Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://ah.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/131380
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.advisor張卿卿zh_TW
dc.contributor.author吳靖雯zh_TW
dc.contributor.authorWu, Ching-Wenen_US
dc.creator吳靖雯zh_TW
dc.creatorWu, Ching-Wenen_US
dc.date2020en_US
dc.date.accessioned2020-08-03T10:48:00Z-
dc.date.available2020-08-03T10:48:00Z-
dc.date.issued2020-08-03T10:48:00Z-
dc.identifierG0107464024en_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/131380-
dc.description碩士zh_TW
dc.description國立政治大學zh_TW
dc.description傳播學院傳播碩士學位學程zh_TW
dc.description107464024zh_TW
dc.description.abstract近年來,隨著YouTuber的蓬勃發展,影響力也逐漸擴大。YouTuber開始發揮意見領袖的作用,影響消費者的種種行為,使得許多品牌商與YouTuber合作,發展出新的行銷模式:「業配影片」。\n過去YouTuber業配影片之相關研究,大多是探討不同內容的YouTuber頻道對於消費者的影響,然而根據本研究觀察,台灣YouTuber業配影片除了內容不同之外,業配影片類型也不同,主要分為商品資訊主導影片及故事主導影片。除此之外,不同的消費者觀看YouTuber業配影片的動機也不盡相同,分別為想要透過影片瞭解商品的資訊搜尋動機,以及把觀看YouTuber業配影片當作是娛樂的娛樂動機。透過上述的兩個實務觀察發現,本研究認為在不同業配影片類型以及觀看動機的刺激下,消費者會產生不同的態度及反應。\n因此,本研究以美妝YouTuber為例,將不同業配影片類型(商品資訊主導、故事主導)、不同消費者觀看動機(資訊搜尋、娛樂)、業配影片態度、品牌態度以及購買意願作為變項,探討在不同的業配影片類型與閱聽眾不同觀看動機的交互作用下,對於業配影片態度、品牌態度以及購買意願之影響。本研究以實驗法作為研究方法,採完全受試者間設計,操弄三個變數分別為:閱聽眾觀看美妝YouTuber業配影片之動機(資訊搜尋vs. 娛樂)、美妝YouTuber業配影片類型(商品資訊主導vs. 故事主導)與兩位YouTuber(YouTuber A vs. YouTuber B)。研究結果顯示出業配影片類型與觀看動機無交互作用,換言之,業配影片類型與業配影片態度的關係不受觀看動機之影響。另外,本研究也發現觀看商品資訊主導影片會使受試者產生較佳品牌態度,也會進一步產生較佳的購買意願。zh_TW
dc.description.tableofcontents第一章、緒論 1\n第一節、 研究背景與動機 1\n第二節、 研究目的 4\n第二章、文獻探討 6\n第一節、 媒體使用動機與接收之訊息一致性 6\n第二節、 YouTuber業配影片類型 8\n第三節、 觀看YouTuber業配影片的動機 13\n第四節、 業配影片效果 15\n第三章、研究架構與假設 17\n第一節、 研究架構 17\n第二節、 研究假設 18\n第四章、研究方法 19\n第一節、 研究方法與實驗設計 19\n第二節、 實驗物前測 22\n第三節、 正式實驗刺激物選擇與設計 42\n第四節、 正式實驗流程 44\n第五節、 變項測量與定義 45\n第五章、研究結果分析 53\n第一節、 實驗受試者樣本分佈 53\n第二節、 量表信度檢驗 54\n第三節、 操弄檢定 55\n第四節、 假設驗證 61\n第六章、結論 68\n第一節、 研究發現與討論 68\n第二節、 學術與實務貢獻 71\n第三節、 研究限制與未來建議 74\n第七章、參考文獻 77\n附錄一 免責聲明Disclaimers 85\n附錄二 YouTuber頻道訂閱數 86\n附錄三 正式實驗物分鏡表 88\n附錄四 前測一問卷 90\n附錄五 前測二問卷 101\n附錄六 正式實驗問卷 110zh_TW
dc.format.extent5673323 bytes-
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdf-
dc.source.urihttp://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#G0107464024en_US
dc.subjectYouTuber業配影片zh_TW
dc.subject觀看動機zh_TW
dc.subject業配影片態度zh_TW
dc.subject品牌態度zh_TW
dc.subject購買意願zh_TW
dc.title從觀看動機差異檢視美妝YouTuber業配影片類型的效果zh_TW
dc.titleThe Effects of Branded Videos Sponsored by YouTubers for Consumers with Different Viewing Motives: An Example Using Branded Videos for Cosmetic Productsen_US
dc.typethesisen_US
dc.relation.reference中文部分\n網路資料:\nIpsos(2013年)。〈YouTube台灣使用者行為大調查〉。上網日期,2020年2月24日。取自:https://www.ipsos.com/en-tw/solutions/overview#category3\n\nIpsos(2018年)。〈YouTube台灣使用者行為大調查〉。上網日期,2020年2月24日。取自:https://www.ipsos.com/en-tw/solutions/overview#category3\n\nMIC產業情報研究所(2014年6月13日)。〈96.2%台灣網友近期曾使用社交網站〉。上網日期,2020年2月24日。取自:https://mic.iii.org.tw/news.aspx?id=364\n\n廣告雜誌(2019年11月18日)。〈先勢集團與東方線上共同發表第三類媒體年度報告 跨視代革命來臨〉。上網日期,2020年2月24日。取自:http://adaround.blogspot.com/2019/11/blog-post_8.html\n\n創市際市場研究(2018年12月)。〈2018 年台灣網路報告〉。上網日期,2020年2月24日。取自:https://www.twnic.net.tw/doc/twrp/201812e.pdf\n\n期刊論文:\n蕭宏祺(2012)。〈YouTube 的崛起: 一個新的公民參與平台〉。新聞學研究,113:239-252。\n\n蘇品伃(2017)。〈YouTuber 對美妝消費者購買決策影響之研究〉。政治大學商學院科技管理與智慧財產研究所學位論文。\n\n李妍慧(2018)。〈YouTuber 可信度對消費者購買意願的影響: 置入性行銷的角色〉。嶺東科技大學行銷與流通管理研究所學位論文。\n\n徐志秀(2018)。〈國內 YouTuber 經營虛擬社群之研究〉。臺灣師範大學圖文傳播學系學位論文。\n\n蔡馨誼(2018)。〈社群媒體投入度之探討研究—以YouTuber頻道觀眾為例〉。東海大學企業管理研究所學位論文。\n\n白嘉寧(2018)。〈消費者觀看美妝 YouTuber 之動機及其對購買行為影響〉。中正大學行銷管理研究所學位論文。\n\n張卿卿(2016)。〈線上影音接收,傳散與產製上傳行為探討:多元動機之觀點〉。中華傳播學刊,30:61-107。\n\n簡培凱(2013)〈品牌知名度,擬社會互動與訊息多面性對於廣告效果之影響:以諮商中心為例〉。新竹教育大學教育心理與諮商研究所學位論文。\n\n鍾育明、黃樸生(2016)〈品牌故事功能對顧客廣告態度與品牌態度之影響—兼論品牌知名度之干擾角色〉。北商學報,(27-30):47-79.\n\n盧奕勛(2018)〈探討 Youtuber 業配影片內容行銷效益–以平衡理論分析〉。政治大學科技管理與智慧財產研究所學位論文。\n\n英文部分\n網路資料:\nJ. Clement (2019, December 4) Annual beauty-related content views on YouTube from 2009 to 2018. https://www.statista.com/statistics/294655/youtube-monthly-beauty-content-views/\n\nSocial Media Today (2013, June 13) Unignorable Stats About How Social Media Influences Purchase Behavior. https://www.socialmediatoday.com/news/unignorable-stats-about-how-social-media-influences-purchase-behaviour/464828/\n\nVisual Capitalist (2019, August 7) Ranking the Top 100 Websites in the World. https://www.visualcapitalist.com/ranking-the-top-100-websites-in-the-world/\n\n期刊論文:\nAhn, D., Jin, S.-A. A., & Ritterfeld, U. (2012). Sad Movies Don’t Always Make Me Cry. Journal of Media Psychology.\n\nBurgess, J., & Green, J. (2018). YouTube: Online video and participatory culture. Polity Press.\n\nChang, C. (2005). The Moderating Influence of Ad Framing for Ad–Self‐Congruency Effects. Psychology & Marketing, 22(12), 955-968.\n\nChang, C. (2009). " Being Hooked" By Editorial Content: The Implications for Processing Narrative Advertising. Journal of advertising, 38(1), 21-34.\n\nCocker, H. L., & Cronin, J. (2017). Charismatic Authority and The YouTuber: Unpacking The New Cults of Personality. Marketing theory, 17(4), 455-472.\n\nCooper, D. R., Schindler, P. S., & Sun, J. (2006). Business Research Methods. McGraw-Hill International Edition.\n\nCupchik, G. C. (2011). The Role of Feeling in the Entertainment = Emotion Formula. Journal of Media Psychology.\n\nDodds, W. B., Monroe, K. B., & Grewal, D. (1991). Effects of Price, Brand, and Store Information on Buyers’ Product Evaluations. Journal of marketing research, 28(3), 307-319.\n\nEngel, J. F., Blackwell, R., & Miniard, P. (1990). Customer Behavior. Hinsdale, IL: Dryden.\n\nFinn, S., & Gorr, M. B. (1988). Social Isolation and Social Support as Correlates of Television Viewing Motivations. Communication research, 15(2), 135-158.\n\nHagander, A., & Rúnarsdóttir, M. (2016). The Online Consumer Decision Journey in the Cosmetic Industry.\n\nHansen, S. S., Lee, J. K., & Lee, S.-Y. J. J. o. E. C. R. (2014). Consumer-Generated Ads on YouTube: Impacts of Source Credibility and Need for Cognition on Attitudes, Interactive Behaviors, and eWOM. 15(3), 254.\n\nHaridakis, P., & Hanson, G. (2009). Social Interaction and Co-Viewing with YouTube: Blending Mass Communication Reception and Social Connection. Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media, 53(2), 317-335.\n\nHolland, M. (2016). How YouTube Developed into a Successful Platform for User-Generated Content. Elon journal of undergraduate research in communications, 7(1).\n\nHuta, V., & Ryan, R. M. (2010). Pursuing Pleasure or Virtue: The Differential and Overlapping Well-Being Benefits of Hedonic and Eudaimonic Motives. Journal of happiness studies, 11(6), 735-762.\n\nIgartua, J.-J., & Barrios, I. (2013). Hedonic and Eudaimonic Motives for Watching Feature Films. Validation Of the Spanish Version of Oliver–Raney’s Scale. De Gruyter.\n\nJerslev, A. (2016). Media Times| In The Time of the Microcelebrity: Celebrification and the YouTuber Zoella. International Journal of Communication, 10, 19.\n\nKeller, K. L. (1993). Conceptualizing, Measuring, and Managing Customer-Based Brand Equity. Journal of marketing, 57(1), 1-22.\n\nKietzmann, J. H., Hermkens, K., McCarthy, I. P., & Silvestre, B. S. (2011). Social Media? Get Serious! Understanding The Functional Building Blocks of Social Media. Business horizons, 54(3), 241-251.\n\nKim, Y. J., & Han, J. (2014). Why Smartphone Advertising Attracts Customers: A Model of Web Advertising, Flow, and Personalization. Computers in Human Behavior, 33, 256-269.\n\nLee, M., & Youn, S. (2009). Electronic Word of Mouth (eWOM) How eWOM Platforms Influence Consumer Product Judgement. International journal of advertising, 28(3), 473-499.\n\nLutz, R. J. (1985). Affective and Cognitive Antecedents of Attitude Toward The Ad: A conceptual Framework. Psychological process and advertising effects: Theory, research, and application, 45-63.\nM\nacKenzie, S. B., Lutz, R. J., & Belch, G. E. (1986). The Role of Attitude Toward The Ad as a Mediator of Advertising Effectiveness: A Test of Competing Explanations. Journal of marketing research, 23(2), 130-143.\n\nMacKinnon, K. A. (2012). User Generated Content vs. advertising: Do Consumers Trust The Word of Others Over Advertisers? The Elon Journal of Undergraduate Research in Communications, 3(1), 14-22.\n\nMehta, A. (2000). Advertising Attitudes and Advertising Effectiveness. Journal of advertising research, 40(3), 67-72.\n\nMick, D. G. and C. Buhl (1992). "A Meaning-Based Model of Advertising Experiences." Journal of consumer research, 19(3), 317-338.\n\nMingione, D. (2014). Hello Internet!: An Analysis of YouTuber Greetings. Editorial Staff, 19.\n\nMoore, D. J., & Homer, P. M. (2008). Self-Brand Connections: The Role of Attitude Strength and Autobiographical Memory Primes. Journal of business research, 61(7), 707-714.\n\nNeuman, W. (2013). Social Research Methods: Pearson New International Edition: Qualitative and Quantitative Approaches (Pearson new international edition. ed.).Pearson Education\n\nOhanian, R. (1990). Construction and Validation of a Scale to Measure Celebrity Endorsers` Perceived Expertise, Trustworthiness, and Attractiveness. Journal of advertising, 19(3), 39-52.\n\nOliver, M. B., & Raney, A. A. (2011). Entertainment as Pleasurable and Meaningful: Identifying Hedonic and Eudaimonic Motivations For Entertainment Consumption. Journal of communication, 61(5), 984-1004.\n\nPhelps, J. E., & Hoy, M. G. (1996). The Aad‐Ab‐PI Relationship in Children: The Impact of Brand Familiarity and Measurement Timing. Psychology & Marketing, 13(1), 77-105.\n\nRichardson, P. S., Jain, A. K., & Dick, A. (1996). Household Store Brand Proneness: a Framework. Journal of retailing, 72(2), 159-185.\n\nRubin, A. M. (2002). The Uses-and-Gratifications Perspective of Media Effects. Media Effects: Advances in Theory and Research.\n\nRyan, R. M., & Deci, E. L. (2001). On Happiness and Human Potentials: A Review of Research on Hedonic and Eudaimonic Well-Being. Annual review of psychology, 52(1), 141-166.\n\nSchramm, H., & Wirth, W. (2010). Exploring The Paradox of Sad-Film Enjoyment: The Role of Multiple Appraisals and Meta-Appraisals. Poetics, 38(3), 319-335.\n\nSmith, A. N., Fischer, E., & Yongjian, C. (2012). How Does Brand-Related User-Generated Content Differ across YouTube, Facebook, and Twitter? Journal of interactive marketing, 26(2), 102-113.\n\nSnickars, P., & Vonderau, P. (2009). The YouTube Reader. Kungliga biblioteket.\n\nSpears, N., & Singh, S. N. (2004). Measuring Attitude Toward The Brand And Purchase Intentions. Journal of current issues & research in advertising, 26(2), 53-66.\n\nSrivastava, K., & Sharma, N. K. (2012). Consumer Attitude Towards Brand-Extension Incongruity: The Moderating Role of Need for Cognition and Need for Change. Journal of Marketing Management, 28(5-6), 652-675.\n\nTingchi Liu, M., Huang, Y.-Y., & Minghua, J. (2007). Relations among Attractiveness of Endorsers, Match-up, and Purchase Intention in Sport Marketing in China. Journal of Consumer Marketing, 24(6), 358-365.\n\nTsay-Vogel, M., & Krakowiak, K. M. (2016). Effects of Hedonic and Eudaimonic Motivations on Film Enjoyment Through Moral Disengagement. Communication Research Reports, 33(1), 54-60.\n\nÜnal, S., Ercis, A., & Keser, E. (2011). Attitudes Towards Mobile advertising–A Research to Determine the Differences between The Attitudes of Youth and Adults. Procedia-Social and behavioral sciences, 24, 361-377.\n\nWirth, W., Hofer, M., & Schramm, H. (2012). Beyond Pleasure: Exploring the Eudaimonic Entertainment Experience. Human Communication Research, 38(4), 406-428.\n\nWu, K. (2016). YouTube Marketing: Legality of Sponsorship and Endorsements in Advertising. JL Bus. & Ethics, 22, 59.\n\nZarantonello, L., & Schmitt, B. H. (2013). The Impact of Event Marketing on Brand Equity: The Mediating Roles of Brand Experience and Brand Attitude. International journal of advertising, 32(2), 255-280.\n\nZhang, Y. (1996). Responses to Humorous Advertising: The Moderating Effect of Need for Cognition. Journal of advertising, 25(1), 15-32.zh_TW
dc.identifier.doi10.6814/NCCU202001033en_US
item.grantfulltextopen-
item.openairetypethesis-
item.fulltextWith Fulltext-
item.openairecristypehttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_46ec-
item.cerifentitytypePublications-
Appears in Collections:學位論文
Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat
402401.pdf5.54 MBAdobe PDF2View/Open
Show simple item record

Google ScholarTM

Check

Altmetric

Altmetric


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.