Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://ah.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/131445
題名: 從輕聲與韻律外現象看漢語方言中虛化的功能詞
Grammaticalized function words in Chinese dialects: neutral tone and prosodic invisibility
作者: 黃子權
Huang, Tzu-Chuan
貢獻者: 蕭宇超
Hsiao, Yu-Chau
黃子權
Huang, Tzu-Chuan
關鍵詞: 虛詞
韻律
語法化
音韻與句法的界面
syntax-phonology interface
grammaticalization
prosodization
日期: 2020
上傳時間: 2-Sep-2020
摘要: 本研究從輕聲與韻律外現象探討漢語方言中功能詞的韻律。輕聲係指完全失去音位對立的聲調形式,韻律外現象則指聲調不受制於一般變調規律的特殊情形。這兩個現象都出現於韻律上無法獨立成詞的韻律附著詞,而韻律附著詞又與實義詞與功能詞的普遍分類有關。實義詞在韻律上通常可以獨立成詞,功能詞則有許多可能,或獨立成詞,或成為各種韻律附著詞。本論文的調查也發現,漢語方言中的功能詞可分成兩類,一類具有韻律顯著性,於韻律上的表現與實義詞相似,另一類則不具有顯著性,因此容易發生輕聲或韻律外現象。本論文的主要目標便是從理論音韻學的角度,探究功能詞這兩種韻律上的分類有何特性。針對這個問題,文獻中通常是採用基於構詞與句法結構的界面制約,這個方法係假設不同的韻律形式直接產生自不同的構詞或句法結構,然而在我所研究的漢語方言中卻發現韻律形式與構詞或句法結構之間並無如此直接的連結。透過對五個漢語方言各類功能詞韻律行為的分析與觀察,本研究提出新的觀點,認為介面制約不只是與構詞或句法結構有關,更與該詞語法化的程度有關。這個觀點是基於語法化研究中一個普遍被接受的概念,即語法化程度與語音形式的弱化正相關,換言之,一個功能詞語法化程度越深,它在韻律形式上也越趨弱化,失去足以獨立成詞的顯著性。本研究將這樣的概念予以形式化,以優選理論的框架提出相關的介面制約,為相關領域的研究提供了一個語義、句法、韻律三者間互有關聯的理論機制。
This dissertation concerns the prosodization of function words in Chinese dialects in terms of neutral tone and prosodic invisibility. Neutral tone refers to the pitch pattern derived by complete loss of original lexical contrast; prosodic invisibility describes a phenomenon where a tone is extraprosodic and thus is excluded from some general tonal process. Both phenomena are considered derived from the status of prosodic clitic, meaning independent syntactic words that are not prosodized as independent prosodic words, and the occurrence of such prosodic clitics is subject to a universal distinction between lexical words and function words. Words of lexical categories strongly correlate with prosodic word status, whereas words of functional categories correspond to more than one prosodic type, ranging from independent prosodic word to free prosodic clitic, and therefore members of functional categories may diverge from one another in whether to perform neutral tone and/or prosodic invisibility. Two prosodic classes are found in the current survey, termed prominent function words on the one hand, and non-prominent function words on the other. Members of the former class exhibit a similar prosodization to lexical word while the class of non-prominent function words is vulnerable to the neutral tone process and prosodic invisibility. The central problem to be addressed in this dissertation is the formal characterization of prosodic distinctions between these subclasses within functional categories. The conventional response to this problem is to take an interface constraint approach grounded by morphosyntax, which assumes that different prosodizations of functional elements directly follow from differences in their morphosyntactic properties and language-specific constraint rankings. However, this straightforward correlation does not uniformly hold in the case that serves as a basis of the dissertation, the neutral tone and prosodic invisibility of Chinese dialects, where function words exhibit a considerable overlap in their morphosyntactic distributions that precludes any differentiation rooted in morphosyntax. This dissertation, though employing a set of interface constraints too, proposes that the ranked interface constraints are grounded by not only morphosyntactic properties but semantic/pragmatic information. By taking an overall look at various types of function words which have potential to perform neutral tones and/or prosodic invisibility, I conclude that the distinction between prominent and non-prominent classes of function words can be drawn along the scale of grammaticalization. The idea is based on the general conception in the literature of grammaticalization that phonological erosion and semantic bleaching usually come hand in hand. As a function word becomes more semantically bleached during the course of grammaticalization, it is more likely to be non-prominent, or weak, to license certain constituents in the prosodic structure. By encoding this information of grammaticalization in the interface constraint, this dissertation offers a formalized mechanism to make use of both morphosyntactic properties and information from semantics-syntax interface. This approach thus leads to a unified account of prosodic distinction between subclasses within functional categories.
參考文獻: Ang, Ui-jin. (1996b). Minnanyu Qingsheng Bianhua Yu Yufa De Guanxi [The Relationship Between Neutral Tone Alternation and Grammar]. In Tungchung-ssu (eds.), Taiwan Minnanyu Jiangshou Ziliao Huibian [Compiled Lecture Materials of an Introduction to Taiwan Southern Min] (pp. 330-382). Taipei: Taiwan Language and Literature Society.\nAng, Ui-jin. (1998f). Minnanyu Qingsheng Ji Qi Yufa Yuyong Fenxi [On the grammr and pragmatics of neutral tones in Southern Min]. In HuangShuanfan (eds.), Di Er Jie Taiwan Yuyan Guoji Yantaohui Lunwun Xuanji [Selected Papers from the Second International Symposium on Language in Taiwan] (pp. 419-449). Taipei: The Crane Publishing Co., Ltd.\nBermúdez-Otero, Ricardo. (2012). The architecture of grammar and the division of labour in exponence. In TrommerJochen (eds.), The morphology and phonology of exponence (Oxford Studies in Theoretical Linguistics 41) (pp. 8-83). Oxford: Oxford University Press.\nBermúdez-Otero, Ricardo. (2015). Amphichronic explanation and the life cycle of phonological processes. In SalmonsHoneybone and Joseph C.Patrick (eds.), The Oxford handbook of historical phonology (pp. 374-399). Oxford: Oxford University Press.\nBrinton, Laurel J. (1996). Pragmatic Markers in English: Grammaticalization and Discourse Functions. Berlin & New York: Berlin & New York: Mouton de Gruyter.\nCarey, Kathleen. (1995). Subjectification and the development of the English perfect. In WrightStein & SusanDieter (eds.), Subjectivity and Subjectivisation: Linguistic Perspectives (pp. 83-102). Cambridge & New York: Cambridge University Press.\nChao, Yuen Ren. (1968). A Grammar of Spoken Chinese. Berkeley: University of California Press.\nCheng, Jia-ming. (2007). Hailukeyu yuqici yanjiu [Research of Hai-Lu Hakka Modal Particle]. M.A. Thesis. Taiwan: National Central University.\nCheng, Robert L. & Chin-chin Tseng. (1997). Zhongyin zai shengdiao yuyan zhong de xingshi, gongneng, hudong, ji zhenghe [The form, function, interaction and integration of stress in tone languages]. In ChengChiu-yu (eds.), Zhongguo jingnei yuyan ji yuyanxue disiji: yuyan leixing [Chinese Languages and Linguistics Volume IV: Typological Studies of Languages in China] (pp. 225-264). Taipei: Institute of History and Philology, Academia Sinica.\nCheng, Robert L. (1973). Some notes on tone sandhi in Taiwanese. Linguistics, 100, pp. 5-25.\nCheng, Robert L. (1968). Tone sandhi in Taiwanese. Linguistics, 41, pp. 19-42.\nCheung, Hung-nin Samuel. (1972). Xianggang yueyu yufa de yanjiu [A Grammar of Cantonese as Spoken in Hong Kong]. Hong Kong: The Chinese University of Hong Kong.\nCheung, Kwan-hin. (1986). The Phonology of Present-Day Cantonese. Doctoral dissertation. University of London.\nCheung, Kwan-hin. (1986). The Phonology of Present-Day Cantonese. University of London.\nChiang, Min-hua. (2018). "Kejia shehui shenghuo duihua" zhong "dao3" "dao5" gongneng de chongdie ji qi yu taiwan keyu de bi jiao [The functional overlapping between dao3 and dao5 in "Hakka Social Life" and its comparison with Taiwan Hakka]. Journal of Taiwanese Languages and Literature, 13(1), pp. 91-123.\nChor, Winnie. (2013). From ‘Direction’ to ‘Positive Evaluation’: On the Grammaticalization, Subjectification and Intersubjectification of faan1 ‘return’ in Cantonese. Language and linguistics, 14(1), pp. 91-134.\nCompany, Concepción. (1995). Old forms for new concepts: the recategorization of possessive duplications in Mexican Spanish. In AndersenHenning (eds.), Historical Linguistics 1993: Selected Papers from the 11th International Conference on Historical Linguistics (pp. 77-92). Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins.\nde Lacy, Paul. (2004). Markedness conflation in Optimality Theory. Phonology, 21, pp. 145–199.\nEnfield, Nick. (2007). A Grammar of Lao. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.\nFlemming, Edward S. (2002). Auditory Representations in Phonology. New York and London: Routledge.\nFlemming, Edward S. (1995). Auditory Representations in Phonology. Doctoral dissertation . Los Angeles: UCLA.\nHayes, Bruce. (1982). Extrametricality and English stress. Linguistic Inquiry, 13, pp. 227-276.\nHengeveld, Kees. (2017). A hierarchical approach to grammaticalization. In Hengeveld& Narrog, H. & Olbertz, HKees (eds.), The Grammaticalization of Tense, Aspect, Modality and Evidentiality from a Functional Perspective (pp. 13-38). Berlin: de Gruyter Mouton.\nHirayama, Hisao. (1992). Cong lishi guandian lun Wuyu biandiao he beijinghua qingsheng de guanxi [On the Relationship Between Tone Sandhi in Wu Chinese and Neutral Tone in Beijing Mandarin: a Historical View ]. Zhongguo Yuwun [Studies of the Chinese Language](4), pp. 244-252.\nHopper, Paul J. & Elizabeth Closs Traugott. (2003). Grammaticalization. Cambridge University Press.\nHsiao, Yuchau E. (1991). Syntax, Rhythm and Tone: A Triangular Relationship. Taipei: Crane.\nHsiao, Yuchau E. (1995). Southern Min Tone Sandhi and Theories of Prosodic Phonology. Taipei: Student Book Co., Ltd.\nHsiao, Yuchau E. (2008). Yinping Tone Sandhi in Two Hakka Dialects∗. In Yuchau E. HsiaoHsu, Lian-Hee Wee & Dah-an HoHuichuan (eds.), Interfaces in Chinese Phonology: Festschrift in Honor of Matthew Y. Chen on his 70th Birthday (pp. 79-97). Taipei: Institute of Linguistics, Academia Sinica.\nHsiao, Yuchau E. (2020). The syntax-prosody competition: Evidence from adjunct prosodic parsing in iGeneration Taiwanese. Lingua, 297, pp. 1-19.\nHsu, Kuei-ping. (1996). Hakka Tone Sandhi: The Interface between Syntax and Phonology. M.A. Thesis. Taiwan: National Tsing Hua University.\nHuang, Karen. (2018). Phonological identity of the neutral-tone syllables in Taiwan Mandarin: An. Acta Linguistica Asiatica, 8(2).\nHuang, Tzu-chuan. (2015). Prosodically determined blocking of tone spread in Shanghai. In WeeE. Hsiao and Lian-HeeYuchau (eds.), Capturing Phonological Shades within and across Languages (pp. 166-187). Newcastle upon Tyne, UK: Cambridge Scholars Publishing.\nIto, Junko & Armin Mester. (2003). Systemic Markedness and Faithfulness. In J. CihlarFranklin, D. Kaiser and I. KimbaraA. (eds.), Proceedings of the 39th Meeting of the Chicago Linguistics Society (pp. 665-689). Chicago: University of Chicago.\nIto, Junko & Armin Mester. (2019). Match as Syntax-Prosody MAX/DEP: Prosodic Enclisis in English. English Linguistics, 36(1).\nKeizer, Evelien. (2007). The lexical-grammatical dichotomy in Functional Discourse Grammar. In HengeveldMattos Dall`Aglio Hattnher & KeesMarize (eds.), Advances in Functional Discourse Grammar. Special Issue of Alfa: Revista de Linguistica , 51, pp. 189-212.\nKönig, Ekkehard. (1991). The Meaning of Focus Particles: A Comparative Perspective. London & New York: Routledge.\nLaw, Sam-po. (1990). The Syntax and Phonology of Cantonese Sentence-final Particles. Doctoral dissertation. Boston University.\nLehmann, Christian. (2015). Thoughts on Grammaticalization. Berlin: Language Science Press.\nLida, Maki. (2018). Sentence-Final Particles in Cantonese and Japanese From a Cross-Linguistic Perspective. Media and Communication Studies, 71, pp. 65-93.\nLubowicz, Anna. (2003). Contrast Preservation in Phonological Mappings. Doctoral dissertation . Amherst: University of Massachusetts.\nLuo, Zhao-jin. (1985). Keyu yufa [A Grammar of Hakka]. Taipei: Student Books.\nMyers, James & Jane S. Tsay. (2008). Neutralization in Taiwan Southern Min Tone sandhi. In HsiaoE. & H.-C. Hsu, L.-H. Wee, D.-A. HoY. (eds.), Interfaces in Chinese phonology: Festschrift in honor of Matthew Y. Chen on his 70th birthday. Language and Linguistics Monograph Series Number W-8, pp. 47-78. Taipei: Academia Sinica.\nMyrberg, Sara. (2010). The Intonational Phonology of Stockholm Swedish. Doctoral dissertation. Stockholm University.\nOu, Shu-chen & Y. E. Hsiao. (1997). Cong yunlv yinyunxue kan taiwan minnanyu de qingsheng xianxiang. [Neutral tone in taiwan southern min: a prosodic phonology perspective]. Chinese Phonology, 6, pp. 865-895.\nPadgett, Jaye. (2003). Contrast and post-velar fronting in Russian. Natural, 21, pp. 39-87.\nPan, Victor Junnan. (2015). Mandarin Peripheral Construals at The Syntax-Discourse Interface. The Linguistic Review, 32(4), pp. 819-868.\nPaul, Waltraud. (2014). Why Particles Are Not Particular: Sentence-Final Particles in Chinese as Heads of a Split CP. Studia Linguistica, 68(1), pp. 77-115.\nPotts, Christopher. (2003). The Logic of Conventional Implicatures. Doctoral dissertation. University of California at Santa Cruz.\nPotts, Christopher. (2005). The logic of conventional implicatures. Oxford and New York: Oxford University Press.\nQian, Nairung. (1997). Shanghaihua Yufa [Grammar of Shanghai]. Shanghai: Shanghai People Press.\nSelkirk, Elisabeth & Tong Shen. (1990). Prosodic domains in Shanghai Chinese. In ZecInkelas and DragaSharon (eds.), The Phonology-Syntax Connection (pp. 313-337). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.\nSelkirk, Elisabeth. (1995a). The Prosodic Structure of Function Words. In Jill N. BeckmanWalsh Dickey and Suzanne UrbanczykLaura (eds.), Papers in Optimality Theory. University of Massachusetts Occasional Papers, vol. 18 (pp. 439-469). Amherst: GLSA.\nSelkirk, Elisabeth. (1996). The prosodic structure of function words. In DemuthL. Morgan and KatherineJames (eds.), Signal to syntax: Prosodic bootstrapping from speech to grammar in early acquisition (pp. 187-214). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.\nSelkirk, Elisabeth. (2005). Comments on intonational phrasing. In Sonia FrotaVigario and Maria Joao FreitasMarina (eds.), Prosodies (pp. 11-58). Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.\nSelkirk, Elisabeth. (2009). On clause and intonational phrase in Japanese: The syntactic grounding of prosodic constituent structure. Gengo Kenkyu [The Study of Languages], 136, pp. 35-73.\nSelkirk, Elisabeth. (2011). The syntax-phonology interface. In John GoldsmithRiggle, and Alan C. L. YuJason (eds.), The handbook of phonological theory, second edition (pp. 435-484). Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell.\nSmith, John C. (1993). Subjectification and the semantic-pragmatic development of French deictic adverbs. Paper presented at the 11th International Conference on Historical Linguistics. Los Angeles: University of California.\nSuzuki, Ryoko. (1998). From a lexical noun to an utterance-final pragmatic particle: wake. In OhoriToshio (eds.), Studies in Japanese Grammaticalization: Cognitive and Discourse Perspectives (pp. 67-92). Tokyo: Kurovvshio.\nSybesma, Rint & Boya Li. (2007). The Dissection and Structural Mapping of Cantonese Sentence Final Particles. Lingua, 117(10), pp. 1739-1783.\nTraugott, Elizabeth Closs. (1982). From propositional to textual and expressive meanings:. In MalkielP. Lehmann & YakovWinfred (eds.), Perspectives on Historical Linguistics (pp. 245-271). Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins.\nTraugott, Elizabeth Closs. (1989). On the rise of epistemic meanings in English: an. Language, 65(1), pp. 31-55.\nTraugott, Elizabeth Closs. (1995). Subjectification in grammaticalization. In WrightStein & SusanDieter (eds.), Subjectivity and Subjectivisation: Linguistic Perspectives (pp. 31-54). Cambridge & New York: Cambridge University Press.\nTraugott, Elizabeth Closs. (1997). Subjectification and the development of epistemic meaning: the case of promise and threaten. Modality in Germanic Languages: Historical and Comparative Perspectives (pp. 185-210). Berlin & New York: Mouton de Gruyter.\nTraugott, Elizabeth Closs. (2003a). Constructions in grammaticalization. In JandaD. Joseph & Richard D.Brian (eds.), The Handbook of Historical Linguistics (pp. 624-647). Malden: Blackwell.\nTraugott, Elizabeth Closs. (2003b). From subjectification to intersubjectification. In HickeyRaymond (eds.), Motives for Language Change (pp. 124-139). Cambridge & New York: Cambridge University Press.\nTraugott, Elizabeth Closs. (2010). (Inter)subjectivity and (inter)subjectification: a reassessment. In Kristin DavidseVandelanotte & Hubert CuyckensLieven (eds.), Subjectification, Intersubjectification and Grammaticalization (pp. 29-71). Berlin & New Tork: De Gruyter Mouton.\nTraugott, Elizabeth Closs. (1999). The rhetoric of counter-expectation in semantic change: a study in subjectification. In KochBlank & PeterAndreas (eds.), Historical Semantics and Cognition (pp. 177-196). Berlin & New York: Mouton de Gruyter.\nTruckenbrodt, Hubert. (1995). Phonological Phrases: Their Relation to Syntax, Focus, and Prominence. PhD thesis, MIT, Linguistics and Philosophy.\nTruckenbrodt, Hubert. (1999). On the relation between syntactic phrases and phonological phrases. Linguistic Inquiry, 30(2), pp. 219-256.\nTyler, Matthew. (2019). Simplifying MATCH WORD: Evidence from English functional categories. Glossa: a journal of general linguistics, 4(1).\nWu, Jui-chun. (2018). Keyu zhong de yuweizhuci honn [Utterance-Final Particle honn in Hakka]. Global Hakka Studies(10), pp. 137-166.\nWu, Wing-Li. (2008). An Acoustic Phonetic Study of the Intonation of Sentence-Final Particles in Hong Kong. Asian Social Science, 4(2), pp. 23-29.\nWu, Wing-Li. (2013). Cantonese Prosody : Sentence-final Particles and Prosodic Focus. Doctoral dissertation. University College London.\nYip, Moira. (2002). Tone. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.\nZec, Draga. (2005). Prosodic differences among function words. Phonology, 22(1), pp. 77-112.\nZec, Draga and Sharon Inkelas. (1990). Prosodically Constrained Syntax. In ZecInkelas and DragaSharon (eds.), The Phonology-Syntax Connection (pp. 365-378). Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.\nZhang, Jie. (2002). The effects of duration and sonority on contour tone distribution — A typological survey and formal analysis. Doctoral dissertation . Los Angeles: UCLA.\nZhang, Jie. (2007). A directional asymmetry in Chinese tone sandhi systems. Journal of East Asian Linguistics, 16, pp. 259-302.\nZoll, Cheryl. (1998). Positional asymmetries and licensing. MS Thesis. Massachusetts Institute of Technology.
描述: 博士
國立政治大學
語言學研究所
100555503
資料來源: http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#G0100555503
資料類型: thesis
Appears in Collections:學位論文

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat
550301.pdf3.71 MBAdobe PDF2View/Open
Show full item record

Google ScholarTM

Check

Altmetric

Altmetric


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.