Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://ah.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/132534
題名: 王陽明良知內在論的建構與定位:以「知行合一說」為核心
The Constitution and Orientation of Wang Yang-Ming`s Model of Liangzhi Internalism: Focus on His Doctrine of the Unity of Moral Knowledge and Action
作者: 賴柯助
Lai, Ko-Chu
貢獻者: 政治大學哲學學報
關鍵詞: 良知  ;  知行合一  ;  內在論  ;  行動理由  ;  證成  ;  動機 
Liangzhi  ;  the Unity of Moral Knowledge and Action  ;  internalism  ;  reasons for action  ;  justification  ;  motivation
日期: Jul-2020
上傳時間: 12-Nov-2020
摘要: 理由論的相關研究有助於我們了解理性、意欲與動力在道德實踐上的複雜關係;了解不同哲學家理論的這層關係,則能掌握其理論型態的異同,這提供我們新的視角來研究與定位宋明儒者的道德理論。本文試圖從理由論中的道德判斷、行動理由、行動動機等現代用語,重新探討與詮釋王陽明的良知學。筆者將在此基礎上(1)以王陽明的「知行合一說」為核心論證其良知學是一種理由內在論版本的合理性,筆者稱之為「良知內在論」。此「內在」有兩個意涵,其一是指良知具立法性,是道德判斷的裁決、立法者;其二是內在論意義下良知判斷(即行動理由/證成)蘊含行動動機。(2)回應至目前學界有關陽明良知學的詮釋歧義問題。最後,筆者會在以自律、他律詮釋宋明儒學理論型態的基礎上,再帶入「內在論」與「外在論」進一步研究陽明學。這兩對概念形成的AHIE象限區分——內在他律(IH);內在自律(IA);外在他律(EH);外在自律(EA),有助於我們進一步釐清陽明學及整個宋明儒學的義理定位。本文將指出,在AHIE象限中,王陽明的「良知內在論」是「內在自律」(IA)型態的道德理論。
Contemporary research on theories of reasons helps us understand the complexity of the relationship among reason, desire, and motivation. Through investigating various philosophers` moral theories, we are able to distinguish their similarities and dissimilarities of how this complicated relationship came about. At the same time, comparative studies offer a new perspective to investigate Neo-Confucian philosophies and thus to help us conceive theoretical orientation of them. This paper attempts to use the modern terminology such as moral judgment, reason-for-action, and motivation to re-interpret Wang Yang-Ming`s theory of Liangzhi. Based on the re-interpretation, (1) I seek to argue for the constitution of the model of Wang Yang Ming`s Liangzhi (良知) Internalism. "The Liangzhi internalism means that Liangzhi by itself legislates the moral law for the action; Liangzhi`s moral judgment is a reason-for-action which necessarily provides motivating force for moral practice. (2) Liangzhi internalism is able to respond the ambiguous interpretation that has existed in scholars` debates on his moral theory. Using the concepts of autonomy and heteronomy to interpret Neo-Confucianism has been the mainstream for Sinophone academic writers. Based on this interpretative approach, I will bring in respectively core concepts of internalism and externalism to investigate Wang Yang Ming`s philosophy. I design an "AHIE Quadrant," including internalism-autonomy, internalism-heteronomy, externalism-autonomy, and externalism-heteronomy. This AHIE quadrant is helpful for us to clarify the theoretical orientation of Wang Yang-Ming`s Liangzhi Theory, and so is Neo-Confucianism.
關聯: 政治大學哲學學報, 44, 1-66
資料類型: article
DOI: https://doi.org/10.30393/TNCUP.202007_(44).0001 
Appears in Collections:期刊論文

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat
8.pdf1.27 MBAdobe PDF2View/Open
Show full item record

Google ScholarTM

Check

Altmetric

Altmetric


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.