Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://ah.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/129007
題名: 影劇新聞中的三十多歲女性形象再現:2001-2019
Representation of female celebrities in their 30s in Taiwanese tabloids from 2001 to 2019
作者: 李令涵
Li, Ling-Han
貢獻者: 王淑美
Wang, Shu-Mei
李令涵
Li, Ling-Han
關鍵詞: 影劇新聞
小報化
性別刻板印象
女明星
Entertainment news
Tabloidization
Gender stereotype
Female celebrities
日期: 2020
上傳時間: 2-Mar-2020
摘要: 為探究台灣影劇娛樂週刊如何再現30-39歲的女星,以及所建構出的女星形象有哪些,本研究採取Norman Fairclough的批判論述分析探究新聞文本,並透過Erving Goffman於《性別廣告》提出的指標進行圖像分析。\n\n研究發現,週刊裡佔比最高的文章類型是討論女星的外表穿著,也是報導30-39歲女星最常論述的主題。僅次於外表穿著,提及三十多歲女星最常聚焦的主題是感情生活,但篇數次多的面向是事業表現,其他依序是年紀歲數和母職召喚。提及女星的外表穿著時,除了羶色腥用字比例隨時代變遷而下降,其餘皆維持週刊一貫特色,即凸顯女星身體局部,並以出糗出醜為賣點。事業表現上,也同外表穿著這個主題,偏好負面再現。2010年前、後,週刊再現女星事業最明顯的改變,莫過於女星產後重返螢光幕比例大增。感情生活上,2010年以前,女星以拜金形象建構,2010年以後,強化明星夫妻形象的比例上升。\n\n在母職召喚的面向上,最大差異在於內外兼具的「完美母職」充分體現於2010年之後的文本。就年紀歲數而言,2010年以前,週刊再現女星易落入年齡迷思,2010年後則以中立態度論述,唯在「年紀」和「生育」上偏向負面建構,深化高齡產婦高風險的既定印象。此類議題之興起與國人女性延緩步入婚姻、生育有關。\n\n圖像分析的部分,2010年以前,週刊中的30-39歲女性圖像以符合屈從行為(ritualization of subordination)、女性觸碰(feminine touch)和退縮抽離(licensed withdrawal)等指標為大宗,2010年之後則以符合屈從行為、退縮抽離和相對大小(relative size)等指標的圖片佔多數。其中,符合「相對大小」的圖片比例增加,傳遞出男女身高懸殊隱含權威和力量的差異。然而,參照Goffman「成對肢體行為」的指標,可發現2010年之後週刊中牽手和肩並肩的圖片比例高,反映出兩性間的地位關係比2010年以前來得對等。整體而言,即使性別意識隨時代變遷提升,小報化的週刊仍偏好以性別刻板再現,甚至有增加趨勢,此結果也與國外諸多研究呼應。
This study aims to examine what images of thirtyish women are represented in entertainment news, and how media portrays them. Norman Fairclough’s Critical Discourse Analysis and dimensions which Erving Goffman presented in Gender Advertisements are utilized to analyze news discourses and photographs in Taiwanese tabloids.\n\nThe results indicate that most of the news articles talk about female celebrities’ appearances in sarcastic tone, and trivialize their bodies. As for their careers, what tabloids usually do is negatively represent celebrities’ performances. On the other hand, there’s been a surge in the percentage of celebrities returning to the screen after childbirth. From a sociocultural perspective, women in the past tended to stay at home and took care of their husbands and children, reflecting patriarchal values. With the rise of gender consciousness as well as the encouragement of the society, more and more females have chosen to be career women. This is also the reason why the images of motherhood have increased in the news after 2010.\n\nIn the news before 2010, women were framed by the myth that aging is disadvantage to them. However, after 2010, the tabloids have represented women’s ages with a neutral attitude, but deepen association between advanced maternal age (AMA) and adverse pregnancy outcomes. Considering the possible consequences, women may choose children over a career. From a sociocultural perspective, as the women having more education delay age at marriage and pregnancy, people have been aware of the controversy over risks in women of AMA these years.\n\nBesides their appearances, female celebrities are frequently framed in their love affairs. According to the news coverage in tabloids before 2010, females were described as gold diggers, while after 2010, celebrity couples have been more represented. For one thing, celebrities’ endless narratives entertain readers. For another, readers project their expectations onto celebrity couples, learning how to get along with their spouses simultaneously.\n\nBefore 2010, photographs in the tabloids frequently corresponded to Ritualization of Subordination, Feminine Touch, and Licensed Withdrawal, whereas Ritualization of Subordination, Licensed Withdrawal, and Relative Size are the most common categories after 2010. Based on Goffman’s theory, the photographs corresponding to Relative Size show males and females have no equal statuses. Nevertheless, a high percentage of men and women performing hand-holding, sitting or standing shoulder to shoulder reveals greater gender equality in a relationship. Despite the rise of gender consciousness, men and women are still represented in stereotypes throughout the years. One possible reason is that stereotypes provoke resonance for audience in no time.
參考文獻: 英文書目\nAronson, E., Willerman, B. & Floyd, J. (1966). The effect of a pratfall on increasing interpersonal attractiveness. Psychonomic Science, 4(6), 227-228.\nBecker, K.E. (1992). Photojournalism and the Tabloid Press. In P. Dahlgren & C. Sparks (eds.) Journalism and Popular Culture. London: Sage.\nBeer, D. & Penfold-Mounce, R. (2009). Celebrity Gossip and the New Melodramatic Imagination. Sociological Research Online, 14(2). Retrieved from http://socresonline.org.uk/14/2/2.html\nBell, A. (1991). The Language of the News Media. Oxford: Blackwell.\nBerg, L. V., & Streckfuss, D. (1992). Prime-time television’s portrayal of women and the world of work: A demographic profile. Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media, 36, 195-199.\nBerg, B. L. (2009). Qualitative research methods for the social science (7th ed.).\nBoston: Allyn & Bacon.\nBerger, J. (1972). Ways of Seeing, 47. London: British Broadcasting Corporation and Penguin.\nCampbell, J. (1949). The hero with a thousand faces. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.\nCrockett, M. (2019). Why do we care so much about celebrity gossip? Stylist investigates. Stylist Magazine. Retrieved from\nhttps://www.stylist.co.uk/life/brad-pitt-angelina-jolie-divorce-fascination-fame-psychology/66278\nDavis, D. (1990). Portrayals of women in prime-time network television: Some demographic characteristics. Sex Roles, 23: 325-332.\nDe Lauretis, T. (2004). The technologies of gender. In Rakow, L. & Wackwitz, L. (Eds.), Feminist Communication Theory (pp. 214-236). London: Sage.\nDjupsund, G. & Carlson, T. (1998). Trivial Stories and Fancy Pictures?\nTabloidization Tendencies in Finnish and Swedish Regional and National Newspapers 1982-1997. Nordicom Review, 101-114.\nEsser, F. (1999). ‘Tabloidization’ of News: A Comparative Analysis of Anglo-American and German Press Journalism. European Journal of Communication, 14(3).\nFairclough, N. (1989). Language and Power. London and New York:\nLongman.\nFairclough, N. (1992). Discourse and social change. Cambridge, UK: Polity Press.\nFairclough, N. (1993). Critical Discourse Analysis and the Marketization of Public Discourse: The Universities. Discourse Society, 4(133). London: Sage.\nFairclough, N. & Wodak, R. (1997) ‘Critical discourse analysis’, in T.A. van Dijk (ed.), Introduction to Discourse Analysis. London: Sage, pp. 258-84.\nFishman, JM. (2001). Documenting death: Photojournalism and spectacles of the morbid in the tabloid and elite newspaper. US: University of Pennsylvania.\nFeasey, R. (2006). Get a famous body: start styles and celebrity gossip in heat magazine, Framing Celebrity: New Directions in Celebrity Culture, Su Holmes and Sean Redmond (eds.). London & New York: Routledge.\nGabler, N. (2001). Toward a New Definition of Celebrity. USC Annenberg: The Norman Lear Center.\nGalician, ML. & Merskin, DL. (2007). Critical Thinking about Sex, Love, and Romance in the Mass Media. New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.\nGoffman, E. (1979). Gender Advertisements. New York: Harper & Row.\nGow, R., Lydecker, J., Lamanna, J. & Mazzeo, S. (2012). Representations of Celebrities’ Weight and Shape during Pregnancy and Postpartum: A Content Analysis of Three Entertainment Magazine Websites. Body Image, 9(1): 172-175.\nHabermas, J. (1977). Erkenntnis und Interesse. Frankfurt: Suhrkamp.\nHarris, J. & Clayton, B. (2002). Femininity, Masculinity, Physicality and the English Tabloid Press: The Case of Anna Kournikova. International Review for the Sociology of Sport, 37, 397-413.\nHays, S. (1996). The Cultural Contradictions of Motherhood. US: Yale University Press.\nHolsti, P. R. (1969). Content analysis for the social sciences and humanities. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.\nHooks, B. (1981). Ain`t IA Woman: Black women and feminism. Boston: South End Press.\nIkeanyi, E. & Onyiriuka, A. (2014). Advanced Maternal Age at the First Pregnancy and Obstetric Performance: A Retrospective Study. Pacific Journal of Medical Sciences, 13(1).\nJette, S. (2006). “Fit for Two?”: A critical discourse analysis of Oxygen fitness magazine. Sociology of Sport Journal, 23(4), 331-351.\nKang, ME. (1997). The portrayal of women`s images in magazine advertisements: Goffman`s gender analysis revisited. Sex Roles, 37, 979-996.\nKenrick, D. T., & Keefe, R. C. (1992). Age preferences in mates reflect sex differences in human reproductive strategies. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 15: 75-133.\nKenrick, D. T., Keefe, R. C., & Gabrielidis, C. (1996). Adolescents` age preferences for dating partners: Support for an evolutionary model of life‐history strategies. Child Development, 67(4): 1499-1511.\nKrippendorff, K. (2003). Content analysis: An introduction to its methodology. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.\nLeitch, Vincent B., ed. (2001). The Norton Anthology of Theory and Criticism. New York: Norton.\nLevinson, D. (1996). The Seasons of a Woman’s Life: A Fascinating Exploration of the Events, Thoughts, and Life Experiences That All Women Share. New York: Random House USA Inc.\nLi, T.S., & Chen, F. M. (2002). Affection in marriage: A study of marital en-qing (loving-kindness) and intimacy in Taiwan. Journal of Psychology in Chinese Societies, 3(1), 37-59.\nLotz, AD. (2001). Postfeminist television criticism: Rehabilitating critical terms and identifying postfeminist attributes. Feminist Media Studies, 1(1): 105-121.\nMansfield, P. K. & McCool, W. (1989). Toward a better understanding of the “advanced maternal age”; factor. Health Care for Women International, 10(4), 395-415.\nMatwick, K. (2017). Language and gender in female celebrity chef cookbooks: cooking to show care for the family and for the self. Critical Discourse Studies, 14(5), 532-547.\nMaynard, M. L., & Taylor, C. R. (1999). Girlish images across cultures: Analyzing Japanese versus U.S. seventeen magazine ads. Journal of Advertising, 28(1), 39-48.\nMcLeod, S. (2018). Maslow`s Hierarchy of Needs. Simply Psychology. Retrieved from\nhttps://www.simplypsychology.org/simplypsychology.org-Maslows-Hierarchy-of-Needs.pdf\nMcManus, J. H. (1994). Market-driven journalism: Let the citizen beware? Newbury Park, CA: Sage.\nMillett, K. (2016). Sexual Politics. New York: Columbia University Press.\nNam, K. Lee, G. & Hwang, JS. (2011). Gender Stereotypes Depicted by Western and Korean Advertising Models in Korean Adolescent Girls’ Magazines. Sex Roles, 64:223–237.\nOrlik, P. (2016). Media Criticism in a Digital Age: Professional and Consumer. New York: Routledge.\nO` Sullivan, T., Hartley, J., Saunders, D., Montgomery, & Fiske, J. (1994). Key concepts in communication and cultural studies. London: Routledge.\nPlant, S. (2000). On The Matrix: Cyberfeminist simulations. The Cybercultures Reader, 326.\nPonterotto, D. (2014). Trivializing the Female Body: A Cross-cultural Analysis of the Representation of Women in Sports Journalism. Journal of International Women`s Studies, 15(2), 94-111.\nRasul, S. (2009). Gender stereotypes in the language of Pakistani newspapers. Proceedings, 8th International Conference on Language and Development, Bangladesh 2009.\nReah, D. (2002). The Language of Newspapers. London: Routledge.\nSaito, S. (2007). Television and cultivation of gender-role attitudes in Japan. Journal of Communication, 57(3), 511–531.\nSalomone, P. R. (1996). Tracing Super’s Theory of Vocational Development: A 40-year retrospective. Journal of Career Development, 22(3).\nSchroeder, F. EH. (1982). National Enquirer is National Fetish! The Untold Story! In R. B. Browne (ed.), Objects of special devotion: Fetishism in popular culture. Bowling Green, OH: Bowling Green University Popular press.\nSegrin, C. and Nabi, R.L. (2002) ‘Does TV viewing cultivate unrealistic expectations about marriage?’, Journal of Communication, 52(2): 247-63.\nSeiter, E. (1986). Stereotypes and the Media: A Re-evaluation. Journal of Communication [spring].\nSignorielli, N., & Bacue, A. (1999). Recognition and respect: A content analysis of prime-time television characters across three decades. Sex Roles, 40, 527-543.\nSparks, C. & Tulloch, J. (Eds) (2000). Tabloid Tales: Global Debates over Media Standards. Oxford: Rowman and Littlefield.\nSpiers, E. (2015, July 24). Why we obsess over some celebrity couples and totally ignore others. The Washington Post. Retrieved from\nhttps://www.washingtonpost.com/posteverything/wp/2015/07/24/why-we-obsess-over-some-celebrity-couples-and-totally-ignore-others/\nStacey, J. (1994). Star Gazing: Hollywood Cinema and Female Spectatorship. London and New York: Routledge.\nSuper, D.E. (1990). A life-span, life-space approach to career development. In D. Brown & L. Brooks (Eds.), Career Choice and Development. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.\nTataru, L. (2012). Celebrity stories as a genre of media culture. Journal of Teaching and Education,1 (6):15-21.\nThussu, D. K. (2007). News as Entertainment: The Rise of Global Infotainment. London: Sage.\nTuchman, G. (1972). ‘Objectivity as a Strategic Ritual’, American Journal of Sociology, 77, 660-79.\nTuchman, G. (1878). Making News. New York: Free Press.\nTyler, I. (2011). Pregnant Beauty: Maternal Femininities under Neoliberalism. In Gill, R. & Scharff C. (eds), New Femininities Postfeminism, Neoliberalism and Subjectivity.\nvan Dijk, T.A. (1993). Principles of critical discourse analysis. Discourse and Society, 4(2).\nVertinsky, P. (1998). “Run, Jane, Run”: Central tensions in the current debate about enhancing women’s health through exercise. Women & Health, 27(4), 81-111.\nWallis, C. (2011). Performing Gender: A Content Analysis of Gender Display in Music Videos. Sex Roles, 64: 160-172.\nWang, H. (2009). Language and ideology: gender stereotypes of female and male artists in Taiwanese tabloids. Discourse and Society, 20(6), 747-774.\nWodak, R. (1997). Gender and Discourse. London: Sage.\nWodak, R., & Meyer, M. (Eds.). (2001). Methods of Critical Discourse Analysis. London: Sage.\nWolf, N. (2002). The Beauty Myth. New York: Harper Collins.\n\n中文書目\n〈女性國軍占比提升 也走出辦公室〉(2018年4月5日)。《人間福報》,\n取自http://www.merit-times.com/NewsPage.aspx?unid=504048\n于佳云(2016年10月5日)。〈壹週刊2.0?《鏡週刊》創刊號上架 設計內\n容緊咬前東家〉,《ETtoday》。取自https://www.ettoday.net/news/20161005/787726.htm\n〈公婆要求低調!小小瑜為愛婚後「淡出演藝圈」〉(2017年11月15日)。《ETtoday星光雲》。取自https://star.ettoday.net/news/1053097\n文化部(2015)。取自「臺灣女人」\nhttps://women.nmth.gov.tw/information_42_39654.html\n內政部戶政司(2019)。〈結婚年齡中位數及平均數〉,《行政院性別平等會》。取自\nhttps://www.gender.ey.gov.tw/gecdb/Stat_Statistics_DetailData.aspx?sn=aeFG0R2tHwmrDtITC%2fJSaA%3d%3d&d=m9ww9odNZAz2Rc5Ooj%2fwIQ%3d%3d\n王石番(1989)。《傳播內容分析法:理論與實證》。台北:幼獅文化。\n王泰俐(2015)。《電視新聞感官主義》。台北:五南。\n王恩惠(2006)。〈已婚職業婦女工作家庭衝突與婚姻滿意度之相關研究〉,《台灣性學學刊》,12(2):13-36。\n〈台灣偶像劇場〉。取自網站http://tw.dorama.info/state/ranking_rate.php\n田中光(2019年4月18日)。〈從「女孩」到「大嬸」與「歐巴桑」:女性稱呼背後的性別歧視與年齡歧視〉,《獨立評論@天下》。取自\nhttps://opinion.cw.com.tw/blog/profile/390/article/7962\n行政院性別平等處(2020)。《2020年性別圖像》。取自\nfile:///Users/leanneli/Downloads/2020%E5%B9%B4%E6%80%A7%E5%88%A5%E5%9C%96%E5%83%8F%E4%B8%AD%E6%96%87%E7%89%88__0103final_.pdf\n何旭初(2007)。〈市場導向新聞學之思維與運作:《蘋果日報》個案分\n析〉,《中華傳播學刊》,11:243-273。\n何撒娜(2017年2月21日)。〈韓國女性的「火病」:我們所受到的壓迫,身體都知道〉,《巷仔口社會學》。取自\nhttps://twstreetcorner.org/2017/02/21/sanaho/\n吳怡卿(2004)。《我的單身何必議論紛紛?催婚情境中的未婚單身女\n性》。高雄師範大學性別教育研究所論文。\n呂明心、傅臨超、邱玉蟬、闕河嘉(2016)。〈男主外,女「煮」內:臺灣「米」電視廣告的性別形象〉,《傳播與發展學報》,33:56-88。\n呂雅雯、盧鴻毅、侯心雅(2010)。〈再現貧窮:以電視新聞為例〉,《新聞學研究》,102:73-111。\n利翠珊(2012)。〈華人社會關係網中的自我觀〉,《本土心理學研究》,37:225-229。\n利翠珊、蕭英玲(2016)。〈夫妻內隱情感經驗:感恩、忍與婚姻滿意度〉,《本土心理學研究》,45:93-128。\n李沄臻(2019年1月7日)。〈台灣訪韓人數突破100萬的因素分析〉,《旅報》。取自https://www.ttnmedia.com/%E5%8F%B0%E7%81%A3%E8%A8%AA%E9%9F%93%E4%BA%BA%E6%95%B8%E7%AA%81%E7%A0%B4100%E8%90%AC%E7%9A%84%E5%9B%A0%E7%B4%A0%E5%88%86%E6%9E%90/\n李美馨(2005)。《女男大不同?電視新聞如何報導政治人物》。政治大學新聞研究所論文。\n李柏鋒(2017年8月31日)。〈專訪《鏡週刊》社長裴偉(中):內容篇-靠人物故事留住讀者〉,《INSIDE》。取自https://www.inside.com.tw/article/10373-mirrormedia-content\n李桐豪(2018年8月31日)。〈【一鏡到底】穿西裝的人 裴偉〉,《眾新\n聞》。取自\nhttps://www.hkcnews.com/article/14697/%E9%BB%8E%E6%99%BA%E8%8B%B1-%E8%A3%B4%E5%81%89-%E9%8F%A1%E9%80%B1%E5%88%8A-14699/%E3%80%90%E4%B8%80%E9%8F%A1%E5%88%B0%E5%BA%95%E3%80%91%E7%A9%BF%E8%A5%BF%E8%A3%9D%E7%9A%84%E4%BA%BA-%E8%A3%B4%E5%81%89\n李惠菁(2006)。《追獵女巫:由「倪夏畸戀」看話題女性新聞的語藝框\n架》。世新大學口語傳播研究所論文。\n杜玉蓉(2004)。《誰在訴說女人的身體?-以瘦身類資訊式廣告為例》。政治大學新聞研究所論文。\n宋志民(2018)。《《壹週刊》封面的設計、議題選擇與銷售量關聯性之研究》。世新大學公共關係暨廣告學研究所碩士論文。\n宋鎮照(1997)。《社會學》,台北:五南。\n巫麗雪、葉秀珍、蔡瑞明(2013)。〈遇見另一半:教育婚配過程中的介紹人與接觸場合〉,《台灣社會學》,26:147-190。\n林怡秀(2019年11月11日)。〈當媽淡出螢幕6年 陳仙梅半夜哭「好想要\n拍戲」〉,《聯合報》。取自https://stars.udn.com/star/story/10091/4157982\n林芳玫(1996)。《女性與媒體再現:女性主義與社會建構輪的觀點》。台北:巨流。\n林思宏(2017)。《樂孕:從懷孕到生產,迷思與疑惑一次解答,陪妳回歸美好孕程》。台北:高寶。\n林俊良(2002)。《閱讀汽車廣告-廣告文本的性別與空間分析》。臺灣大學建築與城鄉研究所碩士論文。\n林帷聆(2019)。《母職的再現與實踐-以《親子天下》為例》。元智大學社會暨政策科學研究所碩士論文。\n林富美(2002)。《文化工業的勞動體制研究:藝人勞動特質與勞雇派遣關係初探》。(國科會委託之研究計畫, NSC90-2412-H-128-001)。\n林詩宜(2006)。《台韓婆媳劇婆媳形象再現的比較研究》。中正大學電訊傳播研究所碩士論文。\n胡如虹(2011)。《應用模糊多評準決策於台灣經紀公司評選新藝人》。銘傳大學傳播管理研究所在職專班碩士學位論文。\n姜貞吟(2019)。〈必須「賢淑」五種父權家庭拒斥的女性〉,王曉丹主編《這是愛女,也是厭女:如何看穿這世界拉攏與懲戒女人的兩手策略》,頁73-96。台北:大家出版。\n施舜翔(2018)。《性、高跟鞋與吳爾芙:一部女性主義論戰史》。台北:台灣商務。\n倪炎元(2012)。〈批判論述分析的定位爭議及其應用問題:以Norman\nFairclough分析途徑為例的探討〉,《新聞學研究》,110:1-42。\n徐桐炘(2019年2月20日)。〈林志玲親證實想用交友軟體!「公開暱稱、頭像」尋覓好對象〉,《中時電子報》。取自https://www.chinatimes.com/realtimenews/20190220004323-260404?chdtv\n翁秀琪(2013)。《大眾傳播理論與證實》。台北:三民書局。\n高秋雅譯(2019)。《黑箱:性暴力受害者的真實告白》。台北:高寶。(原書:伊藤詩織)\n張老師月刊編輯部(1990)。中國人的婚戀觀。台北:張老師。\n張茵(2019)。《台灣鮮乳廣告影片中的理想母親形象分析(2009-2019)》。東吳大學社會學系碩士論文。\n張慶勳(2016)。《論文寫作軟實力》。台北:五南。\n張寶珠(1995)。〈婦女自我肯定、婚姻滿意、父母非理性信念之關係研\n究〉,《輔導季刊》,31(1):21-30。\n張耀仁(2002)。〈市場導向新聞學研究之研究-以台灣三家無線電視台晚間娛樂新聞為例〉,《廣播與電視》,18:59-90。\n莊蕙宇(2014)。《單身女性在社會政策文本中的性別再現》。東吳大學社會工作學研究所論文。\n陸燕玲(2002)。《從「名門正派」到明教教徒?─台灣《壹週刊》新聞工作者的調適與認同》。台灣大學新聞研究所論文。\n許晏瑜(2010)。《高齡產婦生育風險之新聞內容分析》。中正大學電訊傳播研究所論文。\n許韶君(2011)。《影劇新聞之批判話語分析-以「伊能靜婚變事件」為\n例》。臺灣師範大學大眾傳播研究所論文。\n陳志賢、蕭蘋(2008)。〈幸福家庭的房車:汽車廣告中所再現的理想家\n庭〉,《新聞學研究》,96:45-86。\n陳芸芸、劉慧雯譯(2011)。《McQuail’s大眾傳播理論》。台北:韋伯。(原書:McQuail [2005].)\n陳信宏譯(2019)。《女力告白:最危險的力量與被噤聲的歷史》。台北:聯經出版公司。(原書:Beard, M. [2017]. Women & Power: A Manifesto. London: Profile Books.)\n陳春富(2011)。〈「家」的夢想:解析房仲電視廣告中的家庭圖像與性別關係〉,《廣告學研究》,35:75-112。\n陳美瑛譯(2006)。《敗犬的遠吠》。台北:麥田出版。(原書:酒井順子[2003].)\n陳婷玉(2010)。〈當媽媽眞好?流行婦幼雜誌的母職再現〉,《女學學誌:婦女與性別研究》,26:33-86。\n陳貴琳(2016)。《臺灣女性菁英的政治參與-以蔡英文為例》。政治大學國家發展研究所碩士論文。\n陳德愉(1997)。〈再度揭露娛樂新聞背後的大黑幕〉,《新新聞》,\n517:82-84。\n敖國珠(2010)。《我國電視新聞主播養成之研究》。臺灣師範大學圖文傳播學系碩士論文。\n傅佩榮、孔子(2005)。《傅佩榮解讀論語》。台北:立緖文化。\n勞動部統計處(2018)。《近年我國女性勞動參與狀況》。取自\nhttps://www.mol.gov.tw/media/5759086/%E8%BF%91%E5%B9%B4%E5%A5%B3%E6%80%A7%E5%8B%9E%E5%8B%95%E5%8F%83%E8%88%87%E7%8B%80%E6%B3%81.pdf\n勞動部統計處(2019)。《近年我國女性勞動參與狀況》。取自\nhttps://www.mol.gov.tw/media/5760640/%E8%BF%91%E5%B9%B4%E6%88%91%E5%9C%8B%E5%A5%B3%E6%80%A7%E5%8B%9E%E5%8B%95%E5%8F%83%E8%88%87%E7%8B%80%E6%B3%81.pdf\n黃盈盈(2012)。《名人劈腿新聞中的女性再現》。臺灣大學新聞研究所論\n文。\n黃美惠(2001)。《媒介建構之女性參政框架─以副總統呂秀蓮的新聞報導為例》。淡江大學大眾傳播研究所論文。\n黃哲瑋(2015)。《台灣、中國、日本與南韓戲劇節目中之婆媳關係再現研究》。臺灣藝術大學廣播電視研究所碩士論文。\n黃德祥(2008)。《青少年發展與輔導》。台北:五南。\n費雯麗(2017年3月3日)。〈從堀北真希的急流勇退,探討「日本女星結\n婚、育兒」議題〉,《娛樂重擊》。取自https://punchline.asia/archives/40452\n楊士堤譯(2015)。《厭女:日本的女性嫌惡》。台北:聯合文學。(原書:上野千鶴子 [2010].)\n楊堯茹(2017)。《台灣女性政治人物媒體再現的批判論述分析-以2012年及2016年總統大選報導為例》。世新大學新聞研究所論文。\n董蘭英(2000)。《女性政治角色的媒體建構-以北港香爐事件為例》。東吳大學社會學系研究所論文。\n蔡詩薏、胡淑貞(2001)。〈社會人口特質、家庭生命週期與夫妻婚姻滿意度及其差異之研究:一個社區的初探性研究〉,《成功大學學報》,36:23-49.\n蔡德輝、楊士隆(2004)。《青少年暴力行為-原因、類型與對策》,頁\n211。台北:五南。\n盧沛樺、張玉佩(2010)。〈性別差異政治:女性運動員的媒體再現與認同糾葛〉,《中華傳播學刊》,17:139-170。\n謝純雅、邊明道(2013)。〈新聞報導中的女性軍人框架─以四大報為例〉,《復興崗學報》,103:25-52。\n戴國良(2005)。《行銷管理 : 策略、經營與本土實務(第4版)》。台北:五南。\n簡妙如等譯(1999)。《大眾傳播媒體新論》,台北:韋伯文化。(原書\nTaylor, L. & Willis, A. [1999]. Media Studies: Texts, Institutions and Audiences, Blackwell Publishers LTD.)\n蘇明真(2017年9月6日)。〈與1歲愛女打逗趣心理戰 周渝民樂在其\n中〉,《大紀元》。取自https://www.epochtimes.com/b5/17/9/5/n9601922.htm\n蘇俊豪(2010)。《電視奶粉廣告的親職再現分析》。中山大學傳播管理研究所碩士論文。\n蘇瑞仁(1988)。《電視新聞播報人專業形象之研究》。政治大學新聞研究所論文。
描述: 碩士
國立政治大學
傳播學院傳播碩士學位學程
103464048
資料來源: http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#G0103464048
資料類型: thesis
Appears in Collections:學位論文

Show full item record

Google ScholarTM

Check

Altmetric

Altmetric


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.