Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
https://ah.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/131209| 題名: | 推動優勢觀點個管模式之督導歷程與督導者因應策略之探究 An Exploratory Study on the Supervision Process and Supervisors` Strategies to Promote the Utilization of the Strengths Model |
作者: | 鄧啟明 Teng, Chi-Ming |
貢獻者: | 宋麗玉 Song, Li-Yu 鄧啟明 Teng, Chi-Ming |
關鍵詞: | 優勢觀點 優點模式 優勢觀點取向督導 督導策略 督導歷程 strengths perspective strengths model strengths-based supervision supervisory strategies supervision process |
日期: | 2020 | 上傳時間: | 3-Aug-2020 | 摘要: | 臺灣社工服務持續擴張，依循處遇理論發展本土社工督導知能迫在眉睫，本研究以近年來風行的「優勢觀點個管理模式(簡稱優點模式)」為實施理論，探究本取向督導者所發展出之督導信念和策略、優點督導歷程之督導焦點與使能策略，並進一步探究在新管理主義下，本取向督導模式在本土的適用性，翻轉當前社工所遭遇到的困境，培訓更多認同發展合作性及以優勢為本的助人者。\n本研究以詮釋學方法論為基底，透過立意取樣，選取國內有系統推展優點模式之社福組織的督導者和社工為研究對象，以半結構訪談大綱進行深入訪談。本研究共訪問12位督導者和4位社工，皆具有至少一年以上優點模式實務經驗。從其經驗中，本研究歸納出優勢觀點督導模式下，督導者的復元目標為「見證成長、肯定付出」，使能策略為「聚焦存有之優勢、促進反思與覺察、系統性視野凝聚認同」，所建構稱職的督導才能，在教育性督導功能為理論為本、實務智慧、學習力、界限與覺察力，在支持性督導功能為謙卑態度、關懷力，而在行政性督導功能則為領導力、協調力。本取向督導模式萃取出的六大督導信念，包括「受督者是督導關係中的指導者」、「督導關係是基本且必要的」、「聚焦於成就經驗，而非不足或懷疑」、「每個人都有能力學習、成長與改變」、「創造支持優勢觀點之服務脈絡」、「聚焦於尋找復元的意義和可能性」等，前四項以促進「我在、我有、我能和我想」等對話練習，激發改變動能、提升助人者之權能感，第五項則是創造支持推展優點的環境(機構、網絡、制度)，最後，聚焦於助人者成為更好的自己。另一方面，研究發現在促進社工融合優勢觀點的歷程則包括「孵化-轉化-深化-活化」等優勢督導歷程，督導者著重的改變技術，包括「對話示範、覺察練習、促進反思」，體現的督導目標大致包括，(1)重視累積社工教育資本、(2)以親善關係發展優勢視角、(3)善用評量翻轉缺點思維、(4)關注進展提升續航力等。\n優勢觀點督導模式，強調督導者以優勢、謙卑的支持態度滋養受督者，增進其覺察與對話能力，從行動及反思修正處遇方向，陪伴受督者汲取諸多復元故事，從中體察進而彰顯其存有意義，建議本研究結果可以作為培訓督導知能之雛形，有效在組織中發揮傳承實務智慧的影響力。此外，本研究也針對成為督導者是趟終身學習之旅，就時間意識和助人關係等議題進行討論並提出建議。 Social work services in Taiwan have been continuing to expand; in consequence, the supervision competency in indigenous social workers on the basis of the development of practice theory is imminent. This study takes the strengths model of case management, popular in recent years, as the implementation theory, and explores on the supervision belief and strategies from the supervisors and the focus and enabling strategies in the process of the model. And it further explores the indigenous applicability of this model under the new managerialism, flips over the current plight of social workers, and trains more helpers who identify with development coope-ration and strengths-based approaches.\nBased on hermeneutics, this study used purposive sampling to select 12 supervisors and 4 social workers in the social welfare organization who had successfully used the strengths model for at least one year, conducting in-depth interviews by using semi-structured interview outlines. In the participants’ experiences, this study summarized that the supervisor`s recovery goal under the mode of the strengths-based supervision is "witnessing growth, recognizing giving ." The enabling strategies were "focusing on the strengths of being, promoting reflection and awareness, and cohesive identity of systematic vision. " In educational supervision, the competent abilities included "theory-base, practical wisdom, learning ability, boundary and awareness.” In the supportive supervision, they are humble attitude and caring. In the administrative supervision, the abilities are leadership and coordination. The six guiding beliefs extracted from the strengths-based supervision included "the supervisee is the director of the supervision process, the supervision relationship is primary and essential , focus on the achieved experiences rather than insufficiency or doubt , everyone has the ability to learn, grow and change, create a service context of supporting the strengths model, and focus on the meaning and possibility of finding recovery.” The first four promoted dialogue exercises such as “I am, I have, I can and I will” to stimulate a sense of motivation to change kinetic energy and empower others. The fifth was to create an environment (institutions, networks, systems) that supported the development of strengths. Ultimately, the last one was to focus on helping people become better themselves. On the other hand, the study found that processes in promoting the social workers’ integrated strengths perspective included "incubation-transformation-deepening-activation." The supervisor focused on change skills, including "dialogue demonstration, awareness exercise, and promotion of reflection." The objectives were generally including (1) attention to the accumulation of social workers’ education capital, (2) develop strengths perspective based on friendly relationship, (3) make good use of the strengths assessment to flip defective thinking, and (4) pay attention to progress to improve staying power.\nThe strengths-based supervision model emphasized the supervisors with the strengths and humbly supportive attitude to nourish the supervisees, to enhance their awareness and dialogue ability, from the action and reflection of the direction of revision, and to accompany the supervisees to learn a lot of recovery stories, from which to manifest its meaning. It is suggested that the results of this study can be used as the prototype for training supervision, effectively exerting the influence on practical wisdom in the organization. In addition, the study also discusses and makes recommendations on topics such as lifelong learning journeys, time awareness and helping relationships for being supervisors. |
參考文獻: | 一、中文部份\n王行(2015)。儒與家：我在「四書」中體悟的療人之道，輔導季刊51(1)，11-18。\n王行、仇立琪、黃元亭、鄭玉英（2004）。親職暴力處遇：介入與省思。臺北：心理。\n王秀燕(2010)。現實與使用的掙扎 台灣社工人力配置。社區發展季刊，129，114-127。\n王瑞欣(2006)。把愛傳出去－運用優點個案管理工作模式在就業服務之研究(碩士論文)。暨南國際大學社會政策與社會工作研究所，南投縣。\n王增勇(2006)。社工與家庭暴力的相遇：性別關係的複製場域。性別平等教育季刊，37，8-11。\n王麗雲(2009)。慢性精神疾病患者優勢模式家庭個案管理之行動研究(碩士論文)。高雄師範大學復建諮商研究所，高雄市。\n牟宗三(1990)。現象與物自身。臺北:臺灣學生書局。\n刑志彬、黃勇智(2016)。保護性社會工作在督導關係的困境議題與因應。現代桃花源學刊，6，31-51。\n朱惠英、郭凡琦譯(2008)。如何與非自願個案工作，臺北市:張老師。\n行政院(2012)。充實地方政府社工人力配置及進用計畫。取自http://archiv es.ey.gov.tw/01ey/20160519/www.ey.gov.tw/News_Content4be95.html?n=0AD1AB287792C301&sms=4ACFA38B877F185F&s=8E5C6DC0F5B5A282\n吳汝鈞(2001)。胡塞爾的現象學方法。鵝湖月刊，26(12)，14-21。\n吳麗華(2012)。外聘督導的角色功能：以兒童及少年保護個案家庭處遇服務方案為例(碩士論文)。暨南大學社會政策與社會工作學系研究所，南投縣。\n呂季芳、郭俊巖(2017)。兒少保督導功能與新進社工員專業知能養成之研究。台灣社區工作與社區研究學刊，7(1), 69-112。\n呂敏昌（無日期）。組織推動優點個案管理模式之經驗分享。108年2月25日，取自復元與優勢觀點發展中心網頁: http://socialwork2009.nccu.edu.tw/crsp/s/ E04.pdf\n呂學榮(2007)。台灣公部門社工知覺之督導風格、充權感受與工作滿足感相關研究(碩士論文)。台灣大學社會工作研究所，臺北市。\n宋麗玉(2006)。增強權能量表之發展與驗證。社會政策與社會工作學刊，10(2)，49-86。\n宋麗玉(2008)。增強權能策略與方法:台灣本 土經驗之探索。社會政策與社會工作學刊，12(2)，123-194。\n宋麗玉(2009)。優勢觀點社會工作概論。載於宋麗玉、施教裕編，優勢觀點—社會工作理論與實務，41-68。臺北：洪葉文化。\n宋麗玉(2011)。社會工作理論之概述，載於宋麗玉、曾華源、施教裕、鄭麗珍(主編)，社會工作理論—處遇模式與案例分析(3版)。臺北：洪葉文化。\n宋麗玉(2018)。緒論，載於宋麗玉(主編)，優勢觀點與社會工作實務－邁向復元之路，1-14。臺北：洪葉文化。\n宋麗玉、施教裕(2009)。優勢觀點—社會工作理論與實務。臺北：洪葉文化。\n宋麗玉、施教裕(2010)。復元與優勢觀點之理論內涵與實踐成效：臺灣經驗之呈現。社會科學論叢，4(2)，2-34。\n宋麗玉、施教裕、徐淑婷(2015)。優勢觀點與精神障礙者之復元：駱駝進帳與螺旋上升。臺北：洪葉文化。\n宋麗玉、施教裕、顏玉如、張錦麗(2006)。優點個案管理模式之介紹與運用於受暴婦女之評估結果。社區發展季刊，113，146-160。\n李保悅(1989)。美國社會工作督導系統之研究。臺北：中華民國社區發展研究訓練中心。\n李家琦譯(2007)。焦點解決治療法。台北:基礎文化。\n李婉萍(2011)。心路推展優勢觀點的緣起。108年2月25日，取自復元與優勢觀點發展中心網頁: http://socialwork2009.nccu.edu.tw/crsp/s/E03.pdf\n李開敏、陳淑芬(2006)。受暴婦女的充權：社工復原力訓練及督導之整合模式。應用心理研究，35，183-206。\n邱琇琳（2005）。專業助人者之替代性受創與因應策略：以公部門家防社工為例(碩士論文)。臺灣大學社會工作學系研究所，臺北市。\n李維倫（2004）。以「置身所在」做為心理學研究的目標現象及其相關之方法論，應用心理研究，22，157-200。\n李維倫、賴憶嫻（2009）。現象學方法論：存在行動的投入，中華輔導與諮商學報，25，275-321。\n汪文聖（2001）。現象學方法與理論之反思：一個質性方法之介紹，應用心理研究，12，49-76。\n汪文聖(2006)。生活世界中信度、效度與價值的可能性條件。應用心理研究，29，101-129。\n汪淑媛（2008）。論台灣社工教育對社會工作職業風險之忽視。臺大社會工作學刊，17，1-42。\n汪淑媛、蘇怡如(2010)。社工督導功能期待與實踐落差研究─比較督導與被督者之觀點：以公部門家暴防治社工為例。臺灣社會工作學刊，9，41-84。\n沈慶鴻（2015）。社會工作者的去權及增強權能的督導策略。社會政策與社會工作學刊，19(1)，141-187。\n沈慶鴻、賴乃榕（2013）。從「社工」到「督導」：新手社工督導角色轉換之研究－以婚暴防治為例。中華心理衛生學刊，26(2)，215-248。\n卓紋君、徐西森（2002）。完形取向督導模式及其督導歷程實錄分析。中華輔導學報，12，73-116。\n易之新譯(2000)。敘事治療:解構並重寫生命的故事。臺北市:張老師。\n林杏足(2014)。敘事取向督導的理念和實務運用。輔導季刊，50(4)，58-68。\n林怡君(2006)。突圍-從權力觀點看社工員的工作困境與因應。(碩士論文)。台灣大學社會工作學研究所。臺北市。\n林冠馨(2007)。優勢觀點運用於高風險家庭青少年情緒及行為問題(碩士論文)。暨南國際大學社會政策與社會工作研究所，南投縣。\n林姿葶、鄭伯壎（2013）。組織中的時間與時間觀：回顧與展望。本土心理學研究，40，143-195。\n林端(2001)。再論全球化下的儒家倫理—社會學觀點的考察。思與言，39(4) ，107-128。\n邱汝娜、李明德(2005)。政府社會工作員制度的起初：參與者的回顧。社區發展季刊，109，136-141。\n施教裕(2009)。優點工作原則的實踐和做法，載於宋麗玉、施教裕(2009)。優勢觀點—社會工作理論與實務，261-339。臺北：洪葉文化。\n洪娟娟(2010)。難以承受之重—一位兒保督導的觀點，檢索日期:2019年3月13日，取自https://www.mohw.gov.tw/cp-2628-19018-1.html\n胡中宜(2011)。國民教育法第十條修正後學校社會工作的發展議題，社區發展季刊，135，58-71。\n胡幼慧（1996）。質性研究理論、方法及本土女性研究實例。臺北：巨流。\n胡幼慧、姚美華(1996)。一些質性方法上的思考，載於胡幼慧編，質性研究：理論、方法及本土女性研究實例，141-157。臺北：巨流。\n胡孟菁(2013)。優勢觀點為基礎之社會工作者與情感性精神疾病個案雙向復元歷程之探討—穿越生命隧道之旅。政治大學社會工作研究所，臺北市。\n胡淑琴(2005)。試論死亡在生命中的意義:由海德格及拉內觀點出發。神學論集，146，579-599。\n徐筱茜(2016)。運用優勢觀點為基礎之團體於青少年家暴相對人之適用性與成效：親子關係之探討(碩士論文)。政治大學社會工作研究所，臺北市。\n徐震、林萬億(1983)。當代社會工作。臺北：巨流。\n翁淑卿（1995）。督導行為取向與社會工作者職業倦怠感關係之研究—以台灣省縣市政府社會工作員為例。東海大學社會學研究所，臺中市。\n高淑清（2008）。質性研究的 18 堂課：首航初探之旅。高雄：麗文。\n張汝倫（1997）。現象學方法的多重含義。哲學雜誌，20，90-115。\n張瑜洳(2007)。中輟高危險群青少年之處遇研究－優點個案管理之運用(碩士論文)。暨南國際大學社會政策與社會工作研究所，南投縣。\n張鼎國(1995)。海德格的「現象學方法概念」再探，鵝湖學誌，15，93-115。\n張憶純（2011）。桃園縣映晟社工事務所推動優點個案管理模式之經驗分享，108年2月25日，取自復元與優勢觀點發展中心網頁: http://socialwork2009. nccu.edu.tw/crsp/s/E01.pdf\n梁少玲(2018)。推展優勢觀點:對服務管理之挑戰，載於宋麗玉(主編)，優勢觀點與社會工作實務－邁向復元之路，361-368。臺北：洪葉文化。\n畢恆達(1996)。詮釋學與質性研究，載於胡幼慧編，質性研究：理論、方法及本土女性研究實例，27-45。臺北：巨流。\n莫藜藜(2004)。社會工作督導與諮詢，載於李增祿主編，社會工作概論，235-247。臺北：巨流。\n郭貴蘭(2007)。苗栗縣客家籍受虐婦女復元之初探：優勢觀點團體工作之運用(碩士論文)。暨南國際大學社會政策與社會工作學系，南投縣。\n陳向明(2002)。教師如何作質的研究，臺北：紅葉文化。\n曾中明、黃碧霞、陳敬宏、蔡適如、黃珮琪、周慧婷(2010)。健全社會工作專業制度－談社工人力現況及充實公部門社會工作人力規劃。社區發展季刊，129，3-19。\n曾仁杰(2014)。邁向復元之路─優勢觀點社會工作處遇關係之內涵與歷程研究(博士論文)。國立暨南國際大學社會政策與社會工作學系，南投縣。\n曾月娥(2007)。優勢觀點團體工作運用於暴力循環中婦女復元之研究(碩士論文)。暨南大學社會政策與社會工作研究所，南投縣。\n曾煥裕、劉曉春譯（2016）。社工督導：理論與實務。台北：洪葉文化。\n賀玉英、阮新邦(2004)。詮釋取向的社會工作實踐。八方文化。\n黃光國(2013)。社會科學的理路。心理出版社。\n黃明玉（2008）。工作困境與督導制度之研究：以兒童保護社工員為例(碩士論文)。靜宜大學青少年兒童福利學系，臺中市。\n黃葆華(2018)。優勢觀點處遇模式於未成年子女會面交往服務之實踐(碩士論文)。政治大學社會工作研究所，臺北市。\n黃翠紋、葉菀容（2012）。我國兒少保護服務執行現況之評析，社區發展季刊 139， 128-140。\n葉玉如（無日期）。組織推動優點個案管理模式之組織支持經驗—以高雄市家防中心為例。108年2月25日，取自復元與優勢觀點發展中心網頁: http://socialwork2009.nccu.edu.tw/crsp/s/E02.pdf\n詹火生(2007)。台灣社會工作專業發展的經驗與展望。社區發展季刊，120，21-29。\n監察院調查報告(2013)。調查案號 :102內調0049。取自http://www.cy.gov. tw/ sp.asp?xdurl=./CyBsBox/CyBsR1.asp&ctNode=910&mp=1\n臺灣社會工作專業人員協會(2014)。社會工作督導培訓工作坊及督導認證制度說明會。取自http://www.tasw.org.tw/p1-news- detail.php? bgid=4&gid=12&nid=155。\n趙碧華（1980）。台灣省縣市社會工作員專業督導滿足之研究(碩士論文)。東海大學社會學研究所，臺中市。\n劉小菁譯(2001)。助人助人者自助手冊-活力充沛的秘訣。(原作者:Thomas Skovholt)。臺北:張老師。(原著出版年：2001）。\n劉玉鈴(2014)。正向觀點的社工督導關係。台灣社會工作學刊，13，101-126。\n劉玉鈴(2014)。正向觀點的社工督導關係－以保護性業務為例，臺灣社會工作學刊，13，103-126。\n潘德榮(1992)。當代詮釋學的發展及其特徵，鵝湖學誌，9，131-162。\n潘德榮(1996)。詮釋學導論。臺北：五南。\n潘慧玲(2003)。社會科學研究典範的流變。教育研究資訊，11(1)，115-143。\n蔡佑襁(2009)。高風險家庭家庭功能促進－以優勢觀點為取向(碩士論文)。暨南國際大學社會政策與社會工作研究所，南投縣。\n蔡佩真、蔡佩渝、鄭適芬(2009)。安寧緩和醫療團隊外聘督導制度之探討與應用，安寧療護，14(1)，62-69。\n蔡宜庭(2018)。台灣醫療環境下的社工督導實務－督導者視域。台北大學社會工作研究所，臺北市。\n蔡杰伶(2009)。優勢觀點為基礎之探索教育團體對感化教育少年增強權能的成效(碩士論文)。政治大學社會工作研究所，臺北市。\n衛生福利部 (2017)。衛生福利部重申嚴予禁止社工人員薪資回捐 積極維護社工權益。取自https://dep.mohw.gov.tw/DOSAASW/cp-530-7202-103.html\n衛生福利部(2018)。強化社會安全網計畫。取自https://www.mohw.gov.tw/cp-4085-43311-1.html\n衛生福利部社工及社會救助司(2018a)。社工專職人員數。取自https://dep. mohw.gov.tw/DOSAASW/cp-541-4703-103.html\n衛生福利部社工及社會救助司(2018b)。社工師執業人數。取自https://dep. mohw.gov.tw/DOSAASW/cp-541-4704-103.html\n衛生福利部社會及家庭署(2015)。104年度社福績效考核實施計畫與指標。取自 https://www.sfaa.gov.tw/SFAA/Pages/List.aspx?nodeid=487\n衛生福利部社會救助及社工司(2014)。社工分科專業升級落實社會工作師5大專科，衛福季刊，1，28-29。\n鄧啟明、宋麗玉(2018)。將優勢觀點導入老人照顧服務場域之實踐，東吳社會工作學刊，35，1-35。\n鄭瑞隆（2004）。家庭暴力社工員專業服務困境與改進措施之研究。犯罪學期刊，7(2)，129-164。\n鄭麗珍 (2002)。增強權能理論與倡導，載於宋麗玉、曾華源、施教裕、鄭麗珍編著，社會工作理論—處遇模式與案例分析，407-440。臺北：洪葉文化。\n鄭麗珍（2006）。家暴社工的處境與問題。性別平等教育季刊，37，12-18。\n賴乃榕(2013)。從「社工」到「督導」：新手社工督導角色轉換之研究－以婚暴防治為例，中華心理衛生學刊，26(2)，215-248。\n賴兩陽（2007）。社工師法對專業制度的影響與爭議：1997-2007。社區發展季刊，120，67-84。\n賴俐均(2015)。婚暴社工運用優勢觀點的復元經驗及促進復元之因素(碩士論文)。政治大學社會工作研究所，臺北市。\n謝文蒨(2009)。困境與突圍-兒少保護女性社工督導者之路(碩士論文)。高雄醫學大學醫學社會學與社會工作學研究所，高雄市。\n鍾秋菊(2018)。提升照顧服務員自立支援能力之評估研究—以優勢觀點為例(碩士論文)。輔仁大學跨專業長期照護碩士學位學程在職專班，新北市。\n簡春安、鄒平儀(1998)。社會工作研究法，臺北：巨流。\n嚴平譯(1992)。Richard E. Palmer原著(1968)。詮釋學。臺北 : 桂冠。\n蘇怡如(2008)。探討台灣家暴社工督導角色功能之應然面與實然面(碩士論文)。暨南大學社會政策與社會工作研究所，南投縣。\n蘇芳儀（2014）。婚姻暴力社工督導研究—受督者的觀點(碩士論文)。輔仁大學社會工作學系研究所，新北市。\n\n二、西文部份\nAasheim, L. (2012). Practical Clinical Supervision for Counselors: An Experiential Guide. NY: Springer.\nAbramovitz, M. (1998). Social work and social reform: An arena of struggle. Social Work, 43(6), 512-526.\nAmerican Humane Assiociation (2004). Helping in child protective services: a competency-based casework handbook (2th ed.).Oxford University Press.\nAnderson, J. , & Swim, S. (1995). Supervision as collaborative conversation: Connecting the voices of supervisors and supervisee. Journal of Systemic Therapies, 14, 1-13.\nAnna, M. S., Mimi, M. K., Jeffrey, W. S., Marvin, S. S. (2007). Psychiatric advance directives: a tool for consumer empowerment and recovery. Psychiatric Rehabilitation Journal, 31(1), 70-75.\nAyland, L. & West, B. (2006). The good way model: A strengths-based approach for working with young people, especially those with intellctual difficulties who have sexually abusive behaviour. Journal of Sexual Aggression, 12(2), 189-201.\nBell, H. (2003). Strengths and secondary trauma in family violence work. Social Work, 48 (4), 513-522.\nBenard, J. M., & Goodyear, R. K. (1997). Fundamentals of clinical supervision (2rd ed). Boston: Allyn & Bacon.\nBenard, J. M., & Goodyear, R. K. (2014). Fundamentals of clinical supervision (5rd ed). Boston : Pearson.\nBerthold, S. M. (2015). Human Rights-Based Approaches to Clinical Social Work. Springer.\nBobele, M. , Gardner, G. , & Biever, J. (1995). Supervision as social construction. Journal of Systemic Therapies, 14, 14-25.\nBogo, M. & Dill, K. (2008). Walking the Tightrope: Using Power and Authority in Child Welfare Supervision. Child welfare, 87(6), 141-57.\nBrun, C., & Rapp, R. (2001). Strengths-based case management: individuals` perspectives on strengths and the case manager relationship. Social Work ,46(3), 278-288.\nBulin, J.(1995). Supervision: Skills for managing work and leading people. Boston: Houghton Mifflin.\nCearley, S. (2004). The power of supervision in child welfare services. Child and Youth Care Forum, 33(5), 313-327.\nChapin, R. (2011). Social policy for effective practice: A strengths approach (2nd ed.). NY: Routledge.\nCohen, B. (1999). Intervention and supervision in strengths-based social work practice. Families in Society, Sept/Oct, 1-17.\nCohen, H. & Greene, R. R. (2005). Older adults who overcame oppression. Families in Society, 87(1), 1-8.\nCollins-Camargo, C., & Kelly, M. J. (2006). Supervisor as informal mentors: promoting professional development in public child welfare. The Clinical Supervisor, 25(1/2), 127-146.\nCollins-Camargo, C., & Kelly, M. J. (2006). Supervisor as informal mentors: promoting professional development in public child welfare. The Clinical Supervisor, 25(1/2), 127-146.\nCombs, G. & Freedman, J. ( 2004). Narrative, Poststructuralism, and Social Justice Current Practices in Narrative Therapy. The Counseling Psychologist, 40(7), 1033-1060.\nCorey, G., Haynes, R., Moulton, P., & Muratori, M. (2010). Clinical Supervision in the Helping Professions: A Practical Guide (2nd ed.). Alexandria, VA: The American Counseling Association.\nCousins, C. (2004). Becoming a social work supervisor: A significant role transition. Australian Social Work, 57(2), 175-185.\nDavidson, T. (2014). STRENGTH: A System of Integration of Solution- Oriented and Strength-Based Principles. Journal of Mental Health Counseling, 36, 1-17.\nDeJong, P. & Miller, S. D. (1995). How to interview for client strengths. Social Work, 40(6), 729-736.\nDill, K. (2007). Impact of Stressors on Front-Line Child Welfare Supervisors, The Clinical Supervisor, 26(1/2), 177-193.\nDuckworth, A. L., Steen, T. A., & Seligman, M. E. P. (2005). Positive psychology in clinical practice. Annual Reviews of Clinical Psychology, 1, 629-651. doi:10.1146/annurev.clinpsy.1.102803.144154.\nEdwards, J. K. (2013). Strengths-based supervision in clinical practice. Sage.\nGibelman, M. (1999).The Search for Identity: Defining Social Work-Past, Present, Future. Social Work, 44(4), 298-310.\nGiorgi, A. (1997). The theory, practice, and evaluation of the phenomenological method as a qualitative research procedure. Journal of Phenomenological Psychology, 28(2), 235-260.\nGitterman, A. (2011). Advances in the life model of social work practice. In F. Turner (Ed.), Social work treatment, Interlocking theoretical approaches (pp.279-292). NY: Oxford Press.\nGitterman, A., & Germain, C. B. (1976).Social work practice: A life model. Social Service Review, 50, 601-610.\nGould, N., & Baldwin, M. (2004). Social Work, Critical Reflection and the Learning Organisation. UK: Ashgate.\nGray, I., Field, I. & Brown, K. (2010). Effective leadership, management and supervision in health and social care . Learning Matters Ltd.\nGray, J. I., Kabadaki, K. (2005). A Strengths Perspective for Assessing Olding Adults: Curriculum Enrichment in a Human Behavior Course. The Journal Baccalaureate Social Work, 11, 55-66.\nGraybeal, C. (2001). Strengths-based social work assessment: Transforming the dominant paradigm. Families in Society, 82(3), 233–242.\nGreene, G. J., Kondrat, D. C., Lee, M. Y., Clement, J., Siebert, H., Mentzer, R. A., & Pinnel, S. R. (2006). A solution focused approach to case management and recovery with consumers who have a severe mental disability. Families in Society, 87(3), 339-350.\nGuba, N. K. & Lincoln, Y. S. (2018). The Sage handbook of qualitative research (5th ed). London: SAGE.\nHealy, K. (2005). Social work theories in context : creating frameworks for practice. Palgrave Macmillan.\nHenderson, p. Holloway, J. & Millar, A. (2014). Practical supervision : how to become a supervisor for the helping professions. London and Philadelphia: Jessica Kingsley Publishers.\nHenderson, R. & Noble, K. (2015). Professional learning, induction and critical reflection : Building workforce capacity in education. UK: Palgrave MacMillan.\nHolloway, E. L. (1995). Clinical supervision: A systems approach. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.\nHughes, Lynette & Pengelly, Paul (1997). Staff supervision in a turbulent environment: managing process and task in front-line services. London: Jessica Kingsle.\nItzhaky, H., & Aloni, R. (1996). The use of deductive techniques for developing mechanisms of coping with resistance in supervision. The Clinical Supervisor, 14, 65–76.\nKadushin, A., & Harkness, D. (2014). Supervision in social work (5th ed.). New York: Columbia University Press.\nKaiser, T. L. (1997). Supervisory relationships: Exploring the human element. Belmont, CA, US: Thomson Brooks.\nKamerelis, G.,Dimitriadis, G. & Welker, A.(2018). Focus Group Research and/in Figured Worlds. In N. K Guba, & Y. S Lincoln (eds), The Sage handbook of qualitative research( pp.1202-1239) (5th ed) . London: SAGE.\nKam-shing, Y. (2006). A strengths perspective in working with an adolescent with self-cutting behaviors. Child & Adolescent Social Work Journal, 23(2), 134-146.\nKarvinen-Niinikoski, S. (2004). Social work supervision: Contributing to innovative knowledge production and open expertise. In N. Gould & M. Baldwin (Eds.), Social work, critical reflection and the learning organisation (pp. 23–40). UK: Ashgate.\nKelley, P (2011). Narrative theory and social work treatment, In Turner, F. J.(ed.) Social Work Treatment: Interlocking Theoretical Approaches(5th eds., pp. 315-326). New York: Oxford Unversity Press.\nKoenig, T. & Spano, R. (2006). Professional hope in working with older adults. Journal of Sociology & Social Welfare, 33 (3), 25-44.\nLandmark, B.T., Hansen, G.S., Bjones, I., & Bohler, A. (2003). Clinical supervision : factors defined by nurses as influential upon the development of competence and skills in supervision. Journal of Clinical Nursing, 12(6), 834–841.\nLeung, P., Cheung, K. M., Stevenson, K M. (1994). A strengths approach to ethnically sensitive practice for child protective service workers. Child Welfare, 73 (6), 707-721.\nMadsen, W. C. & Gillespie, K. ( 2014). Collaborative Helping: A Strengths Framework for Home-Based Services. John Wiley & Sons Inc.\nMiller, W. R., & Rollnick, S. (2002). Motivational interviewing: Preparing people for change (2nd ed.). NY: The Guildford Press.\nMin, T. (2011). The Client-Centered Integrative Strengths-Based Approach: Ending Longstanding Conflict between Social Work Values and Practice. Canadian Social Science, 7(2), 15-22.\nMorrison, T. (1990). The Emotional Effects of child protection work on the worker, Practice Social Work in Action, 4(4), 253-271.\nMoustakas, C. (1994). Phenomenological research methods. London: International Education and Professional Publisher.\nMunro, E. (2010) The Munro Review of Child Protection. Part One: A Systems Analysis, London, Department for Education.\nMunro, E. (2011) The Munro Review of Child Protection. Final Report: A Child Centred System. London, Department for Education.\nMunson, C. E. (2002). Handbook of Clinical Social work Supervision. (3th ed.). NY: Haworth Press.\nNakamura, J., & Csikszentmihalyi, M. (2003). The motivational sources of creativity as viewed from the paradigm of positive psychology. In L. G. Aspinwall & U. M. Staudinger (Eds.), A psychology of human strengths: Fundamental questions and future directions for a positive psychology (pp. 257–269). American Psychological Association.\nNelson-Becker, H., Chapin, R., & Fast, B. (2013). The strengths model with older adults: Critical practice components. In D. Saleebey (Ed.), The strengths perspective in social work practice (6th ed.). Boston: Allyn & Bacon.\nO’Donoghue, K. & Tsui, M. (2015). Social Work Supervision Research (1970–2010): The Way We Were and the Way Ahead. The British Journal of Social Work, 45(2), 616–633.\nOmand, L. (2009). Supervision in Counselling and Psychotherapy: An Introduction. Palgrave Macmillan.\nPack, M. J. (2009). Clinical supervision: An interdisciplinary review of literature with implications for reflective practice in social work. Reflective Practice,10(5), 657–668.\nParker, J. (2010). Effective Practice Learning in Social Work. Exeter, Learning Matters.\nPayne, M. (2014). Modern social work theory (4th ed.). Chicago: Lyceum Books.\nRapp, C. A. & Goscha, R. J. (2012). The strengths model: A Recovery-oriented approach to mental health services (3rd ed.). New York: Oxford University Press.\nRapp, C. A. (1998). The strengths model: Case management with people suffering from severe and persistent mental illness. New York: Oxford University Press.\nRapp, C.A. & Chamberlain, R. (1985). Case management services for the chronically mentally ill. Social Work, 30, 417–422.\nRapp, R., & Lane, D. T. (2013). “Knowing” the effectiveness of an evidence-based practice: Strengths-based case management with substance abusers. In D. Saleebey (Ed.), The strengths perspective in social work practice (6th ed., pp. 149-160). Boston: Allyn & Bacon.\nRevell, L. & Burton, V. (2015). Supervision and the Dynamics of Collusion: A Rule of Optimism? British Journal of Social Work, 46(6), 1587–1601.\nRevell, L. & Burton, V. (2018). Professional Curiosity in Child Protection: Thinking the Unthinkable in a Neo-Liberal World. British Journal of Social Work, 48(6), 1508–1523.\nRobbins, S. P. (2011). Oppression theory and social work treatment. In F. J. Turner (Eds), Social work treatment: Interlocking theoretical approaches(pp. 343-353). New York: Oxford University Press.\nRobbins, S. P. (2011). Oppression theory and social work treatment. In F. J. Turner (Eds), Social work treatment: Interlocking theoretical approaches (pp. 343-353). New York: Oxford University Press.\nRobbins, S. P., Chatterjee, P., & Canda, E. R. (1999). Ideology, scientific theory, and social work practice, Families in Society, 80(4), 374-384.\nSaleebey, D. (1996). The Strengths Perspective in Social Work Practice: Extensions and Cautions. Social Work, 41(3), 296-305.\nSaleebey, D. (2013). The strengths perspective in social work practice (6nd ed.). White Plains, New York: Longman.\nSheppard, M. (2006). Social Work and Social Exclusion : The Idea of Practice. UK:Ashgate.\nShlomo, Levy & Itzhaky (2012) Development of Professional Identity among Sociall Work Students: Contributing Factors. The Clinical Supervisor, 31(2), 240-255 .\nShulman, L. (1993). Developing and Testing a Practice Theory: An Interactional Perspective. Social Work, 38(1), 91–97.\nShurts, W. M. (2015). Infusing Postmodernism Into Counseling Supervision: Challenges and Recommendations. The Journal of Counselor Preparation and Supervision, 7(3). http://dx.doi.org/10.7729/73.113.\nSimmonds, J. (2010). Relating and relationships in supervision: Supportive and companionable or dominant and submissive?, In Ruch, G., Turney, D. & Ward, A.(eds), Relationship-based Social work(pp214-228), London: Jessica Kingsley Pubishers.\nSnyder, C.R. (2000) .The Past and Possible Futures of Hope. Journal of Social and Clinical Psychology, 19, 11-28. http://dx.doi.org/10.1521/jscp. 2000. 19.1.11.\nSong, L. & Shih, C. (2010). Recovery from partner abuse: the application of the strengths perspective. International Journal of Social Welfare, 19, 23-32.\nStaudt, M., Howardw, M. O. & Drake, B. (2001). The Operationalization, Implementation, and Effectiveness of the Strengths Perspective: A Review of Empirical Studies. Journal of Social Service Research, 27(3), 1-21.\nStoltenberg, C. D., & Delworth, U. (1987). Supervising counselors and therapists: A developmental approach. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass Publishers.\nTill, U. (2007). The values of recovery within mental health nursing. Mental Health Practice, 11(3), 32-36.\nTsui , M. (2005) . Social Work Supervision: Contexts and Concepts. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.\nTurner, F. J. (2011). Social work treatment: interlocking theoretical approaches. New York: Oxford University Press.\nTurney, D. (2010). Sustaining relationships: Working with strong feelings. III. Love and positive feelings, In G. Ruch, D. Turney and A. Ward (eds), Relationship-Based Practice: Getting to the Heart of Social Work, London, Jessica Kingsley.\nWade, J. C. & Jones, J. E. (2015). Strengths-based clinical supervision: A positive psychology approach to clinical training. Springer Publisher Company.\nWeick, A. & Chamberlain, R. (1997). Putting problems in their place: Further explorations in the Strengths perspective. In D. Saleebey (ed.), The Strengths Perspective in Social Work Practice (2nd ed., pp.39-57). White Plains, NY, Longman Publisher.\nWeick, A., Rapp, C., Sullivan, W. P., & Kisthardt, W. (1989). A strengths perspective for social work practice. Social Work, 34(4), 350-354.\nWhite, V. E. (2002). Developing counseling objectives and empowering clients: A strength-based intervention. Journal of Mental Health Couseling, 24(3), 270-279.\nYip, K. S. (2005). A strengths perspective in working with an adolescent with depression. Psychiatric Rehabilitation Journal, 28(4), 362-370. | 描述: | 博士 國立政治大學 社會工作研究所 103264502 |
資料來源: | http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#G0103264502 | 資料類型: | thesis |
| Appears in Collections: | 學位論文 |
Files in This Item:
| File | Description | Size | Format | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 450201.pdf | 9.92 MB | Adobe PDF2 | View/Open |
Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.