馬英九與蔡英文兩岸政策比較「九二共識爭辯」研究

Abstract

兩岸談判與協商過程總是糾纏於「一中爭議」，而這又與「九二共識」有密切關聯。雖然2008年，馬英九政府上台後，兩岸關係與互信已有緩和與提升，但有關一中爭議與九二共識仍是兩岸領導人所欲擱置或仍在摸索當中，然而蔡英文總統執政之後的「九二精神」，被中國大陸官方認為是「未完成的答案卷」，至今仍然持續降低對中國的依賴。\n九二共識在兩岸三個政黨（共產黨、國民黨、民進黨）之間是最爭議性與各說各話的核心議題，也是兩岸衝突或和平發展的關鍵。九二共識不但是兩岸自九○年代以來，數年談判協商與互動的默契與基礎，使九二共識由兩岸交流的政治基礎擴展成國際共識。\n從反服貿到九合一大選至即將到來的2020總統大選，中國大陸在十九大習近平定調，對臺灣要體現、堅持「一個中國」與「九二共識」，推動兩岸關係和平交流發展，深化兩岸經濟合作和文化往來，推動兩岸人民共同反對一切分裂國家之活動，共同為「體現中華民族偉大復興」而奮鬥。證明「九二共識」會持續的扮演深化兩岸交流的平台。

SummaryThe cross-strait negotiation and negotiation process is always entangled in the "one China dispute", and this is closely related to the "92 consensus". Although Ma Ying-jeou ’s government came to power in 2008, cross-strait relations and mutual trust have eased and improved. However, the disputes over China and the 1992 consensus are still shelved or still being explored by cross-strait leaders. However, after President Tsai Ing-wen ’s " The "Spirit of 1992" is regarded by Chinese mainland officials as an "unfinished answer book." It has continued to reduce its dependence on China.\nThe 1992 consensus is the most controversial and talkable core issue among the three political parties (the Communist Party, the Kuomintang, and the Democratic Progressive Party) on both sides of the strait, and it is also the key to cross-strait conflict or peaceful development. The 1992 consensus is not only the tacit understanding and basis of cross-strait negotiations and interaction since the 1990s, which has expanded the 1992 consensus from the political basis of cross-strait exchanges to an international consensus.\nFrom the anti-service trade to the 9th National Assembly election to the upcoming 2020 presidential election, Xi Jinping of the 19th National Congress of the Chinese Communist Party has set a tone for Taiwan. It is necessary to reflect on Taiwan and adhere to the "One China" and "1992 Consensus" to promote the peaceful exchange and development of cross-strait relations To deepen cross-strait economic cooperation and cultural exchanges, push people on both sides of the strait to oppose all activities that split the country, and work together to "represent the great rejuvenation of the Chinese nation." It proves that the "1992 Consensus" will continue to serve as a platform for deepening cross-strait exchanges.