Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
https://ah.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/130671| DC Field | Value | Language |
|---|---|---|
| dc.contributor.advisor | 張郁敏 | zh_TW |
| dc.contributor.advisor | Chang, Yuh-Miin | en_US |
| dc.contributor.author | 程于晏 | zh_TW |
| dc.contributor.author | Cheng, Yu-Yen | en_US |
| dc.creator | 程于晏 | zh_TW |
| dc.creator | Cheng, Yu-Yen | en_US |
| dc.date | 2020 | en_US |
| dc.date.accessioned | 2020-07-01T06:06:53Z | - |
| dc.date.available | 2020-07-01T06:06:53Z | - |
| dc.date.issued | 2020-07-01T06:06:53Z | - |
| dc.identifier | G0107464020 | en_US |
| dc.identifier.uri | http://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/130671 | - |
| dc.description | 碩士 | zh_TW |
| dc.description | 國立政治大學 | zh_TW |
| dc.description | 傳播學院傳播碩士學位學程 | zh_TW |
| dc.description | 107464020 | zh_TW |
| dc.description.abstract | 過去已知消費者使用不同社群媒體的動機，但不了解消費者在每個購買決策過程使用不同社群媒體的需求與動機，也不清楚在不同決策階段何種社群媒體最適用。因此本研究針對18 – 34歲的消費者在評估階段與分享階段使用Facebook、Instagram和YouTube的預期需求滿足進行研究，並透過區位理論比較兩購買決策階段中，三種社群媒體在不同預期需求滿足的滿足程度（區位寬度）、媒體間的競爭狀況（區位重疊度）、媒體優勢性（區位優勢）以及整體競爭狀態。\n 本研究利用調查法蒐集了430份有效樣本，研究結果發現消費者在評估階段有「獲得評論需求」、「休閒娛樂需求」和「資訊分享需求」，在分享階段有「評論娛樂需求」和「習慣分享需求」。比較評估階段媒體競爭狀況，YouTube在「獲得評論需求」和「休閒娛樂需求」皆有可能取代Facebook和Instagram，而Instagram則有可能取代Facebook，但三者在「資訊分享需求」為互相競爭關係；比較分享階段，YouTube在「評論娛樂需求」中有可能取代Facebook和Instagram，但Facebook與Instagram則互相競爭狀態，但在「習慣分享需求」中，Facebook有可能取代Instagram，Instagram則有可能取代YouTube，但Facebook與YouTube呈現互相競爭的狀態。 | zh_TW |
| dc.description.abstract | The motivations of consumers to use different social media has been researched in the past, but the needs and motivations of consumers to use different social media in each stage of customer decision journey are not been found, and it is not clear which social media is the most appropriate at different stages. This study focuses on considering the needs of consumers aged 18 to 34 who use Facebook, Instagram and YouTube in the evaluation stage and sharing stage, and compares the consumer`s satisfaction (Niche Breadth), the competition between media (Niche Overlap), the media superiority (Niche Superiority) and the overall competition through the Niche Theory.\n Collected 430 web questionnaires, the finding of this study shows that consumers have the needs for "obtaining comments", "leisure entertainment" and "information sharing" in the evaluation stage, while in the sharing stage, they have the needs for "comment entertainment" and "habitual sharing". Comparing the competitive states of evaluation stage, YouTube may replace Facebook and Instagram in "obtaining comments needs" and "obtaining comments needs", while Instagram is likely to replace Facebook, but the three are competing in "information sharing needs" comparing the sharing stage, YouTube may also replace Facebook and Instagram in "comment entertainment needs", but Facebook and Instagram compete with each other. However, in "habitual sharing needs", Facebook may replace Instagram and Instagram may replace YouTube, but Facebook and YouTube may compete with each other. | en_US |
| dc.description.tableofcontents | 第一章 緒論 1\n第一節 研究背景與動機 1\n第二節 研究目的與價值 3\n第二章 文獻探討 6\n第一節 顧客決策旅程（Customer decision journey; CDJ） 6\n第二節 區位理論（Niche Theory） 9\n一、 區位寬度（Niche Breadth） 10\n二、 區位重疊度（Niche Overlap） 12\n三、 區位優勢（Niche Superiority） 13\n第三節 社群媒體的使用需求 17\n一、 需求類別 17\n二、 社群媒體使用需求 18\n三、 Facebook使用需求 22\n四、 Instagram使用需求 26\n五、 YouTube使用需求 29\n六、 社交媒體整合使用需求 32\n七、 社群媒體能供性（Affordance）與研究假設 45\n第三章 研究方法 50\n第一節 研究架構 50\n第二節 調查法 52\n一、 母體、抽樣方法與流程 52\n二、 問卷前測 53\n三、 問卷設計與變項測量 60\n第四章 資料分析 71\n第一節 問卷樣本 71\n一、 調查法樣本輪廓 71\n第二節 假設與研究問題檢驗 72\n一、 假設一檢驗 72\n二、 假設二檢驗 78\n三、 研究問題一檢驗 82\n四、 研究問題二檢驗 83\n五、 研究問題三檢驗 85\n六、 假設三檢驗 88\n七、 假設四檢驗 90\n八、 研究假設與研究問題檢驗結果 92\n第五章 研究結果與討論 96\n第一節 評估階段 96\n一、 預期需求滿足 96\n二、 社群媒體整體競爭關係 97\n第二節 分享階段 98\n一、 預期需求滿足 98\n二、 社群媒體整體競爭關係 98\n第三節 研究限制與未來研究建議 100\n第四節 貢獻與建議 101\n參考文獻 106\n附錄一、深訪內容 116\n附錄二、問卷 124 | zh_TW |
| dc.format.extent | 4790841 bytes | - |
| dc.format.mimetype | application/pdf | - |
| dc.source.uri | http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#G0107464020 | en_US |
| dc.subject | 顧客決策旅程 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject | 預期需求滿足 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject | 區位理論 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject | 社群媒體 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject | 競爭關係 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject | Customer decision journey | en_US |
| dc.subject | Needs | en_US |
| dc.subject | Niche Theory | en_US |
| dc.subject | Social media | en_US |
| dc.subject | Competitive relationships | en_US |
| dc.title | 選對媒體才是王道：從區位理論分析Facebook、Instagram和YouTube作為不同購買決策階段之競爭優勢 | zh_TW |
| dc.title | Choosing the right social media platform at different decision stages: Comparing the competitive advantage of Facebook, Instagram, and YouTube through the Niche Theory | en_US |
| dc.type | thesis | en_US |
| dc.relation.reference | 中文部分\n〈2019台灣網路報告〉（2019）。《財團法人台灣網路資訊中心》。取自\nhttps://report.twnic.tw/2019/assets/download/TWNIC_TaiwanInternetReport_20\n19_CH.pdf。\n王嵩音（2007）。〈網路使用之態度、動機與影響〉。《資訊社會研究》，\n12，57–85。取自http://www.nhu.edu.tw/~society/jccic/12/fu/12-03.pdf。汪志堅、陳翔、江義平、江維彬（2013）。〈Facebook社交網站使用因素之量表發展與驗證〉。《電子商務學報》，15，319–351。https://doi.org/10.6188/JEB.2013.15(3).01。\n李岳昇、王嵩音（2015）。〈印刷雜誌、數位雜誌與行動數位雜誌之市場區位\n理論分析〉。《資訊社會學研究》，28，35–65。\nhttps://doi.org/10.29843/JCCIS.201501_(28).0002。\n邱皓政（2010）。《量化硏究與統計分析 : SPSS(PASW)資料分析範例（五版）》。臺\n北市：五南圖書。\n〈品牌影響力調查 Most Influential Brands〉（2018）。《Ipsos、商業周刊》。\n取自https://www.ipsos.com/sites/default/files/ct/publication/documents/2018-01/n042_mkt_millennials_and_the_impact_of_social_brand_perception.pdf。\n〈消費歷程中不容小覷的影響力 YouTube造就成效行銷新勢力 (上) 〉（2019）。\n《台北數位集團》。取自https://index.taipeiads.com/NewsData.php?oid=4。\n區谷怡（2016）。O2O消費的使用與滿足和科技接受整合模式——以線上買票，\n線下觀影為例。國立政治大學傳播學院傳播碩士學位學程碩士論文，台北市。 取自https://hdl.handle.net/11296/2666b5\n郭貞、黃振家（2002）。〈以區位分析比較網路、型錄、與商店做為購物管道\n之競爭優勢：一個跨年比較〉。《新聞學研究》，72，1–26。取自http://www.airitilibrary.com.autorpa.lib.nccu.edu.tw/Publication/alDetailedMesh?DocID=10161007-200207-201305130013-201305130013-1-26。\n黃品慈、李秀珠（2013）。〈不同類型 IPTV 之市場競爭：從區位理論檢視\nPPStream、土豆網與 Youtube 之競爭〉。《中華傳播學刊》，207–241。\nhttps://doi.org/10.6195/cjcr.2013.24.06。\n楊安琪（2018年9月14日）。〈YouTube 影音勢力全面啟動！國際年度盛會\nYouTube FanFest 蓄勢待發〉。《TechNews科技新報》。取自\nhttps://technews.tw/2018/09/14/youtube-pulse-and-youtube-fanfest/。\n詹子君（2015）。《從「區位理論」探討線上新聞平台─ Yahoo! 奇摩、Facebook 與\nLINE─ 之間的情形》。交通大學傳播研究所碩士論文。取自「全國博碩士論\n文資訊網」https://hdl.handle.net/11296/f9tue2。\n萬文隆、林淑芬（2004）。〈深度訪談在質性研究中的應用〉。《生活科技教\n育》，37，17–23。https://doi.org/10.6232/LTE.2004.37(4).4。\n《維基百科》區位論。取自\nhttps://zh.wikipedia.org/wiki/%E5%8C%BA%E4%BD%8D%E8%AE%BA。\n〈線上影片廣告：觀看情境對廣告的影響〉（2017）。《Ipsos》。取自\nhttps://www.ipsos.com/sites/default/files/ct/publication/documents/2017-\n10/P065_CNT_YouTube-Video-Ad-Viewability.pdf。\n謝宗霖、羅新興（2009）。〈網頁訊息對瀏覽者回憶與消費意願的影響-以探討\n涉入的干擾效果〉。《中華管理評論國際學報》，12（4）。取自\nhttp://cmr.ba.ouhk.edu.hk/cmr/webjournal/v12n4/CMR251C09.pdf。\n英文部分\nAlhabash, S., & Ma, M. (2017). A tale of four platforms: Motivations and uses of\nFacebook, Twitter, Instagram, and Snapchat among college students?. Social Media+Society,3(1),2056305117691544. https://doi.org/10.1177/2056305117691544\nBarclays (2018). Gen Z: Step aside Millennials. Retrieved from\nhttps://www.investmentbank.barclays.com/our-insights/generation-z.html\nCoelho, R., Oliveira, D., & Almeida, M. (2016). Does social media matter for post\ntypology? Impact of post content on Facebook and Instagram metrics. Online Information Review, 40, 458–471. https://doi.org/10.1108/OIR-06-2015-0176\nChiang, H., & Hsiao, K. (2015). YouTube stickiness: the needs, personal, and\nenvironmental perspective. Internet Research, 25, 85–106. https://doi.org/10.1108/IntR-11-2013-0236\nCheung, T. T. (2014). A study on motives, usage, self-presentation and number of\nfollowers on Instagram [Master’s thesis]. Retrieved from\nhttp://lbms03.cityu.edu.hk/oaps/ss2014-4595-ctt656.pdf\nCourt, D., Elzinga, D., Mulder, S., & Vetvik, O. (2009). The consumer decision\njourney. The McKinsey Quarterly, (3). Retrieved from\nhttp://search.proquest.com/docview/224538362/\nDeVellis, R. F. (2012). Chapter 6: Factor Analysis. Scale development: Theory and\napplications, 26.\nDuncan (2002): Evaluating the IMC processes (pp. 726-732).\nDimmick, J., Chen, Y., & Li, Z. (2004). Competition Between the Internet and\nTraditional News Media: The Gratification-Opportunities Niche Dimension. Journal of Media Economics, 17, 19–33. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327736me1701_2\nEdelman, D. C. (2010). Branding in the Digital Age. Harvard Business Review,\n88, 14-18. Palgrave Macmillan. doi:10.1108/eb040166\nDimmick, J., Kline, S., & Stafford, L. (2000). The Gratification Niches of Personal E-\nmail and the Telephone: Competition, Displacement, and Complementarity.\nCommunication Research, 27, 227–248.\nhttps://doi.org/10.1177/009365000027002005\nDimmick, J. (1993). Ecology, economics, and gratification utilities, media\neconomics:Theory and practice, 135-156. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum\nAssociates, Inc.\nTHE TRENDS TO KNOW FOR 2019 (2019). GlobalWebIndex. Retrieved from\nhttps://www.globalwebindex.com/2019-consumer-trends.\nGao, Q., & Feng, C. (2016). Branding with social media: User gratifications, usage\npatterns, and brand message content strategies. Computers in Human Behavior, 63, 868–890. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2016.06.022\nGodey, B., Manthiou, A., Pederzoli, D., Rokka, J., Aiello, G., Donvito, R., & Singh,\nR. (2016). Social media marketing efforts of luxury brands: Influence on brand\nequity and consumer behavior. Journal of business research, 69, 5833-5841.\nhttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2016.04.181\nGu, B., & Ye, Q. (2014). First step in social media: Measuring the influence of online\nmanagement responses on customer satisfaction. Production and Operations\nManagement, 23, 570-582. https://doi.org/10.1111/poms.12043\nGatautis, R., & Kazakevičiūtė, A. (2012). Consumer behavior in online social\nnetworks: review and future research directions. Economics and management,\n17, 1457-1463. https://doi.org/10.5755/j01.em.17.4.3014\nGülnar, B., Balcı, Ş., & Çakır, V. (2010). Motivations of Facebook, You Tube and\nsimilar web sites users. Bilig, 54(Summer 2010), 161-184. Retrieved from\nhttp://bilig.yesevi.edu.tr/yonetim/icerik/makaleler/2656-published.pdf\nGulati, R., & Oldroyd, J. B. (2005). The quest for customer focus. Harvard Business\nReview, 83, 92-101.\nHuang, Y. T., & Su, S. F. (2018). Motives for instagram use and topics of interest\namong young adults. Future Internet, 10, 77.\nhttps://doi.org/10.3390/fi10080077\nHaridakis, P., & Hanson, G. (2009). Social interaction and co-viewing with YouTube:\nBlending mass communication reception and social connection. Journal of\nBroadcasting & Electronic Media, 53, 317-335.\nhttps://doi.org/10.1080/08838150902908270\nIBM (2017). Uniquely Generation Z. Retrieved from\nhttps://www.generationy20.com/retail-generation-z.PDF\nKlobas, J. E., McGill, T. J., Moghavvemi, S., & Paramanathan, T. (2019).\nProblematic and extensive YouTube use: first hand reports. Online Information\nReview, 43, 265-282. https://doi.org/10.1108/OIR-01-2018-0032\nKlobas, J. E., McGill, T. J., Moghavvemi, S., & Paramanathan, T. (2018).\nCompulsive YouTube usage: A comparison of use motivation and personality\neffects. Computers in Human Behavior, 87, 129-139.\nhttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2018.05.038\nKhan, M. L. (2017). Social media engagement: What motivates user participation and\nconsumption on YouTube?. Computers in Human Behavior, 66, 236-247.\nhttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2016.09.024\nKoroleva, K., & Kane, G. (2017). Relational affordances of information processing on\nFacebook. Information & Management, 54, 560–572. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.im.2016.11.007\nKim, J., Kim, S., & Nam, C. (2016). Competitive dynamics in the Korean video\nplatform market: Traditional pay TV platforms vs. OTT platforms. Telematics\nand Informatics, 33, 711–721. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tele.2015.06.014\nKeller, K. L. (2016). Unlocking the power of integrated marketing communications:\nhow integrated is your IMC program?. Journal of Advertising, 45, 286-301.\nhttps://doi.org/10.1080/00913367.2016.1204967\nKim, J., Kim, S., & Nam, C. (2016). Competitive dynamics in the Korean video\nplatform market: Traditional pay TV platforms vs. OTT platforms. Telematics\nand Informatics, 33, 711–721. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tele.2015.06.014\nKrause, A. E., North, A. C., & Heritage, B. (2014). The Uses and Gratifications of\nusing Facebook music listening applications. Computers in Human Behavior, 39,\n71e77. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2014.07.001\nKo, H., Cho, C. H., & Roberts, M. S. (2005). Internet uses and gratifications: A\nstructural equation model of interactive advertising. Journal of advertising, 34, 57-\n70. Retrieved from http://search.proquest.com/docview/236570329/\nKaye, B., & Johnson, T. (2004). A Web for all reasons: uses and gratifications of\nInternet components for political information. Telematics and Informatics, 21,\n197–223. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0736-5853(03)00037-6\nKaiser, H. F. (1974). An index of factorial simplicity. Psychometrika, 39, 31-36.\nKaiser, H. F. (1958). The varimax criterion for analytic rotation in factor\nanalysis. Psychometrika, 23, 187-200.\nLarsson, A. O. (2018). The news user on social media: A comparative study of\ninteracting with media organizations on Facebook and Instagram. Journalism\nstudies, 19, 2225-2242. https://doi.org/10.1080/1461670X.2017.1332957\nLu, W., & Hampton, K. (2017). Beyond the power of networks: Differentiating\nnetwork structure from social media affordances for perceived social support.\nNew Media & Society, 19, 861–879. \nhttps://doi.org/10.1177/1461444815621514\nLemon, K. N., & Verhoef, P. C. (2016). Understanding customer experience\nthroughout the customer journey. Journal of marketing, 80, 69-96. https://doi.org/10.1509/jm.15.0420\nLai, C. Y., & Yang, H. L. (2016). Determinants and consequences of Facebook\nfeature use. New Media & Society, 18, 1310-1330.\nhttps://doi.org/10.1177/1461444814555959\nLee, E., Lee, J. A., Moon, J. H., & Sung, Y. (2015). Pictures speak louder than words:\nMotivations for using Instagram. Cyberpsychology, Behavior, and Social\nNetworking, 18, 552-556. https://doi.org/10.1089/cyber.2015.0157\nMalik, A., Dhir, A., & Nieminen, M. (2016). Uses and Gratifications of digital photo\nsharing on Facebook. Telematics and Informatics, 33(1), 129e138.\nhttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.tele.2015.06.009\nMeyer, C., & Schwager, A. (2007). Understanding customer experience. Harvard\nbusiness review, 85(2), 116. Retrieved from\nhttp://search.proquest.com/docview/70260209/\nMierzjewska, B. I., & Hollifield, C. A. (2006). Theoretical approaches in media\nmanagement research. In Handbook of media management and economics (pp.\n49-78). Routledge.\nde Oliveira, R., Pentoney, C., & Pritchard-Berman, M. (2018). YouTube needs:\nunderstanding user’s motivations to watch videos on mobile devices.Proceedings\nof the 20th International Conference on Human-Computer Interaction with\nMobile Devices and Services, 1–11. https://doi.org/10.1145/3229434.3229448\nPrasad, S., Gupta, I., & Totala, N. (2017). Social media usage, electronic word of mouth\nand purchase-decision involvement. Asia-Pacific Journal of Business Administration, 9, 134–145. https://doi.org/10.1108/APJBA-06-2016-0063\nPark, N., & Lee, S. (2014). College students` motivations for Facebook use and\npsychological outcomes. Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media, 58, 601-\n620. https://doi.org/10.1080/08838151.2014.966355\nPempek, T. A., Yermolayeva, Y. A., & Calvert, S. L. (2009). College students` social\nnetworking experiences on Facebook. Journal of applied developmental psychology, 30, 227-238. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.appdev.2008.12.010\nRitchie, J., Lewis, J., Nicholls, C. M., & Ormston, R. (Eds.). (2013). Qualitative\nresearch practice: A guide for social science students and researchers. sage.\nRoy, S. K. (2009). Internet uses and gratifications: A survey in the Indian context.\nComputers in Human Behavior, 25, 878-886. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2009.03.002\nSheldon, P., & Newman, M. (2019). Instagram and American Teens: Understanding\nMotives for Its Use and Relationship to Excessive Reassurance-Seeking and\nInterpersonal Rejection. The Journal of Social Media in Society, 8, 1-16.\nShane-Simpson, C., Manago, A., Gaggi, N., & Gillespie-Lynch, K. (2018). Why do\ncollege students prefer Facebook, Twitter, or Instagram? Site affordances, tensions between privacy and self-expression, and implications for social capital. Computers in Human Behavior, 86, 276-288. Retrieved from http://search.proquest.com/docview/2093196713/\nSheldon, P., Rauschnabel, P. A., Antony, M. G., & Car, S. (2017). A cross-cultural\ncomparison of Croatian and American social network sites: Exploring cultural differences in motives for Instagram use. Computers in Human Behavior, 75, 643-651. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2017.06.009\nSheldon, P., & Bryant, K. (2016). Instagram: Motives for its use and relationship to\nnarcissism and contextual age. Computers in human Behavior, 58, 89-97.\nhttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2015.12.059\nStein, A., & Ramaseshan, B. (2016). Towards the identification of customer\nexperience touch point elements. Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services,\n30, 8-19. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jretconser.2015.12.001\nSundar, S., & Limperos, A. (2013). Uses and Grats 2.0: New Gratifications for New \nMedia. Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media, 57, 504–525.\nhttps://doi.org/10.1080/08838151.2013.845827\nSmock, A. D., Ellison, N. B., Lampe, C., & Wohn, D. Y. (2011). Facebook as a\ntoolkit: A uses and gratifications approach to unbundling feature use. Computers in Human Behavior, 27, 2322e2329. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2011.07.011\nShao, G. (2009). Understanding the appeal of user-generated media: a uses and\ngratification perspective. Internet research, 19, 7-25.\nhttps://doi.org/10.1108/10662240910927795\nVarkaris, E., & Neuhofer, B. (2017). The influence of social media on the consumers’\nhotel decision journey. Journal of Hospitality and Tourism Technology, 8, 101-118. https://doi.org/10.1108/JHTT-09-2016-0058\nWe Are Social & Hootsuite, Task Force. (2019). Digital 2019 Global Digital\nOverview (January 2019) v01. Retrieved from https://www.slideshare.net/DataReportal/digital-2019-global-digital-overview-january-2019-v01?from_action=save\nWe Are Social & Hootsuite, Task Force. (2018). Digital in 2018 Global Overview.\nRetrieved from https://www.slideshare.net/wearesocial/digital-in-2018-global-\noverview-86860338?ref=https://digitalreport.wearesocial.com/\nWhiting, A., & Williams, D. (2013). Why people use social media: a uses and\ngratifications approach. Qualitative Market Research: An International Journal, 16, 362–369. https://doi.org/10.1108/QMR-06-2013-0041\nYi, K., & Sung, Y. (2007). What to read in the morning? A niche analysis of free\ndaily papers and paid papers in Korea. The International Journal on Media Management, 9, 164-174. Retrieved from http://search.proquest.com/docview/220296974/\nZolkepli, I. A., & Kamarulzaman, Y. (2015). Social media adoption: The role of\nmedia needs and innovation characteristics. Computers in Human Behavior, 43,\n189-209. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2014.10.050 | zh_TW |
| dc.identifier.doi | 10.6814/NCCU202000490 | en_US |
| item.fulltext | With Fulltext | - |
| item.cerifentitytype | Publications | - |
| item.grantfulltext | open | - |
| item.openairecristype | http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_46ec | - |
| item.openairetype | thesis | - |
| Appears in Collections: | 學位論文 | |
Files in This Item:
| File | Description | Size | Format | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 402001.pdf | 4.68 MB | Adobe PDF2 | View/Open |
Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.