Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://ah.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/131252
題名: 以DMIS模式探討境外生跨文化學習之研究—以兩所教育學院為例
The Application of DMIS Model on Foreign Students’ Intercultural Learning Experiences in Taiwan—Take Two Colleges in Education as Case Study
作者: 胡馨文
Hu, Hsin-Wen
貢獻者: 侯永琪
Hou, Yung-Chi
胡馨文
Hu, Hsin-Wen
關鍵詞: 高等教育國際化
學生流動
跨文化敏銳度發展模式
DMIS
境外學生
跨文化經驗
Internationalization of higher education
Student mobility
Developmental Model of Intercultural Sensitivity
DMIS
Foreign students
Intercultural learning experiences
日期: 2020
上傳時間: 3-Aug-2020
摘要: 高等教育國際化的趨勢下,帶起更加頻繁的人員流動。本研究在此背景之下,欲探討來台就讀教育領域之境外生跨文化學習經驗,就其學業、生活、語言三部份之適應議題進行觀察與分析,並透過DMIS理論模式檢視其跨文化發展的心理知覺變化,此模式共分為六個階段—抗拒、防禦、極小化、承認、適應、融合,綜合上述研究結果歸納整理出境外生跨文化學習樣態與對研究場域提出建議。\n\n本研究採用質性研究方法,透過半結構訪談方式,輔以文獻分析搜集個案學院境外學生跨文化經驗與發展情形。共訪談11位不同國籍境外學生與2位具國際課程授課經驗教師,以多元角度觀點進行資料搜集,歸納本研究之結論如下:\n\n一、學生透過國際移動尋求專業培育及工作機會,並受其個人、重要他人、整體環境等因素影響選擇跨國學習之動機,藉由跨文化的經驗拓展視野。\n\n二、國家與文化之間具有差異存在,並影響境外生的適應過程,透過問題解決策略的養成與時間的磨合,境外生整體跨文化經驗達到良好的適應。\n\n三、根據DMIS理論模式,境外生在跨文化發展的心理知覺變化由初期介於防禦(defense)與極小化(minimization)之間的階段,經跨文化的學習經驗後,轉變至適應(adaptation)階段,境外生能夠分享和欣賞兩種文化差異,了解自身在異文化中的定位,並對自我未來發展有進一步的規劃。\n\n四、研究場域之個案教育學院致力發展國際化策略,包含建立雙聯學位、設立英語學程等方式,希望加強與國際的連結提升學院國際競爭力以吸引優秀人才。兩學院在國際化發展具有良好表現,來台境外生人數保有穩健成長趨勢。
Over decades, Internationalization of higher education indeed facilitates talent and student mobility. This study is to explore the intercultural learning experience of foreign students who come to Taiwan for studying in the field of education. By applying DMIS model as theoretical framework, foreign students’ academic development, life adaptability and language barriers were analyzed in order to perceive their psychological transformation in the cross-cultural context. There are six distinct stages of DMIS model, including denial, defense, minimization, acceptance, adaptation and integration.\nThis study adopts a qualitative method via in-depth interviews. There were 13 interviewees selected from two case universities. Based on the above data collection, the major research results and conclusions are as follows:\n\n1.Students seek professional development and job opportunities through international mobility. Their motivation for choosing the study destinations might be affected by personal, significant others, and environment factors, however, they are able to expand their horizons through intercultural learning experience.\n\n2.Culture differences exist between countries which would influence the adaptability process of foreign students. Attributed to the problem-solving strategies and the blending of time, foreign students achieves for a good adaptation.\n\n3.According to DMIS model, the psychological perception of foreign students in the initial stage stays between defense and minimization stage. After the intercultural learning experience, it changes to adaptation stage, which foreign students can share and appreciate with two cultures, understand their position, and have further plans for their future development.\n\n4.The two cases in college of education are committed to developing internationalization and attract international students in order to strengthen their global connectedness and competitive edge, such as developing double degree programs, promoting English taught courses, etc. The two colleges not only have great accomplishments in internationalization but also continue to have an increasing number of foreign students.
參考文獻: 中文部分\n中華經濟研究院(2019)。服務貿易議題簡介。取自:https://web.wtocenter.org.tw/Node.aspx?id=320\n牛康侃(2017)。臺灣非師範院校參與師資培育政策實施中的反思。臺灣教育評論月刊,6(7),59-63。\n王湘月(2019a)。臺灣高等教育國際化與在地國際化之初探。南台人文社會學報,20,31-68。\n王湘月(2019b)。課程國際化在高等教育在地國際化角色之探討。臺灣教育評論月刊,8(3),112-120。\n外國學生來臺就學辦法(2017年,09月08日)。\n立法院(2017)。提升我國青年學生全球移動力作法之探討。取自:https://www.ly.gov.tw/Pages/Detail.aspx?nodeid=6590&pid=146979\n朱慧萍、饒夢霞(2000)。大學轉變科系學生生涯決定歷程。教育心理學報,32(1),41-66\n行政院(2018)。新南向人才培育推動計畫。取自:https://www.ey.gov.tw/Page/5A8A0CB5B41DA11E/3a465cbe-5ad0-4e4a-b492-fd43035cf170\n吳清山(2011)。我國高等教育革新的重要課題與未來發展之分析。長庚人文社會學報,4(2),241-280。\n吳清基(2005)。以優質學校指標追求卓越、優質、精緻、創新教育之願景。載於吳清基等編著,優質學校(6-17頁)。台北市:臺北市教師研習中心。\n李振清(2010)。提升教育國際化與競爭力的共識與策略。台灣教育,663,2-11。\n林淑馨(2010)。質性研究:理論與實務。高雄市:巨流。\n邱雅萍、蘇中南(2019)。在臺外籍生跨文化適應問題與因應策略之探討—以中原大學馬來西亞學生為例。中原企管評論,17(1),39-58。\n邱靖雅(2003)。台灣高等教育的國際化。立德學報,1(1),35-41。\n姜麗娟(2005)。論全球化與跨國高等教育對高等教育國際化的新啟示。中正教育研究,4(1),67-98。\n姜麗娟(2009)。重新檢視高等教育國際化與競爭力之關係—以領域學者觀點為例。高等教育,4(2),39-72。\n姜麗娟(2010)。亞太國家國際學生流動與跨國高等教育發展之探討與啟示。教育資料與研究雙月刊,94,113-138。\n翁福元、許瑞芳(2016)。高等教育國際化招收外國學生之探討。臺灣教育評論月刊,5(10),49-57。\n國立中正大學(無日期)。學院簡介。取自:https://coledu.ccu.edu.tw/index.php?option=module&lang=cht&task=pageinfo&id=32&index=1\n國立台灣師範大學校務研究辦公室(無日期)。統計年報。取自:http://www.iro.ntnu.edu.tw/web/?Yreport#report-6\n國立台灣師範大學教育學院(無日期)。國際交流。取自:http://www.coe.ntnu.edu.tw/page3/super_pages.php?ID=page302\n國立台灣師範大學通識教育中心(無日期)。通識理念與目標。取自:http://www.cge.ntnu.edu.tw/web/about/about.jsp?cp_no=CP1566287216393\n國立政治大學國際合作事務處(無日期)。學伴計畫 Buddy Program。取自:http://oic.nccu.edu.tw/files/11-1000-113-1.php/\n國立政治大學國際合作事務處(無日期a)。國際學生統計數據。取自:http://oic.nccu.edu.tw/ezfiles/0/1000/img/3/20190520OICStat.pdf\n國立政治大學教育學院(無日期)。最新消息。取自:https://educ.nccu.edu.tw/zh_tw/News\n國立政治大學教務處(無日期)。通識教育中心。取自:https://aca.nccu.edu.tw/zh/%E9%80%9A%E8%AD%98%E6%95%99%E8%82%B2%E4%B8%AD%E5%BF%83\n國立臺北教育大學研究發展處(無日期)。104-107年度研究發展處統計報表。取自:https://orad.ntue.edu.tw/uploads/archive_file_multiple/file/5c4e6387378e3d5b48000721/%E7%A0%94%E7%A9%B6%E7%99%BC%E5%B1%95%E8%99%95104_107%E5%B9%B4%E7%B5%B1%E8%A8%88%E8%B3%87%E6%96%99%E8%A1%A8.pdf\n國家發展委員會(2020)。高等教育輸出。取自:https://www.ndc.gov.tw/cp.aspx?n=3F2D8EF2E5AEC431&s=3C0B36B61E45C975\n張景森(2004)。挑戰2008:國家發展重點計畫規劃與執行。國家政策季刊,3(2),135-163。\n張智嵐、徐西森(2019)。新住民家庭跨文化適應歷程之個案研究─現象學觀點。輔導季刊,55(3),1-13。\n張鐸嚴(2005)。台灣教育發展史。台北市:空大。\n教育部(2001)。大學教育政策白皮書。取自:https://ws.moe.edu.tw/001/Upload/3/RelFile/6315/6936/90.07%E5%A4%A7%E5%AD%B8%E6%95%99%E8%82%B2%E6%94%BF%E7%AD%96%E7%99%BD%E7%9A%AE%E6%9B%B8.pdf\n教育部(2011)。高等教育輸出—擴大招收境外學生行動計畫。台北市:作者。\n教育部(2013)。教育部人才培育白皮書。台北市:作者。\n教育部(2016)。教育部新南向人才培育推動計畫。台北市:作者。\n教育部(2017)。高等教育深耕計畫(核定版)。台北市:作者。\n教育部(無日期)。108學年度大專校院一覽表。取自:https://ulist.moe.gov.tw/Browse/UniversityList\n教育部統計處(2016)。大專校院境外生之定義範圍?。取自:https://depart.moe.edu.tw/ED4500/News_Content.aspx?n=780B4CFF8FB1916B&sms=23D255462E62FBCD&s=1C9ED8911441F1F1\n教育部統計處(2017)。105年大專校院境外學生概況。取自:http://stats.moe.gov.tw/files/brief/105%E5%B9%B4%E5%A4%A7%E5%B0%88%E6%A0%A1%E9%99%A2%E5%A2%83%E5%A4%96%E5%AD%B8%E7%94%9F%E6%A6%82%E6%B3%81.pdf\n教育部統計處(2019)。107年大專校院境外學生概況。取自:http://stats.moe.gov.tw/files/brief/107%E5%B9%B4%E5%A4%A7%E5%B0%88%E6%A0%A1%E9%99%A2%E5%A2%83%E5%A4%96%E5%AD%B8%E7%94%9F%E6%A6%82%E6%B3%81.pdf\n教育部統計處(無日期)。台灣大專校院境外學生在台留學、研習人數。取自:https://depart.moe.edu.tw/ED4500/cp.aspx?n=1B58E0B736635285&s=D04C74553DB60CAD\n教育部部史(2020)。擴大招收境外學生。取自:http://history.moe.gov.tw/policy.asp?id=18\n許筱君、詹郁萱(2014)。學術資本主義下我國頂尖大學計畫之省思。教育政策論壇,17(3),95-116。\n陳淑敏(2017)。跨文化素養的學習取徑與內涵之探討。教育研究月刊,283,86-100。\n湯志民(2001)。e世紀的校園新貌。學校空間革新趨向之探析(7-34頁)。台北市:作者。\n湯志民(2003)。優質學校環境規劃與問題探析。初等教育學刊。\n湯堯、黎士鳴(2019)。全球化校園之芻議:以移動力為基礎。學校行政雙月刊,123,99-120。\n黃乃縈(2009)。台灣推動中小學國際教育之行動建構。教育資料集刊,42,1-24。\n黃文定(2015)。評析儒家文化下Deardorff跨文化能力模式在我國小學國際交流之應用。當代教育研究季刊,23(3),125-167。\n黃文定(2019)。從2018PISA全球素養評量問卷論國際教育的實踐。臺灣教育評論月刊,8(6),06-11。\n黃文定、林秀勤(2017)。國小高年級學生跨文化溝通態度量表之發展。臺北市立大學學報,48(2),29-52。\n黃美珠(2002)。台灣加入WTO之後高等教育國際化的方向。文教新潮,7(1),7-12。\n楊正誠(2018)。高等教育國際化的概念框架與策略發展:評《紛亂中的高等教育:改變中的世界的國際化》一書。當代教育研究季刊,26(1),115-127。\n楊國賜(2013)。台灣高等教育面對的挑戰及其因應策略。台灣教育,679,2-10。\n葉重新(2004)。教育研究法。台北市:心理。\n詹盛如(2017)。亞洲跨境學生流動:哪些品質重要呢?。評鑑雙月刊,(70),19-21。\n僑生回國就學及輔導辦法(2017年,09月05日)。\n劉政暉(2019)。越在地,越國際?連在地文化都不了解,臺灣年輕人拿什麼「走向世界」?。取自:https://crossing.cw.com.tw/article/12515\n蔡文榮、巫麗芳(2013)。越南籍學生在臺灣的大學適應議題之研究:以中興大學為例。中臺學報(人文社會卷),24(4),75-96。\n蔡文榮、徐主愛(2013)。外籍學生在臺灣的大學適應議題之研究:以中興大學之泰國學生為例。教育科學期刊,12(2),88-119。\n蔡文榮、董家琳(2015)。馬來西亞學生來臺留學適應問題之個案研究。教育科學期刊,14(2),107-134。\n戴曉霞(2004)。高等教育的國際化:亞太國家外國學生政策之比較分析。教育研究集刊,50(2),53-84。\n鍾佳蓉(2017)。商管學院國際化策略及其在推動全校國際化所扮演的角色之研究(未出版之博士論文)。國立臺南大學,台南市。\n韓光俐(2009)。來台大學國際學生課業學習經驗與學習適應歷程之研究—以國立臺灣師範大學大學部學生為例(未出版之博士論文)。國立台灣師範大學,台北市。\n \n西文部分\nAltbach, P. (2002). Perspectives on internationalizing higher education. International Higher Education, 27, 6-8.\nAltbach, P. G. (1998). Comparative higher education: Knowledge, the university, and development. Greenwich, CT: Ablex.\nAppadurai, A. (1990). Disjuncture and difference in the global cultural economy. Theory, culture & society, 7(2-3), 295-310.\nBeine, M., Noël, R., & Ragot, L. (2014). Determinants of the international mobility of students. Economics of Education review, 41, 40-54.\nBennett, J., & Bennett, M. (2004). Developing intercultural sensitivity: An integrative approach to global and domestic diversity. In D. Landis, J. Bennett, & M. Bennett (Eds.), Handbook of intercultural training (3rd ed., pp. 145–167). Thousand Oaks, CA, SAGE Publications.\nBennett, M. J. (1993). Towards ethnorelativism: A developmental model of intercultural sensitivity. Education for the intercultural experience, 2, 21-71.\nBennett, M. J. (1998). Overcoming the golden rule: Sympathy and empathy. In M. J. Bennett (Ed.), Basic concepts of intercultural communication: Selected readings (pp. 191-214). Yarmouth, ME: Intercultural Press.\nBennett, M. J. (2004). Becoming interculturally competent. Toward multiculturalism: A reader in multicultural education, 2, 62-77.\nBerry, J. W., Kim, U., Minde, T., & Mok, D. (1987). Comparative studies of acculturative stress. International Migration Review, 21(3), 491-511.\nBhawuk, D. P. S., & Brislin, R. (1992). The measurement of intercultural sensitivity using the concepts of individualism and collectivism. International Journal of Intercultural Relations, 16(4), 413-436.\nBok, D. C. (2006). Our underachieving colleges: A candid look at how much students learn and why they should be learning more. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.\nChan, S. J. (2012). Shifting patterns of student mobility in Asia. Higher Education Policy, 25(2), 207-224.\nChang, Y. Y. (2010). English-medium instruction for subject courses in tertiary education: Reactions from Taiwanese undergraduate students. Taiwan International ESP Journal, 2(1), 53-82.\nChoudaha, R. (2017). Three waves of international student mobility (1999–2020). Studies in Higher Education, 42(5), 825-832.\nDe Wit, H. (2014). The different faces and phases of internationalisation of higher education. In The forefront of international higher education (pp. 89-99). Springer, Dordrecht.\nDeardorff, D. K. (2006). Identification and assessment of intercultural competence as a student outcome of internationalization. Journal of Studies in International Education, 10(3), 241-266.\nDeardorff, D. K. (2008). Intercultural competence: A definition, model, and implications for education abroad. In V. Savicki (Ed.), Developing intercultural competence and transformation (pp. 32-52). Sterling, VA: Stylus.\nDeardorff, D. K. (2010). Intercultural competence in higher education and intercultural dialogue. In S. Bergan & van’t Land (Eds.), Speaking across borders: Therole of higher education in furthering intercultural dialogue (pp. 87-100). Strasbourg, France: Council of Europe.\nDeardorff, D. K. (2011). Assessing intercultural competence. New directions for institutional research, 149, 65-79.\nDeardorff, D. K. (2015). A 21st Century Imperative: integrating intercultural competence in Tuning. Tuning Journal for Higher Education, 3(1), 137-147.\nEaton, S. E. (2010). Global trends in language learning in the 21st century. Calgary, Canada: Onate.\nEggins, H., & West, P. (2010). The global impact of the financial crisis. Higher Education Management and Policy, 22(3), 1-16.\nEngle, L., & Engle, J. (2003). Study abroad levels: Toward a classification of program types. Frontiers: The Interdisciplinary Journal of Study Abroad, 9, 1-20.\nFantini, A. (2009). Assessing intercultural competence: Issues and tools. In D. K. Deardorff (Ed.), The SAGE handbook of intercultural competence (pp. 456-476). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.\nGill, S. (2007). Overseas students’ intercultural adaption as intercultural learning: A transformative framework. In Compare, (pp.167-183), Routledge, part of the Taylor & Francis Group.\nGreen, M. (2005). Measuring internationalization at comprehensive universities. Washington DC: American Council on Education.\nGudykunst, W. (1979). Intercultural contact and attitude change: A view of literature and suggestions for future research. International and Intercultural Communication Annual, 4, 1–16.\nHammer, M. R., Bennett, M. J., & Wiseman, R. (2003). Measuring intercultural sensitivity: The Intercultural Development Inventory. In R. M. Paige (Guest Ed.), Special issue on the Intercultural Development, International Journal of Intercultural Relations, 27(4), 421-443.\nHou, A. Y. C., Chan, S. J., Lin, L., & Hu, Z. (2020). Student learning venture overseas in the transnational research partnership–a Taiwan and US PIRE case study. Higher Education Evaluation and Development, 14(1), 3-17.\nHou, A. Y. C., Hill, C., Hu, Z., & Lin, L. (2020). What is driving Taiwan government for policy change in higher education after the year of 2016–in search of egalitarianism or pursuit of academic excellence?. Studies in Higher Education, 1-14.\nHurn, B., & Tomalin, B. (2013). Cross-cultural communication: Theory and practice. Houndmills, Hampshire: Palgrave Macmillan.\nInternational Organization for Migration. (2018). Global Migration Indicators 2018. Berlin, Germany: Global Migration Data Analysis Centre(GMDAC)\nJunior, S. and Usher, A. (2008). Student mobility and credit transfer. A national and global survey. Blacksburg, VA: Educational Policy Institute.\nKauffmann, N. L., Martin, J. N., & Weaver, H. D. (1992). Students abroad: Strangers at home. Yarmouth, ME: Intercultural Press.\nKim, Y. Y. (2002). Adapting to an unfamiliar culture: An interdisciplinary overview. In W. B. Gudykunst & B. Mody (Eds.), Handbook of international andintercultural communication (2nd ed., pp. 259-273). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.\nKlemp, G. O., Jr. (1979). Identifying, measuring and integrating competence. In P. S. Pottinger & J. Goldsmith (Eds.), Defining and measuring competence (pp. 41-52). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.\nKlepeis, N. E., Nelson, W. C., Ott, W. R., Robinson, J., Tsang, A. M., Switzer, P., Behar, J. V., Hern, S., and Engelmann, W. (2001). The National Human Activity Pattern Survey (NHAPS): A Resource for Assessing Exposure to Environmental Pollutants, J. Expos. Analysis and Environ. Epidem. 11(3),231-252.\nKnight, J. (1994). Internationalization: Elements and checkpoints. Ottawa, Canada: Canadian Bureau for international Education (CBIE).\nKnight, J. (1999). Internationalization of higher Education. In OECD (Ed.). Quality and internationalization in higher education. Paris: OECD.\nKnight, J. (2003). Updated definition of internationalization. International Higher Education, 33(3), 2-3.\nKnight, J. (2004). Internationalization remolded: Definition, approach, and rationales. Journal of Studies in International Education, 8, 5-31.\nKnight, J. (2008). Higher education in turmoil: The changing world of internationalization. Rotterdam, Netherlands: Sense Publishers.\nKnight, J. (2012). Student mobility and internationalization: Trends and tribulations. Research in Comparative and International Education, 7(1), 20-33.\nKnight, J., & de wit, H. (1997). Internationalisation of Higher Education in Asia Pacific Countries. European Association for International Education, Amsterdam.\nKnight, J., & Madden, M. (2010). International Mobility of Canadian Social Sciences and Humanities Doctoral Students. Canadian Journal of Higher Education, 40(2), 18-34.\nKuroda, K., Sugimura, M., Kitamura, Y. and Asada, S. (2018). Internationalization of Higher Education and Student Mobility in Japan and Asia (Background paper for Global Education Monitoring Report 2019).\nLee, Y. H. (2009). Problems and stress among students in an international campus. International Journal of Learning, 16(4), 361-379.\nLeong, C. & Ward, C. (2000). Identity conflict in sojourners. International Journal of Intercultural Relations, 24, 763–776.\nMarcia, J. E. (1980). Identity in adolescence. In J. Adelson(E The handbook 01 adolescent Psychology. New York: John Wiley & Sons.\nMazarrol, T., Kemp, S. & Savery, L. (1997). International students who choose not to study in Australia: An examination of Taiwan and Indonesia. Australian International Education Foundation, Canberra.\nMazzarol, T., & Soutar, G. N. (2002). “Push‐pull” factors influencing international student destination choice. International Journal of Educational Management.\nMedina-Lopez-Portillo, A. (2004). Intercultural learning assessment: The link between program duration and the development of intercultural sensitivity. Frontiers: The interdisciplinary journal of study abroad, 10, 179-199.\nMestenhauser, J. A. (2003). Building bridges. International Educator, 12(3), 6-11.\nMok, K. H. (2012). The rise of transnational higher education in Asia: Student mobility and studying experiences in Singapore and Malaysia. Higher Education Policy, 25(2), 225-241.\nNonaka, I., & Takeuchi, H. (1995). The knowledge creating company. New York: Oxford University Press.\nOleksiyenko, A., Cheng, K. M., & Yip, H. K. (2013). International student mobility in Hong Kong: private good, public good, or trade in services?. Studies in Higher Education, 38(7), 1079-1101.\nOrganisation for Economic Co-operation and Development. (2010). Education at a Glance 2010. Paris, France: Author.\nOrganisation for Economic Co-operation and Development. (2012). Project update – May 2012. Retrieved from http://www.oecd.org/education/skills-beyond-school/48088270.pdf\nOrganisation for Economic Co-operation and Development. (2018). Preparing our youth for an inclusive and sustainable world. Paris, France: Author.\nOrganisation for Economic Co-operation and Development. (2019). Education at a Glance 2019. Paris, France: Author.\nOrganisation for Economic Co-operation and Development. (n.d). Testing student and university performance globally: OECD’s AHELO. Retrieved from http://www.oecd.org/education/skills-beyond-school/testingstudentanduniversityperformancegloballyoecdsahelo.htm\nOrganization for Economic Co-operation and Development. (2002). Education Policy Analysis 2002. Paris, France: Author. Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.1787/epa-2002-en.\nOrganization for Economic Co-operation and Development. (2004). Education policy analysis. Paris, France: Author.\nPaige, R. M., Jacobs-Cassuto, M., Yershova, Y. A., & DeJaeghere, J. (2003). Assessing intercultural sensitivity: An empirical analysis of the Hammer and Bennett Intercultural Development Inventory. International journal of intercultural relations, 27(4), 467-486.\nPaige, R. M., Jacobs-Cassuto, M., Yershova, Y. A., & DeJaeghere, J. (1999). Assessing intercultural sensitivity: A validation study of the Hammer and Bennett (1998) Intercultural Development Inventory. In International Academy of Intercultural Research conference, Kent State University, Kent, Ohio.\nRogers, P. J. (2000). Program theory: Not whether programs work but how they work. In D. L. Stufflebeam, G. F. Madaus, & T. Kellaghan (Eds.), Evaluation models: Viewpoints on educational and human services evaluation (2nd ed., pp. 209-232). Boston: Kluwer Academic.\nStephan, W. G., & Stephan, C. W. (2013). Designing intercultural education and training programs: An evidence-based approach. International Journal of Intercultural Relations, 37, 277-286.\nTapaninen, R. (n.d.). The Nordic cooperation network: The school of tomorrow. Retrieved from http://www.aia.org/cae_confrep_spring05_nordic\nTeichler, U. (2017). Internationalisation trends in higher education and the changing role of international student mobility. Journal of international Mobility, 1, 177-216.\nThe PIE News. (2018). APAIE: International education crucial for future of work. Retrieved from: https://thepienews.com/news/apaie-intled-crucial-for-future-of-work/\nUNESCO Institute for Statistics (2014). Higher Education. Retrieve from: http://www.uis.unesco.org/Education/Pages/tertiary-education.aspx\nUnited Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization. (2001). Universal declaration on cultural diversity. Retrieved from http://portal.unesco.org/en/ev.php-URL_ID=13179&URL_DO=DO_TOPIC&URL_SECTION=201.html\nUnited Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization. (2015). UNESCO science report toward 2030. Montreal, Canada: Author.\nWard, C., Bochner, S., & Furnham, A. (2001). The psychology of culture shock. London: Routledge.\nWood, J. (2014). Communication in our lives (7th Ed.). Stamford, CT: Cengage Learning.\nYang, R. (2002). University internationalisation: Its meanings, rationales and implications. Intercultural Education, 13(1), 81-95.\nYing, Y. W. (2005). Variation in acculturative stressors over time: A case study of Taiwanese students in United States. International Journal of Intercultural Relations, 29, 59-71.
描述: 碩士
國立政治大學
教育學系
107152013
資料來源: http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#G0107152013
資料類型: thesis
Appears in Collections:學位論文

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat
201301.pdf3.48 MBAdobe PDF2View/Open
Show full item record

Google ScholarTM

Check

Altmetric

Altmetric


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.