Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://ah.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/129225
題名: 社工工會於勞資爭議中之行動經驗初探
Research on the social workers unions’ Experiences in Dealing with Industrial Disputes
作者: 吳宗翰
Wu, Tsung-Han
貢獻者: 蔡培元
Tsai, Pei-Yuen
吳宗翰
Wu, Tsung-Han
關鍵詞: 社會工作
社工工會
勞資爭議
勞動權益
Social Work
Social Workers Union
Industrial Dispute
Labor Right
日期: 2020
上傳時間: 6-四月-2020
摘要: 本研究旨在發展臺灣社工工會實務研究,探討社工工會在勞資爭議中的處理程序、策略思維與外部資源應用、遭遇困境與因應方法。本文採用質性研究,透過立意抽樣與滾雪球抽樣邀請16位具處理勞資爭議經驗之工會幹部與社工,並以深度訪談進行資料蒐集。研究發現:一、社工工會有一套勞資爭議處理程序可循,工會幹部依循諮詢期、介入期、結束期與延續期四階段協助當事人處理爭議事件;二、各工會所著重的處理策略面向不同,可歸納出組織培力、議題結構和公私共理三種策略途徑;三、工會處理勞資爭議常用外部資源有律師、民代、媒體、友好組織與私人關係,工會必須在不同資源之間達到效益與關係的權衡;四、處理勞資爭議的困境包含:政府面缺乏長久性制度規範和有效的執行率、機構面在管理方法未能與時俱進與對勞權有錯誤的認知、工會面臨少數人領導與會員關係經營不足等問題、社工則是行動選擇困境等等,而工會透過爭取制度參與權、營造勞資合作、強化會員參與、提供社工安心與信心行動支持等方法來突破。五、勞資爭議中所衍生實務議題有工會行動角色的選擇、利益爭議的權衡、三種工會型態作為社工工會發展的可能性。研究建議:一、實務面:建立勞資爭議處理說明範本、勞資爭議經驗文本化、夥伴制度的會員經營;二、教育面:橫向勞資政同步強化勞動知能和縱向從校園紮根勞權意識;三、系統合作面:機構主動促成勞資合作、提升工會與機構的良性合作。
The purpose of this research is to study the actions of social worker unions in Taiwan and to record their spirit and experiences when working together. The researcher explores the labor unions’ procedures for dealing with industrial disputes. He also examines the strategies, mindsets and external resources that are used, as well as the challenges these labor unions face and their solutions. The researcher then gives advice based on the research findings. By using purposive and snowball sampling, the researcher conducted depth interviews on 16 labor union staff members and social workers that have experiences with industrial disputes to collect data for this qualitative study. The research findings are as follows: (1) The four phases of industrial dispute are the consultation phase, intervention phase, resolution phase, and the extended phase; (2) Three paths to dealing with industrial disputes are organizational empowerment, issue structures, and involvement from both the public and private sector; (3) External resources that are often used to balance interests and relationships, as well as risk effects and relationship boundaries are lawyers, legislators, the media and private relationships; (4) The challenges and solutions to industrial disputes can be divided into how the government is run, the management and viewpoint of organizations, the leadership and management of labor unions as well as the influence and choices social workers make when taking action. The labor unions then take all of the above into consideration when planning solutions. (5) Issues related to industrial disputes include the role that labor unions play in the disputes, conflict of interests and the three possible ways labor unions could develop into. The researcher’s advice: (1) For practical uses: Create a manual for dealing with industrial disputes, textualize records of industrial disputes, and managing members through a system based on partnerships; (2) For education: Use horizontal collaboration among employers, laborers, and the government to build stronger sense of labor rights and raising awareness of labor rights in schools. (3) For collaboration among different systems: Organizations should take the initiative to create collaboration between employers and laborers in order to improve their image when collaborating with labor unions.
參考文獻: 壹、中文文獻\n于立恩(2016)。國立大學工會的角色與功能之探討:以臺大、政大工會為個案研究(未出版之碩士論文)。國立政治大學,臺北市。\n方昱(2009)。反思性社會工作:「漂流社工」的社區實踐與社工教育。東吳社會工作學報,21,83-100。\n王文科、王智弘(2010)。質的研究的信度和效度。彰化師大教育學報,17,29-50。\n王永慈、劉一龍、邱湘婷、吳庭葦(2017)。臺灣新進社會工作者的職場經驗初探。臺灣社會工作學刊,19,77-106。\n王姝淳(2017)。高雄地區社會工作人員勞動現況、薪酬制度及薪資決定因素之初探(未出版碩士論文)。東海大學,臺中市。\n王增勇(2012)。從台灣社工基進化談理論與實踐的辯證。台灣社會研究季刊,87,317-334。\n王增勇、郭志南、施旦旦(2017)。福利民營化下的專業證照迷思:新社工工會的可能。中國農業大學學報,34(3),128-136。\n全臺社工工會(2017/11/5)。拒絕薪資總額制,基層社工站出來。取自:https://tw.appledaily.com/new/realtime/20171105/1235278/\n吳全成、馬翠華(2017)。勞資關係。新北市:新文京。\n吳秀照、陶蕃瀛(2014)。社會工作從業人員職場安全的雇主責任與相關議題探討。社區發展季刊,147,89-102。\n李允傑(2009)。政府與工會。新北:空大。\n李易駿、陳靜宜(2010)。隱而未見的代價:臺灣社會工作短期契約僱用探析。臺灣社會工作學刊,8,35-88。\n周孟謙(2017/12/7)。社福凜冬將至,「總額勻支制」是解方?(上)。鳴人堂。取自:https://opinion.udn.com/opinion/story/10510/2860040\n周孟謙(2017/3/3)。血汗社福──伊甸基金會復康巴士勞資爭議案。NPOst公益交流站。取自:http://npost.tw/archives/32388\n周孟謙(2018)。新世代基進社工的參與和回應:工會時代。載於蕭新煌、官有垣、王舒芸(主編)臺灣社會福利運動與政策效應:二000–二0一八年(頁79-102)。高雄:巨流。\n周泓良(2018/5/14)。不滿伊甸基金會剝削 復康巴士司機罷工。取自:http://news.ltn.com.tw/news/life/breakingnews/2425339\n周珀妘(2018)。臺灣社工勞動派遣實踐經驗之探討。財務社會工作與貧窮研究學刊,1(1),71-112。\n林冠廷(2015)。關廠失業工人抗爭之集體行動分析,以聯福自救會為例(未出版碩士論文)。政治大學,臺北市。\n林萬億(2015)。當代社會工作:理論與方法(3版)。臺北:五南。\n南投縣社會工作人員職業工會籌備小組、臺中市社會工作服務產業工會籌備小組(2018/10/11)。「社團法人南投縣青年返鄉服務協會」涉及要求員工回捐薪資案。取自:https://www.facebook.com/tcsocialworker/\n洪維彬(2018)。教師工會進行勞資爭議之實務運作。臺灣教育評論月刊,7(5),12-15。\n徐雅嵐(2009)。高風險社會工作專業人員之案主暴力風險知覺與人身安全現況研究(未出版之碩士論文)。國立政治大學,臺北市。\n徐煒勛(2014)。社會福利機構社工人員之勞動現況與工作感受:以臺北市政府社會局公辦民營機構為例(未出版碩士論文)。中國文化大學,臺北市。\n桃園市社會工作人員職業工會(2018/7/12)。日新社工師事務所一案移送桃園地檢署。取自:https://www.facebook.com/tyswunion/\n高淑清(2008)。質性研究的18堂課—首航初探之旅。高雄市:麗文。\n高淑清、連雅慧、林月琴譯(2004)。探究生活經驗:建立敏思行動教育學的人文科學(第二版)(原著:Max Van Manen)。嘉義市:濤石。\n高雄市社工工會(2018/8/8)。衛生福利部能杜絕薪資回捐嗎?取自:https://goo.gl/FcjQS7\n康芸(2006)。社工人員對於自身勞動權益的覺知與因應策略之探討∼以臺北市公設民營之社會福利機構為例(未出版之碩士論文)。慈濟大學,花蓮縣。\n張昌吉、劉政彥(2009)。工會集體行動策略分析:以中華電信工會為例。政大勞動學報,24,43-94。\n張晉芬(2013)。勞動社會學(增訂版)。臺北:政大出版。\n張烽益(2017)。臺灣新世代工會發展困境與突破。臺北:臺灣勞工陣線協會。\n畢恆達 (2015)。社會研究的研究者與倫理。載於嚴祥鸞(編)危險與秘密-研究倫理(修訂第二版)(頁29-76)。臺北:三民。\n許雅惠、徐瑜(2014)。 逼上梁山?組織內道德困境對社會工作的壓迫。社區發展季刊,147,64-75。\n郭志南、陳保穎(2017)。社福團體特性與勞基法的衝突與解套記者會後的網路動亂:逆寫高雄社工工會的黃巾起義。2017年臺灣社會學年會暨科技部研究成果發表會「社流感Sociofluenza:集體行動新視界」,輔仁大學。\n陳怡婷(1999)。臺灣社會福利業社會工作員工作保障機制之研究(未出版之碩士論文)。政治大學,臺北市。\n陳政亮(2017)。社運與政治—總工會與左翼政黨。臺灣社會研究季刊,106,225-236。\n陶蕃瀛譯(1996)。組織結社—基層組織領導者手冊(原作者:Kahn, S.)。臺北:心理(原著出版年:1991)。\n勞動部(2018)。違反勞動法令事業單位(雇主)查詢系統。取自:https://announcement.mol.gov.tw\n黃文瑜(2017/08/17)。加班費1小時僅50元血汗照服員還被逼回捐14萬。自由時報。取自http://news.ltn.com.tw/news/life/breakingnews/2166123\n黃彥宜(2015)。基變社會工作理論與實踐:英語系國家與台灣的比較。台灣社會研究季刊,101,53-86。\n楊玫瑩(2000)。臺灣的社會工作專業化:「社工師法」的立法過程。載於蕭新煌、林國民(編)臺灣的社會福利運動(頁434-454)。臺北:巨流。\n董安琪譯(1898)。集體行動的邏輯(原著者:Mancur Olson)。臺北:遠流。\n臺北市社會工作人員職業工會(2018/6/19)。2018年臺灣社會工作服務產業勞動調查。截取自:https://goo.gl/BKmDNF\n臺灣社會工作專業人員協會(2012)。臺灣社會工作人員勞動權益研究。臺北:臺灣社會工作專業人員協會。\n臺灣社會工作專業人員協會(2015)。104年社會工作者勞動薪資調查研究期末報告。臺北:臺灣社會工作專業人員協會。\n劉峻谷(2017/4/5)。加班當奉獻?沒給加班費,家扶基金會挨罰16萬。取自:https://news.tvbs.com.tw/world/718305\n潘淑滿(2003)。質性研究—理論與應用。臺北市:心理。\n衛民、許繼峰(2018)。勞資關係:平衡效率與公平(五版)。臺北:三民。\n衛生福利部(2017)。社會工作人員執業安全方案。臺北:衛福部。\n鄧湘漪、陳秋山譯(2011)社會工作與社區—實踐的批判性脈絡(原作者:Stepney, P. & Pople, K.)。臺北:心理(原著出版年:2008)。\n鄭天睿(2011)。社會工作者勞動權益的覺醒與行動~以社工籌組工會為例(未出版之碩士論文)。實踐大學,臺北市。\n鄭怡世、巫麗雪、葉秀芳(2017)。臺灣區域醫院社會工作者工作負荷感受之研究。臺灣社區工作與社區研究學刊,7(1),113-150。\n鄭怡世、鐘文鎂(2014)。不友善的勞動處境、不確定的勞動感受:臺灣民間社會福利組織社工員勞動現況之探究。當代社會工作學刊,3,86-123。\n鄭威德(2009)。社工工會籌備小組的故事:突破廠場工會困境的一種嘗試(未出版之碩士論文)。世新大學,臺北市。\n鄭津津(2002)。我國勞資爭議處理制度之現況與檢討。國立中正大學法學集刊,6,65-104。\n薛翰駿(2017/3/3)。民進黨立委:社福團體應排除工時規範,基層痛批「以慈善為名壓榨社工」。取自:https://musou.tw/focuses/1328\n鍾伊玲(2014)。社工人員之勞動條件、人際關係及離職傾向之研究(未出版之碩士論文)。國立臺灣師範大學:臺北市。\n韓意慈(2017)。為曲高和寡的社會工作倡導提出整合取向的新途徑。臺灣社會工作學刊,18,1-28。\n顧美俐、劉一龍(2018)社工員的困境與流動意向:個人因素、工作環境與外部環境之探討。財務社會工作與貧窮研究學刊,1(1),153-204。\n\n貳、外文文獻\nAdams, G. R. & Schvaneveldt, J. D. (1991). Understanding research methods. New York, NY: Longman.\nAlexander, L. B. (1980). Professionalization and unionization compatible after all. Social Work, 25(6), 476-482.\nAlexander, L. B., Lichtenberg, P., Brunn, D. (1980). Social workers in unions: a survey. Social Work, 25(6), 216-223.\nBaines D.(2011). Doing anti oppressive practice: Social Justice Social Work. Canada: Fernwood Publishing\nBaines, D. (2010). In a Different Way: Social Unionism in the Nonprofit Social Services-An Australian/Canadian Comparison. Labor Studies Journal, 35(4) 480-502.\nBarth, M. C. (2003). Social work labor market: A first look. Social work, 48, 9-19.\nBASW(2018). Social Workers Union. Retrieved from: https://www.basw.co.uk/social-workers-union\nCox, F. M. (1987). Strategies of community organization: macro practice (4th ed.). MI:F. E. Peacock Publishers.\nDunlop, J. T. (1993).Industrial Relation Systems, revised ed.Boston: Harvard Business School.\nEpstein, I. (1988). Quantitative and qualitative methods. In R. Grinnell, Jr. (Ed.,) Social work research and evaluation (3rd Ed.,). Itasca, IL: F.E. Peacock Publishers, Inc.\nEzzy, D. (2002). Qualitative analysis: Practice and innovation. New York: Routledge.\nGraham, S. M. & Graham, J. R. (2009). Subjective well-being, mindfulness, and the social work workplace: Insight into reciprocal relationships. In Lee, J. J. & Miller, S. E. (2013) The Journal of Contemporary Social Services,94(2) (pp. 96).\nGrinnell, R., Jr. (1993). Social work research and evaluation (4th Ed.,). Itasca, IL: F.E. Peacock Publishers, Inc.\nIsaac, J. (2007). Reforming Australian Industrial Relations? Journal of Industrial Relations, 49(3), 410-435.\nKarger, H, J. (2008). Social Service Administration and the Challenge of Unionization. Administration in Social Work, 13(3-4), 199-218.\nKaufman, B. E. (2010). The theoretical foundation of industrial relations and its implications for labor economics and human resource management. Industrial and Labor Relations Review, 64(1), 74-108.\nLee, J. J. & Miller, S. E. (2013) A self-care framework for social workers: Building a strong foundation for practice. Families in Society: The Journal of Contemporary Social Services, 94(2): 96-103.\nLightman, E. S. (1983). Social Workers, Strikes, and Service to Clients. Social Work, 28(2), 142–147.\nMonette, D.R., Sullivan, T.J., & Dejong, C.R. (2010). Applied social research: Tool for the human services. New York: Holt, Rinehart & Winston.\nNASW. (2017). Code of Ethics of The National Association of Social Workers. Retrieved from: https://www.socialworkers.org\nNg, R. (1996). Politics of community services. (2nd ed.). Halifax: Nova.\nNorman, F. & Oppenheimer, J. A. (1978). Modern Political Economy. Englewood Cliffs: Prentice-Hall, Inc.\nPayne, M. (2002). The Role and Achievements of a Professional Association in the Late Twentieth Century: The British Association of Social Workers 1970–2000. British Journal of Social Work, 32, 969–995.\nReamer, F. G. (1998). The Evolution of Social Work Ethics. Social Work, 43(6), 488-500.\nRosenberg, J. & Rosenberg, S. (2006). Do Unions Matter? An Examination of the Historical and Contemporary Role of Labor Unions in the Social Work Profession.Social Work, 51(4), 295-302.\nRosenberg. J. (2003). An Investigation into social work and unions. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Yeshiva University. New York.\nSalamon, M. (2000).Industrial Relations: Theory and Practice(4th ed). London:Prentice Hall.\nScanlon, E., & Harding, S. (2005). Social work and labor unions: Historical and contemporary alliances. Journal of Community Practice, 13(1), 9-30.\nScotia: Fernwood Publishing.\nSpradley, James. (1979). The Ethnographic Interview. New York, NY: Wadsworth Publishing Company.\nStrauss, G., Gallagher, G., Madison, F. (1991).The State of the Union. MI: Industrial Relations Research Association.\nStraussner, S. L. A. & Phillips, N. K. (1988). The Relationship between Social Work and Labor Unions: A History of Strife and Cooperation. The Journal of Sociology & Social Welfare, 15(1), 105-118.\nTham, P. & Meagher G. (2009). Working in Human Services: How do Experiences and Working Conditions in Child Welfare Social Work Compare? British Journal of Social Work, 39(5), 807-827.\nWatts, L., Schoder, M. & Hodgson, D. (2018) .The Experiences of Human Service Managers in Contexts of Change and Uncertainty. Australian Social Work, 71, 306-318.\nWebb, S. & Webb, B. (1894). The history of trade unionism. New York: Longmans.\nWeinbach, R., W & Taylor, L., M. (2011). Social Worker as Manager—The: A Practical Guide to Success (6th). Boston: Pearson.\nWhitehead, P. & Crawshaw, P. (2014). A tale of two economies: The political and the moral in neoliberalism. International Journal of Sociology and Social Policy, 34, 19-34.\nYates, M. D. (1998). Why unions matter. New York: Monthly Review Press.
描述: 碩士
國立政治大學
社會工作研究所
105264005
資料來源: http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#G0105264005
資料類型: thesis
Appears in Collections:學位論文

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat
400501.pdf1.99 MBAdobe PDF2View/Open
Show full item record

Google ScholarTM

Check

Altmetric

Altmetric


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.