,<http://www.mod.go.jp/j/approach/anpo/shishin/js20150427j.html>。\n日本外務省,「日米防衛協力のための指針(2015.4.27)」,<http:// www.mod.go.jp/j/approach/anpo/shishin/shishin_20150427j.html>。\n日本外務省,「日米防衛協力のための指針の見直しに関する中間報告」,<https://www.mofa.go.jp/mofaj/files/000055168.pdf>。\n日本外務省,「主要援助国のODA実績の推移(支出純額ベース)」,<https://www.mofa.go.jp/mofaj/gaiko/oda/shiryo/jisseki.html>。\n日本外務省,「平成30年度ODA一般会計予算(当初予算)」,<https://www.mofa.go.jp/mofaj/gaiko/oda/files/000325637.pdf>。\n日本外務省,「平成30年度開発協力重点方針(PDF)」,<https://www.mofa.go.jp/mofaj/gaiko/oda/files/000356010.pdf>。\n日本外務省,「安倍総理大臣のインド訪問」,<http://www.mofa.go.jp/mofaj/s_sa/sw/in/page3_001501.html>。\n日本外務省,「対インド国別援助方針」,<https://www.mofa.go.jp/mofaj/gaiko/oda/files/000189321.pdf>。\n日本外務省,「国別援助実績 1990年までの実績 インド」,<https://www.mofa.go.jp/mofaj/gaiko/oda/shiryo/jisseki/kuni/j_90sbefore/902-01.htm>。\n日本外務省,「政府開発援助(ODA)大綱」,<https://www.mofa.go.jp/mofaj/gaiko/oda/seisaku/taikou.html>。\n日本外務省,「政府開発援助(ODA)国別データ集2017」,<https: //www.mofa.go.jp/mofaj/gaiko/oda/press/shiryo/page1w_000024.html>。\n日本外務省,「政府開発援助国別データブック 2002年度版」,<https://www.mofa.go.jp/mofaj/gaiko/oda/shiryo/kuni/02_databook/index.html> 。\n日本外務省,「科学技術の分野における協力に関する日本国政府とインド政府との間の協定」,<https://www.mofa.go.jp/mofaj/files/000231325.pdf>。\n日本外務省,「第1回日印外務・防衛閣僚会合 共同声明」,<https://www.mofa.go.jp/mofaj/files/000544337.pdf>。\n日本外務省,「第9回日・インド科学技術協力合同委員会」,<https://www.mofa.go.jp/mofaj/s_sa/sw/in/page22_002764.html>。\n日本外務省外交防衛委員会調査室,「第2次安倍内閣の外交防衛政策」,<http://www.sangiin.go.jp/japanese/annai/chousa/rippou_chou sa/backnumber/2013pdf/20131001003.pdf>。\n日本防衛省,「平成19年版防衛白書」,<http://www.clearing.mod. go.jp/hakusho_data/2007/2007/index.html>。\n日本首相官邸,「日印共同宣言」,<https://www.kantei.go.jp/jp/koizumispeech/2001/1210india.html>。\n日本海上保安庁,「アロンドラ・レインボー号事件」,<https://ww w.kaiho.mlit.go.jp/info/books/report2007/yougo/pp005.html>。\n日本財務省,「外貨準備等の状況(平成28年3月末現在)」,<http://www.mof.go.jp/international_policy/reference/official_reserve_assets/2803.html>。\n日本経済産業省,「第9回日印エネルギー対話共同声明」,<http:// www.meti.go.jp/press/2018/05/20180507005/20180507005-6.pdf>。\n日本貿易振興機構,「2017年度 アジア・オセアニア進出日系企業実態調査(2017年12月)」,<https://www.jetro.go.jp/world/report s/2017/01/b817c68e8a26685b.html>。\n日本貿易振興機構,「投資先としてのインドの今」,<http://www.maff.go.jp/j/kokusai/kokkyo/food_value_chain/attach/pdf/0308haifu_gfvc-22.pdf>。\n在インド日本大使館,「インド進出日系企業リスト」,<https://ww w.in.emb-japan.go.jp/Japanese/Japanese_companies_2018.html>。\n首相官邸,「地球儀を俯瞰する外交」,<https://www.kantei.go.jp/jp/ feature/gaikou/index.html>。\n首相官邸,「安全保障の法的基盤の再構築に関する懇談会」,<https://www.kantei.go.jp/jp/singi/anzenhosyou2/>。\n香港貿易發展局,「一帶一路建設」,<http://china-trade-research.hktd c.com/business-news/article/%E4%B8%80%E5%B8%B6%E4%B8%80 %E8%B7%AF/%E4%B8%80%E5%B8%B6%E4%B8%80%E8%B7%AF-%E5%BB%BA%E8%A8%AD/obor/tc/1/1X000000/1X0A36B7.ht m>。\n經濟部臺商服務中心,「主要國家經濟成長率」,<http://twbusiness.nat.gov.tw/old/pdf/sec6.pdf>。\n駐印度台北經濟文化中心經濟組,「印日加強全球夥伴關係專報」,經貿透視雙周刊,<http://www.trademag.org.tw/page/newsid1/?id= 416488&iz=6>。\n駐胡志明市辦事處經濟組,「日本推動政府開發援助(ODA)政策及對越南之作法」,經濟部國際貿易局,<https://www.trade.gov.tw/ App_Ashx/File.ashx?FileID=C2E5F8A4DCC5A20B>。\n\n四、報章雜誌\nBBC News\nFinancial Times\nIndia Today\nNHK News\nThe American Interest\nThe Economic Times\nThe Diplomat Magazine\nThe Indian Express\n中央社\n中國時報\n日本経済新聞\n民報\n共同通信社\n自由時報\n亞洲時報\n信傳媒\n科技新報\n時事通信\n產經新聞\n朝日新聞\n新華社\n新頭殼\n讀賣新聞\n聯合報\n\n五、網路資料\nAPEC能源國際合作資訊網,「印度因應國際能源局勢變遷的國際合作」,<https://apecenergy.tier.org.tw/report/article25.php>。\nAsian Development Bank, “Asian Development Outlook 2019: Growth Outlook,” <https://www.adb.org/news/infographics/asian-development-outlook-2019-growth-outlook>.\nAsian Development Bank, “Booming South Asia Is Driving Economic Growth in Asia,” <https://www.adb.org/news/features/booming-south-asia-driving-economic-growth-asia>.\nBeginda Pakpahan, “Indonesia Must Lead in the Indo-Pacific Region,” Global Asia, <https://www.globalasia.org/v13no3/feature/indonesia-must-lead-in-the-indo-pacific-region_beginda-pakpahan>.\nCentre for Policy Research, “NonAlignment 2.0: A Foreign and Strategic Policy for India in the Twenty First Century,” <http://www.cprindia.org/research/reports/nonalignment-20-foreign-and-strategic-policy-india-twenty-first-century>.\nDhruva Jaishankar, “Why Hillary is a safe bet for India,” The Brookings, <https://www.brookings.edu/blog/order-from-chaos/2016/08/08/why-hillary-is-a-safe-bet-for-india/#cancel>.\nDipanjan Roy Chaudhury, “India, Japan come up with AAGC to counter China’s OBOR,” The Economic Times, <https://economictimes.indiatimes.com/news/economy/policy/india-japan-come-up-with-aagc-to-counter-chinas-obor/articleshow/58846673.cms>.\nDipanjan Roy Chaudhury, “PM Modi proposes Indo-Pacific Oceans Initiative,” The Economic Times, <https://economictimes.indiatimes.com/news/politics-and-nation/pm-modi-proposes-indo-pacific-a-initiative/articleshow/71915838.cms>.\nDivyansh Awasthi, “China’s Belt Road Initiative: A Win-Win From Afar,” Frontera, <https://frontera.net/news/chinas-belt-road-initiative-a-win-win-from-afar/>.\nDominic Wilson, Roopa Purushothaman, “DreamingWith BRICs: The Path to 2050,” Goldman Sachs, <http://www.goldmansachs.com/our-thinking/archive/brics-dream.html>.\nDominic Wilson, Roopa Purushothaman, “Global Economics Paper No: 99,” Goldman Sachs, <http://www.goldmansachs.com/our-thinking/archive/archive-pdfs/brics-dream.pdf>.\nErnest Z. Bower, “Can India Transition from Looking East to Acting East with ASEAN`s Help? Commemorating Two Decades of ASEAN-India Relations,” Center for Strategic and International Studies (CSIS), <https://www.csis.org/analysis/can-india-transition-looking-east-acting-east-aseans-help-commemorating-two-decades-asean>.\nFrank-Jurgen Richter, “The alternative to Chinese debt for Africa from Japan and India,” Nikkei Asain Review, <https://asia.nikkei.com/Opinion/The-alternative-to-Chinese-debt-for-Africa-from-Japan-and-India> .\nGeNet觀點,「生醫新視野 印度第一大藥廠是日印合婚」,<http://www.genetinfo.com/investment/featured/item/8512.html>。\nGo Yamada, “India considers partial opening of first high speed rail project,” Nikkei Asian Review, <https://asia.nikkei.com/Business/Business-Trends/India-considers-partial-opening-of-first-high-speed-rail-project>.\nGoldman Sachs, “White Paper June 2010,” <http://www.goldmansachs.com/gsam/docs/instgeneral/general_materials/whitepaper/india_revisited.pdf>.\nHenny Sender, “Fallout: SoftBank`s next big crisis may be brewing in India,” Nikkei Asian Review, <https://asia.nikkei.com/Spotlight/Cover-Story/Fallout-SoftBank-s-next-big-crisis-may-be-brewing-in-India>.\nHillary Clinton, “America’s Engagement in the Asia-Pacific Region,” U.S. Mission to ASEAN, <https://asean.usmission.gov/americas-engagement-in-the-asia-pacific-region/>.\nHillary Clinton, “America’s Pacific Century,” Foreign Policy, <https://foreignpolicy.com/2011/10/11/americas-pacific-century/>.\nInternational Monetary Fund, “DATA AND STATISTICS,” <http://www.imf.org/external/data.htm>.\nInternational Monetary Fund, “South Asia: Shifting Outlook Calls For Steadfast Reforms,” South Asia Regional Update, <https://www.imf.org/~/media/Files/Countries/ResRep/BGD/south-asia-regional-economic-update-august-2019.ashx>.\nInternational Monetary Fund, “World Economic Outlook Database April 2016 Edition,” <http://www.imf.org/external/pubs/ft/weo/2016/01/weodata/index.aspx>.\nJeffery Goldberg, “The Obama Doctrine,” The Atlantic, <https://www.theatlantic.com/magazine/archive/2016/04/the-obama-doctrine/471525/>.\nJim O’Neill, “Building Better Global Economic BRICs,” Goldman Sachs, <https://www.goldmansachs.com/insights/archive/archive-pdfs/build-better-brics.pdf>.\nJohn J. Hamre, “Defining Our Relationship with India for the Next Century: An Address by U.S. Secretary of State Rex Tillerson,” Center for Strategic and International Studies (CSIS), <https://www.csis.org/analysis/defining-our-relationship-india-next-century-address-us-secretary-state-rex-tillerson> .\nJoseph Yun, “The Rebalance to Asia: Why South Asia Matters (Part 1),” U.S. State Department, <https://2009-2017.state.gov/p/eap/rls/rm/2013/02/205208.htm>.\nJPMorgan Chase & Co., “ASEAN`S BRIGHT FUTURE: GROWTH OPPORTUNITIES FOR CORPORATES IN THE ASEAN REGION,” <https://www.jpmorgan.com/country/US/EN/cib/investment-banking/trade-asean-future>.\nKanti Bajpai, “Can ‘Make in India’ work? Why India is not going to be the next China – or anything like China ever,” The Times of India, <https://blogs.timesofindia.indiatimes.com/toi-edit-page/can-make-in-india-work-why-india-is-not-going-to-be-the-next-china-or-anything-like-china-ever/>.\nKeith Bradsher, “China’s Economic Growth Looks Strong. Maybe Too Strong,”The New York Times, <https://cn.nytimes.com/business/20180118/china-gdp-economy-growth/zh-hant/>.\nKeith Bradsher, “India’s Manufacturing Sector Courts the World, but Pitfalls Remain,” The New York Times, <https://cn.nytimes.com/business/20151015/c15makeindia/zh-hant/>.\nKoichi Hamada, “Japan 1968: A Reflection Point During the Era of the Economic Miracle,” Economic Growth Center, Yale University, <http://www.econ.yale.edu/growth_pdf/cdp764.pdf>.\nLisa Curtis, Walter Lohman, Lydia Powell, et al., “Shared Goals, Converging Interests: A Plan for U.S.-Australia-India Cooperation in the Indo-Pacific,” The Heritage Foundation, <http://www.heritage.org/asia/report/shared-goals-converging-interests-plan-us-australia-india-cooperation-the-indo-pacific>.\nMacmillan Dictionary, “Asia-Pacific (noun) definition and synonyms,” <http://www.macmillandictionary.com/dictionary/british/asia-pacific> .\nMark E. Manyin, et al., “Pivot to the Pacific? The Obama Administration`s ‘Rebalancing’ Toward Asia,” CRS Report for Congress, <http://www.fas.org/sgp/crs/natsec/R42448.pdf>.\nMarty Natalegawa, “An Indonesian Perspective on the Indo-Pacific,” Center for Strategic and International Studies (CSIS), <https://csisprod.s3.amazonaws.com/s3fspublic/legacy_files/files/attachments/130516_MartyNatalegawa_Speech.pdf>.\nMasa Wakita, “Maritime security issues in the region cannot be separated: Japan’s Vice Minister,” Observer Research Foundation, <http://www.orfonline.org/research/maritime-security-issues-in-the-region-cannot-be-separated-japans-vice-minister/>.\nNDTV, “PM Meets Japan`s Shinzo Abe, Regional Security On Agenda In Talks,” <https://www.ndtv.com/india-news/pm-modi-arrives-in-tokyo-to-a-warm-welcome-1938698>.\nNITI Aayog, “About Us - Overview,” <http://niti.gov.in/content/overview>.\nOECD, “Development aid stable in 2017 with more sent to poorest countries,” <http://www.oecd.org/newsroom/development-aid-stable-in-2017-with-more-sent-to-poorest-countries.htm>.\nOrganisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD), “OECD sees global growth slowing, as Europe weakens and risks persist,” <https://www.oecd.org/newsroom/oecd-sees-global-growth-slowing-as-europe-weakens-and-risks-persist.htm>.\nOxford Dictionaries. “Asia-Pacific - definition of Asia-Pacific in English,” <https://en.oxforddictionaries.com/definition/asia-pacific>.\nPriyanka Pani, “Japan overtakes China, US in investing in Indian start-ups,” The Hindu Business Line, <https://www.thehindubusinessline.com/news/japan-overtakes-china-us-in-investing-in-indian-start-ups/article24203723.ece>.\nRohan Choudhary, “The US, China, and power politics in the Indian Ocean,” The Telegraph, <https://www.telegraphindia.com/opinion/the-us-china-and-power-politics-in-the-indian-ocean/cid/1695895>.\nRory Medcalf, “Reimagining Asia: From Asia-Pacific to Indo-Pacific,” The Asan Forum, <http://www.theasanforum.org/reimagining-asia-from-asia-pacific-to-indo-pacific/>.\nRory Medcalf, “The Indo-Pacific: What`s in a Name?,” The American Interest, <https://www.the-american-interest.com/2013/10/10/the-indo-pacific-whats-in-a-name/>.\nRory Medcalf, ”Pivoting the Map: Australia’s Indo-Pacific System,” Lowy Institute, <http://www.Lowyinstitute.org/publications/pivoting-map-australias-indo-pacific-system>.\nRory Medcalf, Andrew Shearer, “Shared Goals, Converging Interests: A Plan for U.S.-Australia-India Cooperation in the Indo-Pacific,” Lowy Institute for International Policy, <http://www.lowyinstitute.org/files/pubfiles/Shared_goals%2C_converging_interests.pdf>.\nShinzo Abe, “Asia’s Democratic Security Diamond,” Project Syndicate, <https://www.project-syndicate.org/commentary/a-strategic-alliance-for-japan-and-india-by-shinzo-abe>.\nSteve Johnson, “The Brics are dead. Long live the Ticks,” Financial Times, <http://www.ft.com/intl/cms/s/2/b1756028-c355-11e5-808f-8231cd71622e.html>.\nSweta Kumari, “Indo- Pacific Oceans Initiative: India’s Outlook in the Region,” Kalinga Institute of Indo-Pacific Studies, <http://www.kiips.in/research/indo-pacific-oceans-initiative-indias-outlook-in-the-region/>.\nThe World Bank, “GDP (current US$),” <https://data.worldbank.org/indicator/NY.GDP.MKTP.CD?end=2018&locations=CN-FR-IN-US-JP-GB-DE&start=2000&view=chart>.\nThe World Bank, “GDP at market prices (current US$),” <http://data.worldbank.org/indicator/NY.GDP.MKTP.CD/countries/all>.\nThe World Bank, “GDP growth (annual %),” <https://data.worldbank.org/indicator/NY.GDP.DEFL.KD.ZG?end=2018&locations=CN-FR-IN-US-JP-GB-DE&start=2000&view=chart>.\nThe World Bank, “Global Economic Prospects: Slow Growth, Policy Challenges,” <http://www.worldbank.org/en/publication/global-economic-prospects>.\nThe World Bank, “Global Growth to Weaken to 2.6% in 2019, Substantial Risks Seen,” <https://www.shihang.org/zh/news/press-release/2019/06/04/global-growth-to-weaken-to-26-in-2019-substantial-risks-seen>.\nTitli Basu, “Thinking Africa: India, Japan, and the Asia-Africa Growth Corridor,” The Diplomat, <https://thediplomat.com/2017/06/thinking-africa-india-japan-and-the-asia-africa-growth-corridor/>.\nVikram Nehru, “Six Reasons for India to Look East,” Carnegie Endowment for International Peace, <http://carnegieendowment.org/2013/02/26/six-reasons-for-india-to-look-east-pub-51039>.\nVinayak HV, Fraser Thompson and Oliver Tonby, “Understanding ASEAN: Seven things you need to know,” McKinsey Insights, <https://www.mckinsey.com/industries/public-sector/our-insights/understanding-asean-seven-things-you-need-to-know>.\nVrishti Beniwal, “Backlash Against Chinese Products Ramps Up in India,” Bloomberg, <http://hk.bbwc.cn/xbizds.html>.\nWade Shepard, “As Japan Propels India Into The Age Of High-Speed Rail, China Is Left Behind,” Forbes, <https://www.forbes.com/sites/wadeshepard/2017/09/14/japan-propels-india-into-the-age-of-high-speed-rail-china-stands-by-watching/#127ea2261a9e>.\nビジネス+IT,「データで見る対インド投資 「高速鉄道」「日本式ものづくり学校」のその先へ」,<https://www.sbbit.jp/article/cont1/34642>。\nビジネス+IT,「日本の新幹線技術がインドの交通インフラに革命をもたらす」,<https://www.sbbit.jp/article/cont1/32830>。\nみずほ銀行直投資源部,「インド進出日系企業の動向と工業団地の現状について」,<http://jp.fujitsu.com/group/fri/downloads/events/other/20140203mizuho.pdf>。\nラジブ・ダス,「インド経済政策の担い手「計画委員会」」,一般財団法人海外投融資情報財団,<https://www.joi.or.jp/modules/downloads_open/index.php?page=visit&cid=17&lid=1411>。\n中央廣播電臺,「美印太報告多次稱「緊密結合」臺灣新南向政策 嚴厲批評中國干預」,<https://www.rti.org.tw/news/view/id/2040356>。\n亓樂義,「安倍「安保三箭」 箭箭瞄準中國」,風傳媒,<https://www.storm.mg/article/21691>。\n方天賜,「印度眼中的中國威脅論」,自由評論網,<https://talk.ltn.com.tw/article/breakingnews/2676748>。\n日本国際協力機構,「ODA見える化サイト」,<https://www.jica.go.jp/oda/index.html>。\n日本国際問題研究所,「インド太平洋時代の日本外交─スイング・ステーツへの対応」,<http://www2.jiia.or.jp/pdf/resarch/H25_Indo-Pacific/H25_Japanese_Diplomacy_in_the_Indo-Pacific_Age.php>。\n王星宇,「日本印太戰略構想的內涵與政策特徵」,臺灣中評網,<http://www.crntt.tw/doc/136_4711_105122862_1.html>。\n吳瑟致,「中國大陸經濟崛起的國際環境因素之研究-全球主義之觀點」,2005多元文化與族群融合學術研討會,<http://www2.nsysu.edu.tw/sis/discuss/1C-2.pdf>。\n対外関係タスクフォース,「21世紀日本外交の基本戦略-新たな時代、新たなビジョン、新たな外交」,首相官邸,<http://www.kantei.go.jp/jp/kakugikettei/2002/1128tf.html>。\n李京倫,「莫迪談中印:不讓歧異變爭議」,聯合報,<https://money.udn.com/money/story/5599/3741098>。\n李思嫺,「印度「戰略自主性」下的印美關係觀察:以2012年美國亞洲「再平衡」政策為例」,南亞觀察,<http://southasiawatch.tw/%E5%8D%B0%E5%BA%A6%E3%80%8C%E6%88%B0%E7%95%A5%E8%87%AA%E4%B8%BB%E6%80%A7%E3%80%8D%E4%B8%8B%E7%9A%84%E5%8D%B0%E7%BE%8E%E9%97%9C%E4%BF%82%E8%A7%80%E5%AF%9F%EF%BC%9A-%E4%BB%A5-2012-%E5%B9%B4%E7%BE%8E>。\n沈旭暉,「另起爐灶:印度版「一帶一路」?」,<http://www.ir-basilica.com/%E5%8F%A6%E8%B5%B7%E7%88%90%E7%81%B6%EF%BC%9A%E5%8D%B0%E5%BA%A6%E7%89%88%E3%80%8C%E4%B8%80%E5%B8%B6%E4%B8%80%E8%B7%AF%E3%80%8D%EF%BC%9F/>。\n林賢參,「區域安全新概念:「印度太平洋」與「中」印崛起」,清流月刊103年5月號,<http://www.mjib.gov.tw/mojnbi.php?pg=d2%2F10305%2F1-1.htm>。\n林讓均,「24個科技產業聚落 力拚印度經濟兩位數成長」,遠見雜誌,<https://www.gvm.com.tw/article.html?id=44836>。\n徐子軒,「濕婆神的核武:美中角力下印度的核子之路」,UDN轉角國際,<https://global.udn.com/global_vision/story/8663/1896197>。\n徐遵慈,「從「重返亞洲」到「印太戰略」─美國對東南亞政策的轉變與最新發展」,中華經濟研究院,<http://web.wtocenter.org.tw/Mobile/page.aspx?pid=312621&nid=126>。\n國家實驗研究院科技政策研究與資訊中心,「從「Make In India」來看印度政府產經政策」,<http://iknow.stpi.narl.org.tw/post/Read.aspx?PostID=12405>。\n張子清,「莫迪安倍推動印度太平洋戰略 對抗中國」,中央廣播電臺,<https://www.rti.org.tw/news/view/id/368918>。\n張沛元,「對抗中國 小泉亞歐之旅出發」,自由時報,<http://news.ltn.com.tw/news/world/paper/15066>。\n張國威,「新美日防衛指針 強化釣島防禦」,中時電子報,<https://www.chinatimes.com/newspapers/20150426000680-260301>。\n張棋炘,「From Look East to Ac East 莫迪外交-從「東望」邁向「東進」」,南亞觀察,<https://southasiawatch.tw/from-look-east-to-ac-east-%E8%8E%AB%E8%BF%AA%E5%A4%96%E4%BA%A4%EF%BC%8D%E5%BE%9E%E3%80%8C%E6%9D%B1%E6%9C%9B%E3%80%8D%E9%82%81%E5%90%91%E3%80%8C%E6%9D%B1%E9%80%B2%E3%80%8D/%E3%80%82>。\n麻生太郎,「「自由と繁栄の弧」をつくる」,外務省,<https://www.mofa.go.jp/mofaj/press/enzetsu/18/easo_1130.html>。\n辜樹仁,「中國、印度 決戰印度洋」,天下雜誌442期,<https://www.cw.com.tw/article/article.action?id=5000585>。\n黑沼勇史,「印度成為各國核電爭奪主戰場」,日經中文網,<https://zh.cn.nikkei.com/industry/ienvironment/20006-20160613.html>。\n新唐人電視臺,「日ODA轉投印度聯手堵中共 黨媒仍唱「中日共榮」」,<http://ca.ntdtv.com/xtr/b5/2018/10/30/a1397361.html>。\n鈴木美勝,「安倍戰略外交的「三支箭」」,Nippon.com,<https://www.nippon.com/hk/genre/politics/l00041/>。\n鈴木通彦,「「インドは米国と同盟を結ばない」東南アジア諸国や日本を介し米国と接近」,三井物産戦略研究所,<https://www.mitsui.com/mgssi/ja/report/detail/1221260_10674.html>。\n寧勝男,「莫迪政府“印度製造”:效果評析與前景展望」,中國國際問題研究院,<http://www.ciis.org.cn/chinese/2017-07/07/content_9554166.htm>。\n臺灣東南亞國家協會研究中心,「東協發展簡介」,<http://www.aseancenter.org.tw/ASEANintro.aspx>。\n臺灣環境資訊中心,「印度最大核電廠開始運轉供電」,<https://e-info.org.tw/node/87303>。\n遠景基金會,「「美日澳印『民主鑽石』合作機制之展望」座談報告」,<http://www.pf.org.tw/article-pfch-2044-6139>。\n蔡裕明,「來自海上之威脅:印度海上安全挑戰與政策」,第八屆「恐怖主義與國家安全」學術研討會,<http://trc.cpu.edu.tw/ezfiles/93/1093/img/644/626229970.pdf>。\n賴怡忠,「美日印軍演-安倍新外交戰略的初步實踐」,中華民國大陸委員會,<http://www.mac.gov.tw/public/Attachment/05281358846.pdf>。
描述: 碩士
國立政治大學
外交學系戰略與國際事務碩士在職專班
103922012
資料來源: http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#G0103922012
資料類型: thesis
Appears in Collections:學位論文

Files in This Item:
File SizeFormat
201201.pdf3.66 MBAdobe PDF2View/Open
Show full item record

Google ScholarTM

Check

Altmetric

Altmetric


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.