Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://ah.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/131319
題名: Facebook直播如何影響消費者線上購買決策?–以流行服飾產業為例
How Facebook Live affects consumer`s online purchasing behavior? - Take fashion industry as an example
作者: 程郁婷
Cheng, Yu-Ting
貢獻者: 張瑜倩
Chang, Yu-Chien
程郁婷
Cheng, Yu-Ting
關鍵詞: 直播
社群商務
社群媒體
購買決策
流行服飾產業
Live stream
Social media
Social Commerce
Purchase decision process
Fashion clothes industry
日期: 2020
上傳時間: 3-Aug-2020
摘要: 社群媒體的發展受到行動裝置的普及、科技技術的提升,及進入門檻低的影響,扮演的角色已從社交互動或娛樂行為轉變成交易買賣的場所,而當社群媒體多了交易行為的特點後,社群商務的概念隨之出現。社群媒體龍頭Facebook也在這個新的商業模式之下,出現了更多不同於以往的交易行為。\n數位時代來臨,流行服飾產業近幾年受到巨大影響,紛紛從實體商店遷移至網路商店,但因其產品特性重視視覺效果,消費者在無法到店體驗的情況下,鏡頭前商品的呈現方式就顯得十分重要。業者為了促進消費者的購物行為而採取直播的方式吸引其目光,社群媒體於是成為直播發生的場域,直播也從原先的電子競技、網紅才藝轉變為另一種促進交易的工具。消費者在這新興的交易模式下的購買行為有何轉變,是值得探討的議題。\n本研究之研究問題為探討「Facebook直播如何影響消費者線上購買決策?」並以流行服飾產業為例進行探討,以觀看服飾業者Facebook直播的消費者為研究對象,選用網路民族誌(netnography)作為研究方法進行資料蒐集。研究者在線上觀察與參與直播影片後,再訪談十三位消費者,整理結果並予以歸納。本研究發現,在流行服飾產業,消費者非常看重是否可以找到對應自己身型的直播主,也會當成產品的評估標準及後續風險確認因素,並影響購買後是否滿意與回購。此外,消費者一開始對於產品的需求除了來自內部動機或外部誘因之外,也可能是觀看直播後才說服自己有此需求而進入購買決策。最後,即便處在社群商務的環境下,社群對於消費者在購買決策的影響並不大。
The development of social media has been affected by the popularity of mobile devices, improvement of technology and lower entry barrier. The role of social media has changed from entertainment to commercial actions. When commercial practice is introduced to social media, the concept of social commerce appears. Facebook, the main leader of social media, also adds commercial functions under this phenomenon, which is well-known as Facebook Live.\nIn the recent years, the fashion clothes industry has been affected by the macro environment as well as the consumer’s purchasing behaviors. Thus, more physical stores move to online. To induce consumer’s purchasing behavior, sellers began to adopt online tool, such as live stream, to attract consumer’s attention and social media has become the field where live occurs.\nThe aim of this research is to explore how Facebook live stream affects consumer’s online purchasing behavior, and take fashion clothes industry as an example. This study uses netnography as research method. Researcher conducts online observation, as well as undertake in-depth interviews with 13 consumers who have experienced live stream to consume fashion clothes. The research finds out that consumer attach great importance to whether they can find a live host corresponding to their body figures. In addition, consumers may convince themselves to have demand after watching live stream. The study also finds even under the circumstance of social commerce, the community has little influence on consumer’s purchasing behavior.
參考文獻: 一、中文文獻\n王文科、王智弘(2010)。質的研究的信度和效度。彰化師大教育學報,17,29–50。\n吳柏羲(2017)。娛樂先行,直播搶占眼球經濟—2017上半年直播平台選擇與觀看行為分析。資策會產業情報研究所(Market Intelligence & Consulting Institute, MIC)研究報告。\n吳柏羲(2018)。行動黏著延伸生活—直播使用概況與內容偏好。資策會產業情報研究所(Market Intelligence & Consulting Institute, MIC)研究報告。\n吳柏羲(2019)。利基市場成熟,需求專業內容—直播平台使用概況。資策會產業情報研究所(Market Intelligence & Consulting Institute, MIC)研究報告。\n林忻祐(2019)。願付意願興起,拍賣購物優先—社群媒體延伸服務偏好。資策會產業情報研究所(Market Intelligence & Consulting Institute, MIC)研究報告。\n林金定、嚴嘉楓、陳美花(2005)。質性研究方法:訪談模式與實施步驟分析。身心障礙研究季刊,3(2),122–136。\n林庭如(2013)。線上跨境合購購買決策之研究-以批踢踢實業坊為例。碩士論文,國立政治大學科技管理與智慧財產研究所,台北市。\n林慶龍(2018)。探討使用 Facebook 直播平台的購買態度與意圖―以服飾品為例。碩士論文,國立中央大學資訊管理學系所,桃園市。\n哈利熊(2019)。FB行銷系列|展望2020,你必須知道的10大FB數據。2020年1月19日,檢自 https://www.holibear.com/fb%E8%A1%8C%E9%8A%B7%E7%B3%BB%E5%88%97%EF%BD%9C2019%E5%B9%B4%E4%BD%A0%E5%BF%85%E9%A0%88%E7%9F%A5%E9%81%93%E7%9A%8410%E5%A4%A7%E6%95%B8%E6%93%9A%EF%BD%9C%E5%93%88%E5%88%A9%E7%86%8Aholibear/#gsc.tab=0。\n柯雅綾(2014)。流行服飾業之體驗行銷、品牌評價及購買意願之關係研究。碩士論文,中國文化大學國際貿易學系所,台北市。\n洪仲威、陳伯璿(2015)。遊戲玩家線上直播的持續使用因素分析―以 Twitch 的英雄聯盟直播為例。碩士論文,國立交通大學傳播研究所,新竹市。\n胡自立(2017)。網紅經濟下國際直播平台營運模式分析。資策會產業情報研究所(Market Intelligence & Consulting Institute, MIC)研究報告。\n唐士哲(2004)。民族志學應用于網路研究的契機、問題,與挑戰。資訊社會研究,6,59–90。\n財團法人資訊工業策進會產業情報研究所(Market Intelligence & Consulting Institute, MIC)(2019)。【網購調查系列一】網購消費占比達16.5% 愛用電商平台大排名。2020年1月20日,檢自https://mic.iii.org.tw/news.aspx?id=516&List=29。\n梁汝英(2004)。消費者行為學。重慶:重慶大學出版社。\n陳世智(2016)。顧客體驗與社群媒體行銷活動效果評析:二個社群媒體之實證研究。博士論文,國立交通大學經營管理研究所,新竹市。\n陳志萍(2008)。精進網路研究方法—網路民族誌。圖書資訊學研究,2(2),1–15。\n陳威珞(2012)。Justin TV網路影音直播平台使用行為研究。碩士論文,國立中正大學傳播學系電訊傳播研究所,嘉義縣。\n陳建銘(2014)。遊戲直播網站忠誠度與持續使用意圖之研究:以 Twitch TV為例。碩士論文,義守大學資訊管理學系,高雄市。\n陳炳宏(2017)。<封面故事>臉書直播購物,粉絲團人氣變現金。2020年1月20日,檢自https://ec.ltn.com.tw/article/paper/1149337。\n陳國晃、謝士煜、廖錦農(2016)。穿戴式裝置消費市場決策影響因素之研究。 中華科技大學學報,65,89–110。\n黃筠婷(2019)。網路直播共創者投入對價值共創影響程度—以直播主的雙面靈巧行為與觀眾的社會比較資訊注意程度為干擾變數。碩士論文,國立台北科技大學經營管理系所,台北市。\n勤業眾信(2017)。2018全球高科技、媒體及電信產業趨勢預測。勤業眾信聯合會計師事務所(Deloitte)研究報告。\n愛范兒(2019)。快時尚、鞋業巨頭都倒下!關店數將破1.2萬家,實體零售業該如何求生?。2020年3月11日,檢自https://www.bnext.com.tw/article/56005/us-retail-downturn-in-2019。\n楊之瑜(2017)。【圖輯】臉書直播趨勢分析:人氣最高的不是美妝,而是賣運動鞋。2020年1月20日,檢自https://www.thenewslens.com/article/83459。\n楊以凡(2018)。行動直播平台經營模式之研究。碩士論文,國立政治大學科技管理與智慧財產研究所,台北市。\n經濟部統計處(2019)。今年電子購物業營收可望再創新猷。2020年1月20日,檢自https://www.moea.gov.tw/Mns/dos/bulletin/Bulletin.aspx?kind=9&html=1&menu_id=18808&bull_id=6182。\n謝佳蓉(2017)。直播電商對消費者購買決策流程之影響。碩士論文,國立政治大學企業管理研究所,台北市。\n鍾敏玲(2019)。專家傳真—社群直播電商大融合,打造智慧行銷新零售模式。2020年2月15日,檢自https://tw.news.yahoo.com/%E5%B0%88%E5%AE%B6%E5%82%B3%E7%9C%9F-%E7%A4%BE%E7%BE%A4%E7%9B%B4%E6%92%AD%E9%9B%BB%E5%95%86%E5%A4%A7%E8%9E%8D%E5%90%88-%E6%89%93%E9%80%A0%E6%99%BA%E6%85%A7%E8%A1%8C%E9%8A%B7%E6%96%B0%E9%9B%B6%E5%94%AE%E6%A8%A1%E5%BC%8F-215011094--finance.html。\n羅靚(2018)。電商直播的使用與滿足研究。碩士論文,國立政治大學傳播碩士學位學程,台北市。\n龔偉豪(2019)。網路口碑對流行服飾品牌購買意願之影響:以 UNIQLO為例。碩士論文,國立中興大學科技管理研究所,台中市。\n\n二、英文文獻\nBai, Y., Yao, Z., & Dou, Y.-F. (2015). Effect of social commerce factors on user purchase behavior: An empirical investigation from renren. com. International Journal of Information Management, 35(5), 538-550.\nBlackwell, R. D., Miniard, P. W., & Engel, J. F. (2001)。消費者行為(二版)(謝文雀譯)。台北市:華泰文化。\nBoyd, D. M., & Ellison, N. B. (2007). Social network sites: Definition, history, and scholarship. Journal of Computer‐mediated Communication, 13(1), 210-230.\nCai, J., Wohn, D. Y., Mittal, A., & Sureshbabu, D. (2018, June). Utilitarian and hedonic motivations for live streaming shopping. Paper presented at the Proceedings of the 2018 ACM international conference on interactive experiences for TV and online video, Newark, NJ, USA.\nChen, A., Lu, Y., & Wang, B. (2017). Customers’ purchase decision-making process in social commerce: a social learning perspective. International Journal of Information Management, 37(6), 627-638.\nChen, C. C., & Lin, Y. C. (2018). What drives live-stream usage intention? The perspectives of flow, entertainment, social interaction, and endorsement. Telematics and Informatics, 35(1), 293-303.\nChow, W. S., & Shi, S. (2014, June). Understanding Consumer Trust in Social Commerce Websites. Paper presented at the Pacific Asia Conference on Information Systems (PACIS), Chengdu, China.\nChu, S.-C., & Choi, S. M. (2011). Electronic word-of-mouth in social networking sites: A cross-cultural study of the United States and China. Journal of Global Marketing, 24(3), 263-281.\nChu, S.-C., & Kim, Y. (2011). Determinants of consumer engagement in electronic word-of-mouth (eWOM) in social networking sites. International Journal of Advertising, 30(1), 47-75.\nConstantinides, E., & Fountain, S. J. (2008). Web 2.0: Conceptual foundations and marketing issues. Journal of Direct, Data and Digital Marketing Practice, 9(3), 231-244.\nDimension. (2013)。【Dimension】社群媒體的歷史總表。Retrieved January 08, 2020, from http://technews.tw/2013/01/28/dimension-the-history-of-social-media/.\nEngel, J. F., Blackwell, R. D., & Kollat, D. T. (1978). Consumer Behavior (Vol. 6). New York: Holt, Dryden Press.\nEtikan, I., Musa, S. A., & Alkassim, R. S. (2016). Comparison of convenience sampling and purposive sampling. American Journal of Theoretical and Applied Statistics, 5(1), 1-4.\nGEMarketing. (2018)。口碑行銷|PTT VS DCARD 兩大論壇綜合比較。Retrieved May 21, 2020, from https://www.gemarketing.com.tw/article/wom/ptt-dcard/.\nHan, H., Xu, H., & Chen, H. (2018). Social commerce: A systematic review and data synthesis. Electronic Commerce Research and Applications, 30, 38-50.\nHilvert-Bruce, Z., Neill, J. T., Sjöblom, M., & Hamari, J. (2018). Social motivations of live-streaming viewer engagement on Twitch. Computers in Human Behavior, 84, 58-67.\nHong, Z., & Yi, L. (2012). Research on the influence of perceived risk in consumer on-line purchasing decision. Physics Procedia, 24, 1304-1310.\nHuang, Z., & Benyoucef, M. (2017). The effects of social commerce design on consumer purchase decision-making: An empirical study. Electronic Commerce Research Applications, 25, 40-58.\nJiang, G., Ma, F., Shang, J., & Chau, P. Y. (2014). Evolution of knowledge sharing behavior in social commerce: an agent-based computational approach. Information Sciences, 278, 250-266.\nJorgensen, D. L. (2015). Participant observation. In R. A. Scott, S. M. Kosslyn & M. Buchmann (eds.), Emerging Trends in the Social and Behavioral Sciences: An Interdisciplinary, Searchable, and Linkable Resource, Hoboken: Wiley Online, 1-15.\nKaplan, A. M., & Haenlein, M. (2010). Users of the world, unite! The challenges and opportunities of Social Media. Business Horizons, 53(1), 59-68.\nKarimi, S., Papamichail, K. N., & Holland, C. P. (2015). The effect of prior knowledge and decision-making style on the online purchase decision-making process: A typology of consumer shopping behaviour. Decision Support Systems, 77, 137-147.\nKawulich, B. B. (2005). Participant observation as a data collection method. Paper presented at the Forum: Qualitative Social Research, Berlin.\nKim, D. J., Ferrin, D. L., & Rao, H. R. (2008). A trust-based consumer decision-making model in electronic commerce: The role of trust, perceived risk, and their antecedents. Decision Support Systems, 44(2), 544-564.\nKim, Y., & Srivastava, J. (2007, August). Impact of social influence in e-commerce decision making. Paper presented at the Proceedings of the ninth international conference on Electronic commerce, Minneapolis, MN, USA.\nKozinets, R. V. (2002). The Field behind the Screen: Using Netnography for Marketing Research in Online Communities. Journal of Market Research, 39(1), 61-72.\nKozinets, R. V. (2012). Marketing Netnography: Prom/ot(Ulgat)ing a New Research Method. Methodological Innovations Online, 7(1), 37-45.\nKozinets, R. V. (2015). Netnography. In R. Mansell & P. H. Ang (eds.), The International Encyclopedia of Digital Communication and Society, New York: Wiley, 1-8.\nLiang, T.-P., Ho, Y.-T., Li, Y.-W., & Turban, E. (2011). What drives social commerce: The role of social support and relationship quality. International Journal of Electronic Commerce, 16(2), 69-90.\nLiang, T.-P., & Turban, E. (2011). Introduction to the special issue social commerce: a research framework for social commerce. International Journal of Electronic Commerce, 16(2), 5-14.\nMangold, W. G., & Faulds, D. J. J. B. h. (2009). Social media: The new hybrid element of the promotion mix. Business Horizons, 52(4), 357-365.\nMilena, Z. R., Dainora, G., & Alin, S. (2008). Qualitative research methods: A comparison between focus-group and in-depth interview. Annals of the University of Oradea, Economic Science Series, 17(4), 1279-1283.\nNg, C. S.-P. (2013). Intention to purchase on social commerce websites across cultures: A cross-regional study. Information & Management, 50(8), 609-620.\nNoble, H., & Smith, J. (2015). Issues of validity and reliability in qualitative research. Evidence-based nursing, 18(2), 34-35.\nNoor, A. D., Sulaiman, R., & Bakar, A. A. (2014, November). A Review of Factors that Influenced Online Trust in Social Commerce. Paper presented at the Proceedings of the 6th International Conference on Information Technology and Multimedia, Putrajaya, Malaysia.\nO`dell, J. (2011). The History of Social Media [INFOGRAPHIC]. Retrieved January 08, 2020, from https://mashable.com/2011/01/24/the-history-of-social-media-infographic/.\nSiekkinen, M., Masala, E., & Kämäräinen, T. (2016, November). A first look at quality of mobile live streaming experience: the case of periscope. Paper presented at the Proceedings of the 2016 Internet Measurement Conference, Santa Monica, CA, USA.\nSun, Y., Shao, X., Li, X., Guo, Y., & Nie, K. (2019). How live streaming influences purchase intentions in social commerce: An IT affordance perspective. Electronic Commerce Research and Applications, 37, 1-12\nTeo, T. S., & Yeong, Y. D. (2003). Assessing the consumer decision process in the digital marketplace. Omega, 31(5), 349-363.\nTulloch, J., & Jenkins, H. (1995). Science fiction audiences: watching Doctor Who and Star Trek. London: Routledge.\nVickery, G., & Wunsch-Vincent, S. (2007, October). Participative Web And User-Created Content: Web 2.0 Wikis and Social Networking. France: Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD).\nWang, X., Yu, C., & Wei, Y. (2012). Social Media Peer Communication and Impacts on Purchase Intentions: A Consumer Socialization Framework. Journal of Interactive Marketing, 26(4), 198-208.\nWang, Y., & Yu, C. (2017). Social interaction-based consumer decision-making model in social commerce: The role of word of mouth and observational learning. International Journal of Information Management, 37(3), 179-189.\nWigand, R. T. (1997). Electronic Commerce: Definition, Theory, and Context. The Information Society, 13(1), 1-16.\nWongkitrungrueng, A., & Assarut, N. (2018). The role of live streaming in building consumer trust and engagement with social commerce sellers. Journal of Business Research. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2018.08.032.\nYadav, M. S., De Valck, K., Hennig-Thurau, T., Hoffman, D. L., & Spann, M. (2013). Social Commerce: A Contingency Framework for Assessing Marketing Potential. Journal of Interactive Marketing, 27(4), 311-323.\nZhang, K. Z., & Benyoucef, M. (2016). Consumer behavior in social commerce: A literature review. Decision Support Systems, 86, 95-108.\nZhu, Z., Yang, Z., & Dai, Y. (2017, May). Understanding the Gift-Sending Interaction on Live-Streaming Video Websites. Paper presented at the International Conference on Social Computing and Social Media, Beijing, China.
描述: 碩士
國立政治大學
科技管理與智慧財產研究所
107364110
資料來源: http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#G0107364110
資料類型: thesis
Appears in Collections:學位論文

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat
411001.pdf2.4 MBAdobe PDF2View/Open
Show full item record

Google ScholarTM

Check

Altmetric

Altmetric


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.