Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
https://ah.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/131444| 題名: | 英語與華語歌曲中語言與音樂之關係：音段、節奏與聲調 The Connection Between Language and Music in English and Mandarin Songs: Segment, Rhythm, and Tone |
作者: | 凌旺楨 Ling, Wang-Chen |
貢獻者: | 蕭宇超 Hsiao, Yuchau E. 凌旺楨 Ling, Wang-Chen |
關鍵詞: | 音樂與語言的對應 感知語法 詞彙連結 韻律結構 子音串 優選理論 Language-music mapping Perception grammar Lexical association Prosodic structure Consonant cluster Optimality Theory |
日期: | 2020 | 上傳時間: | 2-Sep-2020 | 摘要: | 本論文以優選理論(Prince and Smolensky 1993/2004)分析英語及華語歌曲中音樂與語言的互動關係，並由音段、節奏與聲調三方面切入探討。本文首先研究語言到音樂的對應，檢視華語成人如何將自己說出的英語聲母子音串，以及韻尾子音串，感知進入音樂中唱出。研究結果顯示音樂節拍會導致唱的音段與唸的音段不同。此外，本文也討論作曲者如何將華語兒歌歌詞韻律結構，包含音步(foot)及語調詞組(intonational phrase)，感知進入音樂之中。本文發現韻律結構會與音樂旋律對整、並影響音樂節拍的指派。\n\n音樂到語言的對應則是觀察華語兒童聽華語歌曲時，如何將音樂旋律感知為語言聲調，並說出其所聽到的音節聲調。結果顯示兒童所感知的語言聲調與歌曲旋律相近。然而所產出的聲調則因心理詞彙的連結與否，而可能造成產出與感知的聲調不同。\n\n節奏的對應與音段的改變，顯示語言到音樂的感知語法具有重要角色。兒童產出聲調與感知聲調的不同，亦可驗證感知與產出係由獨立不同的語法所管理。 This study aims to investigate the relationship between language and music through segment, rhythm, and tone in English and Mandarin songs. The language-music mappings are analyzed under the framework of Optimality Theory (Prince and Smolensky 1993/2004).\n\nThis research first examines the language-to-music mapping through Mandarin-accented English in reading and singing. This study discusses how onset and coda clusters are produced in the linguistic output, and how the linguistic output is perceived into music. Segmental changes are shown in the language-to-music mapping, where beat assignment takes place and affects the linguistic output form. The language-to-music mapping is also explored through the composing of Mandarin children’s songs. This study finds that the prosodic structures of foot and intonational phrase in Mandarin children’s songs are aligned with music structures. Footing and intonational phrasing also affect the musical beat assignment.\n\nThe music-to-language mapping is examined through children’s perception of the musical melody in songs. The issue lies in how native Mandarin-speaking children map the music pitches to Mandarin tones, and how they produce what they hear. In the perception of the musical pitches, singing words or phrases are perceived into the linguistic input forms with similar tonal values. However, the children may produce syllables whose tones are different from what they perceive because of lexical association.\n\nThis research provides an extensive study on the interaction between language and music. Segmental changes, rhythmic correspondences, and tonal adjustments in language-music mapping reveal that perception and production are governed by independent phonological grammars. |
參考文獻: | English References:\nBermúdez-Otero, R. (1999). Constraint interaction in language change: quantity in English and Germanic (doctoral dissertation). University of Manchester, UK.\nBermúdez-Otero, R. (2007). Diachronic phonology. In P. de Lacy (Ed.), The Cambridge handbook of phonology (pp. 497-517). Cambridge, Mass.: Cambridge University Press.\nBoersma, P. (2001). Phonology-semantics interaction in OT, and its acquisition. In R. Kirchner, W. Wikeley and J. Pater (Ed.), Papers in experimental and theoretical linguistics, 6, 24-35. Edmonton: University of Alberta.\nBooij, G. E. & Rubach, J. (1987). Postcyclic versus postlexical rules in lexical phonology. Linguistic Inquiry, 18 (1), 1-44.\nBroselow, E., and Finer, D. (1991). Parameter setting gin second language phonology and syntax. Second Language Research, 7, 35-59.\nCarr, P. (1993). Phonology. New York: St. Martins Press.\nChao, Y. R. (1930). A system of tone letters. Le Maître Phonétique, 45, 24-27.\nChen, M. (1984). Unfolding Latent Principles of Literary Taste: Poetry as a Window onto Language. Tsinghua Journal of Chinese Studies, 16, 203-240.\nDowning, B. (1970). Syntactic Structure and Phonological Phrasing in English (doctoral dissertation). University of Texas at Austin, Austin.\nDowning, B. (1973). Parenthesization Rules and Obligatory Phrasing. Papers in Linguistic, 6, 108-128.\nGoldsmith, J. A. (1976). Autosegmental Phonology (doctoral dissertation). MIT, Cambridge, Mass.\nGreen, T. (1993). The conspiracy of completeness. Paper presented at Rutgers Optimality Workshop1.\nHalle, J. & Lerdahl F. (1993). A generative textsetting model. Current Musicology, 55, 3-23.\nHayes, B. (2005). Textsetting as constraint conflict. In J.-L. Aroui and A. Arleo (Eds.), Towards a typology of poetic form (pp. 43-61). Amsterdam: Elsevier.\nHalliday, M. A. K. (1967). Intonation and grammar in British English. The Hague: Mouton.\nHsiao, Y. E. (1991). Syntax, rhythm and tone: a triangular relationship. Taipei: The Crane Publishing.\nHsiao, Y. E. (2006). The metrical structure of Changhua folk verse. Concentric: Studies in Linguistics, 32 (1), 1-29.\nHsiao, Y. E. (2007). The metrical structure of Taiwanese nursery rhymes: a corpus study. In D. L. Hoover and S. Lattig (Eds.), Stylistics: prospect & retrospect (pp. 85-106). Amsterdam: Rodopi.\nHsiao, Y. E. (2015). Tonal chain shifts in Taiwanese: a comparative markedness approach. In Y. E. Hsiao, L.-H. Wee (Eds.), Capturing phonological shades within and across languages (pp. 142-165). Newcastle upon Tyne: Cambridge Scholars Publishing.\nInkelas, S. (1989). Prosodic constituency in the lexicon (doctoral dissertation). Stanford University, Stanford.\nIto, J., Kubozono, H., Mester, A. & Tanaka, S. (2019). Kattobase: the linguistic structure of Japanese baseball chants. In K. Hout, A. Mai, A. McCollum, S. Rose, and M. Zaslansky (Eds.), Proceedings of the 2018 Annual Meetings on Phonology. Tokyo, Japan: Kurosio Publishing.\nJespersen, O. (1904). Lehrbuch der phonetik. Leipzig: Teubner.\nKager, R. (1999). Optimality theory. New York: Cambridge University Press.\nKenstowicz, M. (2003). The role of perception in loanword phonology. A review of Les emprunts linguistiques d’origine europénne en Fon by Flavien Gbéto Köln: Rüdiger Köppe Verlag. 2000. Studies in African Linguistics, 32, 95-112.\nKiparsky, P. (1982). From cyclic phonology to lexical phonology. In H. van der Hulst, N. Smith (Eds.), The structure of phonological representations (PartI) (pp. 131-175). Dordrecht: Foris Publications.\nKiparsky, Paul. (2010). Reduplication in stratal OT. In L. Uyechi and L.-H. Wee (Eds.), Reality exploration and discovery: pattern interaction in language & Life (pp. 125-142.).\nLeben, W. R. (1973). Suprasegmental phonology (doctoral dissertation). MIT, Cambridge, Mass.\nLerdahl, F. & Jackendoff, R. (1983). A generative rheory of tonal music. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press.\nLindblom, B. (1978). Final lengthening in speech and music. In E.Gårding, G. Bruce, and R. Bannert (Eds.), Nordic prosody: papers from a symposium (pp.85-102). Lund: Department of Linguistics, Lund University\nŁubowicz, A. (2002). Derived environment effects in optimality theory. Lingua, 112 (4), 243-280\nŁubowicz, A. (2005). Locality of conjunction. In J. D. Alderete, C. Hang and A. Kochetov (Eds.), Proceedings of the 24th West Coast Conference on Formal Linguistics (pp. 254-262). Somerville: Cascadilla Proceedings Project.\nMcCarthy, J. J. and Prince, A. (1995). Faithfulness and reduplicative identity. In: B. Jill, L. Walsh Dickey, and S. Urbanczyk (Eds.), University of Massachusetts Occasional Papers in Linguistics 18 (pp.249-384). Amherst, MA: GLSA Publications.\nMcCarthy, J. J. and Prince, A. (1999). Faithfulness and identity in prosodic morphology. In R. Kager, H. van der Hulst, and W. Zonneveld (Eds.), The Prosody–Morphology Interface (pp. 218-309). Cambridge, Mass.: Cambridge University Press. [Excerpted in John J. McCarthy (Ed.) Optimality Theory in Phonology: A Reader, Malden, MA & Oxford: Blackwell (2004).]\nMohanan, K. P. (1982). Lexical Phonology (doctoral dissertation). MIT, Cambridge, Mass.\nMorris, R. E. (2002). Coda obstruents and local constraint conjunction in North-Central Peninsular Spanish. In T. Satterfield, C. Tortora and D. Cresti (Eds.), Current issues in Romance Languages (pp. 207-224). The Netherlands: John Benjamins B.V.\nNespor, M., and Irene Vo. (1986). Prosodic phonology (doctoral dissertation). Dordrecht: Foris.\nPrince, A., and Smolensky, P. (1993). Optimality theory: constraint interaction in generative grammar. Manuscript. Rutgers University.\nPrince, A. and Smolensky, P. (2004). Optimality theory: constraint interaction and generative grammar. Blackwell Publishing.\nSchellenberg, M. (2009). Singing in a tone language: Shona. In A. Ojo and L. Moshi (Eds.), Proceedings of the 39th Annual Conference on African Linguistics (pp. 137-144). Somerville, MA: Cascadilla Proceedings Project.\nSchreuder, M. (2006). Prosodic Processes in Language and Music (doctoral dissertation). Research School of Behavioral and Cognitive Neurosciences (BCN), Groningen.\nSelkirk, E. (1980). Prosodic domains in phonology: Sanskrit revisited. In M. Aronoff and M.-L. Kean (Eds.), Juncture (pp. 107-129). Saratoga, CA: Anma Libri.\nSelkirk, E. (1984). Phonology and syntax: the relation between sound and structure. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press.\nShih, C. L. (1986). The Prosodic Domain of Tone Sandhi in Chinese. San Diego: University of California dissertation.\nSievers, E. (1881). Grundzüge der Phonetik. Leipzig, Germany: Breitkopf and Hartel.\nSilverman, D. (1992). Multiple scansions in loanword phonology: evidence from Cantonese. Phonology, 9, 289-328.\nSmolensky, P. (1995) On the internal structure of the constraint component CON of\nUG. Handout presented in the University of Arizona.\nSmolensky, P. (1996). On the comprehension/production dilemma in child language. Linguistic Inquiry, 27, 720-731.\nSundberg, J and Lindblom, B. (1991). Generative theories for describing musical structure. In P. Howell, R. West, and I. Cross (Eds.), Representing musical structure (pp. 245-272). London: Academic Press.\nWee, L. H. (2002). Of chains and weights. Handout for seminar series Grammaticality of the Fittest, City University of Hong Kong.\nWee, L. H. (2007). Unraveling the relation between Mandarin tones and musical melody. Journal of Chinese Linguistics, 35, 128-144.\nWong, P. and Diehl, R. (2002). How can the lyrics of a song in a tone language be understood? Psychology of Music, 30, 202-209.\nYip, M. (1989). Hanyu fangyan gaiyao [An introduction to Chinese dialects]. 2nd edn. Beijing: Wenzi Gaige Chubanshe.\nYip, M. (1993). Cantonese loanword phonology and optimality theory. Journal of East Asian Linguistics, 1 (1), 261-291.\nYip, M. (2007). Tone. In P. de Lacy (Ed.), The Cambridge handbook of phonology (pp. 229-252). Cambridge, Mass.: Cambridge University Press.\n\nChinese References:\n方金雅、蘇姿云 (Fang and Su 2005)。童謠教學對幼兒聲韻覺識影響之研究。高雄師大學報：教育與社會科學類，19，1-19。\n李金青 (Li 2009)。兒歌的韻律研究 (碩士論文)，國立臺東大學，臺東。\n李紫蓉、楊麗鈴 (2007)。手指遊戲動動兒歌-小猴子。臺北：信誼基金出版社。\n李紫蓉、朱雲嵩、林炳興、張硯田、蘇珊。(2011)。早安晚安：給0~3歲的自理兒歌。臺北：信誼基金出版社。\n李紫蓉、鄭榮珍、張麗雪、蘇珊、張硯田、陳中申 (2014)。小雨滴。臺北：信誼基金出版社。\n李紫蓉、林世仁、蘇珊 (2017)。1234動動體操。臺北：信誼基金出版社。\n宋凱琳 (Sung 2012)。從優選理論看語言與音樂的互動：從詩經入樂談起。華語文教學研究，9 (4)，17-39。\n林清山 (Lin 1968)。男女學前兒童語言發展各變數的比較研究。心理與教育，2，121-137。\n林蕙珊 (Lin 2001)。從「優選理論」來談國語的三聲變調。聲韻論叢，10，497-524。\n黃婷 (Huang 2007)。華語手指謠之韻律研究。華語文教學研究，4 (2)，29-42。\n劉惠美、曹峰銘 (Liu and Tsao 2010)。華語嬰幼兒溝通發展量表。臺北：心理。\n劉惠美、陳昱君(Liu and Chen 2015)。華語嬰幼兒表達性詞彙的語意內容及詞類組成之發展。教育心理學報，47 (2)，217-242。 | 描述: | 博士 國立政治大學 語言學研究所 100555501 |
資料來源: | http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#G0100555501 | 資料類型: | thesis |
| Appears in Collections: | 學位論文 |
Files in This Item:
| File | Description | Size | Format | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 550101.pdf | 3.91 MB | Adobe PDF2 | View/Open |
Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.