Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://ah.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/131253
題名: 輔助國中生生涯探索之桌上遊戲設計
Designing a Table Game to facilitate Junior High School Students’ Career Exploration
作者: 陳思諪
Chen, Ssu-Ting
貢獻者: 詹志禹
Chan, Chih-Yu
陳思諪
Chen, Ssu-Ting
關鍵詞: 桌上遊戲
生涯探索
生涯決定狀態
生涯自我效能
Tabletop game
Career exploration
Career decision
Career self-efficacy
日期: 2020
上傳時間: 3-Aug-2020
摘要:  本研究目的旨在探討《人生旅途》桌上遊戲幫助國中生進行生涯探索之成效,以及遊玩桌上遊戲前後國中生的生涯決定狀態與生涯自我效能間的差異情況。研究採立意取樣,選擇臺北市小北國中四班七年級學生,以及桃園市小國國中兩班七年級、四班八年級學生,共十個班級學生做為研究對象,有效樣本共274人。\n  本研究根據 John Holland生涯類型論、 Gardner多元智能理論及 Spranger的價值取向理論,設計一套桌上遊戲,希冀學生可透過遊戲將「智力」、「興趣」、「職業」及「價值觀」四個觀念串聯起來,提升對自我興趣及個人能力的認知、確立職涯方向,以及澄清個人價值觀。\n  本研究以問卷調查法蒐集量化資料,包括「生涯決定狀態量表」、「生涯決策自我效能預期量表」與「桌上遊戲課程反饋量表」,並於課程結束後以半結構訪談蒐集質性資料。所得資料以描述統計、單因子多變量變異數分析、典型相關分析、觀察法、訪談法、內容分析法等統計方法進行分析處理,研究結果如下:\n\n一、國中生的生涯決定狀態,在性別及年齡背景變項無統計上的顯著差異。\n二、《人生旅途》桌上遊戲可使國中生的生涯決定狀態趨近自主定向型。\n三、《人生旅途》桌上遊戲對國中生生涯自我效能中的制訂自身生涯目標計畫、提升對自我興趣及能力認知,以及正確評量自己能力專長與個性之能力三面向皆具輔導效果,惟對於確立自身職業方向之輔導效果不顯著。\n四、《人生旅途》桌上遊戲能對學生探索生涯有所助益\n\n  最後,本研究建議,將此套桌遊融入綜合活動等課程,可提升學生的學習興趣,並對學生的自我認識與生涯抉擇有所幫助。
Based on Holland’s Theory of Career Choice (RIASEC) , Gardner’s Theory of multiple intelligences and Spranger’s model of six value orientations, the current study designed a table game named “Life Journey.” The purpose of this research is to explore the effectiveness of the table game on facilitating junior high school students’ career exploration, expecting to see that students can integrate self-reflection on multiple intelligence, career interest and value orientations. Quasi-experimental design was adopted to test the effects. Dependent variables included career decisions and career self-efficacy. Pre-tests and post-test were administered to both the experimental and controlled groups. The sample was a total of 274 students from Xiaobei Junior High School in Taipei City (7th grade students) and Xiaoguo Junior High School in Taoyuan City (7th grade and 8th grade students). After experimentation, a semi-structured interview was used to collect qualitative data of user’s feedback. Quantitative data was analyzed by descriptive statistics and ANOVA.\nThe following results were found:\n\n1.Gender and age had no effect on career decisions status.\n2.The table game facilitated decision status approaching to autonomous orientation.\n3.The table game had significant effects on formulating career goals, improved self-understanding of interest, ability and values, as well as promoted correctness of self-assessment of ability strength and personality. However, its effect on helping career direction is not significant.\n\nIn conclusion, the table game designed by the current research can facilitate junior high school students’ career exploration. It was suggested that this table game be integrated into the career-related curriculum to help students’ learning motivation, self-understanding and career decision.
參考文獻: 中文部分\n王春展(2004)。專科生情緒智慧、人境適配度與生涯阻隔之研究—以中部某專科學校為例。嘉南學報(人文類),30,頁443 - 460。\n生涯(2019)。教育部重編國語辭典修訂本。取自http://dict.revised.moe.edu.tw-/cgibin/cbdic/gsweb.cgi?o=dcbdic&searchid=Z00000132553\n田秀蘭(1996)。自我效能預期與女性之生涯發展。諮商與輔導,123,頁32-33。\n田秀蘭(2001)。大專學生對生涯決定困難的知覺分析。教育心理學報,33(1),頁87-98。\n田秀蘭(2003)。社會認知生涯理論之興趣模式驗證研究。教育心理學報,34(2),頁247 - 266。\n李瑞森(2015)。游戲專業概論(第2版)。新竹市:清華大學出版社。\n林幸台(1983)。我國高中及大一學生職業決策行為之調查實驗與研究。輔導學報,6,頁 91-124。\n林幸台、田秀蘭、張小鳳、張德聰(2010)。生涯輔導。臺北市:心理出版社。\n林家米、隋翠華(2017)。桌遊融入語詞學習之應用研究分析。臺灣教育評論月刊,6(4),頁 196 - 202。\n林清文(1994)。大學生生涯確定狀態及其因徑模式驗證之研究(未出版之博士論文)。國立彰化師範大學,彰化市。\n林惠瑜(2004)。大學生知覺之家庭親子界限與其生涯自我效能的關係(未出版之博士論文)。國立政治大學,臺北市。\n金樹人(1987)。價值問卷在生計輔導上的應用,諮商與輔導,6,頁21 - 22。\n金樹人(1997)。生涯諮商與輔導。臺北市:東華。\n金樹人、林清山、田秀蘭(1989)。我國大專學生生涯發展定向之研究。教育心理學報,22,頁167-190。\n連廷誥(1996)。專科學生生涯發展及其相關因素之研究(未出版之碩士論文)。國立高雄師範大學,高雄市。\n張育瑋(2010)。多元智能理論運用於繪本教學之研究─以兒童繪畫表現為例(未出版之碩士論文)。國立臺中教育大學,臺中市。\n張春興(2000)。教育心理學(重訂版十六刷)。臺北:東華。\n張春興(2013)。教育心理學-三化取向的理論與實踐(重修二版)。臺北:東華\n張銀珍(2014)。大學生職業興趣類型與生活適應之相關研究-以某科技大學為例(未出版之碩士論文)。淡江大學,新北市。\n許榮哲、歐陽立中(2016)。桌遊課:原來我玩的不只是桌遊,是人生。新北市:遠流出版事業股份有限公司。\n智力(2019)。教育部國語辭典簡編本。取自 http://dict.concised.moe.edu.tw/cgi-bin/jbdic/gsweb.cgi?o=djbdic&searchid=Z00000029374\n邱卉綺(2004)。高中生生涯決定困難、生涯自我效能與焦慮憂鬱情緒之相關研究(未出版之碩士論文)。臺北市,國立臺灣師範大學。\n陳金定(1987)。生計決策訓練課程對高一男生生計決策行為之實驗研究。臺北市,國立臺灣師範大學。\n陳秀婷(2003)。國中學生生涯自我概念之研究(未出版之碩士論文)。國立高雄師範大學,高雄市。\n陳鈺萍(2015)。生涯探索團體方案對高職二年級女學生生涯發展及生涯自我效能之影響研究(未出版之碩士論文)。國立高雄師範大學,高雄市。\n陳佩雯(2004)。以合作學習進行批判性思考教學之行動研究(未出版之碩士論文)。國立臺灣師範大學,臺北市。\n黄炤容(2000)。國中生心理性別、知覺性別期待與生涯自我效能相關之研究(未出版之碩士論文)。臺北市,國立臺灣師範大學。\n黃素菲(2016)。生涯興趣與生涯自我效能對專業滿意度與生涯成熟度的相關研究─以上海交通大學為例。輔導與諮商學報,38(1),頁29 - 60。\n黃惠香(2008)。青少年生涯自我效能量表編製之研究(未出版之碩士論文)。國立臺東大學,臺東市。\n楊智馨(1997)。大學生生涯發展狀況與自我認定狀態之相關研究(未出版之碩士論文)。國立臺灣師範大學,臺北市。\n蔡順良(2008)。青少年多向度效能量表編製與驗證。教育心理學報測驗與評量專刊,39,頁105 - 126。\n郭蓓蓉(2008)。臺北市高中生生涯自我概念、生涯自我效能與生涯決定困難之研究(未出版之碩士論文)。國立臺灣師範大學,臺北市。\n賴思蓉(2017)。台北市公立國中修讀技藝教育課程學生生涯自我概念與生涯自我效能之研究(未出版之碩士論文)。國立彰化師範大學,彰化市。\n謝宏惠(1990)。大專生性別角色、場地獨立性、決策型態、生涯自我效能與生涯不確定之相關研究(未出版之碩士論文)。國立臺灣師範大學,臺北市。\n羅曼玉(2014)。國中生生涯發展準備度、社會支持與生涯自我效能之研究(未出版之碩士論文)。國立新竹教育大學,新竹市。\n鄭棓原(2019)。高中生知覺父母生涯支持、生涯自我效能與生涯決定困難之相關研究(未出版之碩士論文)。國立高雄師範大學,高雄市。\n鄭黎玲(1995)。焦慮、自尊、內外控與高職生生涯決策、工作價值觀之相關研究。臺南師院學生學刊,16,頁22-38。\n鄭博真(2000)。多元智能統整課程與教學。高雄市:復文。\n \n西文部分\nArmstrong, T. (1997). Multiple intelligences in the classroom. 李平(翻譯), 經營多元智慧. 臺北: 遠流.\nBandura, A. (1977). Self-efficacy: Toward a unifying theory of behavioral change. Psychological Review, 84(2), 191–215.\nBetz, N. E. (2004). Contributions of Self‐Efficacy Theory to Career Counseling: A Personal Perspective. The Career Development Quarterly, 52(4). 363-369.\nBetz, N. E., & Hackett, G. (1981). The relationship of career-related self-efficacy expectations to perceived career options in college women and men. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 28(5), 399–410.\nGardner, H. (1983). Frames of Mind: The theory of multiple intelligences. NY: Basic Books.\nGardner, H. (1995). Reflections on Multiple Intelligences : Myths and Messages. Phi Delta Kappan, 77(3), 200-209.\nGardner, H. (2000). Intelligence Reframed: Multiple Intelligences for the 21st Century. NY: Basic Books. 李心瑩(翻譯), 再建多元智慧─21世紀的發展前景與實際應用. 臺北:遠流.\nHackett, G., & Betz, N. E. (1981). A self-efficacy approach to the career development of women. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 18, 326-339.\nHolland, J. L. (1973). Making vocational choices: A theory of vocational personalities and work environments. Englewood Cliffs: NJ: Prentice-Hall.\nHolland, J. L. (1990). The Self-Directed Search. Odessa: FL: Psychological Assessment Resources.\nHolland, J. L. (1997). Making vocational choices: A theory of vocational personalities and work environments (3rd ed.). Odessa: Psychological Assessment Resources.\nGee, J. P. (2007). What Video Games Have to Teach Us About Learning and Literacy. United States: Palgrave Macmillan.\nKluckhohn, C. (1951). Values and Value-Orientations in the Theory of Action: An Exploration in Definition and Classification. Toward a General Theory of Action, 388–433. doi:https://doi.org/10.4159/harvard.9780674863507\nLent, R. W., & Hackett, G. (1987). Career self-efficacy: Empirical status and future directions. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 30(3), 347-382.\nMarcia, J. E. (1966) . Development and validation of ego-identity status. Journal ol Personality and Social Psychology.3(5), 551-558.\nMau, W. C. (2002). Cultural differences in career decision-making styles and self-efficacy. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 57(3), 365-378.\nNiles, S. G., Amundson, N. E., & Neault, R. A. (2011). Career flow: A hope-centered approach to career development. Boston, CA: Pearson Education.\nRokeach, M. (1973). The Nature of Human Values: Free Press.\nRowland, K. D. (2004). Career decision-making skills of high school students in the Bahamas. Journal of Career Development, 31(1), 1-13.\nSavickas, M. L. (2013). Career construction theory and practice. In S. D. Brown & R. W. Lent (Eds.),Career development and counseling: Putting theory and research to work.Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & Sons.\nSilver, H. F., Strong, R. W., & & Perini, M. J. (2000). So each may learn: Integrating learning styles and multiple intelligences.田耐青(翻譯) ,統整多元智慧與學習風格:把每位學生帶上來. 臺北: 遠流.\nSuper, D. E. (1976). Career Education and the Meaning of Work. Monographs on Career Education. Washington, D. C. : Office of Education.\nTaylor, K. M., & Betz, N. E. (1983). Applications of self-efficacy theory to the understanding and treatment of career indecision. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 22(1), 63–81.
描述: 碩士
國立政治大學
教育學系
107152014
資料來源: http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#G0107152014
資料類型: thesis
Appears in Collections:學位論文

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat
201401.pdf8.91 MBAdobe PDF2View/Open
Show full item record

Google ScholarTM

Check

Altmetric

Altmetric


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.