Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
https://ah.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/133926| DC Field | Value | Language |
|---|---|---|
| dc.contributor.advisor | 周家瑜 | zh_TW |
| dc.contributor.advisor | Chou, Chia-Yu | en_US |
| dc.contributor.author | 鄭泰鈞 | zh_TW |
| dc.contributor.author | Cheng, Tai-Chun | en_US |
| dc.creator | 鄭泰鈞 | zh_TW |
| dc.creator | Cheng, Tai-Chun | en_US |
| dc.date | 2021 | en_US |
| dc.date.accessioned | 2021-02-01T06:18:33Z | - |
| dc.date.available | 2021-02-01T06:18:33Z | - |
| dc.date.issued | 2021-02-01T06:18:33Z | - |
| dc.identifier | G0106252023 | en_US |
| dc.identifier.uri | http://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/133926 | - |
| dc.description | 碩士 | zh_TW |
| dc.description | 國立政治大學 | zh_TW |
| dc.description | 政治學系 | zh_TW |
| dc.description | 106252023 | zh_TW |
| dc.description.abstract | 本文試圖通過盧梭為其文本一致性所辯護的「融貫體系」，說明在此之中所隱含的歷史觀，深切地影響其對於普遍意志與立法家的思考。筆者主張，《社會契約論》旨在克服《第二論述》的歷史發展中曾經出現的假契約，而立法家的角色，則是為了引導自我奴役的社會人，得以成為獨立訂立契約的公民，兩部著作的目標均是為了回應人性歷史不可避免的腐化。最後，筆者從盧梭為日內瓦、波蘭與科西嘉書寫的改革意見中，指出其以立法家的角色，基於對歷史的判斷，提供化解特定社會困境的療方。 | zh_TW |
| dc.description.abstract | This thesis attempts to articulate how Rousseau’s implicit view of history deeply influenced his perspective towards the General Will and the Legislator, through the way he defended the “coherent system” for the consistency of his texts. In this thesis, I contend that the aim of both The Social Contract and The Second Discourse is to resolve the inevitable corruption in the history of human nature. Specifically speaking, the main idea of The Social Contract is to overcome the false contract emerged in history development described in the Second Discourse. In addition, the role of Legislator is to direct the self-enslaved social men to become the citizens who are able to establish Social Contract on their own. Finally, I conclude that in the reforming projects for Geneva, Poland and Corsica, as a legislator, Rousseau provides the remedy for certain social impediment, based on his judgment of history. | en_US |
| dc.description.tableofcontents | 目 次\n第一章 緒論 5\n第一節 前言 5\n第二節《第二論述》的研究方法與盧梭的寫作意圖 9\n第三節 自然與歷史：自我完善的能力 15\n第四節 章節安排 22\n第二章 面對歷史I：社會契約論 26\n第一節 《社會契約論》之前的歷史情境 26\n1. 自重之愛及其誘發的邪惡與奴役 28\n2. 「假契約」與奴役的歷史循環 34\n第二節 克服奴役：《社會契約論》 39\n1. 「從邪惡裡尋找醫治人類的補救辦法」 43\n2. 「新的結合」與「如以往一般自由」 47\n3. 普遍意志的共同性與時間性 53\n第三章 面對歷史II：立法家 66\n第一節 立法家的科學 71\n1. 《第二論述》與《社會契約論》的過渡問題：語言 72\n2. 立法家的說服技藝 75\n第二節 英雄主義與立法家 80\n1. 政治與哲學的不和睦 81\n2. 英雄的超卓之能 83\n第四章 盧梭的歷史 88\n第一節 盧梭與日內瓦 90\n1. 日內瓦的宗教思想與政治生活 91\n2. 十八世紀日內瓦的政治危機 92\n3. 盧梭論日內瓦政府與人民 97\n第二節 「正如建築家建立一座大廈」：盧梭作為立法家 103\n1. 盧梭論愛國情感的運用 105\n2. 現代立法家：盧梭的立法技藝 112\n第五章 結論 117\n第一節 面對人類的慾望史 117\n第二節 理想與現實之間 119\n附錄：參考文獻 122\n一、 Jean-Jacques Rousseau本人的著作 122\n二、中文參考資料 122\n三、外文參考資料 123 | zh_TW |
| dc.format.extent | 3890789 bytes | - |
| dc.format.mimetype | application/pdf | - |
| dc.source.uri | http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#G0106252023 | en_US |
| dc.subject | 讓‧雅克‧盧梭 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject | 歷史 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject | 普遍意志 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject | 立法家 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject | 社會契約論 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject | Jean-Jacques Rousseau | en_US |
| dc.subject | History | en_US |
| dc.subject | General Will | en_US |
| dc.subject | Legislator | en_US |
| dc.subject | Social Contract | en_US |
| dc.title | 面對歷史：盧梭論普遍意志與立法家 | zh_TW |
| dc.title | Facing History: Rousseau on the General Will and the Legislator | en_US |
| dc.type | thesis | en_US |
| dc.relation.reference | 一、 Jean-Jacques Rousseau本人的著作\n1979. Emile : or, On education. New York: Basic Books.(Translated by Allan Bloom)\n1990. The Collected Writings of Rousseau, Vol. 1. Hanover, NH: University Press of New England. (Edited by Roger D. Masters and Christopher Kelly ; Translated by Judith R. Bush, Christopher Kelly, and Roger D. Masters)\n1992. The Collected Writings of Rousseau, Vol. 3. Hanover, NH: University Press of New England. (Edited by Roger D. Masters and Christopher Kelly ; Translated by Judith R. Bush, Christopher Kelly, Roger D. Masters and Terence Marshall)\n1994 The Collected Writings of Rousseau, Vol. 4. Hanover, NH: University Press of New England. (Edited by Roger D. Masters and Christopher Kelly ; Translated by Judith R. Bush, Christopher Kelly, Roger D. Masters)\n1997a. The discourses and other early political writing. Cambridge, U.K.: Cambridge University Press.(Edited and translated by Victor Gourevitch)\nb. The social contract and other later political writings. Cambridge, U.K.: Cambridge University Press.(Edited and translated by Victor Gourevitch)\n2001. The Collected Writings of Rousseau, Vol. 9. Hanover, NH: University Press of New England. (Edited by Christopher Kelly and Eve Grace ; Translated by Christopher Kelly and Judith R. Bush)\n2005. The Collected Writings of Rousseau, Vol. 11. Hanover, NH: University Press of New England. (Edited by Christopher Kelly ; Translated by Christopher Kelly and Judith R. Bush)\n\n二、中文參考資料\n朱堅章，1972，〈盧梭政治思想中自由觀念的分析〉，《國立政治大學學報)，(26): 183-206。\n彼得‧蓋伊，2008，《啟蒙運動(下)：自由之科學》，新北市: 立緒文化。(劉森堯及梁永安合譯)。譯自Peter Gay. 1971. The Enlightenment : an interpretation Vol. 2. New York: Knopf.\n維特多‧沙博爾夫斯基，2018，《跳舞的熊》，新北市: 衛城，遠足文化出版。(林蔚昀譯)。譯自Witold Szabłowski. 2018. Tańczące niedźwiedzie.\n蕭高彥，2013，《西方共和主義思想史論》，臺北市: 聯經出版社。\n陳嘉銘，2014，〈「創造出公民，要什麼就都有了」？論盧梭的自由、愛國主義和實現共和的弔詭〉，《人文及社會科學集刊》，26(2): 175-218。\n\n三、外文參考資料\nAnsell-Pearson, Keith\n1991. Nietzsche contra Rousseau : a study of Nietzsche’s moral and political thought. Cambridge, U.K.: Cambridge University Press.\nBertram, Christopher.\n2004. Routledge Philosophy Guidebook to Rousseau and the Social Contract. London: Routledge.\nCharvet, John.\n1974. The Social Problem in the Philosophy of Rousseau. Cambridge, Eng: Cambridge University Press.\nDent, Nicholas\n2005. Rousseau. London: Routledge.\nEinaudi, Mario\n1967. The early Rousseau. Ithaca, N.Y: Cornell University Press.\nEthan, Putterman\n2001 “Realism and Reform in Rousseau’s Constitution projeet.” Political studies 49: 481-494.\nGossman, Lionel\n1964. “Time and History in Rousseau” Studies in Voltaire and the eighteenth century 30: 311-349.\nHanley, Ryan P.\n2008. “Enlightened nation building: The “science of the legislator” in Adam Smith and Rousseau.” American Journal of Political Science 52(2), 219-234.\nHankins, Thomas L.\n1985. Science and the Enlightenment. Cambridge, U.K.: Cambridge University Press.\nHenry, John\n2008. The scientific revolution and the origins of modern science. Basingstoke, Hampshire: Palgrave Macmillan.\nHulliun, Mark\n2019. “How would Rousseau have answered the Scots?” In The Rousseauian Mind, eds. Eve Grace and Christopher Kelly. New York, NY: Routledge.\nJackson, M. W.\n1989. “Rousseau`s Discourse on Heroes and Heroism.” American Philosophical Society 133(3): 434-46.\nKelly, George A.\n1968. “Rousseau, Kant, and history.” Journal of the History of Ideas 29(3): 347-364.\nKelly, Christopher\n1987. “To Persuade without Convincing: The Language of Rousseau`s Legislator.” American Journal of Political Science 31(2): 321-335.\n2019. “Discourse on the origin of Inequality” In The Rousseauian Mind, eds. Eve Grace and Christopher Kelly. New York, NY: Routledge.\nLanson, Gustave\n2006. “The Unity of Jean-Jacques Rousseau’s Thought” In Jean-Jacques Rousseau : critical assessments of leading political philosophers, ed. John T. Scott. London : Routledge.\nMason, Pamela A.\n1993. The Genevan republican background to Rousseau’s “Social Contract.” History of political Thought 14(4): 547-572.\nMelzer, Arthur M.\n1983. “Rousseau`s" mission" and the intention of his writings.” American Journal of Political Science 27(2): 294-320.\n1990. The Natural Goodness of Man : on the System of Rousseau’s Thought. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.\nMasters, Roger D.\n1968. The political philosophy of Rousseau. Princeton, N.J: Princeton University Press.\nNeuhouser, Frederick\n2008 Theodicy of Self-Love: Evil, Rationality, and the Drive for Recognition. Oxford University Press.\nOutram, Dorinda\n1995. The enlightenment. Cambridge, U.K.: Cambridge University Press.\nRehm, M.\n2012. “Obligation in Rousseau: Making Natural Law History?” Jahrbuch Für Recht Und Ethik /Annual Review of Law and Ethics (20): 139-154.\nRosenblatt, Helena\n1997. Rousseau and Geneva : from the first discourse to the social contract, 1749-1762. Cambridge, U.K.: Cambridge University Press.\nSchaeffer, Denise\n2012. “Attending to Time and Place in Rousseau’s Legislative Art.” The Review of Politics 74(3): 421-441.\n2019. “Moral motivation and rhetoric.” In The Rousseauian Mind, eds. Eve Grace and Christopher Kelly. New York, NY: Routledge.\nScott, John T.\n1997. “Rousseau and the Melodious Language of Freedom.” Journal of Politics 59(3): 803–829\nShklar, Judith N.\n1969. Men and citizens : a study of Rousseau’s social theory. London: Cambridge University Press.\nStaen. Christophe V.\n2019. “Rousseau and science.” In The Rousseauian Mind, eds. Eve Grace and Christopher Kelly. New York, NY: Routledge.\nStrauss, Leo\n1989. “The three waves of modernity.” In An Introduction to Political Philosophy : Ten Essays. Detroit: Wayne State University Press.\nStrong, Tracy B.\n1994. Jean Jacques Rousseau : the Politics of the Ordinary. Thousand Oaks, Calif: Sage.\nVerli, Dorina.\n2018. “Reforming Democracy: Constitutional Crisis and Rousseau`s Advice to Geneva.” The Review of Politics 80(3): 415-438.\nWood, Allen W.\n1990. Hegel`s Ethical Thought. New York: Cambridge University Press. | zh_TW |
| dc.identifier.doi | 10.6814/NCCU202100055 | en_US |
| item.fulltext | With Fulltext | - |
| item.cerifentitytype | Publications | - |
| item.openairetype | thesis | - |
| item.grantfulltext | open | - |
| item.openairecristype | http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_46ec | - |
| Appears in Collections: | 學位論文 | |
Files in This Item:
| File | Description | Size | Format | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 202301.pdf | 3.8 MB | Adobe PDF2 | View/Open |
Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.