Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
https://ah.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/132534
題名: | 王陽明良知內在論的建構與定位:以「知行合一說」為核心 The Constitution and Orientation of Wang Yang-Ming`s Model of Liangzhi Internalism: Focus on His Doctrine of the Unity of Moral Knowledge and Action |
作者: | 賴柯助 Lai, Ko-Chu |
貢獻者: | 政治大學哲學學報 | 關鍵詞: | 良知 ; 知行合一 ; 內在論 ; 行動理由 ; 證成 ; 動機 Liangzhi ; the Unity of Moral Knowledge and Action ; internalism ; reasons for action ; justification ; motivation |
日期: | Jul-2020 | 上傳時間: | 12-Nov-2020 | 摘要: | 理由論的相關研究有助於我們了解理性、意欲與動力在道德實踐上的複雜關係;了解不同哲學家理論的這層關係,則能掌握其理論型態的異同,這提供我們新的視角來研究與定位宋明儒者的道德理論。本文試圖從理由論中的道德判斷、行動理由、行動動機等現代用語,重新探討與詮釋王陽明的良知學。筆者將在此基礎上(1)以王陽明的「知行合一說」為核心論證其良知學是一種理由內在論版本的合理性,筆者稱之為「良知內在論」。此「內在」有兩個意涵,其一是指良知具立法性,是道德判斷的裁決、立法者;其二是內在論意義下良知判斷(即行動理由/證成)蘊含行動動機。(2)回應至目前學界有關陽明良知學的詮釋歧義問題。最後,筆者會在以自律、他律詮釋宋明儒學理論型態的基礎上,再帶入「內在論」與「外在論」進一步研究陽明學。這兩對概念形成的AHIE象限區分——內在他律(IH);內在自律(IA);外在他律(EH);外在自律(EA),有助於我們進一步釐清陽明學及整個宋明儒學的義理定位。本文將指出,在AHIE象限中,王陽明的「良知內在論」是「內在自律」(IA)型態的道德理論。 Contemporary research on theories of reasons helps us understand the complexity of the relationship among reason, desire, and motivation. Through investigating various philosophers` moral theories, we are able to distinguish their similarities and dissimilarities of how this complicated relationship came about. At the same time, comparative studies offer a new perspective to investigate Neo-Confucian philosophies and thus to help us conceive theoretical orientation of them. This paper attempts to use the modern terminology such as moral judgment, reason-for-action, and motivation to re-interpret Wang Yang-Ming`s theory of Liangzhi. Based on the re-interpretation, (1) I seek to argue for the constitution of the model of Wang Yang Ming`s Liangzhi (良知) Internalism. "The Liangzhi internalism means that Liangzhi by itself legislates the moral law for the action; Liangzhi`s moral judgment is a reason-for-action which necessarily provides motivating force for moral practice. (2) Liangzhi internalism is able to respond the ambiguous interpretation that has existed in scholars` debates on his moral theory. Using the concepts of autonomy and heteronomy to interpret Neo-Confucianism has been the mainstream for Sinophone academic writers. Based on this interpretative approach, I will bring in respectively core concepts of internalism and externalism to investigate Wang Yang Ming`s philosophy. I design an "AHIE Quadrant," including internalism-autonomy, internalism-heteronomy, externalism-autonomy, and externalism-heteronomy. This AHIE quadrant is helpful for us to clarify the theoretical orientation of Wang Yang-Ming`s Liangzhi Theory, and so is Neo-Confucianism. |
關聯: | 政治大學哲學學報, 44, 1-66 | 資料類型: | article | DOI: | https://doi.org/10.30393/TNCUP.202007_(44).0001 |
Appears in Collections: | 期刊論文 |
Show full item record
Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.