Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://ah.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/132124


Title: 《故宮季刊》、《故宮學術季刊》及《國立臺灣大學美術史研究集刊》中國書畫藝術研究論文引用文獻特性探析
Citation Analysis on the Literature Cited in the Studies of Chinese Painting and Calligraphy Published in the NPM Quarterly, NPM Research Quarterly, and Taida Journal of Art History
Authors: 葉淑慧
Yeh, Shu-Hwei
Contributors: 圖資與檔案學刊
Keywords: 故宮季刊 ; 故宮學術季刊 ; 國立臺灣大學美術史研究集刊 ; 引用文獻分析 ; 中國書畫藝術 
National Palace Museum Quarterly ; National Palace Museum Research Quarterly ; Taida Journal of Art History ; Citation analysis ; Chinese painting and calligraphy
Date: 2019-12
Issue Date: 2020-10-07 11:54:08 (UTC+8)
Abstract: 本研究旨在利用引用文獻分析法,分析1966年至2017年《故宮學術季刊》(含其前身《故宮季刊》)及《國立臺灣大學美術史研究集刊》所刊登273篇中國書畫藝術研究論文之13,552筆引用文獻,探討其引用文獻之資料類型、學科領域、出版年代與半衰期、出版語言、最常被引用圖書及期刊等引用習慣及特性。研究結果顯示,中國書畫藝術研究之引用資料類型以古籍類所佔比例最高,其次是現代專書。被引用的古籍類及現代出版圖書之所屬學科領域以藝術類文獻居首,而語言文學類居次,中國史地類再次。整體中國書畫藝術研究領域引用文獻的學科領域,非來自藝術類文獻者逾半數。引用文獻之出版年代分佈長遠,參引範圍涵蓋古今文獻。現代出版文獻其引用年代距出版年代以6至10年引用最多,逾八成引用文獻出版於被引用的當年至30年間,文獻老化問題不顯著,引文半衰期為13.8年。被引用之文獻以中文文獻最多,然而,最常被引用之現代圖書及期刊頗多出自英文出版品,這也顯示了整體中國書畫藝術研究領域不單倚重於中文文獻。被引用的古籍與現代出版圖書逾七成僅被引用一次,最常被引用的古籍32種、現代圖書48種、期刊24種,期刊自引率以《國立臺灣大學美術史研究集刊》最低。
This study applies the method of citation analysis to analyze the 13,552 citations and works cited in the 273 research papers on Chinese painting and calligraphy published in the National Palace Museum Quarterly, the National Palace Museum Research Quarterly, and Taida Journal of Art History from 1966 to 2017. It explores those cited works and citations' characteristics such as their types, disciplines, publication eras, citation half-life, publication languages, and tendencies including the most frequently cited books and journals. The research results revealed that ancient books make up the largest proportion of the works cited in the 273 research papers, and modern monographs make up the second largest proportion of those cited works. Art is the discipline that most of the ancient and modern books cited come from; the discipline of language and literature and that of Chinese history and geography have the second and the third most ancient and modern books cited. More than half of the works cited of ancient and modern books are not from the discipline of Art. The publication eras of the works cited covers a wide range; both ancient and modern works are covered. Concerning the cited works published in the modern era, the number of the works that were cited after six to ten years since their publication is the highest. More than 80 percent of the works cited of modern publications were cited within one to 30 years since their publication, and thus the problem of literature obsolescence is not obvious. The citation half-life is 13.8 years. In the 273 papers, the number of works cited in Chinese is the highest; however, many of the most frequently cited modern books and journals are publications in English. This result also revealed that the research field of Chinese painting and calligraphy does not rely solely on literatures in Chinese. More than 70 percent of ancient and modern books cited in the 273 papers were cited only once. There are 32 titles of ancient books, 48 titles of modern books, and 24 titles of journals that are most frequently cited. Taida Journal of Art History has the lowest journal self-citation rate.
Relation: 圖資與檔案學刊, 95, 78-116
Data Type: article
DOI 連結: https://doi.org/ 10.6575/JILA.201912_(95).0003
Appears in Collections:[圖資與檔案學刊] 期刊論文

Files in This Item:

File Description SizeFormat
141.pdf639KbAdobe PDF32View/Open


All items in 學術集成 are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved.


社群 sharing