Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://ah.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/128970
題名: 博士生學習經驗與就業規劃之研究:以一所研究型大學為例
A Study on Doctoral Students’ Learning Experiences and Career Planning:A Case Study of a Research University
作者: 趙靜婷
Jhao, Jing-Ting
貢獻者: 陳榮政
趙靜婷
Jhao, Jing-Ting
關鍵詞: 博士生就業規劃
博士生學習經驗
博士教育
Doctoral student career planning
Doctoral student learning experience
Doctoral education
日期: 2020
上傳時間: 2-Mar-2020
摘要: 本研究以一所研究型大學為例,探討博士生學習經驗與就業規劃之現況、差異以及博士生學習經驗對就業規劃的預測因素。研究使用之調查工具為「亞洲旗艦大學博士生比較研究(Comparative Study of Doctoral Students in Asian Flagship Universities)」臺灣研究團隊翻譯之問卷,有效樣本426份,以描述統計、卡方檢定、獨立樣本t檢定、單因子變異數分析、羅吉斯迴歸進行分析與探討,獲致結論:\n一、博士生整體學習經驗現況極佳,攻讀博士學位期間在文化氛圍、指導關係、能力訓練、課程規劃、支持系統層面均感受中高程度正向學習品質,而同儕互動及壓力情形之感受為中低程度。\n二、博士生就業規劃現況以非學術工作意向多於學術工作意向。\n三、指導教授的指導頻率影響博士生整體學習經驗,頻繁的指導對於博士生在指導關係、課程規劃、支持系統、文化氛圍、能力訓練的感受均有正面幫助。\n四、不同專業學科領域在博士生就業規劃意向上具有顯著差異,STEM領域博士生就業規劃意向傾向非學術工作,非STEM領域博士生就業規劃意向傾向學術工作。\n五、就業規劃意向為學術工作之博士生在學習經驗中的指導關係感受高於就業規劃意向為非學術工作之博士生。\n六、STEM與非STEM之專業領域以及學習經驗中的指導關係,對於博士生從事學術工作之就業規劃具有顯著預測力。\n根據以上研究結論,提出建議,供高等教育機構及教育工作者未來研究參考。
This study takes a research university as an example to explore the current situation and differences of doctoral students’ learning experiences and career planning, as well as the predictive factors of doctoral students’ learning experiences in career planning. The survey tool of this study is the questionnaire translated by a Taiwanese research team, namely “Comparative Study of Doctoral Students in Asian Flagship Universities”. A total of 426 valid samples were analyzed and discussed by descriptive statistics, chi-squared test, independent sample t-test, one-way analysis of variance (one-way ANOVA), and logistic regression. Conclusions are summarized as follows:\n1.The overall learning experiences of doctoral students is very good. Doctoral students experience a medium-to-high level of positive learning quality in terms of cultural atmosphere, advisor-student relationship, ability training, curriculum planning, and support system during their doctoral studies, whereas the peer interaction and stress level are at a moderate and low degree.\n2.Currently, in terms of career planning, the majority of doctoral students have a higher interest in non-academic career than in academic career.\n3.The frequency of the advisor’s guidance affects the overall learning experiences of doctoral students. Frequent guidance provides positive assistance to doctoral students in terms of advisor-student relationship, curriculum planning, support system, cultural atmosphere, and ability training.\n4.There are significant differences in career planning among doctoral students from different discipline areas: STEM doctoral students prefer non-academic career, while non-STEM doctoral students prefer academic career.\n5.Doctoral students planning to pursue academic career have greater advisor-student relationship experience than doctoral students planning to pursue non-academic career.\n6.STEM and non-STEM discipline areas, as well as the advisor-student relationship in the learning experiences, show significant predictability for the career planning of doctoral students planning to pursue academic career.\nBased on the above research conclusions, suggestions are made for future research reference for higher education institutions and educators.
參考文獻: 參考文獻\n壹、中文參考文獻\n全國法規資料庫(2013)。大學法。取自https://law.moj.gov.tw/LawClass/LawAll.aspx?pcode=H0030001\n全國法規資料庫(2017)。外國專業人才延攬及僱用法。取自https://law.moj.gov.tw/LawClass/LawAll.aspx?pcode=A0030295\n全國法規資料庫(2018)。學位授予法。取自https://law.moj.gov.tw/LawClass/LawAll.aspx?pcode=H0030010\n科技部(2019a)。科技部補助大學校院培育優秀博士生獎學金試辦方案。取自https://www.most.gov.tw/most/attachments/ab9b0faf-1cd7-4cd7-aae5-239aa2758d93\n科技部(2019b)。科技部108年度補助博士卓越提升試辦方案。取自https://www.most.gov.tw/most/attachments/2121900f-59f0-4ec4-8913-e6444d2b3284\n科技部(2019c)。科技部補助重點產業高階人才培訓與就業計畫作業要點。取自https://law.most.gov.tw/NewsContent.aspx?id=10903\n科技部(2019d)。博士創新之星計畫。取自https://leap.stpi.narl.org.tw/index\n科技部(2019e)。年輕學者養成計畫。取自http://ysgrant.stpi.narl.org.tw/\n徐一萍、廖珮珳、鄭淑美、張玄熹(2016)。2015年NPHRST博士就業知覺調查分析報告,取自https://hrst.stpi.narl.org.tw/report/31/2015+NPHRST+PhD+Survey%20(53).htm\n徐遵慈、李明勳(2018)。我國新南向政策的執行成果與未來展望。經濟前瞻,(176),9-18。\n財團法人國家實驗研究院科技政策研究與資訊中心(2015)。2014年NPHRST博士就業調查(D00120)【原始數據】。取自中央研究院人文社會科學研究中心調查研究專題中心學術調查研究資料庫。doi:10.6141/TW-SRDA-D00120-1\n財團法人國家實驗研究院科技政策研究與資訊中心(2015)。2014年NPHRST博士就業調查問卷分析報告。取自https://hrst.stpi.narl.org.tw/report/27/2014_NPHRST_employment_report.pdf.htm\n財團法人國家實驗研究院科技政策研究與資訊中心(2016)。2015年NPHRST博士就業知覺調查分析報告(D00123)【原始數據】。取自中央研究院人文社會科學研究中心調查研究專題中心學術調查研究資料庫。doi:10.6141/TW-SRDA-D00123-1\n財團法人國家實驗研究院科技政策研究與資訊中心(2017)。2016年NPHRST博士流動意向調查(D00129)【原始數據】。取自中央研究院人文社會科學研究中心調查研究專題中心學術調查研究資料庫。doi:10.6141/TW-SRDA-D00129-1\n財團法人國家實驗研究院科技政策研究與資訊中心(2019)。2018年NPHRST 博士求學動機與學位效益調查(D00169)【原始數據】。取自中央研究院人文社會科學研究中心調查研究專題中心學術調查研究資料庫。doi:10.6141/TW-SRDA-D00169-1\n高教技職簡訊(2014年12月10日)。臺北市:教育部高等教育司。取自http://www.news.high.edu.tw/edm/review.php\n張芳全(2017)高等教育:理論與實證 (初版)。臺北市:高等教育\n教育部(2018)。教育部補助大專校院實施特殊優秀人才彈性薪資作業要點。取自https://edu.law.moe.gov.tw/LawContent.aspx?id=GL001827#lawmenu\n教育部部史全球資訊網(2019)。教育大事年表。取自http://history.moe.gov.tw/milestone.asp?YearStart=81&YearEnd=90&page=17\n教育部統計處(2019)。各級學校基本資料。取自https://depart.moe.edu.tw/ED4500/News_Content.aspx?n=5A930C32CC6C3818&sms=91B3AAE8C6388B96&s=9D1CE6578E3592D7\n勞動部(2016)。勞動統計專網-薪資行情及大專生就業導航。取自https://www.mol.gov.tw/statistics/\n勞動部勞動力發展署(2018)。外國專業人才延攬及僱用。取自https://ezworktaiwan.wda.gov.tw/Content_List.aspx?n=C2FA9FA45D75B2DC\n彭明輝(2017)研究生完全求生手冊 :方法、秘訣、潛規則 / 彭明輝著(初版)臺北市:聯經\n廖珮珳、鄭淑美、徐一萍(2019)。2018年NPHRST博士求學動機與學位效益調查報告。取自https://hrst.stpi.narl.org.tw/report/243/2018年NPHRST%20Report_20190415.htm\n廖珮珳、鄭淑美、張玄熹、徐一萍(2017)。2016年NPHRST博士流動意向調查分析報告。取自https://hrst.stpi.narl.org.tw/report/32/NPHRST_2016%20(7).htm\n蘇容梅(2015)。學術卓越背景下博士生學習經驗之研究:學術代工的觀點。國立臺南大學教育學系教育經營與管理碩博士班博士論文,臺南市。 取自https://hdl.handle.net/11296/5g9c84\n貳、英文參考文獻\nArimoto, A. (2018). Doctoral education in Japan: Historical development and challenges. In J. C. Shin, B. M. Kehm & G. A. Jones (Eds.), Doctoral education for the knowledge society: Convergence or divergence in national approaches? (pp. 167-181). Gewerbestraees, Switzerland: Springer.\nAuriol, L., Misu, M., & Freeman, R. A. (2013). Careers of doctorate holders: Analysis of labour market and mobility indicators. St. Louis: Federal Reserve Bank of St Louis. Retrieved from https://search.proquest.com/docview/1698886866?accountid=14229\nCambridge dictionary. (2019). Retrieved from https://dictionary.cambridge.org/zht/%E8%A9%9E%E5%85%B8/%E8%8B%B1%E8%AA%9E/stem\nCassuto, L. (2015). The graduate school mess: What caused it and how we can fix it. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.\nCastelló, M., Pardo, M., Sala-Bubaré, A., & Suñe-Soler, N. (2017). Why do students consider dropping out of doctoral degrees? Institutional and personal factors. Higher Education, 74(6), 1053–1068. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10734-016-0106-9\nChen, R. J. (2018). Doctoral education in Taiwan: Balancing market demands and supply. In J. C. Shin, B. M. Kehm & G. A. Jones (Eds.), Doctoral education for the knowledge society: Convergence or divergence in national approaches? (pp. 223–236). Gewerbestraees, Switzerland: Springer.\nChen, R. J., Ho, S. S., & Hsu, Y. H. (2019). The Relationships among Socialization, Professional Training and Perspectives on Job Market: Evidence from Taiwan Doctoral Students Survey. International Journal of Chinese Education, 8(2), 134-159.\nCurtin, N., Malley, J., & Stewart, A. (2016). Mentoring the Next Generation of Faculty: Supporting Academic Career Aspirations among Doctoral Students. Research in Higher Education, 57(6), 714–738. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11162-015-9403-x\nDericks, G., Thompson, E., Roberts, M., & Phua, F. (2019). Determinants of PhD student satisfaction: the roles of supervisor, department, and peer qualities. Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education., 44(7), 1053–1068. https://doi.org/10.1080/02602938.2019.1570484\nDuke, D., & Denicolo, P. (2017). What supervisors and universities can do to enhance doctoral student experience (and how they can help themselves). FEMS Microbiology Letters, 364(9), https://doi.org/10.1093/femsle/fnx090\nEtmanski, B. (2019). The prospective shift away from academic career aspirations. Higher Education, 77(2), 343–358. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10734-018-0278-6\nEUA Council for Doctoral Education (2019). Retrieved from https://eua-cde.org/who-we-are.html\nGe, Y., & Ho, K. (2018). The cultivation of research labor in Pacific Asia with special reference to Singapore. Asia Pacific Education Review, 19(2), 199–210. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12564-018-9531-z\nGerman, K. T., Sweeny, K., & Robbins, M. L. (2019). Investigating the role of the faculty advisor in doctoral students’ career trajectories. Professional Development in Education, 45(5), 762-773.\nGibbs, K., & Griffin, K. (2013). What Do I Want to Be with My PhD? The Roles of Personal Values and Structural Dynamics in Shaping the Career Interests of Recent Biomedical Science PhD Graduates. CBE - Life Sciences Education, 12(4), 1102–1118. https://doi.org/10.1187/cbe.13-02-0021\nGruzdev, I., Terentev, E., & Dzhafarova, Z. (2019). Superhero or hands-off supervisor? An empirical categorization of PhD supervision styles and student satisfaction in Russian universities. Higher Education, 1–17. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10734-019-00437-w\nGube, J., Getenet, S., Satariyan, A., & Muhammad, Y. (2017). Towards “operating within” the field: Doctoral students’ views of supervisors’ discipline expertise. International Journal of Doctoral Studies, 12, 1-16. Retrieved from http://www.informingscience.org/Publications/3641\nGuo, F., Kang, N., & Shi, J. (2018). Preparation for the scholar’s role: first-year doctoral students in Tsinghua University. Asia Pacific Education Review, 19(2), 169–185. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12564-018-9529-6\nHasgall, A., Saenen, B., Borrell - Damian, L., Van Deynze, F., Seeber, M., & Huisman, J. (2019). Doctoral education in Europe today: approaches and institutional structures. Retrieved from https://biblio.ugent.be/publication/8623363\nHorta, H. (2018). PhD students’ self-perception of skills and career plans while in doctoral programs: are they associated? Asia Pacific Education Review, 19(2), 211–228. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12564-018-9532-y.\nHorta, H., Cattaneo, M., & Meoli, M. (2019). The impact of Ph.D. funding on time to Ph.D. completion. Research Evaluation, 28(2), 182–195. https://doi.org/10.1093/reseval/rvz002\nHuang, F. (2018). Changes and Challenges to Chinese Doctoral Education. In J. C. Shin, B. M. Kehm & G. A. Jones (Eds.), Doctoral education for the knowledge society: Convergence or divergence in national approaches? (pp. 203-222). Gewerbestraees, Switzerland: Springer.\nJones, M. (2013). Issues in Doctoral Studies - Forty Years of Journal Discussion: Where have we been and where are we going? In E. Cohen & E. Boyd (Eds.), Proceedings of Proceedings of the Informing Science and Information Technology Education Conference 2013 (pp. 83-104). Informing Science Institute. Retrieved December 7, 2019 from https://www.learntechlib.org/p/114657/\nJung, J. (2018). Learning experience and perceived competencies of doctoral students in Hong Kong. Asia Pacific Education Review, 19(2), 187–198. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12564-018-9530-0\nKim, E., Benson, S., & Alhaddab, T. (2018). A career in academia? Determinants of academic career aspirations among PhD students in one research university in the US. Asia Pacific Education Review, 19(2), 273–283. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12564-018-9537-6\nLee, H., Miozzo, M., & Laredo, P. (2010). Career patterns and competences of PhDs in science and engineering in the knowledge economy: The case of graduates from a UK research-based university. Research Policy, 39(7), 869–881. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2010.05.001\nLim, H. (2018). STEM doctoral students’ research stress: Causes and coping mechanism. A case based on Seoul National University. Doctoral dissertation. Seoul National University.\nLim, H., & Shin, J. C. (2018). Doctoral Education in South Korea: On the Way Toward Becoming an Independent Research Hub. In J. C. Shin, B. M. Kehm & G. A. Jones (Eds.), Doctoral education for the knowledge society: Convergence or divergence in national approaches? (pp. 183-202). Gewerbestraees, Switzerland: Springer.\nNeumann, R., & Tan, K. (2011). From PhD to initial employment: the doctorate in a knowledge economy. Studies in Higher Education, 36(5), 601–614. https://doi.org/10.1080/03075079.2011.594596\nNisticò, R. (2018). The Effect of PhD Funding on Postdegree Research Career and Publication Productivity. Oxford Bulletin of Economics and Statistics, 80(5), 931–950. https://doi.org/10.1111/obes.12232\nOECD (2012). Transferable Skills Training for Researchers: Supporting Career Development and Research, OECD Publishing. http://dx.doi.org/10.1787/9789264179721-en\nO`Meara, K., Griffin, K. A., Kuvaeva, A., Nyunt, G., & Robinson, T. N. (2017). Sense of belonging and its contributing factors in graduate education. International Journal of Doctoral Studies, 12, 251-279.\nPassaretta, G., Trivellato, P., & Triventi, M. (2019). Between academia and labour market—the occupational outcomes of PhD graduates in a period of academic reforms and economic crisis. Higher Education, 77(3), 541–559. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10734-018-0288-4\nPritchard, J., MacKenzie, J., & Cusack, M. (2010). The response of Physical Science post-graduates to training courses and the connection to their PhD studies.\nQuacquarelli Symonds. (2019). QS World University Rankings: Methodology. Retrieved from https://www.topuniversities.com/university-rankings/world-university-rankings/2020\nRoach, M., & Sauermann, H. (2010). A taste for science? PhD scientists’ academic orientation and self-selection into research careers in industry. Research Policy, 39(3), 422–434. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2010.01.004\nSánchez-Sánchez, N., & McGuinness, S. (2015). Decomposing the impacts of overeducation and overskilling on earnings and job satisfaction: an analysis using REFLEX data. Education Economics, 23(4), 419–432.\nSauermann, H., & Roach, M. (2012). Science PhD career preferences: Levels, changes, and advisor encouragement. PLoS ONE, 7(5), e36307. http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0036307\nShibayama, S., & Kobayashi, Y. (2017). Impact of Ph.D. training: a comprehensive analysis based on a Japanese national doctoral survey. Scientometrics, 113(1), 387–415. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-017-2479-7\nShin, J., Kim, S., Kim, E., & Lim, H. (2018). Doctoral students’ satisfaction in a research-focused Korean university: socio-environmental and motivational factors. Asia Pacific Education Review, 19(2), 159–168. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12564-018-9528-7\nShin, J., Postiglione, G., & Ho, K. (2018). Challenges for doctoral education in East Asia: a global and comparative perspective. Asia Pacific Education Review, 19(2), 141–155. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12564-018-9527-8\nShin, J. C., Kehm, B. M., & Jones, G. A. (2018). The Increasing Importance, Growth, and Evolution of Doctoral Education. In Doctoral Education for the Knowledge Society (pp. 1-10). Springer, Cham.\nStephan, P. E. (2012). How economics shapes science. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.\nSuleman, F. (2018). The employability skills of higher education graduates: insights into conceptual frameworks and methodological options. Higher Education, 76(2), 263–278. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10734-017-0207-0\nTeichler, U. (2009). Higher education and the world of work : conceptual frameworks, comparative perspectives, empirical findings / by Ulrich Teichler. Rotterdam: Sense Publishers.\nTrow, M. (1973). Problems in the Transition from Elite to Mass Higher Education. Carnegie Commission on Higher Education.\nVan Rooij, E., Fokkens-Bruinsma, M., & Jansen, E. (2019). Factors that influence PhD candidates’ success: the importance of PhD project characteristics. Studies in Continuing Education, 1-20. DOI: 10.1080/0158037X.2019.1652158\nWaaijer, C. J. (2013). Careers in science: Policy issues according to Nature and Science editorials. Scientometrics, 96(2), 485-495. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-013-0958-z\nWaaijer, C. J. (2017). Perceived career prospects and their influence on the sector of employment of recent PhD graduates. Science and Public Policy, 44(1), 1-12. https://doi.org/10.1093/scipol/scw007\nWeber, C. T., Borit, M., Canolle, F., Hnatkova, E., O`Neill, G., Pacitti, D., & Parada, F. (2018). Identifying Transferable Skills and Competences to Enhance Early Career Researchers Employability and Competitiveness.\nWeisbuch, R., & Cassuto, L. (2016). Reforming doctoral education, 1990 to 2015: Recent initiatives and future prospects. Andrew W. Mellon Foundation, 2. Retrieved from https://mellon.org/media/filer_public/35/32/3532f16c-20c4-4213-805d-356f85251a98/report-on-doctoral-education-reform_june-2016.pdf\nWenqin, S., Yao, G., Bin, Z., & Jin, J. (2018). Academia or enterprises: gender, research outputs, and employment among PhD graduates in China. Asia Pacific Education Review, 19(2), 285–296. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12564-018-9538-5\nZhao, C., Golde, C., & McCormick, A. (2007). More than a signature: how advisor choice and advisor behaviour affect doctoral student satisfaction. Journal of Further and Higher Education., 31(3), 263–281. https://doi.org/10.1080/03098770701424983\nZhou, E., & Okahana, H. (2019). The Role of Department Supports on Doctoral Completion and Time-to-Degree. Journal of College Student Retention: Research, Theory & Practice, 20(4), 511–529. https://doi.org/10.1177/1521025116682036
描述: 碩士
國立政治大學
學校行政碩士在職專班
105911016
資料來源: http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#G0105911016
資料類型: thesis
Appears in Collections:學位論文

Files in This Item:
File SizeFormat
101601.pdf3.45 MBAdobe PDF2View/Open
Show full item record

Google ScholarTM

Check

Altmetric

Altmetric


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.