Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://ah.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/130677
題名: 知識翻新活動融入達悟族大船文化課程教學之行動研究--以臺東縣蘭嶼鄉朗島國小六年級學生為例
An action research of integrating knowledge building activities into the teaching of the ship culture of Tao -- An example from a class of sixth graders in Iraraley Elementary School, Lanyu, Taitung County
作者: 許菱雅
Shiu, Ling-Yia
貢獻者: 洪煌堯
Hong, Huang-Yao
許菱雅
Shiu, Ling-Yia
關鍵詞: 知識翻新
文化課程
達悟族
大船文化
Knowledge building
Cultural curriculum
The ship culture of Tao
日期: 2020
上傳時間: 1-七月-2020
摘要: 本研究旨在探討知識翻新活動融入六年級達悟族大船文化課程教學對學生的學習歷程與成就之影響。研究對象為七位台東縣蘭嶼鄉朗島國小的六年級學生;七人皆為達悟族籍。研究方法採行動研究法;教學課程設計期程為二十週,包含進行前測、教學與後測。\n研究問題有四項:(1)學生的整體文化認同感情形為何?(2)透過知識翻新融入文化教學,學生在數位學習平台中的活動情形為何?(3)透過知識翻新融入文化教學,學生對大船文化知識理解的轉變為何?以及(4)透過知識翻新融入文化教學,教師的創新教學知能轉變為何?\n研究資料來源包含:(1)學生課程前後的半結構訪談;(2)數位學習平台的記錄;(3)學生課程中手繪的大船文化知識心智圖;(4)學生課程前後拍攝的導覽影片;以及(5)教師的教學筆記。資料分析主要採質性方式;透過深入分析多元資料,以了解在知識翻新教學融入大船文化課程後,學生的學習歷程與成效,以及教師過程中的教學省思。\n本研究期望承先啟後,發展出符應十二年國教核心素養的文化課程教學模式。透過知識翻新活動融入教學,讓學生逐步建構出大船文化的知識地圖,並培養學生核心素養。研究結果如下:(1)學生對當地文化具有高度的文化認同感,但對大船文化知識了解並不深入;(2)透過知識翻新活動融入教學,學生能在數位學習平台上共構出大船文化知識地圖,並改善線上活動情形、提升提問品質,及歸類各種大船文化的想法;(3)學生在訪談、手繪心智圖和導覽影片中,也分別有不同程度上大船文化知識理解的提升;以及(4)教師在依據一些知識翻新的原則進行省思後,也能適當對課程設計進行調整,以提升其創新教學知能。
The purpose of this study was to explore sixth-grades’ learning processes and achievements after integrating knowledge building activities into the teaching of the ship culture of the Tao aboriginal tribe. The study participants were seven sixth-grade students of Iraraley Elementary School in Lanyu, Taitung County. All of them were from the Tao aboriginal tribe. This research adopted an action research method. The duration of the course was 20 weeks.\nThere were four main research questions: (1) To what extent do students identify their Tao culture before and after the course? (2) How were students working and interacting with one another in the digital learning platform through the integration of knowledge building activities into the cultural teaching? (3) How were students changing their understanding of the ship cultural knowledge through the integration of knowledge building into the cultural curriculums? And (4) How was the teacher reflecting and accordingly developing deeper understanding of innovative teaching knowledge through integrating knowledge building into her cultural teaching activities?\nData sources mainly came from: (1) semi-structured interviews; (2) online activities recorded in the digital learning platform; (3) students’ concept-mapping of their ship cultural knowledge; (4) videos made by students to introduce the Tao ship culture; and (5) teacher’s personal reflective teaching notes. Data were analyzed mainly via qualitative means.\nThis research intends to develop a local cultural curriculum to teach some core competencies of the 12-year basic education. Through integrating knowledge building principles into class teaching, students gradually built a more complete knowledge map of the Tao ship culture and developed some core competencies. The main findings of this study were as follows: (1) students had a strong cultural identity towards their local tribal culture, but they did not have the necessary understanding of their Tao ship cultural knowledge; (2) students were able to construct a more complete Tao ship cultural knowledge, as reflected in the concept-mapping activity, via the use of an online learning platform, and were able to perform fairly frequent online activities, produced quality questions, and analytically synthesize various ship culture ideas into different themes/categories; (3) students’ interviews, concept-mapping results and final video projects, also showed that students had reached higher levels of understanding of the Tao ship cultural knowledge; and (4) with frequent teaching reflection on some knowledge building principles, the class teacher was also able to make appropriate adjustments to her curriculum design, and accordingly enhance her innovative teaching abilities.
參考文獻: Chang, Y. H., & Hong, H. Y. (2011). Facilitating belief change among prospective science teachers through knowledge building. Paper presented at the annual conference of American Educational Research Association (AERA), New Orleans, LA.\nCorson, D. (1999). Community-based education for indigenous cultures In S. May (Ed.),Indigenous community-based education (pp.8-19). Clevedon, UK: Multilingual Matters.\nMcCarty, T. L., & Watahomigie, L.J. (1999). Indigenous community-based language education in the USA In S. May (Ed.), Indigenous community-based education (pp. 79-94). Clevedon, UK: Multilingual Matters.\nHarris, S. (1989). Culture Boundaries, Culture Maintenance-in-Change, and Two-Way Aboriginal Schools. The Australian Journal of Indigenous Education, 17(5), 3-19. doi:10.1017/S0310582200007069\nHong, H.-Y., & Sullivan, F. R. (2009). Towards an idea-centered, principle-based design approach to support learning as knowledge creation. Educational Technology Research and Development, 57(5), 613-627.\nHuang, Y.M., Chen, M.Y.& Mo, S.S.(2015). How do we inspire people to contact aboriginal culture with Web2. 0 technology? Computers & Education, 86, 71-83.\nHong, H. Y., Scardamalia, M., Messina, R., & Teo, C. L. (2008). Principle-based design to foster adaptive use of technology for building community knowledge. In G. Kanselaar, V. Jonker, P.A. Kirschner, & F.J. Prins (Eds.). International. Perspectives in the Learning Sciences: Cre8ing a learning world. Proceedings of the Eighth International Conference for the Learning Sciences – ICLS 2008, Vol. 1 (pp. 374-381). Utrecht, the Netherlands: International Society of the Learning Sciences, Inc.\nKanu, Y. (2005). Teachers` Perceptions of the Integration of Aboriginal Culture Into the High School Curriculum. Alberta Journal of Educational Research, 51(1), 50-68.\nKing, A. (1994).Guiding knowledge construction in the classroom: Effects of teaching children how to question and how to explain. American Educational Research Journal, 31(2), 338-368.\nLee, E. Y. C., Chan, C. K. K., & van Aalst, J. (2006). Students assessing their own collaborative knowledge building. International Journal of Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning, 1(1), 57–87.\nOshima, J., Oshima, R., Murayama, I., Inagaki, S., Takenaka, M., Nakayama, H., et al. (2004). Design experiments in Japanese elementary science education with computer support for collaborative learning: hypothesis testing and collaborative construction. International Journal of Science Education, 26(10), 1199-1221.\nPan, S. L., & Yang, Q. (2010). A Survey on transfer learning. IEEE Transactions on\nKnowledge and Data Engineering, 22(10), 1345-1359.\nResnick, M. (1996). Distributed Constructionism. Proceedings of the 1996 International Conference of the Learning Sciences, Northwestern University.\nScardamalia, M. (2002). Collective cognitive responsibility for the advancement of knowledge. In B. Smith (Ed.), Liberal education in a knowledge society (pp. 67–98). Chicago, IL: Open Court.\nScardamalia, M. (2004). CSILE/Knowledge Forum. In Education and Technology: An encyclopedia (pp. 183-192). Santa Barbara: ABC-CLIO.\nScardamalia, M., & Bereiter, C. (2003a). Knowledge building environments: Extending the limits of the possible in education and knowledge work. In A. DiStefano, K.E. Rudestam, & R. Silverman (Eds.), Encyclopedia of distributed learning. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.\nScardamalia, M., & Bereiter, C. (2003b). Knowledge building. In James, W. G.(Ed.),The Encyclopedia of Education (2nd ed., pp. 1370-1373). New York: Macmillan Reference, USA.\nScardamalia, M., & Bereiter, C. (2006). Knowledge building:Theory, pedagogy, and technology. In K.Sawyer.(Ed.),Cambridge handbook of the learning sciences. Cambridge:Cambridge Univ. Press.\nScardamalia, M., Bereiter, C., & Lamon, M. (1994). The CSILE project: Trying to bring the classroom into World 3. In K. McGilley (Eds.), Classroom lessons: Integrating cognitive theory and classroom practice (pp. 201-228). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.\nStahl, G. (2007). Meaning making in CSCL: Conditions and preconditions for cognitive processes by groups. Paper presented at the international conference on Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning (CSCL2007), Brunswick, NJ.\nStrauss, A., & Corbin, J. (1990). Basic of Qualitatiove research:Grounded theory procedures and techniques. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.\nVander Ark, T. (2011).Getting Smart: How Digital Learning is Changing the World.San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.\n王永福(2019)。教學的技術。台北市:商周。\n王守玉、Windsor,C. & Yate,P.(2012)。簡介紮根理論研究法。護理雜誌,59(1),91-95。\n王前龍(2017)。從原住民族自決與民族學校之法律定位展望原住民族實驗教育的方向。台灣原住民族研究學報,7(2),39-58。\n王博賢(2010)。知識翻新教學對小學生科學探究活動與科學合作概念之影響(碩士論文)。取自http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/cgibin/gs32/gsweb.cgi/ccd=bDEtK-K/record?r1=1&h1=0\n王靜華(2016)。知識翻新對國小四年級學生閱讀理解和寫作表現之影響(碩士 論文)。取自https://hdl.handle.net/11296/24gmqt\n史美奐(2004)。教師創新教學的類型與可能。課程與教學,7(1),1-14+177。\n李台元(2017)。從多元文化到多元文化教育。教育脈動,12,1-6。\n李佩蓉(2014)。電腦支援協作知識翻新教學與提升學生科學理論本質理解之相關研究(碩士論文)。取自http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/cgibin/gs32/gsweb.cgi/lo-gin?o=dwebmge\n李勇輝(2017)。學習動機、學習策略與學習成效關係之研究-以數位學習為例。經營管理學刊,14,68-86。\n余光弘(2004)。雅美族。臺北市:三民。\n何惠蘭(2010)。台東縣國小原住民學童族群認同與生活適應之相關研究(碩士論 文)。取自華藝線上圖書館。( DOI:10.6836/NTTU.2010.00098)\n吳麗美(2018)。幼兒園實施在地文化課程困境與展望(碩士論文)。取自https://hdl.handle.net/11296/g6h2ad\n林玉芬(2013)。幼兒園阿美族野菜飲食文化課程之教與學(碩士論文)。取自https://hdl.handle.net/11296/k9a5qp\n林昭元(2014)。蘭嶼達悟族民族植物知識內涵與傳統學習歷程之探討─以造舟相關知識為例(碩士論文)。取自http://rportal.lib.ntnu.edu.tw/bitstream/20.50- 0.12235/103637/1/n060146004s01.pdf\n林素甘、高子洵(2014)。誰在書寫蘭嶼,建構蘭嶼知識:蘭嶼專題圖書之分析。國家圖書館館刊,103(1),1-18。\n阿將伊崮喜瀾(2015)。影片教學與數位遊戲式學習應用於台灣原住民文化教育之成效分析與反思-以北排灣拉瓦爾的藥用植物文化教學為例(碩士論文)。取自https://hdl.handle.net/11296/raaef7\n施文玲(2007)。以學習理論為基礎的數位化教學策略。生活科技教育月刊,40(2),32-41。\n洪志彰(2018)。南王Puyuma花環實驗小學文化課程設計與教學。教育脈動,16,1-7。\n洪新怡(2017)。體驗式寫作融入原住民文化課程對原鄉小學教學成效之行動研究(碩士論文)。取自https://hdl.handle.net/11296/spu55b\n洪愷德(2019)。幼兒園教師實施西拉雅文化課程經驗之探究(碩士論文)。取自https://hdl.handle.net/11296/dxtq32\n教育部(2014)。十二年國民基本教育課程綱要總綱。取自https://www.naer.edu.tw/ezfiles/0/1000/attach/87/pta_18543_581357_62438.pdf\n陳步肄(2005)。對創新教學實踐的思考。平原大學學報,22(5),101-102。\n陳宜美(2019)。知識翻新活動融入英語課程對國中生閱讀理解及口說能力之影響(碩士論文)。 取自https://hdl.handle.net/11296/74e34b\n陳奕璇(2013)。原住民舞樂學習與文化展演對學生文化認同影響之研究-以新北市樟樹國中「原住民藝文表演社」為例(碩士論文)。取自華藝線上圖書館。(DOI:10.6835/TNUA.2013.00189)\n國家教育研究院(2019)。議題融入說明手冊。取自https://www.naer.edu.tw/ezfiles/0/1000/img/67/39258456.pdf\n葉重新(2017)。教育研究法(第三版)。台北市:心理。\n葉晏瑜(2019)。知識翻新活動對英語閱讀理解、焦慮及動機之影響(碩士論文)。取自https://hdl.handle.net/11296/67v43k\n黃姿瑋(2014)。融入知識翻新教學對國小學童閱讀理解和閱讀動機之影響(碩士論文)。取自https://hdl.handle.net/11296/5djtyf\n黃添丁(2015)。數位學習融入課程之學習動機及學習行為對學習成效的影響。慈濟科技大學學報,1,35-52。\n達西烏拉彎‧畢馬(2002)。台灣的原住民─達悟族。臺北市:臺原。\n楊怡婷(2016)。電腦輔助知識翻新活動對高中生學習環境感知與英文寫作表現 之影響(碩士論文)。取自https://hdl.handle.net/11296/cdu45m\n楊懷恩(2015)。比哨的獵人學校:數位遊戲式學習輔助太魯閣族傳統狩獵文化教育(碩士論文)。取自https://hdl.handle.net/11296/7r8e8y\n蔡佩真(2011)。透過知識翻新活動以提升國小學童對節能減碳概念之理解(碩士論文)。取自https://hdl.handle.net/11296/tas2t2\n蔡清田(2013)。教育行動研究新論。台北市:五南。\n潘文欽(2008)。蘭嶼拼板舟造舟過程及植物利用之研究-以2004年紅頭部落為例(碩士論文)。取自https://hdl.handle.net/11296/u9xyrs\n鄭漢文(2004)。蘭嶼雅美大船文化的盤繞—大船文化的社會現象探究(碩士論文)。取自https://hdl.handle.net/11296/fv9a3c\n鄭漢文、王桂清、廖聖福、施拿保(2012)。蘭嶼雅美拼板舟之結構用材。東臺灣研究,7,3-44。\n謝永泉(2019)。Mapabosbos-拼板舟下水禮。臺東縣:台東縣蘭嶼天主教文化研究發展協會。\n譚光鼎(2000)。原住民教育研究(第二版)。台北市:五南。
描述: 碩士
國立政治大學
圖書資訊學數位碩士在職專班
107913023
資料來源: http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#G0107913023
資料類型: thesis
Appears in Collections:學位論文

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat
302301.pdf5.46 MBAdobe PDF2View/Open
Show full item record

Google ScholarTM

Check

Altmetric

Altmetric


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.