Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://ah.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/133847
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.advisor林士貴zh_TW
dc.contributor.advisorLin, Shih-Kueien_US
dc.contributor.author吳浚和zh_TW
dc.contributor.authorWu, Chun-Heen_US
dc.creator吳浚和zh_TW
dc.creatorWu, Chun-Heen_US
dc.date2020en_US
dc.date.accessioned2021-02-01T06:00:45Z-
dc.date.available2021-02-01T06:00:45Z-
dc.date.issued2021-02-01T06:00:45Z-
dc.identifierG0108352013en_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/133847-
dc.description碩士zh_TW
dc.description國立政治大學zh_TW
dc.description金融學系zh_TW
dc.description108352013zh_TW
dc.description.abstract國際會計準則理事會( IAIS )將於2022年實施IFRS 17,台灣主管機關也就接軌IFRS17為產業設定各階段導入時程。在此新制下,要求各國從原先的固定折現因子改變為需要隨著市場資料即時變動之折現因子,保單貸款的會計科目也將從目前帳列資產,變成負債的減項,且要求保險公司將保單貸款將包括在保險合同的計量中。對於壽險公司,其最大的負債為其所發行之保單,因此在資產與負債的管理上,保單貸款行為就需要被列入特別考慮。\n本研究將保單貸款的行為藉由真實保單貸款資料模型化,並預測未來保單貸款情形。將模型帶入生死合險試算各期保單現金流,最後再使用Smith-Wilson 模型與台灣公債、公司債資料建構適當的折現率曲線,計算此保單之準備金。\n從結果中可以得知,無論使用ARIMA模型、Nelson Siegel 與 Nelson Siegel Svensson模型預測未來貸還款現金流,對於準備金的影響皆不大,其可能原因在於市場利率持續走低,使保戶進行保單貸款意願低,保單貸款僅佔保費的極小部分。zh_TW
dc.description.abstractThe International Accounting Standards Board (IAIS) will implement IFRS 17 in 2022, and the Taiwan authorities have also set up a phase-in schedule for the industry in line with IFRS 17.\nUnder the new system, countries will be required to change from a fixed discount factor to a discount factor that changes in real time with market data. For life insurance companies, their largest liability is the policies they issue, so policy lending behavior needs to be given special consideration in the management of assets and liabilities.\nIn this study, I modeled policy loan behavior using real policy loan data and predict future policy loan scenarios. The model is applied to the endowment insurance to calculate the cash flow of each policy period, and using Smith-Wilson model to construct an appropriate discount rate curve with the data of Taiwan bonds and corporate bonds to calculate the reserves of the insurance policy.\nFrom the results, it can be seen that the ARIMA, Nelson Siegel and Nelson Siegel Svensson models do not have a significant impact on the reserve, probably due to the low interest rates in the market and the low willingness of policyholders to take out policy loans, which account for a very small portion of the premiums.en_US
dc.description.tableofcontents致謝 ii\n摘要 iii\nAbstract iv\n第一章 緒論 1\n第一節 研究背景 1\n第二節 研究架構 2\n第二章 文獻回顧 3\n第一節 保單貸款 3\n第二節 國際監理機關建構無風險利率方式 4\n一、 國際精算原則註解文件(International Actuarial Notes, IANs) 4\n二、 保險資本標準(Insurance Capital Standard, ICS) 6\n第三節 國際監理機關針對風險溢酬計算 8\n一、 國際保險監理官協會(International Association of Insurance Supervisors, IAIS) 9\n二、 歐洲保險與職業年金監理機關 (Insurance and Occupational Authority, EIPOA) 10\n第三章 研究方法 12\n第一節 借還款模型假設 12\n一、 保費與佣金 12\n二、 貸款、還款模型 12\n三、 死亡 15\n四、 現金流量 16\n第二節 建構折現率 16\n一、 無風險利率估計 16\n二、 風險貼水估計 19\n第四章 數值分析 22\n第一節 保單條件 22\n第二節 保單貸還款預測 22\n一、 ARIMA 24\n二、 Nelson Siegel 與 Nelson Siegel Svensson 25\n第三節 折現率曲線建構結果 27\n一、 無風險利率 27\n二、 風險貼水 29\n第四節 現金流測試 33\n第五章 結論與建議 36\n參考文獻 37\n附錄 39zh_TW
dc.format.extent2022493 bytes-
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdf-
dc.source.urihttp://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#G0108352013en_US
dc.subject保單貸款zh_TW
dc.subjectIFRS17zh_TW
dc.subjectPolicy loanen_US
dc.subjectIFRS17en_US
dc.titleIFRS 17下保單貸款行為對準備金的影響:以10年期生死合險為例zh_TW
dc.titleModeling policy loan behaviors and estimating its impact on reserves under IFRS 17: Using 10-year endowment assurance as an exampleen_US
dc.typethesisen_US
dc.relation.reference中文文獻\n[1] 中華民國精算學會. (2016). 保險合約負債公允價值評價精算實務處理準則(108年版草案).\n[2] 中華信用評等. (2020). 中華信評2019年企業違約與評等變動研究.\n[3] 政治大學商學院保險業永續發展研究中心. (2020). IFRS 17中無風險利率曲線之建構.\n[4] 陳賢儀. (2018). IFRS 17對保險公司之影響分析. 國立臺灣大學碩士學位論文.\n[5] 黃台心. (2009). 計量經濟學:Econometrics. 新陸書局.\n[6] 勤業眾信. (2018). 保險面面觀:IFRS 17 及保險精算實務解析.\n[7] 劉志鏞. (2003). 保單貸款對於壽險公司負債之影響. 國立臺灣大學碩士學位論文.\n[8] 羅郁婷. (2019). IFRS 17規範下以Smith-Wilson模型建構無風險利率曲線之期限結構. 國立政治大學碩士學位論文. \n\n英文文獻\n[1] Carson, J. M., & Hoyt, R. E. (1992). An Econometric Analysis of the Demand for Life Insurance Policy Loans. The Journal of Risk and Insurance, 59(2), 239-251.\n[2] European Insurance and Occupational Pensions Authority (2019) . Technical documentation of the methodology to derive EIOPA’s risk-free interest rate term structures.\n[3] International Accounting Standards Board (2017) . IFRS 17 Insurance Contracts.\n[4] International Association of Insurance Supervisors. (2018) . IAIS Base Yield Curve Methodology for ICS Version 2.0.\n[5] Liebenberg, A. P., Carson, J. M., & Hoyt, R. E. (2010). The Demand for Life Insurance Policy Loans. Journal of Risk and Insurance, 77(3), 651-666.\n[6] The Financial Supervisory Authority of Norway. (2010) . A Technical Note on the Smith-Wilson Method.\n[7] The International Actuarial Association. (2018) . International Actuarial Note on Application of IFRS 17 Insurance Contracts.\n[8] Wood, G. L., & Rottman, D. L. (1970). Policy Loan Interest Rates: A Critical Evaluation. The Journal of Risk and Insurance, 37(4), 555-566.zh_TW
dc.identifier.doi10.6814/NCCU202100020en_US
item.grantfulltextrestricted-
item.openairecristypehttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_46ec-
item.openairetypethesis-
item.cerifentitytypePublications-
item.fulltextWith Fulltext-
Appears in Collections:學位論文
Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat
201301.pdf1.98 MBAdobe PDF2View/Open
Show simple item record

Google ScholarTM

Check

Altmetric

Altmetric


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.