Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:

Title: Decolonizing Love: Ambivalent Love in Contemporary (Anti)Sexual Movements of Taiwan and South Korea
Authors: 陳佩甄
Contributors: 台文所
Keywords: Colonial ambivalence; modern love; LGBTQ; marriage; decolonialization
Date: 2018-12
Issue Date: 2020-04-16 11:43:15 (UTC+8)
Abstract: This article problematizes the modern construction of “love” in colonial and contemporary Taiwan and South Korea through historicizing the concept from the nineteenth century to the present. The conception of modern love in East Asia emerged during the late nineteenth century that coincided with the beginnings of civilization and nation-building discourses advocating as a strong mediator for the reconfiguration of social and intimate relationships. In the case of colonial Taiwan and Korea, the colonial governments and intellectuals constantly pivoted on “exceptions” – obscene sex, indecent behavior or illegitimate subjects – to justify their political legitimacy/hegemony to love that prescribed a normative social relationship. Fully embraced by colonial Taiwan and Korea, this mechanism was extended to their postwar regimes; that is, love is celebrated and worshiped without the recognition of its underlying ideology of discrimination and exclusion. I coin the term “love unconscious” to characterize the colonial legacies of love in the contemporary social movements in Taiwan and South Korea. Furthermore I examine how both religious groups and LGBTQ activism were stuck in the “love unconscious” with two cases of contested love: the definition of love in the dictionary, and the rhetoric of love in (anti-)same-sex marriage movements. This article argues that Taiwan and South Korea's LGBTQ and marriage movements are based neither on Western discourses nor inspiration, but are instead driven by the reality and legacy of colonial history. To envisage the decolonization of love is to deconstruct the love unconscious and reconsider the history of colonial love.
Relation: Inter-Asia Cultural Studies, Vol.19, No.4, pp.551-567
Data Type: article
DOI 連結:
Appears in Collections:[臺灣文學研究所] 期刊論文

Files in This Item:

File Description SizeFormat
131.pdf1636KbAdobe PDF69View/Open

All items in 學術集成 are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved.

社群 sharing